People are really overthinking this.
Collins is the most talented runner and an OK receiving back on a team that wants to feature him, didn't draft any RB in a loaded RB draft, and will be on an offense with improved pass catchers, a healthier and much improved line, and 2 additional rookie TE's who'll keep linebackers honest. And people want to nitpick about YPC over a handful of games last year during his first extended look when his overall numbers were strong?
He didn't even land in Baltimore until September last year and looked strong. He ran hard and showed explosiveness. And the Ravens clearly like him and don't have a QB who'll be airing it out all the time. Unless you believe Allen or Dixon will unseat him, which to me is highly unlikely, you're looking at a soon-to-be 24 year old starting RB with some history of success and both a relatively high floor AND ceiling if he stays healthy. There's really not a lot to dislike about him right now.
Or people are oversimplifying.
Is he the most talented runner? Maybe - we have yet to really see what Dixon can do and he was drafted ahead of Collins (and unlike Collins, he hasn't been cut by the team that drafted him).
Is he an ok receiving back? Or is he worse than average? I really don't know, but I'm not sure anyone else in here actually does.
They didn't draft RB bc they only had 2 picks (and lots of needs) before the top 8 were gone. The rest of the RBs in this draft are depth-level talent and they've already got that on their roster.
Will the OL be improved? I don't think they added anyone and I recall they at least lost Ryan Jensen to the Bucs. Signs point to "average at best" for this OL.
Improved WRs... I mostly agree but Wallace wasn't bad and nobody knows for sure what they'll get out of John Brown. I don't expect the difference to be night and day.
Rookie TEs are going to keep the LBs honest? TEs are the slowest developing of all the positions. Don't bank on them making a big difference.
Since when is half a season a handful of games? And that half season is notable because that's when he started getting a starter's workload.
Do the Ravens clearly like him? Are you getting that from the tiny 1-year contract they gave him?
From what I've read, Dixon is a good inside runner, is a plus receiver, and a plus pass blocker. Collins has first dibs on the job, but I wouldn't consider his job security to be that high.
Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying the situation is terrible. I'm merely imploring the use of caution here. He is a talented runner, I just don't think we
know he's the most talented on the roster. Not drafting any RBs is nice for him, regardless of the reason. But let's not pretend we know the reason (vote of confidence vs. lack of draft picks vs. other needs). The OL won't be good, but we've seen plenty of RBs survive average to poor OLs. Let's hope Crabtree keeps his head on straight, John Brown is healthy, and Snead rekindles whatever he showed his first two years in NO, but let's not bank on this ragtag group of WRs revitalizing the offense. Similarly, it's ok to hope the TEs pay immediate dividends, but historically it is unlikely. As for the contract, I
think he was a RFA so the Ravens elected to go with the 1-year deal. They certainly could've signed him longterm if they really liked him, but their frugality doesn't mean they don't intend to use him this year or possibly re-sign him next year. So while I seem to be arguing one side of things in this thread, I actually consider myself neutral on him. I'm pursuing him in drafts, but so far others are pursuing harder. He's got an interesting mix of red flags and opportunity. It's best not to oversimplify it.