You say Akers did not look 100% and I'll agree but I for sure don't agree he looked terrible.Dr. Octopus said:I don't see how anyone thinks Robinson could actually return and be effective this season. It was basically a miracle that Akers made it back and he looked terrible on the field.
Go check out his thread and see what people were saying the game after he returned, and then he faced 3 top 10 rushing defenses and Rams had zero running game. I know you can point to the YPC and say well look, the guy averaged a little over 2.5 YPC so there he sucked. A few problems with that to me.The strength of defenses like I mentioned and fact the whole team could not run. Akers was 67/172 rushing which again is not good but Sony/Henderson were not blowing the doors off going 30/87 and that's a little misleading in terms of production because a chunk of those came on one Sony 35 yard run(before they faced the top 10 D's)and without that run Sony/Henderson combined to go 29/52, 1.70 YPC. Now if you are or anyone is saying BS at the notion of removing one long play look at the flip side where Akers went 8/86 receiving vs Sony/DH going 6/35 and it's because of one huge 40 yard play by Akers otherwise he was only a little better.
Point is he looked at least as good and if you don't want to buy that at least as productive as Sony/DH. And if anyone still refuses to believe that I guess you are saying McVay does not know what he's doing feeding Akers during the most important stretch of the season. Henderson/Sony is not a high bar but those RB's both had fantasy success during periods last year.
Now I almost never bring Akers up here unless it's response to someone bringing him up, like now. But not for nothing if you got back to the Akers thread not long after his injury and while I did not think he'd make it back in 6 months I was preaching to people to not give up on him. It's there and I like I said then and it remains true I don't own Akers in dynasty, just thought people were overreacting calling him done. I only point that out because I do own a lot of Robinson, and keep increasing it.
I don't count on Robinson but fact he's got 3-6 more months then Akers to me makes it perfectly reasonable to believe there is a chance he returns and is productive at some point during the season. Like Akers won't be 100%, but productive for sure.