Stevens seems like a great fit as GM. might take a bit to learn the role, but he's smart, calculated.. seems like a basketball savant.
i think he'll do well and GM seems like a long-term job vs. the mania of coaching and that stress.
Well, the almost universal hot take among the Boston media is that Stevens is not a great fit for the job and will be somewhere else in a year. It is said he likes coaching, teaching younger players, player development, and X's and O's. It is also said he is not the type to worry about salary cap implications, player exceptions, stashing players overseas, and luxury tax considerations.
So the collective minds felt he would either move on to a premium NBA head coaching gig, a premium college head coaching gig, or if he likes getting kicked upstairs, even a college athletic director gig.
The rationale is Boston really wasn't considering Stevens as a replacement for Ainge and all the names they considered got shot down by the owner. Even though they are denying it, people feel that with Stevens still with 5 years on his contract, they would rather he try a G.M. role than pay him not to coach. Perhaps if he wants to coach a different NBA team they can get something in return for him . . . or if he wants to bolt to a college he can opt out of his contract and the Celtics won't owe him anything.
Another discussion that popped up everywhere was that he lost his locker room and the respect of his players. That lead people to think he would be happier in a college setting than dealing with a bunch of superstar prima donnas that can't be coached in the NBA. The other concern people had is Stevens is a straight shooter that doesn't lie, mislead, deceive, exaggerate, or take advantage of people. Essentially, they said those are great traits for a regular human being but terrible traits to be an NBA G.M.
We'll see how things go and how they play out, but some folks felt he might not even make it to the start of next year's NBA season with the team.