JetMaxx said:
Found this in in a reddit thread regarding Hardy case. Pretty interesting:
Lenient?
I followed this case ready to throw the book at him, and after following the entire case from start to finish I came away convinced that the entire episode was a farce.
Consider the following:
- Aside from the girl, the only witness attesting to her version of events is a neighbor in the building who admitted she saw nothing and only heard a lot of banging and screaming.
- The cop on the scene saw nothing and the girl avoided him entirely as she admitted she was carrying cocaine and was both inebriated and doped up at the time.
- Hardy placed his own 911 call asking for a police response Only days before, Hardy had maneuvered to have the girl's crap taken away form his house by tricking her into going to Miami
- The friend who came with the girl testified on Hardy's behalf, specifying that the accuser told her that she wanted to get back at Hardy for kicking her out of his place
- The North Carolina judicial system is a ####ed up railroading calamity. The entire reason Hardy was "found guilty" is because to keep poor people from having their rightful jury trials the state forces cases to go through a bench trial first, and then only people who can afford appeals actually get their due process with a jury. THIS IS AGAINST THE CONSTITUTION
- There's no actual physical evidence of an assault taking place. Bruises can be self-inflicted or caused by engaging in offensive fighting; aside from that, there's no eyewitnesses or video or pictures substantiating the claims in question.
- The judge in this case is a renowned member of anti-domestic violence organizations, and she could not be trusted to be impartial as she specifically requested to adjudicate the case
- The judge herself admitted the only reason she found Hardy guilty was because of the testimony of the neighbor who didn't see anything, saying that she had nothing to gain by her actions. SHE DIDN'T SEE ANYTHING.
- What the girl accused Hardy of ranged from getting her arm stuck in a toilet lid to being thrown onto a bed of assault rifles to getting her arm broken to miraculously her arm is fine and it was really her shoulder that he broke to OK the shoulder's fine, I just have some bruises your honor. . .
reddit? Ok.
I don't get the humor. Is football guys the premier message board while reddit can't be trusted? would it have really made such a difference if that post was posted here first instead of at reddit? Please explain legitimately want to understand your rationale
I don't think it's any more or less legitimate than a post here. That is to say, it's some guy on what is essentially an internet message board making assumptions/guesses about things, many of which can't be backed up by evidence or real sources in any way.
The problem is you quoting it as a "source" and deciding it is somehow conclusive proof of anything. It's just another post here with someone, likely biased, trying to convince themselves and everyone else of something that they think/hope is true.