I've been saying this for a year now, but people don't care because the injury supports the "injury prone" narrative they've already painted onto him.This whole "injury prone" discussion - wasn't his injuries last year caused by his diving into a scrum for a loose ball? It's not like he's hurt each year on non-contact stuff. Last year just seemed fluky to me.
I think Gordon is more valuable than Crowell. Not only is Gordon on a good offense, he also catches passes and he isn't in a RBBC. IMO that makes him a very valuable RB regardless of his points per carry, which he could improve on this year. I wouldn't let the loss of Lamp scare me off either. Every player has some risk.not buying him as a consensus top 5 RB in most mags and on most FF websites..call me cray-cray or whatever, but Gordon's 3.9 ypc avg last season,coupled with the less than 1000 yards rushing , and an unsustainable TD number, significant loss on the o-line with Lamp done for the season before it even got started, there's almost nowhere to go but down for Gordon..last year seems like an outlier than the norm..slight regression is in order here..Chargers' achillies' heel has been their o-line and it's significantly worse than last season, a lesser o-line..
and I never trust Ken Whisenhunt for anything.I know he was there last season,but he's a lousy OC, on a team with a bunch of new coaches and cast-offs from elsewhere...Gus Bradley as DC? seriously? eesh..
I dunno, Gordon did all he could last year on 250+ carries and could only muster 3.9 per carry, which is right on with his career avg..
I view him as more of an I. Crowell, or lesser-type RB, only thing is, Gordon is going 2-3 rounds before Crowell and the others..what I would do is wait on Doug Martin, you'll reap the rewards..but to take Gordon at the tail end of the first round is just a reach.grab a quality RB at that point, or take Aaron Rodgers..but get significant value with the pick.but Gordon is a 3rd round player not a top 8-9 player..not even close..he overachieved last season and I would not expect him to do better..not with Hunter, Williams, Allen ( if he can stay healthy),etc..
Yeah, his 997 yards rushing was a world away from 1000 yards. And he did it in essentially 12 games (he played 5 snaps in game 13).coupled with the less than 1000 yards rushing
There is no reason to believe the Chargers OL will be worse, despite Lamp's injury. They moved from LT Dunlap to LT Okung, which should be an improvement. They moved from LG Franklin + C Slauson to LG Slauson + C Pulley/Feeney/Tuerk, which should be a wash or an improvement, since Franklin was one of the worst OGs in the NFL. They moved from RG Fluker to RG Feeney/Clark/Wiggins, which should be a wash, since Fluker was terrible; Lamp would have definitely upgraded this spot. Overall, this looks like a slightly improved OL.significant loss on the o-line with Lamp done for the season before it even got started... Chargers' achillies' heel has been their o-line and it's significantly worse than last season, a lesser o-line.
I think Gordon is more valuable than Crowell. Not only is Gordon on a good offense, he also catches passes and he isn't in a RBBC. IMO that makes him a very valuable RB regardless of his points per carry, which he could improve on this year. I wouldn't let the loss of Lamp scare me off either. Every player has some risk.
The loss of Lamp is a big blow for the Chargers but the line is still better than it was last season.not buying him as a consensus top 5 RB in most mags and on most FF websites..call me cray-cray or whatever, but Gordon's 3.9 ypc avg last season,coupled with the less than 1000 yards rushing , and an unsustainable TD number, significant loss on the o-line with Lamp done for the season before it even got started, there's almost nowhere to go but down for Gordon..last year seems like an outlier than the norm..slight regression is in order here..Chargers' achillies' heel has been their o-line and it's significantly worse than last season, a lesser o-line..
and I never trust Ken Whisenhunt for anything.I know he was there last season,but he's a lousy OC, on a team with a bunch of new coaches and cast-offs from elsewhere...Gus Bradley as DC? seriously? eesh..
I dunno, Gordon did all he could last year on 250+ carries and could only muster 3.9 per carry, which is right on with his career avg..
I view him as more of an I. Crowell, or lesser-type RB, only thing is, Gordon is going 2-3 rounds before Crowell and the others..what I would do is wait on Doug Martin, you'll reap the rewards..but to take Gordon at the tail end of the first round is just a reach.grab a quality RB at that point, or take Aaron Rodgers..but get significant value with the pick.but Gordon is a 3rd round player not a top 8-9 player..not even close..he overachieved last season and I would not expect him to do better..not with Hunter, Williams, Allen ( if he can stay healthy),etc..
Crowell is not in a RBBC. Since the beginning of the off-season everything coming out of Cleveland points towards Crowell being the feature back with Duke getting obvious passing down work and maybe give some breathers.I think Gordon is more valuable than Crowell. Not only is Gordon on a good offense, he also catches passes and he isn't in a RBBC. IMO that makes him a very valuable RB regardless of his points per carry, which he could improve on this year. I wouldn't let the loss of Lamp scare me off either. Every player has some risk.
Good luck on that. I'm sure no one else is targeting him.Crowell is not in a RBBC. Since the beginning of the off-season everything coming out of Cleveland points towards Crowell being the feature back with Duke getting obvious passing down work and maybe give some breathers.
I still like Gordon over Crowell for end of season totals but I would gladly pass on Gordon at his ADP in favor or a high end WR or QB (super-flex league) if I knew I could get Crowell later.
You never know how any draft will fall but Gordon is typically coming off the board as RB 4-6 in a PPR and Crowell around RB 12-14. So the opportunity should realistically be there.Good luck on that. I'm sure no one else is targeting him.
Crowell catches passes, and nobody is in less of a RBBC than he is. He will get about 250 carries this year.I think Gordon is more valuable than Crowell. Not only is Gordon on a good offense, he also catches passes and he isn't in a RBBC. IMO that makes him a very valuable RB regardless of his points per carry, which he could improve on this year. I wouldn't let the loss of Lamp scare me off either. Every player has some risk.
You truly believe that?Crowell catches passes, and nobody is in less of a RBBC than he is.
I think the offense he's on and the QB he's with is worth paying 2 rounds forCrowell catches passes, and nobody is in less of a RBBC than he is. He will get about 250 carries this year.
Gordon is better. But is he 2 rounds better? Ehhh....
One has rivers as qb, the other has...Crowell catches passes, and nobody is in less of a RBBC than he is. He will get about 250 carries this year.
Gordon is better. But is he 2 rounds better? Ehhh....
Absolutely. Duke will get very few carries. He's mostly been lining up as a slot WR in camp. Dayes will probably get more carries than Duke. Hue Jackson has said he regrets abandoning the run too soon in games last year. Crow will get his.You truly believe that?
Could be. Lot more competition for touches there too though.I think the offense he's on and the QB he's with is worth paying 2 rounds for
Lots more scoring opps too. Give me that all day. I stumbled into Gordon last year and was impressed with what he did.Could be. Lot more competition for touches there too though.
I kind of disagree that Gordon is better. He has a better offense around him but I think Crowell is a better football player.Crowell catches passes, and nobody is in less of a RBBC than he is. He will get about 250 carries this year.
Gordon is better. But is he 2 rounds better? Ehhh....
Melvin Gordon rushed nine times for 13 yards and one touchdown in the Chargers' Week 2 loss to the Dolphins, adding 65 receiving yards on seven catches.
Gordon couldn't get anything going on the ground against Ndamukong Suh, who was blowing up the run game. Gordon was lucky to get his touchdown on a one-yard plunge; the Chargers gave it to the fullback from the one-yard line on the previous two plays only to see him fail both times. Even when Gordon struggles on the ground, his heavy usage in the pass game makes his floor extremely safe. Keep firing Gordon out there as an RB1 next week against the Chiefs.
He was questionable with a knee issue, announcers said that is what took him out of the game.Anyone know his status? He was out, then came back, then went back out. What happened?
Melvin Gordon reportedly has a "minor" bone bruise on his knee.
Gordon played a season-low 42 percent of the Chargers' Week 3 offensive snaps due to this injury. Gordon apparently suffered the injury in practice last week. Gordon's Week 4 status against the Eagles is uncertain. NFL Network's Ian Rapoport says Gordon "wanted to go back in" to last week's loss to Kansas City.
Source: Ian Rapoport on Twitter
Sep 25 - 4:30 PM
I don't agreeguy's made of glass..if he doesn't score these cheesy TDs, he's just a useless RB..for his career he's averaging 3.7 yards per carry, in 2017, that number is now down to 3.3 yards..he's essentially Ameer Abdullah .yawn. you can never consider Melvin Gordon a start with confidence guy.
cringe-worthy starts, ala Jay Cutler..I'd be looking to trade to a desperate owner as soon as the bye weeks come rolling along
need2know said:I don't agree
Guy was a monster last year and has been good so far this year. Their oline blows and hes playing with pass happy rivers who never stays with the run.
He looks stronger and more confident in what he's doing as wellYou can really tell who is watching the games and who isn't in these threads. Gordon has not only produced the part (fantasy wise) but also looked the part since last year. Right up to this week. He just passes the eye test despite the bad OL. He's a very good RB, and what he does after the snap but before crossing the LOS is what makes him so good, and able to produce what he does despite the OL.
It's deff his knee. He didn't look right at the end of the game last week either. They should let Gordan rest his knee for a week or 2,T!he Chargers are going nowhere fast. Why risk further injury. A player with an injury will change the way he runs,and can end up hurting something other than his original injury...I'm picking up Ekeler(He's looked pretty good) in a couple leagues.B Oliver is not the same rb he was before his injury either(and he wasn't that good to begin with),So I don't believe he's the backup for Gordan if he went down.If Gordan keeps running with his knee issue,changing his running style compensating for his hurting knee,he will be the next IR casualty before you know it. We have deep benches,21 man rosters,with 1 IR spot,so their isn't much out there.I think Ekeler is a good bench stash and you can probably get him for free this week.So is it the knee?
Well they also just kind of gave up on the run. If Gordon is still really hurt why the hell was he active?Just Win Baby said:Posted this a few minutes ago in yesterday's game thread:
On Chargers radio this morning, Hardwick said Gordon was pulled because he was ineffective. They went on to play a clip from Anthony Lynn's postgame, within which he said something non-specific about making changes. Hardwick then said one of the changes he would make is to reduce Gordon's playing time in favor of Ekeler. Who knows if Lynn would actually consider that, but I thought it was interesting.
I was one of the very few who drafted Gordon before Gurley. I thought he was system proof. I think the 3.7 has more to do with the team,but if he were system proof, it would be higher.He's a lifetime 3.7 YPC rusher on ~500 carries. Maybe he's just not that good.
Interesting.Posted this a few minutes ago in yesterday's game thread:
On Chargers radio this morning, Hardwick said Gordon was pulled because he was ineffective. They went on to play a clip from Anthony Lynn's postgame, within which he said something non-specific about making changes. Hardwick then said one of the changes he would make is to reduce Gordon's playing time in favor of Ekeler. Who knows if Lynn would actually consider that, but I thought it was interesting.
Doesn’t seem there’s too many people paying for tickets to see much of anything.Interesting.
It's pretty easy for Hardwick to say that after Ekeler breaks off one long run, though. The bigger problem is NOBODY is going to be successful behind that line... going on YEARS now. It's a miracle Rivers has been successful passing behind it as he has up until now. If the spanos family refused to hire someone to fix it over the vast majority of River's career I don't see it getting fixed over Gordon's career(which may be cut short due to annual knee injuries since he's been in the league).
But hey, the spanos family is just catering to the demands of his "home" crowd at this point. The people that pay for the tickets want to see the chargers OL struggle, right?
I'm sure they paid a fortune for market analyses and feasibility studies etc, but this move to L.A. sure seems like an epic disaster when they can't even come close to selling out a small soccer venue this early in year 1.Doesn’t seem there’s too many people paying for tickets to see much of anything.
When Woodhead was healthy, he played more snaps than Matthews and later Gordon, even though Mathews and Gordon were viewed as the primary running backs. Current OC Whisenhunt was the OC for that split with Mathews in 2013. People have been saying the Chargers need to get back to that short passing game Whisenhunt installed in 2013, which was a good year for Rivers and the entire offense, but Woodhead was a huge part of that, and they are missing that element right now.Interesting.
It's pretty easy for Hardwick to say that after Ekeler breaks off one long run, though. The bigger problem is NOBODY is going to be successful behind that line... going on YEARS now. It's a miracle Rivers has been successful passing behind it as he has up until now. If the spanos family refused to hire someone to fix it over the vast majority of River's career I don't see it getting fixed over Gordon's career(which may be cut short due to annual knee injuries since he's been in the league).
They didn't pay a dime for any study...nfl wants two teams in LA.I'm sure they paid a fortune for market analyses and feasibility studies etc, but this move to L.A. sure seems like an epic disaster when they can't even come close to selling out a small soccer venue this early in year 1.
No, the genius spanos family spent all their money on stadiumbicycle_seat_sniffer said:They didn't pay a dime for any study...nfl wants two teams in LA.
When built the Rams stadium will be packed and sold out every week. Think Dodgers and Lakers. The temp venues are terrible. Parking is $100. People are avoiding for different reasons.No, the genius spanos family spent all their money on stadiumschemesplans that would never, ever, in a million years actually get built. So much money in fact that they can only afford a dollar-store GM.
Now they will get to rent out the Rams stadium when they aren't using it. I can't wait to see the giant swaths of empty seats in that thing..... there are only so many Eagles fans to hide your complete incompetence. Just imagine what the PHI game would have looked like in the stands if the Eagles fans wouldn't have showed up for the game in the small soccer stadium.
Were the Chris Everett Rams really selling out every week?When built the Rams stadium will be packed and sold out every week. Think Dodgers and Lakers. The temp venues are terrible. Parking is $100. People are avoiding for different reasons.