So it's the next several songs, along with "All Together Now," that made me see that "Kite" is too low for my taste. Stand by for future updates, but for now:
167. Every Little Thing (Beatles for Sale, 1964)
Beatles version:
Spotify YouTube
Winner of the "Biggest Drop from Initial Rankings" award! When we did the album-by-album listen, I was forced to listen to some songs that I usually don't focus on, and in the context of that album both Mr. krista and I thought this was
great. So it went into a higher-than-justified tier and has spent its remaining months dropping and dropping. Don't get me wrong, I still think this song is terrific, but it also has flaws that I was reminded of on frequent listens. Those flaws include but are not limited to...those drums. You know the part. Those big bashing timpani that seem, charitably, inappropriate. WTF is going on there?
This song is unusual in that it appears to be a rare one in which the chief songwriter (Paul) is not the lead singer (John), though I say "appears to be" because, as in many instances, it's not entirely clear who should get most of the songwriting credit and who is singing which part, though it seems clear John's the lead in the verses and that Paul is the backing vocal and not an overdub of John. But some disagree. It's a bit of a mess in that regard. It's also not clear who is playing which guitar parts, though the consensus is John is on a Rickenbacker. This is just one of many, many instances of not knowing who did what on a Beatles song, which I think is interesting and notable considering how full our information is these days. I haven't read the Geoff Emerick book about recording the Beatles (I know, I know, I must - I've bought it but haven't read), but I think he must have the most information to solve some of these questions.
I just realized I haven't said anything that i like about this song. I do love the vocals and think that what I hear as the softer side of Paul and the acerbic side of John make for a great blend. That is also evident to me in the lyrics: what could be taken as simple, even trite, lines sound instead like there's more than that beneath them...the line "Yes, I know I'm a lucky guy" always makes me question if that's meant to be sincere or sarcastic, or more likely a combination of both. There's something about that descent of that line in particular that draws me in and makes me want to know what comes after, and then surely enough, despite being written (we think) by sunny Paul, it is:
"I remember the first time
I was lonely without her
Can't stop thinking about her now"
Italics for Friday-night emphasis.
And so right after he says how lucky he is, he is mourning being without her.
Aw hell, I've written so much about a song ranked in the 160s, but I find it so intriguing. It's sneakily complex, and despite that timpani I love to hear it.
Mr. krista: "This is my favorite song on the record so far. I’d like to listen to it again. Surprisingly heavy and kind of dark. This is like the black album. Pretty sweet timpani action."
Suggested cover: There is a pretty well-known Yes cover of this song, and if Yes if your thing, go for it. For me, I'll take
Lou Ann Barton instead. I don't love it, but it's not Yes.