What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

The Irishman - New Scorcese movie about Jimmy Hoffa (1 Viewer)

so do you guys believe his story?
I know a few people who were in and around the scene. Joey Merlino's cousin is a family friend of my family. Word gets around on the best ones later especially when people die. Merlinos cousin isn't in La Costra Nostra but definitely will tell you what is BS and what isn't when it comes to the life and people. Sheehan's tale timelines and such are very accurate. I would say he may have sugar coated a few things he did to make it more spicy but I believe he killed those he said he has. 

 
Pesci was the best part of this, IMO.  I thought he was great.  Was definitely was a little too long - the last 20-30 minutes could use some serious editing.  I thought the CGI worked although Deniro for some reason looked a little off - Pesci and Pacino looked fine.  There's an excellent 2 hour film in there with the right editing.  I thought it was really good though - I love mafia movies.

 
Anyone notice that Hoffa's wife was the girl in Goodfellas who needs her lucky hat to travel with the coke? Also instantly placed the guy who eats the boozy watermelon as the FBI guy who has the gun pointed at Liottas head, "don't you move you mf'er or I'll blow your brains out..." Some other more obvious ones too like Beansie from Sopranos. Any others who are more obscure?
LIttle Stevie Van Zandt was the singer at Sheeran's Awards Ceremony.

 
I’ll also say this.  I’m glad Scorsese told this story, whether 100% true or not.  I grew up in Allentown so I knew stories of the Philly mob but not a lot.  The NY mob is generally the media darling, but Philly needed a story too. Never knew what came before Nicky Scarfo, etc.
Living on The Main Line, having Italian friends, people from the barber shop South Philly etc. I learned a lot about the Philly mob. When I was growing up Joey Merlino was in the news Often. Media made him look awful while a lot of people in town saw him as some anti christ 

 
I really enjoyed it and thought the time went by fast. The CGI was really distracting at times though, especially in the beginning. Felt like watching a video game. Lots of scenes filmed in my neighborhood, where DeNiro curb stomped the shop owner, the church, inside and out, etc. 

Noticed Herc from the Wire right away from his voice. Was that Gus from Breaking Bad at the dais during the ceremony?

I rarely watch movies more than once. I doubt I'll watch this again but it was worth seeing.

 
Liked the story, thought it was 20-30 minutes too long. Had I not known about the CGI stuff I would have bought it.

 
I know you didn’t really dig it but I enjoyed it and find myself thinking about it a lot. I expect it will be even better the 2nd time around.
but a person my age appreciates that, since a Scorsese flick almost always goes off the rails toward the end, THIS time it careened into geriatric angst...

 
Didn't plan on watching the whole thing last night but ended up staying up till 3:30am and finished it. 

This is not Goodfellas or the Departed. The action is few and far between. A lot of it is slow. Very slow. I like slow movies but this takes it to an extreme in a lot of scenes. Some scenes are a bit repetitive. They took a lot more time to reiterate relationships and bickering back and forth before actually deciding something. The daughter part was very basic. I got it but they didn't really expand on anything with it. 

With all that said, I was interested throughout. The subject material kept me compelled. The settings were perfect. Pesci especially gave a very good performance for his role. Deniro was ok. Pacino did well enough. A lot of other Scorcese veterans in here too. 

Overall I'd say it's a 7/10. Well worth watching once. Could have been about 45 minutes shorter and if it was wide released I think it would have been. 
This is a good and fair review. 
 

 
The “it’s too long crowd” should start editing movies, obviously Thelma Schoonmaker doesn’t know what she’s doing. 

😉

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The “it’s too long crowd” should start editing movies, obviously Thelma Schoonmaker doesn’t know what she’s doing. 

😉
I watched the whole thing but I think it was left at 3.5 hours because it was on Netflix. No way it stays that long if it had a theatrical release. 

 
anyone else remember going to see movies in the theaters and those ####s had an intermission?

anything over 1:45 had a 10 minute intermission

 
This movie is bad. I'm a Scorsese fanboy through and through. But it was a huge mistake to ask these old dudes to play guys in their 40s. Watching DeNiro attempt to kick a guy was just awful. Seeing all the praise The Irishman is receiving, I wonder what these same critics thought about Casino. Because Casino is 100 times better in every single way. 

 
I watched the whole thing but I think it was left at 3.5 hours because it was on Netflix. No way it stays that long if it had a theatrical release. 
Maybe- it did have a theatrical release although limited. Wasn’t the last Avengers 3 hours?

anyone else remember going to see movies in the theaters and those ####s had an intermission?

anything over 1:45 had a 10 minute intermission
I think any movie over 140 minutes should have an intermission. Insane not to.

 
This movie is bad. I'm a Scorsese fanboy through and through. But it was a huge mistake to ask these old dudes to play guys in their 40s. Watching DeNiro attempt to kick a guy was just awful. Seeing all the praise The Irishman is receiving, I wonder what these same critics thought about Casino. Because Casino is 100 times better in every single way. 
I agree that especially the one scene Deniro beats up the guy at the grocery is laughably bad and could have been so easily fixed too. Not sure how that got by. However, I don’t think Casino is nearly as good.

 
I agree that especially the one scene Deniro beats up the guy at the grocery is laughably bad and could have been so easily fixed too. Not sure how that got by. However, I don’t think Casino is nearly as good.
This movie would have been much better with age-appropriate actors. I know that opinions are subjective, but I really can't fathom the notion that Irishman is better than Casino. 

 
This movie would have been much better with age-appropriate actors. I know that opinions are subjective, but I really can't fathom the notion that Irishman is better than Casino. 
I get your argument and I can’t say it’s right or wrong because it doesn’t exist. I agree it would have been bette if Al, Bob and Joe were 10 years younger. You need someone who can play 35-85 so it’s a big range they go for here. Casino is much more fun but it just feels like “more Goodfellas.” This took the 4 icons of the last generation of Italian gangster movies and really gave us a look at things from an end of life perspective. I’m not sure younger actors bring to the screen all the weight and memories that Pacino or Deniro do. To me this felt like an incredible swan song and said something new that I’ve never seen a gangster movie say. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
A lot of on-target comments in this thread. I really thought Pesci was extraordinary. Not sure why Keitel took such a nothing role, except I guess he didn't want to be left out.

I also agree that Pacino for once in the last 20 years underplayed a role - Nicholson's Hoffa was so much more electric. This Hoffa never had an air of danger about him. 

One thing I liked that I haven't seen mentioned here is how DeNiro's character did his hits. They weren't dramatic, they weren't tortured. It was just a guy with a job in front of him that he did in the most workmanlike way he could. From the two Germans in the grave to Hoffa at the end, it was like a carpenter hammering a nail or a housepainter applying a brush stroke. 

 
A lot of on-target comments in this thread. I really thought Pesci was extraordinary. Not sure why Keitel took such a nothing role, except I guess he didn't want to be left out.

I also agree that Pacino for once in the last 20 years underplayed a role - Nicholson's Hoffa was so much more electric. This Hoffa never had an air of danger about him. 

One thing I liked that I haven't seen mentioned here is how DeNiro's character did his hits. They weren't dramatic, they weren't tortured. It was just a guy with a job in front of him that he did in the most workmanlike way he could. From the two Germans in the grave to Hoffa at the end, it was like a carpenter hammering a nail or a housepainter applying a brush stroke. 
Great post. I forgot about Keitel which is both logical because it’s so long but also weird because it’s Keitel. Thinking back, I liked him in his role. He had a calm menace about him. He was able to immediately communicate that he was dangerous, important and in a whisper could make people disappear. 

 
This movie is bad. I'm a Scorsese fanboy through and through. But it was a huge mistake to ask these old dudes to play guys in their 40s. Watching DeNiro attempt to kick a guy was just awful. Seeing all the praise The Irishman is receiving, I wonder what these same critics thought about Casino. Because Casino is 100 times better in every single way. 
Ugh, Sharon Stone's acting ruined Casino for me.

 
I get your argument and I can’t say it’s right or wrong because it doesn’t exist. I agree it would have been bette if Al, Bob and Joe were 10 years younger. You need someone who can play 35-85 so it’s a big range they go for here. Casino is much more fun but it just feels like “more Goodfellas.” This took the 4 icons of the last generation of Italian gangster movies and really gave us a look at things from an end of life perspective. I’m not sure younger actors bring to the screen all the weight and memories that Pacino or Deniro do. To me this felt like an incredible swan song and said something new that I’ve never seen a gangster movie say. 
I hear you. There are sentimental reasons to like The Irishman. Some of the performances are great, so when I say it's bad it's not all bad. 

 
I think any movie over 140 minutes should have an intermission. Insane not to.
in theaters, i think it's a good idea. gets people up out of their seats and back in to the lobby for more popcorn/soda/snacks, etc.

what with the way everything is going straight to Netflix or whatever of the 1mm other services, people can just use the pause button.

but i do like the long movies and the theater experience so i'd welcome the return of the 3 hour movie w/ intermission.

 
anyone else remember going to see movies in the theaters and those ####s had an intermission?

anything over 1:45 had a 10 minute intermission
I think every movie should have a 10 minute intermission regardless of length.

I would appreciate it, and the theater would inevitably make more in drink/snack sales.  

No brainer

 
Didn’t realize that Jerry Orbach was such a bad ### in real life, hanging out all the time with Crazy Joe Gallo, including the night he was gunned down. He supposedly knew the killer but never cooperated with law enforcement as to the identity of Gallos killer, taking the secret to his grave. The movie seems to suggest Sheeran knew something about the identity of the killer as well. Fascinating stuff.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Didn’t realize that Jerry Orbach was such a bad ### in real life, hanging out all the time with Crazy Joe Gallo, including the night he was gunned down. He supposedly knew the killer but never cooperated with law enforcement as to the identity of Gallos killer, taking the secret to his grave. The movie seems to suggest Sheeran knew something about the identity of the killer as well. Fascinating stuff.
WAT?  Sheeran says he was the killer.

 
Ilov80s said:
The “it’s too long crowd” should start editing movies, obviously Thelma Schoonmaker doesn’t know what she’s doing. 

😉
You're telling me that slow motion bull#### at the wedding at the end was necessary? GTFO

 
RUSF18 said:
Think the more appropriate thing is to have a problem with the character, not the actress. Just IMO. 
Yes. That's what people often get misconstrued with Casino. The character is such a POS that we often associate with Stone. But that just shows how well she played the role. We hate this person so much that we sympathize with a ball breaking gangster over her. 

 
Yes. That's what people often get misconstrued with Casino. The character is such a POS that we often associate with Stone. But that just shows how well she played the role. We hate this person so much that we sympathize with a ball breaking gangster over her. 
No, I thought her acting was terrible in it.

 
No, I thought her acting was terrible in it.
Agreed 100%.  She's nice to look at, but her acting has always sucked.  I love to watch Casino, but cringe every time she is on screen.  Could have been casted much better, and the movie would have been even better.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top