This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
New here?Respect the Oat.QB5 last year: 5k, 40+QB5 this year: 4300/24?This is what Bostonfred was talking about. So rarely does anyone put anything of substance up, and the few who try are clueless like this. This forum really is a stinking heap of turds.
'matuski said:New here?Respect the Oat.QB5 last year: 5k, 40+QB5 this year: 4300/24?
Where's your thread?QB5 last year: 5k, 40+QB5 this year: 4300/24?
LMFAO
He wrote it up preinjury it seems. Unlike Hawks, who die a slow, painful death... Hogs seems to send theirs out to immediate slaughter.
Pigs? Really. Good luck with that fellas. Pig guy writes a column and his main pick has his ankle explode in a nuclear fusion reaction. Coach writes one up and, well, did anyone see how sharp Cutler and Marshall looked the other night? Holy crap.
I quit reading right there. No way does 4300/24 make the top 5.QB5 last year: 5k, 40+QB5 this year: 4300/24?
If you had read a little further, you'd have seen the fish was wrong, because if you average out QB5 over the last 5 years, you end up with ~4100 and 25.6TD.I quit reading right there. No way does 4300/24 make the top 5.QB5 last year: 5k, 40+QB5 this year: 4300/24?
Before Julio Jones, Harvin, and AJ Green for sure. HTH
Do hawks still wear Vuarnet sunglasses, depeche mode tshirts and go to the theaters to catch the breakfast club?Like in the today, Otis.
You've won me over with this airtight logic - it's Cutler for my magic team this year!If you had read a little further, you'd have seen the fish was wrong, because if you average out QB5 over the last 5 years, you end up with ~4100 and 25.6TD.I quit reading right there. No way does 4300/24 make the top 5.QB5 last year: 5k, 40+QB5 this year: 4300/24?
wish you had told us that before I just gave away my first 2 picks.
Uh oh.
Two questions...1) Which QB doesn't throw for 4300/24 this year? Brady, Rodgers, Brees, or StaffordDon't take the bait, RN. You're better than this. While this might not be so obvious down in the deep murky blue, but it turns out there was football before 2011. If you average out QB5 over the last 5 years, you end up with ~4100 and 25.6TD; depending on scoring system both of those numbers may deviate. Also, if you consider climate conditions and the harsh winter we'll be expecting, the fellas up in The Nest are predicting down QB numbers this year. And there you have it.QB5 last year: 5k, 40+
QB5 this year: 4300/24?
This is what Bostonfred was talking about. So rarely does anyone put anything of substance up, and the few who try are clueless like this. This forum really is a stinking heap of turds.
NEXT QUESTION
1) Who says none of them will? That's 4 guys, and I said he would finish "around top 5." Look, this isn't English class, and I'm not here for reading comprehension. I'm here to help you with magic football. PM Smoo or pickles for help with the word stuff.2) Depending on your league scoring, a different QB might end up being QB5 in any given year, and thus the numbers will change.Two questions...1) Which QB doesn't throw for 4300/24 this year? Brady, Rodgers, Brees, or StaffordDon't take the bait, RN. You're better than this. While this might not be so obvious down in the deep murky blue, but it turns out there was football before 2011. If you average out QB5 over the last 5 years, you end up with ~4100 and 25.6TD; depending on scoring system both of those numbers may deviate. Also, if you consider climate conditions and the harsh winter we'll be expecting, the fellas up in The Nest are predicting down QB numbers this year. And there you have it.QB5 last year: 5k, 40+
QB5 this year: 4300/24?
This is what Bostonfred was talking about. So rarely does anyone put anything of substance up, and the few who try are clueless like this. This forum really is a stinking heap of turds.
NEXT QUESTION
2) Explain how scoring system may make the 4100 / 25.6 numbers deviate?
How do you define "around"? Would this be the Hucks definition of +/- 15 spots or the MOP version?1) Who says none of them will? That's 4 guys, and I said he would finish "around top 5." Look, this isn't English class, and I'm not here for reading comprehension. I'm here to help you with magic football. PM Smoo or pickles for help with the word stuff.2) Depending on your league scoring, a different QB might end up being QB5 in any given year, and thus the numbers will change.Two questions...1) Which QB doesn't throw for 4300/24 this year? Brady, Rodgers, Brees, or StaffordDon't take the bait, RN. You're better than this. While this might not be so obvious down in the deep murky blue, but it turns out there was football before 2011. If you average out QB5 over the last 5 years, you end up with ~4100 and 25.6TD; depending on scoring system both of those numbers may deviate. Also, if you consider climate conditions and the harsh winter we'll be expecting, the fellas up in The Nest are predicting down QB numbers this year. And there you have it.QB5 last year: 5k, 40+
QB5 this year: 4300/24?
This is what Bostonfred was talking about. So rarely does anyone put anything of substance up, and the few who try are clueless like this. This forum really is a stinking heap of turds.
NEXT QUESTION
2) Explain how scoring system may make the 4100 / 25.6 numbers deviate?
Please direct all future correspondence to my interns -- interns@thenest.com
TIA
Watching someone getting kicked in the nads repeatedly is humorous too.
Watching someone getting kicked in the nads repeatedly is humorous too.
A bit.
Did anyone see who Cutler and Marshall were playing the other night?
Good question. We'll release this in the coming days.
What are the thoughts on both of the rookies projected to start opposite of WR Brandon Marshall and WR Greg Little?What are the thoughts of both rookies?
Convince me why.Rivers didn't finish as the top QB with better a team in the past four years so why know on a team that is consistently recognized as being weaker? I'll grant you he is a good value at the current price, but saying he is a legit candidate for the top QB at the end of the year is a stretch.
Fair question. Rivers has been a top 10 QB for the last four years. His run over the last six (since he has become a starter) looks like this (Data pulled from pro-football-reference.com):2006: 8
Well hurry. Some of us draft friday! Zomg!
Things people are saying about Cutler in fantasy, where the same they were saying about Eli. Jeffrey's showing he can play. So Jay might not only FINALLY have 1 NFL starting WR this year....but TWO.Rivers -- not a bad pick. I'm not crazy whatsoever on Meachem -- who it wouldn't shock me if only lasted a season there. Thought he was a TERRIBLE pick up by SD. It took him 25 years to pick up nuisances of New Orleans offense (even then, he really didn't have to run a full route tree there). Huge Huge Huge downgrade from Vince Jax to Meachem. If Gates/Floyd stay healthy, Rivers should still put up nice #'s. I think Vincent Brown was a huge loss for Rivers. (I had Brown ranked ahead of Meachem this year)Crabtree won't be the focal point IMO. That'll be Vernon -- who we saw go nuts in the postseason. Crabtree's ceiling is as a WR3 -- which is what he was last year. Moss/Manningham will produce more than the secondary WR options did last year in SF (I expect and uptick in yardage for Alex Smith....I just don't think Crabtree's going to be main beneficiary.Like the Donald Brown call. Been singing his praises since early last year when people were still on the nuts of the fresh toy Delone Carter (a practice squad talent).
which one? or both?
