Bill Brasky
Footballguy
oh, my mistake.4 years, FWIW.playing 18 elimination games in 3 years is a lot of loses
I'm thinking of 3 games ago when every Rangers fan on the internet was asking what's wrong with Hank.
oh, my mistake.4 years, FWIW.playing 18 elimination games in 3 years is a lot of loses
Don't lump me in with the doubters.oh, my mistake.4 years, FWIW.playing 18 elimination games in 3 years is a lot of loses
I'm thinking of 3 games ago when every Rangers fan on the internet was asking what's wrong with Hank.
No. It doesn't matter at all. You really think a guy like Steven Stamkos considers that stuff? These are not fat talk radio buffoons.Edit: If anything I would think they relish the opportunity to break whatever string people think exists.You think the Bolts don't know about that string? They can say it has no bearing on the game, but you know its going to have some kind of mental impact - that and the no show in game six. Still going to be a coin-flip though.None of those were against this team. Doesn't really matter. Just like that whole they are 7-0 at MSG thing. Who cares? The better team will win tonight, phantom stats from years ago are just a confidence builder for fans who don't play.The King is 4-0 in Game 7s at home and 15-3 in elimination games since 2012, posting a 1.47 goals-against average and .954 save percentage in those games.
Also tied for the record with 6 game 7 wins.
Go Bolts?![]()
![]()
Plus 3 losses in those elimination games. Seems important. People are acting like they've never lost.playing 18 elimination games in 3 years is a lot of losses
it's awfully difficult to never lose elimination games but still have no cups.Plus 3 losses in those elimination games. Seems important. People are acting like they've never lost.playing 18 elimination games in 3 years is a lot of losses
Come home happy.Going bolts tonight. Rags @-152 are too expensive IMO.
My friend paid $800/seat for tix in section 206 row N in Anaheim. A 5 second stubhub search showed the same section and row for $650 so I laughed at him and his idiocy. He called up his broker, yelled at him and cancelled the order. He then got us free tix in the box of one of his clients. Free is good. I think I will be the only Hawks fan in the box though.
I thought the stats weren't important?Plus 3 losses in those elimination games. Seems important. People are acting like they've never lost.playing 18 elimination games in 3 years is a lot of losses
Right. That's a good illustration of why they aren't.I thought the stats weren't important?Plus 3 losses in those elimination games. Seems important. People are acting like they've never lost.playing 18 elimination games in 3 years is a lot of losses
Not impartial but yes it does.Anyone without an axe tonight going to bet the game? Does -152 seem really pricey for the rags?
Don't care who wins but yeah I wouldn't touch that.Not impartial but yes it does.Anyone without an axe tonight going to bet the game? Does -152 seem really pricey for the rags?
They can pack it in like the team did in the 3rd of game 6.Rangers are 6-0 on Fridays this season. Not looking good Bolts backers.
Well #### now it's over.Rangers are 6-0 on Fridays this season. Not looking good Bolts backers.
All you need to know is that you can't win with him.What's Bishop's record against the Rangers again? What about his record playing in MSG?
I just want it to be over so that every newspaper headline writer can finally get out whatever combination of "king/bishop" tacky headline they have been dying to publish since this series started. They will feel sooooo originalAll you need to know is that you can't win with him.What's Bishop's record against the Rangers again? What about his record playing in MSG?
FantasticAwesome new Stanley Cup commercial: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E8uggvSFsl0
esp for my isles being the final shot. (and yes, i know it was way too funking long ago)Ok now the Bolts have to win tonightAwesome new Stanley Cup commercial:
I don't see +150 available anywhere, even those with 10 cents or less lines.Man the Bolts are at +150. Rangers at -170.![]()
http://espn.go.com/blog/nhl/post/_/id/37888/w2w4-lightning-at-rangers-game-7Hank's moment: Game 7 is Henrik Lundqvist time. He has six consecutive wins in Game 7s, which is a playoff record. His six career Game 7 wins are tied with Patrick Roy and Martin Brodeur for the most by a goalie.
For his career, he’s 6-1 in Game 7s, with a 0.97 goals-against average and .966 save percentage.
And, according to Elias Sports, he’s 10-0 with a 0.96 goals-against average and .968 save percentage at home when facing elimination dating to the 2008 playoffs.
But do the Lightning care? If there’s one team in the Eastern Conference that can look at Lundqvist’s Game 7 mastery and actually view it as a delicious opportunity, it’s indeed these young, brash Lightning.
These kids are champing at the bit to make history.
Asked yet again about Lundqvist’s Game 7 numbers, Lightning captain Steven Stamkos delivered the money quote of the day.
"He’s a great goalie. He’s never played the Tampa Bay Lightning in a Game 7 before," Stamkos said Friday morning.
Boom.
These Tampa kids have an edge about them that’s infectious. I’ve said it before, but it reminds me a bit of the rising Edmonton Oilers of the early 1980s and the healthy cockiness they carried. It was so refreshing at the time.
GB SS.Aaron Rudnicki said:http://espn.go.com/blog/nhl/post/_/id/37888/w2w4-lightning-at-rangers-game-7Hank's moment: Game 7 is Henrik Lundqvist time. He has six consecutive wins in Game 7s, which is a playoff record. His six career Game 7 wins are tied with Patrick Roy and Martin Brodeur for the most by a goalie.
For his career, he’s 6-1 in Game 7s, with a 0.97 goals-against average and .966 save percentage.
And, according to Elias Sports, he’s 10-0 with a 0.96 goals-against average and .968 save percentage at home when facing elimination dating to the 2008 playoffs.
But do the Lightning care? If there’s one team in the Eastern Conference that can look at Lundqvist’s Game 7 mastery and actually view it as a delicious opportunity, it’s indeed these young, brash Lightning.
These kids are champing at the bit to make history.
Asked yet again about Lundqvist’s Game 7 numbers, Lightning captain Steven Stamkos delivered the money quote of the day.
"He’s a great goalie. He’s never played the Tampa Bay Lightning in a Game 7 before," Stamkos said Friday morning.
Boom.
These Tampa kids have an edge about them that’s infectious. I’ve said it before, but it reminds me a bit of the rising Edmonton Oilers of the early 1980s and the healthy cockiness they carried. It was so refreshing at the time.
Just hand McDonagh the EC Trophy right after the anthem, amirite?!Capella said:Well #### now it's over.Billy Bats said:Rangers are 6-0 on Fridays this season. Not looking good Bolts backers.
now I see +154 in one spot. crazy. came close to that for game 5 thoughBill Brasky said:I don't see +150 available anywhere, even those with 10 cents or less lines.Capella said:Man the Bolts are at +150. Rangers at -170.![]()
You toGood luck to the TB guys. Been a hell of a series and think either team can hold their own against the west.
I'm not a gambling guy, what do those numbers mean?now I see +154 in one spot. crazy. came close to that for game 5 thoughBill Brasky said:I don't see +150 available anywhere, even those with 10 cents or less lines.Capella said:Man the Bolts are at +150. Rangers at -170.![]()
Tampa is rather sizable dogs considering they were ~ +120 to win the series and ~ +125 in games 1&2.+150 means $100 bet wins $150I'm not a gambling guy, what do those numbers mean?now I see +154 in one spot. crazy. came close to that for game 5 thoughBill Brasky said:I don't see +150 available anywhere, even those with 10 cents or less lines.Capella said:Man the Bolts are at +150. Rangers at -170.![]()
+150 is probably a 7 point road dog in football.I'm not a gambling guy, what do those numbers mean?now I see +154 in one spot. crazy. came close to that for game 5 thoughBill Brasky said:I don't see +150 available anywhere, even those with 10 cents or less lines.Capella said:Man the Bolts are at +150. Rangers at -170.![]()
That's what I thought. ThanksTampa is rather sizable dogs considering they were ~ +120 to win the series and ~ +125 in games 1&2.+150 means $100 bet wins $150I'm not a gambling guy, what do those numbers mean?now I see +154 in one spot. crazy. came close to that for game 5 thoughBill Brasky said:I don't see +150 available anywhere, even those with 10 cents or less lines.Capella said:Man the Bolts are at +150. Rangers at -170.![]()