So check this out, I texted a buddy in Vegas 1/2 hour ago to see if he can get me down on Xander. He says sure and that his book had X at 20-1. I took it right there and in a matter of minutes he sent a copy of the play. But at 25-1 (not 20-1)!
That is rare. 1.) For odds to change that much that fast (25%). 2.) IN my favor. 3.) On golf?
I mean what could have possibly occurred to make that happen? This isn't a sport where you get some phantom plunger coming in with a large sum on one that causes others to drop. The sheer size of the field doesn't present those scenarios. And bookmakers certainly aren't going to lower odds dramatically to align with "true" odds, or at least not by that amount.
The only thing I can figure is X simply didn't take much money leading up and we happen to just get lucky that this book was trying to fetch more money on him and whomever else was they had low exposure to.
My guess is the bold.
Last I read, they are exposed on Bryson.
Yeah, that doesn't surprise me in the least. Annoying word, but he is "trending" for sure, on multiple levels, so you knew this was coming from the masses. He went for 8K in this Calcutta. Some here might be in said Calcutta, btw.
Here's right around where some of the others went (pays out top 4):
Scheffler went for 13K
Rory 9
Colin 7
Rahm 6
Aber 6
Turner 4.2
Brooks 3.8
X 3.8