timschochet
Footballguy
Just analyzed Rd7 and I was right. After Qe5 Rxf7! and the game is over. No good defense for black.
Too caught up in gaining material back to even recognize Rd7.And now White has Rd7! and I am in HUGE trouble. I'm not sure there is anyway out of it. Forced to move my queen, and the pawn on f7 is undefended. Pretty sure he has a mating attack here, although I didn't analyze it. I was considering resigning. Luckily for me, he didn't see it. He took my bishop instead, and that gave me all the breathing room I needed to stifle his attack and eventually force a win.
I really need to force myself to start looking at all possible options before submitting a move. My instinct is to just quickly submit the first thing that I see, and that's not good.My (probably mistaken) thought process at this point was that I had no way to protect the bishop on F4 anyway, so I may as well sacrifice my other bishop and get a pawn for it. But you're right, at this point I knew I was pretty much screwed regardless.Not sure what white was thinking here. I'm pretty sure he was lost anyhow after Re4. But this made it quicker.
Make sure you sent it to Iamabraham- there is another player at chesstime called "Abraham" who is not the same person.Invite sent, Abe my man.
Challenge them both and go with the best result.Make sure you sent it to Iamabraham- there is another player at chesstime called "Abraham" who is not the same person.Invite sent, Abe my man.
http://www.amazon.com/Complete-Idiots-Guide-Chess-Edition/dp/1592573169I suck at chess.![]()
When does round 3 start?
i haven't read it , but for me Logical Chess Move by Move was the most helpful when I started.http://www.amazon.com/Complete-Idiots-Guide-Chess-Edition/dp/1592573169Seriously. Probably one of the best beginner chess books written.I suck at chess.![]()
When does round 3 start?
Eh, doesn't seem that bad for black. After Rd7, black can just take the rook with the queen. At that point it's two rooks for the queen, fairly even trade.Just analyzed Rd7 and I was right. After Qe5 Rxf7! and the game is over. No good defense for black.
didn't even consider that. DamnEh, doesn't seem that bad for black. After Rd7, black can just take the rook with the queen. At that point it's two rooks for the queen, fairly even trade.Just analyzed Rd7 and I was right. After Qe5 Rxf7! and the game is over. No good defense for black.
I think this should be the 2nd chess book anyone reads.i haven't read it , but for me Logical Chess Move by Move was the most helpful when I started.http://www.amazon.com/Complete-Idiots-Guide-Chess-Edition/dp/1592573169Seriously. Probably one of the best beginner chess books written.I suck at chess.![]()
When does round 3 start?
I like how he showed that you don't have to rely on tactical brilliance to win at chess ( which is good for me because I don't have any.) if you can grasp the position and avoid blunders, you'll be all right. In the instructive book I recall a game by Salo Flohr which is just beautiful- no complex moves, just Flohr making one simple good move after another and forcing a win.I think this should be the 2nd chess book anyone reads. GM Nunn's criticisms's about the analysis aside (Chernev was about 2000-2200 strength I think), the real value of that book and his Most Instructive Games Ever Played is the passion he puts into the commentary. He makes reading an annotated game fun. So what if h3 isn't quite as coffeehouse a move as he thought? Getting good at chess is hard work, and I think giving someone an introduction to chess via Chernev is a good way to take some of that edge off and make you want to get better. Chernev does a good job selecting games for instruction and annotating them for beginners to get an understanding of what's going on.i haven't read it , but for me Logical Chess Move by Move was the most helpful when I started.http://www.amazon.com/Complete-Idiots-Guide-Chess-Edition/dp/1592573169Seriously. Probably one of the best beginner chess books written.I suck at chess.![]()
When does round 3 start?
Oh and he had a HUGE mancrush on Capablanca. Pretty sure he had posters of him on his wall.
I'm of the opinion that players of our collective caliber (that is to say, far from master-level) should be playing virtually every game out to checkmate. But that's just me.Edit: Just goes to show that it pays to play the game out to the mate.
I disagree with that. I think you should take less draws, but not play out hopeless positions.I'm of the opinion that players of our collective caliber (that is to say, far from master-level) should be playing virtually every game out to checkmate. But that's just me.Edit: Just goes to show that it pays to play the game out to the mate.
I suppose. It doesn't help the player in the losing position, but I don't think it hurts the player in the winning position to keep sharp on his basic mating patterns.SacramentoBob said:I disagree with that. I think you should take less draws, but not play out hopeless positions.Steve Tasker said:I'm of the opinion that players of our collective caliber (that is to say, far from master-level) should be playing virtually every game out to checkmate. But that's just me.dancingbones said:Edit: Just goes to show that it pays to play the game out to the mate.
And to be clear, I said "virtually" every game. If you're playing against a player who clearly knows how to execute a rook-and-king vs king mate and is a handful of moves away, fine, resign, but if you're like a pawn down in a rook+king+pawn vs rook+king endgame, play it out even if it looks lost.I suppose. It doesn't help the player in the losing position, but I don't think it hurts the player in the winning position to keep sharp on his basic mating patterns.SacramentoBob said:I disagree with that. I think you should take less draws, but not play out hopeless positions.Steve Tasker said:I'm of the opinion that players of our collective caliber (that is to say, far from master-level) should be playing virtually every game out to checkmate. But that's just me.dancingbones said:Edit: Just goes to show that it pays to play the game out to the mate.
That came out of nowhere to me. ggragincajun said:Ragincajun squeaked out a win from Shuke.
Still waiting on Joe T to accept my invitationInvite sent to Joe T...
VA703 had sent me an invite and we are currently in a game so I guess that one will not count...
Well, its Saturday, and he was slow out of the gate last time around. We'll give it until Monday and see what happens.Still waiting on Joe T to accept my invitationInvite sent to Joe T...
VA703 had sent me an invite and we are currently in a game so I guess that one will not count...
invite not receivedStill waiting on Joe T to accept my invitationInvite sent to Joe T...
VA703 had sent me an invite and we are currently in a game so I guess that one will not count...
You could have let me know about the underscore, so I could have corrected the OP. Or maybe you did? I didn't notice it when we played, and I can't keep track of everything, sorry.invite not receivedStill waiting on Joe T to accept my invitationInvite sent to Joe T...
VA703 had sent me an invite and we are currently in a game so I guess that one will not count...
Again, username is Joe_T
Take your time. See the whole board.For the record joffer and I are well underway. Very complex game, which means I fully expect him to clean my clock.
Ok, that was the reason, I was going based on what was provided in the OP...You could have let me know about the underscore, so I could have corrected the OP. Or maybe you did? I didn't notice it when we played, and I can't keep track of everything, sorry.invite not receivedStill waiting on Joe T to accept my invitationInvite sent to Joe T...
VA703 had sent me an invite and we are currently in a game so I guess that one will not count...
Again, username is Joe_T
Crying complete. dancingbones v charvik (0-1)It seems the rumours of my chess acumen have been greatly exaggerated.
It's all over but the crying for charvik & I, with me doing the crying.
Nicely played charvik. :thumbsup:
gg, it turned out very interesting... Not sure how to copy the moves over for a breakdown.Crying complete. dancingbones v charvik (0-1)It seems the rumours of my chess acumen have been greatly exaggerated.
It's all over but the crying for charvik & I, with me doing the crying.
Nicely played charvik. :thumbsup:
Joe_TOk, that was the reason, I was going based on what was provided in the OP...You could have let me know about the underscore, so I could have corrected the OP. Or maybe you did? I didn't notice it when we played, and I can't keep track of everything, sorry.invite not receivedAgain, username is Joe_TStill waiting on Joe T to accept my invitationInvite sent to Joe T...
VA703 had sent me an invite and we are currently in a game so I guess that one will not count...
So timschochet, am I supposed to be playing Joe_T or VA703???
I thought you drew? Or was that another game?It seems the rumours of my chess acumen have been greatly exaggerated.
It's all over but the crying for charvik & I, with me doing the crying.
Nicely played charvik. :thumbsup:
After the game is over you have the option to email the PGN (which is just a text file) to yourself.gg, it turned out very interesting... Not sure how to copy the moves over for a breakdown.Crying complete.dancingbones v charvik (0-1)It seems the rumours of my chess acumen have been greatly exaggerated.
It's all over but the crying for charvik & I, with me doing the crying.
Nicely played charvik. :thumbsup:
If a player is rated better than me I try to grab as many pieces as possible and hope for the best. I was on the ropes here but think I've put him in a bit of a pickle at the moment. We shall seeChesstime Abraham? Screw that guy! I want the REAL DEAL.
I don't expect mine to last much longer. Joffer is just rope-a-doping me at this point.EddieSpaghetti vs Joe_T (0-1)
That was a game with someone else that I drew.I thought you drew? Or was that another game?It seems the rumours of my chess acumen have been greatly exaggerated.
It's all over but the crying for charvik & I, with me doing the crying.
Nicely played charvik. :thumbsup:
Thanks! I didn't know that... here it is, in case anyone is interested. I am pleased with not making any major mistake, even though DB forced me to change my original opening early.After the game is over you have the option to email the PGN (which is just a text file) to yourself.gg, it turned out very interesting... Not sure how to copy the moves over for a breakdown.Crying complete.dancingbones v charvik (0-1)It seems the rumours of my chess acumen have been greatly exaggerated.
It's all over but the crying for charvik & I, with me doing the crying.
Nicely played charvik. :thumbsup:
I think I was in a strong position until move #17.Thanks! I didn't know that... here it is, in case anyone is interested. I am pleased with not making any major mistake, even though DB forced me to change my original opening early.After the game is over you have the option to email the PGN (which is just a text file) to yourself.gg, it turned out very interesting... Not sure how to copy the moves over for a breakdown.Crying complete.dancingbones v charvik (0-1)It seems the rumours of my chess acumen have been greatly exaggerated.
It's all over but the crying for charvik & I, with me doing the crying.
Nicely played charvik. :thumbsup:
1. c4 c5
2. Nf3 Nf6
3. Nc3 b6
4. e4 d6
5. d4 cxd4
6. Nxd4 Bb7
7. Bd3 e6
8. O-O Be7
9. f4 Nc6
10. Nf3 O-O
11. a3 Rc8
12. Qe2 Na5
13. Nd2 Nd7
14. b4 Nc6
15. Nf3 Bf6
16. Bb2 Bd4+
17. Kh1 Bf6
18. Nb5 Bxb2
19. Qxb2 Qe7
20. e5 dxe5
21. fxe5 Rc8d8
22. Ra1d1 a6
23. Nd6 Nd7xe5
24. Nxe5 Rxd6
25. Ng4 Rf8d8
26. Qe2 f5
27. Ne3 Ne5
28. Bc2 Rxd1
29. Rxd1 Rxd1+
30. Nxd1 Qd6
31. h3 Qd4
32. Bb3 f4
33. c5 f3
34. Qe3 fxg2+
35. Kg1 bxc5
36. Bxe6+ Kf8
37. Qxd4 Nf3+
38. Kxg2 Nxd4+
39. Kf2 Nxe6
40. Ne3 cxb4
41. axb4 Nf4
42. Kg3 Nd3
43. Nc2 Bd5
44. h4 Ke7
45. Kg4 Bb3
46. Nd4 Be6+
47. Nxe6 Kxe6
48. Kf3 h5
49. Ke4 Nxb4
50. Kf4 Kf6
51. Ke4 a5
52. Kd4 Nc2+
53. Kc3 Ne1
54. Kb3 Nf3
55. Ka4 Nxh4
56. Kxa5 Nf5
57. Kb4 h4
58. Kc5 h3
59. Kd5 h2
60. Ke4 h1=Q+
61. Kf4 Qh4+
62. Kf3 Qe1
63. Kg4 Qg3+
64. Kh5 Qh4# 0-1
ETA: Like someone else said above, with the huge disadvantage in ranking, my thought was exchanging as many pieces like-for-like as possible and be defensive. I still feel I lucked out getting in a good position with my pieces, and a slight advantage in strength (extra pawn and bishop).