Sounds like you don't treat the women you are with very well if that's the case.Everyone has flaws in their personalities. We as humans manipulate situations all the time to get outcomes we desire. Sometimes the manipulation is very conscious sometimes not. No relationship is perfect. There will always be situations or entire relationships that are unhealthy and it can go both ways. You can’t police the world towards perfect behavior. This is getting out of control imo. Rant to your friends and family and lean on them for support... that’s how you deal with a relationship like she described. You don’t post an article and make news of it. God forbid my ex wife were to do that and I was famous. Bottom line is we all have personality flaws and each of our relationships with other individuals can bring out any combination of outcomes. Human brain is complex and personalities just as complex.
Cosby is a predatorEach one of these guys is the answer to the question "which one is not like the others" --
Cosby is different because he drugged his victims and, in theory, did not threaten them or force them to have sex.
Weinstein is different because he's the only one on the list who actually blackmailed and threatened women into sex-for-employment.
Rose is different because he never actually engaged in a sex act with any of the women he harassed.
CK is different because he "only" masturbated.
Hardwick is different because his girlfriend gave consent.
But every one of them is on the sexual predator spectrum.
Marital relations between man and woman, only one of whom is truly interested. The other party just lies there like said aquatic life form and allows the act to proceed without being truly engaged. Trying to describe the other probably won't fly.
I guess we disagree on what "some" mental abuse is and what falls into the sexual abuse spectrum.I think there was some mental abuse going on in the relationship, definitely no sexual abuse and to ruin his reputation because of their bad/toxic relationship is going too far IMO.
you could make the argument that there is some type of mental abuse in any prolonged relationshipI think there was some mental abuse going on in the relationship, definitely no sexual abuse and to ruin his reputation because of their bad/toxic relationship is going too far IMO.
again you are assuming 100% of what she wrote is trueI guess we disagree on what "some" mental abuse is and what falls into the sexual abuse spectrum.
F you. We live in a world where people are now labeled and defined based on a sentence?! JFC. I don’t know many ex partners who would say kind words about their ex. That was my point. Watch where you sling mud #######. You don’t know anything about me, how I treat women or the trauma/abuse I have suffered in life so just stop with your god complex.Sounds like you don't treat the women you are with very well if that's the case.
You seem angry. Maybe switch to decaf?F you. We live in a world where people are now labeled and defined based on a sentence?! JFC. I don’t know many ex partners who would say kind words about their ex. That was my point. Watch where you sling mud #######. You don’t know anything about me, how I treat women or the trauma/abuse I have suffered in life so just stop with your god complex.
I’d like to get a full life transcript from all you mo fos who appear to be perfect in your daily lives. Apparently a whole bunch of you are absolute saints in all of your relationships and how you treat others at all times with not one blemmish in your history. Gimme a ####### break!
Most of us are very fortunate to not have the liability of fame holding us accountable to demonstrate perfect behavior every minute of every day. I’m not saying Hardwick’s behavior, if true, is ordinary or right but it’s definitely not sexual abuse and it’s certainly not worthy of being made public and ruining his life in many ways. Again, consider for a moment what it’s like to have everything you have done in life - right or wrong - plastered all over the internet and media outlets. Us normal folks don’t have to worry about that and NOBODY lives a perfect life. Get over yourselves.
I can get behind this as long as this definition includes someone who thought they were consensually entering a relationship, yet the "predator" was actually manipulating their victim into the relationship. If a victim thought they were consensually entering the relationship, that doesn't exclude the other person from being a predator.Regretting the decision to begin a sexual relationship with another person is completely different than being a victim of a predator.
The decision to begin a sexual relationship with another person may eventually lead to abuse, and that abuse may be the reason for the regret, but again it's not being a victim of a predator. It's being a victim of abuse.
Just because abuse that occurs after a consensual sexual relationship began may be as a result of one partner's authority or power over the other, that does not make the other person a predator. It's the authority or power over someone else that is being used to begin, or attempt to begin, the sexual relationship that is predatory.
A victim of a predator is someone who was compelled to begin an unwelcome sexual relationship via the predatory's authority or power over them.
I don’t take too kindly to implications that I treat women poorly from someone who knows nothing about me. You better believe I’m angry. Those are fighting words.You seem angry. Maybe switch to decaf?![]()
I agree. But if it means he is on TV less that is a huge bonus.I think there was some mental abuse going on in the relationship, definitely no sexual abuse and to ruin his reputation because of their bad/toxic relationship is going too far IMO.
I'm fine using different wording than "compelled". The point is that the beginning of the relationship would not have occurred if it weren't for the predatory using their existing position of power/authority over the victim.I can get behind this as long as this definition includes someone who thought they were consensually entering a relationship, yet the "predator" was actually manipulating their victim into the relationship. If a victim thought they were consensually entering the relationship, that doesn't exclude the other person from being a predator.
I'm not saying that has anything to do with the relationship currently being discussed. I just think "compelled" is a tricky word to define the start of the relationship.
I don't think that these are mutually exclusive things.Regretting the decision to begin a sexual relationship with another person is completely different than being a victim of a predator.
The decision to begin a sexual relationship with another person may eventually lead to abuse, and that abuse may be the reason for the regret, but again it's not being a victim of a predator. It's being a victim of abuse.
Just because abuse that occurs after a consensual sexual relationship began may be as a result of one partner's authority or power over the other, that does not make the other person a predator. It's the authority or power over someone else that is being used to begin, or attempt to begin, the sexual relationship that is predatory.
A victim of a predator is someone who was compelled to begin an unwelcome sexual relationship via the predatory's authority or power over them.
Given the vast majority of consensual relationships end, the odds are pretty good that everyone has at least one ex-partner that could make an argument that they are a sexual predator, if we are going to define it so loosely.I don't think that these are mutually exclusive things.
A person can be a predator and another person could consent to begin a relationship with them. Part of being a good predator is hiding the fact that you are one.
Just feels like there are a fair number of blanket statements like there couldn't be abuse or a person can't be a predator if somebody willingly has a relationship with them.
Loosely as far as this specific case, or are you talking broadly about what some people have been fired over as far as what they have said or done?Given the vast majority of consensual relationships end, the odds are pretty good that everyone has at least one ex-partner that could make an argument that they are a sexual predator, if we are going to define it so loosely.
i think what he is saying is if you dated enough women one of them at least would have a bad opinion of you and could distort things to make you look controlling or whatever.Loosely as far as this specific case, or are you talking broadly about what some people have been fired over as far as what they have said or done?
I don't think many of us have had a relationship with somebody who has acted like he has been accused of acting.
ETA: I was also talking about predator in a general sense, not specifically sexual predator so that was causing some problems I think.
I am not taking everything as gospel on her end. I am just in the NV camp that it's much more rare to have abuse cases that are made up just to get back at somebody.i think what he is saying is if you dated enough women one of them at least would have a bad opinion of you and could distort things to make you look controlling or whatever.
and once again i think its foolish to take everything she is saying at face value all things considered
This is what I don't agree with. IF what she reported was true, I think is abuse -sexual and emotional, and I have 0 issues with people like that being outed so others know and charges can be brought if applicable.I’m not saying Hardwick’s behavior, if true, is ordinary or right but it’s definitely not sexual abuse and it’s certainly not worthy of being made public and ruining his life in many ways.
As is? Sure.I can't imagine anyone reading this and thinking "I fail to see the abuse there."
I guess i have lived a boring life in that department then.not necessarily in that way but for sure you have pissed off enough
Loosely in general.Loosely as far as this specific case, or are you talking broadly about what some people have been fired over as far as what they have said or done?
I don't think many of us have had a relationship with somebody who has acted like he has been accused of acting.
ETA: I was also talking about predator in a general sense, not specifically sexual predator so that was causing some problems I think.
Don't agree on Louis CK. I think he has/had a legitimate sexual disfunction born from self-loathing and was never out to hurt women or abuse his position.Cosby is a predator
Weinstein is a predator
Rose is a predator
CK is a predator
Hardwick is NOT a predator. A jerk? Yes. But he hasn't done anything to put him on the predator spectrum.
Abuse <> Predator. HTH.
And she’s a cosplayer. I’ve been dates a few times with women that were in to that and they are very unstable.As is? Sure.
I also don't think it would be weird if a guy had an issue with his girlfriend going out at night with other guys.
Hardwick is a recovering addict. He told her to be in a realtionship with him she couldn't drink. That's not unusual. She made him into a monster on that account. Makes me question how she characterized everything.
I don’t really understand bringing up the alcohol thing... you get into a relationship with a recovering addict and they ask you not to drink. I think thats pretty cut and dry. Why bring that into your argument, that’s a reasonable request.As is? Sure.
I also don't think it would be weird if a guy had an issue with his girlfriend going out at night with other guys.
Hardwick is a recovering addict. He told her to be in a realtionship with him she couldn't drink. That's not unusual. She made him into a monster on that account. Makes me question how she characterized everything.
im not allowed to say this anymore but jenny mccarthy was so hot back thenRemember when he was just a game show host on MTV? Those were good times.
She’s not only not in her right mind, but in any mind that any of us recognize.uh....
this is actually kind of awesome in that "you have no idea where it's going or what to expect next" kinda wayETA: perhaps a LOT of coo coo pants.
egadsWhy is she crazy? Because her claims seem outlandish?
You have it backwards, her claims are outlandish BECAUSE she is crazy.Why is she crazy? Because her claims seem outlandish?
With @POTUS in charge now, things are changing, and the executive order he signed on 12/21/17 is directly related to this cult & their trafficking, which supports their entire operation, which is really about Luciferianism & cannibalism, not pedophilia, in the end.
hmmmm. The Man With One Red Shoe .... on the left foot.I too am reminded of the missing left glove left shoe theme which clearly indicates Tom Hanks is a Rosicrucian.