And cheap. And readily accessible.I got up to the about where they started talking about soda and think I got the gist.
Not much to argue about with what he said, we are a bunch of fatties addicted to salt and sugar because they are delicious and an easy legal "high".
especially when the FDA, Big Agri and Big Pharma actively are pushing and promoting horrible eating habitsIt's super hard to change habits.
most of America is not only fat, but obeseThanks. Can you share a cliff notes version? What is his main point?
Basically there's an elephant in the room (we're fat and unhealthy which can easily be tied to disease and death) and rather than be able to talk about it and encourage societal improvement, it's labeled as "fat shaming".Thanks. Can you share a cliff notes version? What is his main point?
Just look at what happens in these threads when people mention making better food choices. There is always a big pushback.There should be more push back on people using the excuse that it’s hard to eat healthy. For most people, it isn’t hard. You just have to want to do it.
Right. In my experience cheap unhealthy food is much more delicious than cheap healthy food.There should be more push back on people using the excuse that it’s hard to eat healthy. For most people, it isn’t hard. You just have to want to do it.
After one cleans up the diet for a while, a lot of the unhealthy stuff doesn’t taste as good as one remembers. Some of the good stuff can even taste better. I actually like the flavor of celery these days.Right. In my experience cheap unhealthy food is much more delicious than cheap healthy food.
Well you see if we acknowledge that adele shouldnt be heavy then we are not properly treating the small % of people that have something like prader willi syndrome.He is right. Adele was shamed a while back for losing weight. Read that again. For losing weight. Shame on her for not staying overweight and unhealthy. Welcome to 2022.
The food scientists have this down to a science. Sugar, Salt, Fat. Food is just the delivery system. I'm not saying they are big tobacco but they live on the same blockAfter one cleans up the diet for a while, a lot of the unhealthy stuff doesn’t taste as good as one remembers. Some of the good stuff can even taste better. I actually like the flavor of celery these days.
Yes ever since I started limiting salt and sugar a lot of popular junk food is just too sweet or too salty.After one cleans up the diet for a while, a lot of the unhealthy stuff doesn’t taste as good as one remembers. Some of the good stuff can even taste better. I actually like the flavor of celery these days.
you don't think high fructose corn syrup is a problem?Instead we get body positivity movements and blame the government and hf corn syrup.
Not intending to get political here, but I never understood the blanket pushback on Michelle Obama’s efforts to combat childhood obesity. Sure there may have been elements that seemed unworkable (e.g. salad bars in school cafeterias) but the general effort to promote physical activity, encourage healthier food options, and consider removing inherently bad options (do we really need to offer sugar soft drinks in elementary school?) should have been supported by just about everyone regardless of politics.Just look at what happens in these threads when people mention making better food choices. There is always a big pushback.
All this talk about this being the governments fault just serves as a distraction from the real problem.
We arent going to get delicious tasting stuff banned. Nor should we. People wont stop eating twinkies because we add a tax. And if they do it will be because they found a replacement tasty treat that isnt taxed.
Anything short of figuring out how to get kids and adults active understanding that eating too many calories is really bad for you wont work.
Instead we get body positivity movements and blame the government and hf corn syrup.
Like sugar? Eat fruit.The food scientists have this down to a science. Sugar, Salt, Fat. Food is just the delivery system. I'm not saying they are big tobacco but they live on the same block![]()
This guy gets it. The FDA is in the business preservation business and no one, including you and me, are doing a damn thing to stop it.especially when the FDA, Big Agri and Big Pharma actively are pushing and promoting horrible eating habits
High Fructose Corn Syrup is the single worst food item you can ingest, but it is used in practically all processed food
much easier to sell a never ending annuity program of drugs to fix all of those problems
can you say Statin Drugs?
Like sugar? Eat fruit.
Like fat? Eat nuts and healthy oils.
Like salt? Find other spices you like to cook with.
I dont think eliminating hf corn syrup fixes the problem. In fact i think it would barely make a dent.you don't think high fructose corn syrup is a problem?
Agreed. Now convince 90% of the country to do this as opposed to ice cream, potato chips, and fast food. People are hooked to the later.Like sugar? Eat fruit.
Like fat? Eat nuts and healthy oils.
Like salt? Find other spices you like to cook with.
If you watch the Maher / Carolla interview this is a part of the discussion.I've been thinking a good bit about this lately as I need to lose about 15 pounds.
I'm 6'0" and 210 and feel better when I'm around 195.
My best friend just did something similar where he lost 20 pounds and he's about my size. He's an MD and we were talking about it this week.
He said, "Everyone asks me how I did it? Less carbs? Less sugar? Less fat? My answer is 'yes'".
He said he just simply ate less food.
Then he said, "Nobody wants to hear it. But the truth is I was hungry a lot of the time.".
In other words, he was uncomfortable a good bit of the time. And we don't do that well.
I still eat way too much sugar, but a long time ago I switched from sweet tea to unsweet tea and I absolutely hate the taste of sweet tea now. Way too sweet. And, man, the Chick Fil A lemonade is undrinkable for me. So freaking sweet.Yes ever since I started limiting salt and sugar a lot of popular junk food is just too sweet or too salty.
Is this chronic situation though? Similar to our tastes changing based on what we eat, don't our appetites change based on how much we eat?Then he said, "Nobody wants to hear it. But the truth is I was hungry a lot of the time.".
In other words, he was uncomfortable a good bit of the time. And we don't do that well.
For general good health, it seems like, at a minimum, the science hasn’t been settled. Probably best for most people to consume it in moderation. If you have some articles indicating “nothing” is wrong with it, I’d like to read them.There's nothing wrong with salt. Not even in the same universe as sugar in terms of the contribution to obesity.
unrefined himalayan and sea salt is fineFor general good health, it seems like, at a minimum, the science hasn’t been settled. Probably best for most people to consume it in moderation. If you have some articles indicating “nothing” is wrong with it, I’d like to read them.
Not trying to remove blame from a society who stuff their faces with this stuff but I heard this guy interviewed awhile ago: Michael MossIs this chronic situation though? Similar to our tastes changing based on what we eat, don't our appetites change based on how much we eat?
Is being obese or overweight and unfit a choice? When I've been motivated enough at stages in my life, I've been very fit. At other stages, I've been much less so. During my adult life I've weighed 245 (age 21), 200-215 (age 25-38), 190 after a divorce 9 years ago and back up to 245 again last summer. Down to 230 and hoping to get back to 205 or so to keep my knees from getting destroyed on the hikes I have planned. 45 left on my list.
In my experience, I guess it is a choice but it's a harder choice to make than it should be. The big question is... why is it so hard? What kept me drinking 4 PBRs and having a bowl of ice cream every night? I don't know.
Seems like, as a society we're not getting this one right.
Not only is it marketed, but there's likely backroom deals between the industry and our government to maintain demand for cheap, calorie dense food and drink. Someone asked above why there was so much resistance to eliminating sugary drinks in our schools. There's a good chance the corn and sugar lobbies were fighting it to some extent.Agreed. Now convince 90% of the country to do this as opposed to ice cream, potato chips, and fast food. People are hooked to the later.
We are a nation of crack heads for sugar, salt, fat. It's all easily available, is marketed to kids and is a trillion dollar industry.
Not really sure the solution, but telling people to eat healthy alone won't cut it.
But assuming that folks were slimmer across the board in the 70s and 80s, I don’t think they were any less comfortable were they? So what was the difference? More physical activity then versus now? Perhaps. Easier access to a wider range of unhealthy food options now versus back then? I’d say that’s likely. But I’d be willing to bet that the biggest difference is a change in portion size then versus now.I've been thinking a good bit about this lately as I need to lose about 15 pounds.
I'm 6'0" and 210 and feel better when I'm around 195.
My best friend just did something similar where he lost 20 pounds and he's about my size. He's an MD and we were talking about it this week.
He said, "Everyone asks me how I did it? Less carbs? Less sugar? Less fat? My answer is 'yes'".
He said he just simply ate less food.
Then he said, "Nobody wants to hear it. But the truth is I was hungry a lot of the time.".
In other words, he was uncomfortable a good bit of the time. And we don't do that well.
when an additive like HFCS is the single largest component in most processed foods and it leads directly to diabetes,I dont think eliminating hf corn syrup fixes the problem. In fact i think it would barely make a dent.
So is it a "problem"? Sure. Should it be where we spend a ton of focus? Nope.
But assuming that folks were slimmer across the board in the 70s and 80s, I don’t think they were any less comfortable were they?
My vegan daughter in LA would like to have a word with you. It does take time to prepare healthy food, and it helps if you like spicy food, which is what many people in the rest of the world have preparing and eating for centuries.Right. In my experience cheap unhealthy food is much more delicious than cheap healthy food.
I watched a documentary about this a few months ago which spoke to the difference: Food is easier to get, it's more affordable, and usually the most affordable food has more calories. Ultimately we're not only eating more, but what we're eating is more calorie dense and harder to burn.But assuming that folks were slimmer across the board in the 70s and 80s, I don’t think they were any less comfortable were they? So what was the difference? More physical activity then versus now? Perhaps. Easier access to a wider range of unhealthy food options now versus back then? I’d say that’s likely. But I’d be willing to bet that the biggest difference is a change in portion size then versus now.
Gary Taubes has some great stuff on salt. He explains it far better than I ever can in terms of the effects on our health/blood pressure, etc. But this thread isn't about blood pressure or health, it's about obesity. And salt has no calories. Sugar is loaded in calories.For general good health, it seems like, at a minimum, the science hasn’t been settled. Probably best for most people to consume it in moderation. If you have some articles indicating “nothing” is wrong with it, I’d like to read them.
Supersize this post.But assuming that folks were slimmer across the board in the 70s and 80s, I don’t think they were any less comfortable were they? So what was the difference? More physical activity then versus now? Perhaps. Easier access to a wider range of unhealthy food options now versus back then? I’d say that’s likely. But I’d be willing to bet that the biggest difference is a change in portion size then versus now.
There are no doubt some great health food.My vegan daughter in LA would like to have a word with you. It does take time to prepare healthy food, and it helps if you like spicy food, which is what many people in the rest of the world have preparing and eating for centuries.
In the end, it's not really about healthy or unhealthy food. It's about caloric intake as the PhD nutritionist from Kansas showed with the twinkle diet, losing weight and improving his lipid profile eating mainly twinkles for about 2 months. Of course, "an entire pound of spinach has the same amount if calories as a single Oreo cookie."
https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2010-dec-06-la-he-fitness-twinkie-diet-20101206-story.html
Not intending to get political here, but I never understood the blanket pushback on Michelle Obama’s efforts to combat childhood obesity. Sure there may have been elements that seemed unworkable (e.g. salad bars in school cafeterias) but the general effort to promote physical activity, encourage healthier food options, and consider removing inherently bad options (do we really need to offer sugar soft drinks in elementary school?) should have been supported by just about everyone regardless of politics.
The rest of the world is witnessing an increase in obesity. Probably due to those some factors you mention.I watched a documentary about this a few months ago which spoke to the difference: Food is easier to get, it's more affordable, and usually the most affordable food has more calories. Ultimately we're not only eating more, but what we're eating is more calorie dense and harder to burn.
But I’d be willing to bet that the biggest difference is a change in portion size then versus now.
I certainly agree with your general point, but I guess I meant uncomfortable with respect to being hungry, the situation noted by your friend. But perhaps you’re right that we have a higher standard for feeling satiated (and thus, comfortable) than we did back then.That's a good question. My thought is we are way more comfortable now. From remote controls to next day shipping to shopping online and having most anything we want and can afford the next day. From cars to homes to just about anything, I think we're way more comfortable today. And on the flip side, I think we're way more averse to not having things the way we want them. I think of the things I feel like complaining about compared to the things my grandparents complained about and it's remarkable.
Just like all products in our consumer driven market, the food industry has improved and continues to improve to stay alive.But assuming that folks were slimmer across the board in the 70s and 80s, I don’t think they were any less comfortable were they? So what was the difference? More physical activity then versus now? Perhaps. Easier access to a wider range of unhealthy food options now versus back then? I’d say that’s likely. But I’d be willing to bet that the biggest difference is a change in portion size then versus now.
Did you know there's only one F in Double Stuf Oreos?There are no doubt some great health food.
You put an Oreo cookie down in front of a kid or a pound of spinach I think I know what they are going for![]()
Ok. Now this conversation is starting to make me hungry. Whose idea was this?Did you know there's only one F in Double Stuf Oreos?