What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Black Lives Matter- but so do all lives (2 Viewers)

BTW anyone who says or types the phrase "all lives matter" should be punted to the moon.
I understand their point, but I don't agree with it. All lives DO matter. It grates me that Martin O'Malley had to apologize to these nuts. He shouldn't have.

I would love to see Hillary have a "Sista Souljah" moment with these people, but I doubt she will.
The "all lives matter" shtick marginalizes and pushes aside the original, initial movement. It's not a movement about black supremacy, it's essentially saying that blacks have been left out, in a lot of respects, and argues for inclusion. To say "Well yes, everyone should be included" ignores that any exclusion ever took place in the first place.

That said, I think progressive movements fare a lot better when they work to find allies that might not necessarily belong to that group. Those two women didn't do BLM a whole lot of favors.

 
BTW anyone who says or types the phrase "all lives matter" should be punted to the moon.
Because some don't, honestly.
Let's list some examples.

1. Child molesters

2. Rapers

3. Raider Fans

4. People who fart on crowded elevators

5. The Kardashians
Can we talk real for just a second?

One of my most satisfyingly happy moments was when I was in a hot, 5 hour car ride to the beach at the outer banks NC, with my wife and her brother (and my two year old son in the car seat in back). We were in standstill traffic on Route 95 South, and it was about 120 degrees outside. I had a case of the most horrible farts. Mostly because I stayed up until midnight the night before eating approximately two gallons of granola in anticipation of the car ride (I LOVE granola, but I've know since the 10th grade that it gives me tremendous gas).

Anyway, my wife and brother in law had to choose between a pleasant air conditioned car that smelled like dead animals, or rolling the windows down and letting in the sweltering heat of hell itself. They were SO angry about the whole situation. For a while I thought they were going to kick me out of the car right on the highway. When I look back at the good days of my marriage, that is going to be tops on the list, I think.

But I digress: Not all elevator farters are bad people. We just have a different way of viewing the world.

 
BTW anyone who says or types the phrase "all lives matter" should be punted to the moon.
Because some don't, honestly.
Let's list some examples.

1. Child molesters

2. Rapers

3. Raider Fans

4. People who fart on crowded elevators

5. The Kardashians
Can we talk real for just a second?

One of my most satisfyingly happy moments was when I was in a hot, 5 hour car ride to the beach at the outer banks NC, with my wife and her brother (and my two year old son in the car seat in back). We were in standstill traffic on Route 95 South, and it was about 120 degrees outside. I had a case of the most horrible farts. Mostly because I stayed up until midnight the night before eating approximately two gallons of granola in anticipation of the car ride (I LOVE granola, but I've know since the 10th grade that it gives me tremendous gas).

Anyway, my wife and brother in law had to choose between a pleasant air conditioned car that smelled like dead animals, or rolling the windows down and letting in the sweltering heat of hell itself. They were SO angry about the whole situation. For a while I thought they were going to kick me out of the car right on the highway. When I look back at the good days of my marriage, that is going to be tops on the list, I think.

But I digress: Not all elevator farters are bad people. We just have a different way of viewing the world.
That's actually pretty profound.

 
Everyone agrees that black lives matter, and everyone agrees that matter can be converted into energy, but I introduce a simple plan that combines these two concepts and suddenly it's all "ICC" this and "genocide" that and "you're history's greatest monster".

 
Here in Minnesota last year they planned a protest at the Mall of America.. MOA warned them weeks in advance that if they do they will get arrested.. They protested anyways, got arrested and now are calling it "racism" for arresting them and are fighting it in court..

The problem, IMO, is that Minnesota empowered them a few weeks before that as they marched onto a Freeway... Instead of trying to prevent them from entering the freeway, or arresting them, they shutdown the freeway to prevent people from driving on it until the protesters had reached their destination. :wall:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
BTW anyone who says or types the phrase "all lives matter" should be punted to the moon.
I understand their point, but I don't agree with it. All lives DO matter. It grates me that Martin O'Malley had to apologize to these nuts. He shouldn't have.

I would love to see Hillary have a "Sista Souljah" moment with these people, but I doubt she will.
The "all lives matter" shtick marginalizes and pushes aside the original, initial movement. It's not a movement about black supremacy, it's essentially saying that blacks have been left out, in a lot of respects, and argues for inclusion. To say "Well yes, everyone should be included" ignores that any exclusion ever took place in the first place.

That said, I think progressive movements fare a lot better when they work to find allies that might not necessarily belong to that group. Those two women didn't do BLM a whole lot of favors.
I agree that blacks have been left out, and inclusion is obviously a desired goal. But when your motto is "Black Lives Matter" and you shout down anyone who says "All lives matter" as racist or "just don't get it", I think you do a disservice to your own cause.

 
Here in Minnesota last year they planned a protest at the Mall of America.. MOA warned them weeks in advance that if they do they will get arrested.. They protested anyways, got arrested and now are calling it "racism" for arresting them and are fighting it in court..

The problem, IMO, is that Minnesota empowered them a few weeks before that as marched onto a Freeway... Instead of trying to prevent them from entering the freeway, or arresting them, they shutdown the freeway to prevent people from driving on it until the protesters had reached their destination. :wall:
Shutting down the freeway.

There's a great story that Bill Walton likes to tell: back when he was at UCLA, he was a student protestor, and he and his buddies blocked Wilshire Boulevard (a major street) in order to protest the Vietnam War, which blocked traffic for miles. Walton was arrested, and his coach, John Wooden, picked him up from jail. As they were driving back, Wooden said, (in his typical mild voice), "Bill, I can appreciate you wanting to protest the war. But was this really the right way to go about it? Did you ever think about people that needed to get to work to feed their families, or people that had to get to the hospital, but were slowed down or stopped? What if there was an emergency?"

Walton confessed that he hadn't considered any of those things. He continued to protest the war, but never again took part in blocking traffic.

 
BTW anyone who says or types the phrase "all lives matter" should be punted to the moon.
I understand their point, but I don't agree with it. All lives DO matter. It grates me that Martin O'Malley had to apologize to these nuts. He shouldn't have.

I would love to see Hillary have a "Sista Souljah" moment with these people, but I doubt she will.
The "all lives matter" shtick marginalizes and pushes aside the original, initial movement. It's not a movement about black supremacy, it's essentially saying that blacks have been left out, in a lot of respects, and argues for inclusion. To say "Well yes, everyone should be included" ignores that any exclusion ever took place in the first place.

That said, I think progressive movements fare a lot better when they work to find allies that might not necessarily belong to that group. Those two women didn't do BLM a whole lot of favors.
I agree that blacks have been left out, and inclusion is obviously a desired goal. But when your motto is "Black Lives Matter" and you shout down anyone who says "All lives matter" as racist or "just don't get it", I think you do a disservice to your own cause.
So your argument is that the black lives matter people have done a disservice to their own cause by not being cordial enough with idiots?

 
I've been thinking more and more about this BLM movement, and listening to its spokesmen, and the more I hear the more I don't like.

I absolutely believe that there is institutionalized racism in this country and that young black men are mistreated by police/ it's a real issue, we need to find ways to solve it, and I totally get the frustration and rage. But that doesn't make it right. These guys are divisive. As someone pointed out in the Bernie Sanders thread, they are more Malcolm X than Martin Luther King.

These people, like the Tea Party, like Occupy Wall Street, represent the growing extremism that is taking over the edges of our society. They don't seem to want rational discourse or real solutions. Instead they're just looking for a fight. Count me out.
Was thinking about this last night when I heard about someone disturbing Bernie's speech. Feel like BLM is setting back the cause at this point. Changes need to be made but BLM isn't the right way to go about it.

 
Very glad to see this. Tim said it far better than I have been able to this past year. Since day one I have found the whole BLM movement to be racist and corrupt. Glad to see it exposed, and I think what we are seeing now is the beginning of the end. A lot of damage has been done, but hopefully we can pick up the pieces and deal with the real underlying issues at play here.
Future generations will view Tim's thread as the watershed moment for race relations in this country.
You're half right. I think thr BLM movement has been exposed recently and is on life support. History will not be kind to it either. It was largely responsible for setting race relations back about 25 years. Good riddance to it.
 
BTW anyone who says or types the phrase "all lives matter" should be punted to the moon.
I understand their point, but I don't agree with it. All lives DO matter. It grates me that Martin O'Malley had to apologize to these nuts. He shouldn't have.

I would love to see Hillary have a "Sista Souljah" moment with these people, but I doubt she will.
The "all lives matter" shtick marginalizes and pushes aside the original, initial movement. It's not a movement about black supremacy, it's essentially saying that blacks have been left out, in a lot of respects, and argues for inclusion. To say "Well yes, everyone should be included" ignores that any exclusion ever took place in the first place.

That said, I think progressive movements fare a lot better when they work to find allies that might not necessarily belong to that group. Those two women didn't do BLM a whole lot of favors.
I agree that blacks have been left out, and inclusion is obviously a desired goal. But when your motto is "Black Lives Matter" and you shout down anyone who says "All lives matter" as racist or "just don't get it", I think you do a disservice to your own cause.
I don't really know anything about the BLM movement. I don't know their leaders, or know in great detail their positions. But saying "all lives matter" in response to "black lives matter" is stupid. Regardless of whether a person who says that is "objectively" racist, if I had a gun to my head and had to put the "all lives matter" speaker on a one-to-ten "racist" spectrum, I have an idea of where I'd place him.

 
BTW anyone who says or types the phrase "all lives matter" should be punted to the moon.
I understand their point, but I don't agree with it. All lives DO matter. It grates me that Martin O'Malley had to apologize to these nuts. He shouldn't have.

I would love to see Hillary have a "Sista Souljah" moment with these people, but I doubt she will.
The "all lives matter" shtick marginalizes and pushes aside the original, initial movement. It's not a movement about black supremacy, it's essentially saying that blacks have been left out, in a lot of respects, and argues for inclusion. To say "Well yes, everyone should be included" ignores that any exclusion ever took place in the first place.

That said, I think progressive movements fare a lot better when they work to find allies that might not necessarily belong to that group. Those two women didn't do BLM a whole lot of favors.
Black lives matter is an insult to other minorities that suffer from discrimination. All lives matter is a much better way to approach the problem since it encompasses everyone.

 
BTW anyone who says or types the phrase "all lives matter" should be punted to the moon.
Because some don't, honestly.
Let's list some examples.

1. Child molesters

2. Rapers

3. Raider Fans

4. People who fart on crowded elevators

5. The Kardashians
Can we talk real for just a second?

One of my most satisfyingly happy moments was when I was in a hot, 5 hour car ride to the beach at the outer banks NC, with my wife and her brother (and my two year old son in the car seat in back). We were in standstill traffic on Route 95 South, and it was about 120 degrees outside. I had a case of the most horrible farts. Mostly because I stayed up until midnight the night before eating approximately two gallons of granola in anticipation of the car ride (I LOVE granola, but I've know since the 10th grade that it gives me tremendous gas).

Anyway, my wife and brother in law had to choose between a pleasant air conditioned car that smelled like dead animals, or rolling the windows down and letting in the sweltering heat of hell itself. They were SO angry about the whole situation. For a while I thought they were going to kick me out of the car right on the highway. When I look back at the good days of my marriage, that is going to be tops on the list, I think.

But I digress: Not all elevator farters are bad people. We just have a different way of viewing the world.
Farting in a car with people you love is not even remotely the same thing as farting on a crowded elevator with strangers. Who amongst us has NOT unleashed the hounds in car full of friends or family? Hell, I even lock the windows down BEFORE detonation, then smile like a cat who ate the cannery.

 
Here in Minnesota last year they planned a protest at the Mall of America.. MOA warned them weeks in advance that if they do they will get arrested.. They protested anyways, got arrested and now are calling it "racism" for arresting them and are fighting it in court..

The problem, IMO, is that Minnesota empowered them a few weeks before that as marched onto a Freeway... Instead of trying to prevent them from entering the freeway, or arresting them, they shutdown the freeway to prevent people from driving on it until the protesters had reached their destination. :wall:
Shutting down the freeway.

There's a great story that Bill Walton likes to tell: back when he was at UCLA, he was a student protestor, and he and his buddies blocked Wilshire Boulevard (a major street) in order to protest the Vietnam War, which blocked traffic for miles. Walton was arrested, and his coach, John Wooden, picked him up from jail. As they were driving back, Wooden said, (in his typical mild voice), "Bill, I can appreciate you wanting to protest the war. But was this really the right way to go about it? Did you ever think about people that needed to get to work to feed their families, or people that had to get to the hospital, but were slowed down or stopped? What if there was an emergency?"

Walton confessed that he hadn't considered any of those things. He continued to protest the war, but never again took part in blocking traffic.
That anybody hasn't considered that is stunning to me, but I'm a property-loving guy, I guess.

#Ihatepublicfarts

 
BTW anyone who says or types the phrase "all lives matter" should be punted to the moon.
I understand their point, but I don't agree with it. All lives DO matter. It grates me that Martin O'Malley had to apologize to these nuts. He shouldn't have.

I would love to see Hillary have a "Sista Souljah" moment with these people, but I doubt she will.
The "all lives matter" shtick marginalizes and pushes aside the original, initial movement. It's not a movement about black supremacy, it's essentially saying that blacks have been left out, in a lot of respects, and argues for inclusion. To say "Well yes, everyone should be included" ignores that any exclusion ever took place in the first place.

That said, I think progressive movements fare a lot better when they work to find allies that might not necessarily belong to that group. Those two women didn't do BLM a whole lot of favors.
I agree that blacks have been left out, and inclusion is obviously a desired goal. But when your motto is "Black Lives Matter" and you shout down anyone who says "All lives matter" as racist or "just don't get it", I think you do a disservice to your own cause.
I don't really know anything about the BLM movement. I don't know their leaders, or know in great detail their positions. But saying "all lives matter" in response to "black lives matter" is stupid. Regardless of whether a person who says that is "objectively" racist, if I had a gun to my head and had to put the "all lives matter" speaker on a one-to-ten "racist" spectrum, I have an idea of where I'd place him.
I really disagree with you.

 
Tobias, I don't think it's idiotic to say that all lives matter.
I assume you've read this analogy. I assume you would agree the father in that analogy is being either an idiot or an ###hole. How is the "all lives matter" response any different than the father's response to his son there?

Sorry, but IMO if you don't understand that the word "too" is implicit in the slogan "black lives matter" you are absolutely an idiot. And if you understand it but respond with "all lives matter" anyway you're being an ###hole. Whether that ###holery is rooted in racism or not, I don't know.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Very glad to see this. Tim said it far better than I have been able to this past year. Since day one I have found the whole BLM movement to be racist and corrupt. Glad to see it exposed, and I think what we are seeing now is the beginning of the end. A lot of damage has been done, but hopefully we can pick up the pieces and deal with the real underlying issues at play here.
Future generations will view Tim's thread as the watershed moment for race relations in this country.
You're half right. I think thr BLM movement has been exposed recently and is on life support. History will not be kind to it either. It was largely responsible for setting race relations back about 25 years. Good riddance to it.
I bet you would have a hard time finding many black people who agreed with you.

If you mean "setting race relations back about 25 years from the perspective of white conservatives," maybe you are right. I don't really know.

Because from a white perspective, hey, race relations are great! White middle class folks are not really having to face the consequences of racism in this country. And yes, if BLM folks are shoving these consequences in white faces, I can see how those white folks might be made uncomfortable.

 
Very glad to see this. Tim said it far better than I have been able to this past year. Since day one I have found the whole BLM movement to be racist and corrupt. Glad to see it exposed, and I think what we are seeing now is the beginning of the end. A lot of damage has been done, but hopefully we can pick up the pieces and deal with the real underlying issues at play here.
Future generations will view Tim's thread as the watershed moment for race relations in this country.
You're half right. I think thr BLM movement has been exposed recently and is on life support. History will not be kind to it either. It was largely responsible for setting race relations back about 25 years. Good riddance to it.
You may be right but the current movement will be replaced by something similar the next time the cops shoot an unarmed black person.

 
Tobias, I don't think it's idiotic to say that all lives matter.
I assume you've read this analogy. I assume you would agree the father in that analogy is being either an idiot or an ###hole. How is the "all lives matter" response any different than the father's response to his son there?

Sorry, but IMO if you don't understand that the word "too" is implicit in the slogan "black lives matter" you are absolutely an idiot. And if you understand it but say it anyway you're being an ###hole. Whether that ###holery is rooted in racism or not, I don't know.
I've read the analogy. And quite frankly, I think if the movement was called "Black Lives Matter Too!" it would be far more acceptable.

The problem, I think, is the combination of booing people who say "All lives matter" and calling them racist, along with a lot of other radical rhetoric.

 
Here in Minnesota last year they planned a protest at the Mall of America.. MOA warned them weeks in advance that if they do they will get arrested.. They protested anyways, got arrested and now are calling it "racism" for arresting them and are fighting it in court..

The problem, IMO, is that Minnesota empowered them a few weeks before that as marched onto a Freeway... Instead of trying to prevent them from entering the freeway, or arresting them, they shutdown the freeway to prevent people from driving on it until the protesters had reached their destination. :wall:
Shutting down the freeway.There's a great story that Bill Walton likes to tell: back when he was at UCLA, he was a student protestor, and he and his buddies blocked Wilshire Boulevard (a major street) in order to protest the Vietnam War, which blocked traffic for miles. Walton was arrested, and his coach, John Wooden, picked him up from jail. As they were driving back, Wooden said, (in his typical mild voice), "Bill, I can appreciate you wanting to protest the war. But was this really the right way to go about it? Did you ever think about people that needed to get to work to feed their families, or people that had to get to the hospital, but were slowed down or stopped? What if there was an emergency?"

Walton confessed that he hadn't considered any of those things. He continued to protest the war, but never again took part in blocking traffic.
A enormous vegan like Walton must have been a great farter when healthy.

 
[insert group here] [insert verb here] demonstrates that the group really doesn't believe that it verbs

Painting any segment of the population with a broad brush does a disservice to all, not just the segment in question.

Oh, BTW... Cowboys fans SUCK! :IBTL:

 
I honestly don't believe that if Martin Luther King were alive he would be part of this movement. I think it's central tenet is in direct contradiction to his "I have a dream" speech, in which he invokes "All God's children."

 
BTW anyone who says or types the phrase "all lives matter" should be punted to the moon.
I understand their point, but I don't agree with it. All lives DO matter. It grates me that Martin O'Malley had to apologize to these nuts. He shouldn't have. I would love to see Hillary have a "Sista Souljah" moment with these people, but I doubt she will.
The "all lives matter" shtick marginalizes and pushes aside the original, initial movement. It's not a movement about black supremacy, it's essentially saying that blacks have been left out, in a lot of respects, and argues for inclusion. To say "Well yes, everyone should be included" ignores that any exclusion ever took place in the first place.

That said, I think progressive movements fare a lot better when they work to find allies that might not necessarily belong to that group. Those two women didn't do BLM a whole lot of favors.

</blockquote>

Black lives matter is an insult to other minorities that suffer from discrimination. All lives matter is a much better way to approach the problem since it encompasses everyone.</blockquote>Bingo. It's exclusive, dumb, and it's not even accurate. It presupposes that police kill black people because their lives don't matter. That notion is flat out false. Blacks this year account for 25% of all those killed by police. And we know from recent FBI arrest data that blacks account for 28% of all arrests by police, and the percentage of interactions with police is undoubtedly larger than that. Now as far as profiling goes - different story. Blacks are clearly unfairly profiled and that is a legitimate issue that needs to be dealt with. But BLM has focused on police brutality, and on that issue it is not unique to blacks. Which is why on that particular issue it is more correct to say "all lives matter".

 
Last edited:
BTW anyone who says or types the phrase "all lives matter" should be punted to the moon.
I understand their point, but I don't agree with it. All lives DO matter. It grates me that Martin O'Malley had to apologize to these nuts. He shouldn't have.

I would love to see Hillary have a "Sista Souljah" moment with these people, but I doubt she will.
The "all lives matter" shtick marginalizes and pushes aside the original, initial movement. It's not a movement about black supremacy, it's essentially saying that blacks have been left out, in a lot of respects, and argues for inclusion. To say "Well yes, everyone should be included" ignores that any exclusion ever took place in the first place.

That said, I think progressive movements fare a lot better when they work to find allies that might not necessarily belong to that group. Those two women didn't do BLM a whole lot of favors.
Black lives matter is an insult to other minorities that suffer from discrimination. All lives matter is a much better way to approach the problem since it encompasses everyone.
The levels and types of discrimination that people have been subjected to in the US (going back to the Irish, Poles, etc.) have differed. Koreans are not being killed in disproportionate numbers by the police the way blacks are.

 
Tobias, I don't think it's idiotic to say that all lives matter.
I assume you've read this analogy. I assume you would agree the father in that analogy is being either an idiot or an ###hole. How is the "all lives matter" response any different than the father's response to his son there?

Sorry, but IMO if you don't understand that the word "too" is implicit in the slogan "black lives matter" you are absolutely an idiot. And if you understand it but say it anyway you're being an ###hole. Whether that ###holery is rooted in racism or not, I don't know.
I've read the analogy. And quite frankly, I think if the movement was called "Black Lives Matter Too!" it would be far more acceptable.

The problem, I think, is the combination of booing people who say "All lives matter" and calling them racist, along with a lot of other radical rhetoric.
Quite frankly I don't think they have to go out of their way to cater to idiots too stupid to understand the implied "too" at the end of the slogan. Those are not the kind of people whose attention needs to be drawn to the cause. Those people need to focus on more basic things, like not stabbing themselves in the eye with their forks and not wandering out into traffic.

 
BTW anyone who says or types the phrase "all lives matter" should be punted to the moon.
I understand their point, but I don't agree with it. All lives DO matter. It grates me that Martin O'Malley had to apologize to these nuts. He shouldn't have.

I would love to see Hillary have a "Sista Souljah" moment with these people, but I doubt she will.
The "all lives matter" shtick marginalizes and pushes aside the original, initial movement. It's not a movement about black supremacy, it's essentially saying that blacks have been left out, in a lot of respects, and argues for inclusion. To say "Well yes, everyone should be included" ignores that any exclusion ever took place in the first place.

That said, I think progressive movements fare a lot better when they work to find allies that might not necessarily belong to that group. Those two women didn't do BLM a whole lot of favors.
Black lives matter is an insult to other minorities that suffer from discrimination. All lives matter is a much better way to approach the problem since it encompasses everyone.
The levels and types of discrimination that people have been subjected to in the US (going back to the Irish, Poles, etc.) have differed. Koreans are not being killed in disproportionate numbers by the police the way blacks are.
Nobody is scared of Koreans.

 
There is also a movement, among conservatives and pro-police types, called "Blue Lives Matter." Now this movement has been scorned by BLM people as ignorant and racist. And maybe the people behind it ARE ignorant and racist; I don't know.

But personally I believe that Blue Lives (meaning police) DO matter. Just as black lives matter. It doesn't have to be one or the other.

 
BTW anyone who says or types the phrase "all lives matter" should be punted to the moon.
I understand their point, but I don't agree with it. All lives DO matter. It grates me that Martin O'Malley had to apologize to these nuts. He shouldn't have.

I would love to see Hillary have a "Sista Souljah" moment with these people, but I doubt she will.
The "all lives matter" shtick marginalizes and pushes aside the original, initial movement. It's not a movement about black supremacy, it's essentially saying that blacks have been left out, in a lot of respects, and argues for inclusion. To say "Well yes, everyone should be included" ignores that any exclusion ever took place in the first place.

That said, I think progressive movements fare a lot better when they work to find allies that might not necessarily belong to that group. Those two women didn't do BLM a whole lot of favors.
Black lives matter is an insult to other minorities that suffer from discrimination. All lives matter is a much better way to approach the problem since it encompasses everyone.
The levels and types of discrimination that people have been subjected to in the US (going back to the Irish, Poles, etc.) have differed. Koreans are not being killed in disproportionate numbers by the police the way blacks are.
Nobody is scared of Koreans.
Disagree, my buddy is terrified of his MIL

 
BTW anyone who says or types the phrase "all lives matter" should be punted to the moon.
I understand their point, but I don't agree with it. All lives DO matter. It grates me that Martin O'Malley had to apologize to these nuts. He shouldn't have.

I would love to see Hillary have a "Sista Souljah" moment with these people, but I doubt she will.
The "all lives matter" shtick marginalizes and pushes aside the original, initial movement. It's not a movement about black supremacy, it's essentially saying that blacks have been left out, in a lot of respects, and argues for inclusion. To say "Well yes, everyone should be included" ignores that any exclusion ever took place in the first place.

That said, I think progressive movements fare a lot better when they work to find allies that might not necessarily belong to that group. Those two women didn't do BLM a whole lot of favors.
Black lives matter is an insult to other minorities that suffer from discrimination. All lives matter is a much better way to approach the problem since it encompasses everyone.
The levels and types of discrimination that people have been subjected to in the US (going back to the Irish, Poles, etc.) have differed. Koreans are not being killed in disproportionate numbers by the police the way blacks are.
Nobody is scared of Koreans.
Well not those nice, fun-loving South Koreans...

 
There is also a movement, among conservatives and pro-police types, called "Blue Lives Matter." Now this movement has been scorned by BLM people as ignorant and racist. And maybe the people behind it ARE ignorant and racist; I don't know.

But personally I believe that Blue Lives (meaning police) DO matter. Just as black lives matter. It doesn't have to be one or the other.
I tried. Tapping out now.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top