ETA - 5th of 12 in scoring, 11th of 12 in points against. 1-8 to show for it. Crazy. The team that is 12th in points against is 10th in points scored and is 5-4. Guess I need a better AD/scheduler.Mr. Know-It-All said:1-8 almost wrapped up. Played the #1 team, who had bye week issues at RB so he picked up Karlos Williams. My god this game is random. McCoy goes down, Williams goes off and his bye week play is his high scorer.
One simple tweak: Stop reading any websites or forums (except for injury reports) on Sunday morning.I shouldn't change lineups on Sunday morning for anything other than injury.
Grumble Grumble GrumbleGrumble Grumble Grumble
Charcandrick West and Martavis Bryant on my bench.
Grumble Grumble Grumble
What are you doing Starting Snead over Hurns at this point?? He was comiing into this week vs a weak Bal D and going for 7 straight tds. Snead is just a flex guy or bye filler come on bro. that's bad decision making, almost Like what the Lions would do I can't even feel sorry for you it wasn't like it was a toss up Hurns is light years ahead of Snead.Man goose egg from Snead in a game with sixty total points scored is tough to swallow. Left seventeen points from hurns on my bench, that was the difference in my loss. Was worried about his injury. What can ya do :-/
wow that is a tough one but I think I would have went with Cooper/Cooks which wasn't as bad but fitz in over cooper would be the play although I would have never thought that. Hard to bench cooks with the way Brees has been hitting him up last 3 weeksStarted Cooper and Diggs over Cooks and Fitzgerald.
I knew it was gonna be a tough choice and I was sure to make the wrong decision, but it just looks so freakin stupid right now.
FWIW, my FBG rankings had Hurns #21 @ 14.0 projection and Snead #23 @ 13.4 projection. I also put up the question in Assistant Coach and the other responses (only 2) also recommended to sit Hurns given the injury risk. Figured NO/WAS should be a shootout (it was) and Snead should be a safer play (he wasn't). Anyway, I wasn't the only one who thought it was at least closeT with T said:What are you doing Starting Snead over Hurns at this point?? He was comiing into this week vs a weak Bal D and going for 7 straight tds. Snead is just a flex guy or bye filler come on bro. that's bad decision making, almost Like what the Lions would do I can't even feel sorry for you it wasn't like it was a toss up Hurns is light years ahead of Snead.jawhoo said:Man goose egg from Snead in a game with sixty total points scored is tough to swallow. Left seventeen points from hurns on my bench, that was the difference in my loss. Was worried about his injury. What can ya do :-/
Closest I came was 8.5 high weeks in 2013. 8 outright high scores and one tie...out of a 13 game schedule. Strange year though because despite that I wound up 9-4, so any week I wasn't high score I lost.If I win this week, I will have won the league high points 5 out of 10 weeks. Thinking of each week as a ten-sided die, I think its pretty good to win half the rolls. Is it possible to win high points ALL weeks in a competitive league? Has anyone ever done this or got close to doing this?
I need 1 catch for 15 yards, im worried.....Hopkins' lowest total so far in my league this year was a 10. I need 9 out of him to win tonight. He has 0 at the half, and it's not even close to 1. I'm going to lose. Arggggghhhh!