RBM
Footballguy
You don't think the current Ravens have a ton of offensive talent do you? We just saw them pick on the best D in the league on the biggest stage. Really wondered if Flacco would still need defended after what he just did, yet I'm still surprised that I have to. I mean I'd rather have Rodgers but to lump him in with Newton is pretty disrespectful.Exactly. I feel the same way. Rodgers and Brees don't need grade A talent around them on offense to be successful. If I started with a Flacco or a Newton for example I would feel like I would have to invest early on offense to put them in a position to succeed. With Rodgers, I feel like I could focus on defense early if the board dictated that and still have one of the best offenses in the league.Yes, I was VERY happy.Very hard for me to choose Flacco over him, but the age and size were the deciding factors. I disagree with the 5 good yrs comment. I'd say more like 2-3 at his current level.I'm shocked that Drew Brees was available at 1.09 and taken after Flacco, Watt, and Newton. He's one of those quarterbacks that makes your team playoff bound even if your draft outside of the first round is only average compared to the rest of the teams. He just turned 34 so he still has a good 5 or so years left. Gandalas has to be thrilled.Now that I have a complete stud at the QB position, I can go wherever the draft takes me with my later picks.
Last edited by a moderator: