On the latest car dealership guy podcast, he's got the founder of Autonomy. The guy also founded Fare and True Car.
Anyway Autonomy provides EVs on a subscription basis. Sort of like a lease but it allows them to skirt all the leasing regulations. He also believes that eventually all cars will be subscriptions, and thinks the end of car ownership is in sight (and sounds like he genuinely believes that's a good thing).
The odd part is his goal in life as he stated many times is to help make driving a car more affordable.
Yet his approach to solving that problem, at least with Fare and Autonomy, is to try to keep "helping" people drive cars they can't afford.
I have absolutely no doubt he's going to make a whole bunch of money with car subscriptions. And there's absolutely no way it's going to be a good move for consumers financially.
Hmmm. I‘ve been stalling replacing my vehicle, hoping autonomous drivers make ownership obsolete. I guess subscriptions can serve as a bridge.
Why are you convinced it will be a bad financial decision?
ETA I‘ve never leased or financed a vehicle.
The companies will certainly pass on the costs of the depreciation, interest, and maintenance on to the customers.
Outside of very weird stuff (like cars appreciating for the first time in history), leasing/subscribing is generally a pretty expensive convenience.
For a wealthy person that could just pay cash for the car otherwise, but can afford to burn the money for convenience, fine. Great for the them.
But for the vast majority of people, it's a way to drive a car they can't afford, and plan on a lifetime of payments.
Really though, it's just that every time we come up with a slick new way for someone making $60,000 a year with no savings to drive an $80,000 car, it keeps working out poorly for the consumers for some odd reason.