Chris Brown (1 Viewer)

[Enraged Nerfball]

On what basis is your projection of Foster as a top 10 back different from projecting Brown lower than A. Smith and James Stewart. Neither Foster or Brown have played entire seasons as starting RB's, both have had injury issues, and Foster did not have superior college stats to Brown. So, I ask again, on what basis do you arrive at your projection, and why such a huge disparity.

A) It is widely accepted that Foster was going to win the Heisman before the SUV scandal that knocked him out of it...Chris Brown did not have a season that matched that year. B) I have seen both players run. In my opinion Foster is a superior runningback to Chris Brown...so superior, that in our hypothetical Foster would be worth much more than is Brown. So basically the huge disparity you are asking for is in talent...because obviously the hypothetical situation has all other variables the same. Although I doubt A. Smith would have been brought in as rapidly if they had a healthy Foster....thus lessening the likelihood of a RBBC...or as Fisher stated "split" in carries.Does that answer your question?

A) It is widely accepted that Foster was going to win the Heisman before the SUV scandal that knocked him out of it...Chris Brown did not have a season that matched that year. 

I have taken the "Heisman" year for Foster and taken Brown's last yr. as a player (as a Jr.) and crunched some numbers. I extrapolated for Foster based on his numbers for 8 games. As you said he missed three games that year Foster games carries yds ypc tdActual 8 216 1109 5.1 12Extrap. 11 297 1523 5.1 16Brown 11 303 1841 6.0 19Comments?

I have stated this over and over, but you can't compare YPCs from different systems...especially in college where schedule variance and system variance is so drastic.

This is the data I have been trying to get you to comment on. Fostergames carries yds ypc tdActual 8 216 1109 5.1 12Extrap. 11 297 1523 5.1 16Brown 11 303 1841 6.0 19It has been on several threads, including this one and most of the ones you have responded to. It has carries, yards, TD's and the now infamous YPC. In your response you only responded to YPC and I wanted to know why?

b) I don't care what he did in college

OK, but you introduced the comparison of college production with this response

A) It is widely accepted that Foster was going to win the Heisman before the SUV scandal that knocked him out of it...Chris Brown did not have a season that matched that year.

I simply responded to that statement with the data that clearly refutes it. Again, the data includes more than YPC if you just look at it.

 

[JohnnyU]

Because I watched his games.

Oh, that explains it. In that case, I admit you know more than me and most all other posters on this board about Brown's intangibles, because you watched him play. I'm embarrassed for you

 

[LHUCKS]

LHUCKS,Serious question: Where did you have Deuce McAllister ranked when you drafted in 2002?THanks,Colin

Deuce McCallister was a guy I glady passed on in the second round. I had him ranked higher than Brown though because he a) had more talent b) had much less competition than Brown. Nevertheless, McCallister never saw any of my teams that year.McCallister was the exception to the rule...ff is a game of odds. Sometimes you can beat the odds, but you better have some very conclusive evidence before you attempt to do so.It's funny you bring up McCallister, he is one of the case studies I'm using in my white paper as the exception to the rule.

 

[LHUCKS]

Because I watched his games.

Oh, that explains it. In that case, I admit you know more than me and most all other posters on this board about Brown's intangibles, because you watched him play. I'm embarrassed for you

a) "most all other posters" ...how do you know that? This thread is filled with enraged Brown owners, not "most all other posters"b) I'm "embarrased" for you as well since you took Brown too early. I hope you play with goldfish and not sharks.I hope you're around in four months when I bump this thread.

 

[Colin Dowling]

I'm still wondering what LHUCKS thought of Deuce McAllister pre-season 2002. Here's a guy who had talent, but clearly had injury concerns. He was "competing" with Lamar Smith and Ki-Jana Carter. (Its worth mentioning that Lamar Smith was a similarly useless runner as A-Smith, but was younger and brought in for the exact same reason - to offer the Saints som insurance if Deuce fell apart).Oh yeah, Deuce had fewer carries than Brown. THat year, many FF players saw opportunity + ability = FF production. I don't think Brown will be as good as Deuce, but the situation is almost EXACTLY the same.And no, you can't answer with "I saw Deuce play in college and he had vision!" because by your own admission, college doesn't matter. Am I right to conclude that you had McAllister in the low-30s of your 2002 RB rankings?TIA,Colin

 

[LHUCKS]

Deuce McCallister was a guy I glady passed on in the second round. I had him ranked higher than Brown though because he b) had much less competition than Brown.

Less competition? Did NO have Ricky Williams on their team before Deuce McAllister? Ricky didn't get traded until Deuce's 2nd yr.

I thought we were talking about the second year?

 

[JohnnyU]

Deuce McCallister was a guy I glady passed on in the second round.  I had him ranked higher than Brown though because he b) had much less competition than Brown.

Less competition? Did NO have Ricky Williams on their team before Deuce McAllister? Ricky didn't get traded until Deuce's 2nd yr.

I thought we were talking about the second year?

Oh, sorry about that, my bad.

 

[LHUCKS]

Deuce McCallister was a guy I glady passed on in the second round. I had him ranked higher than Brown though because he b) had much less competition than Brown.

Less competition? Did NO have Ricky Williams on their team before Deuce McAllister? Ricky didn't get traded until Deuce's 2nd yr.

Nice try...2002 was his second year.Let me know when you're done ATTEMPTING to undermine my authority.

 

[JohnnyU]

Deuce McCallister was a guy I glady passed on in the second round.  I had him ranked higher than Brown though because he b) had much less competition than Brown.

Less competition? Did NO have Ricky Williams on their team before Deuce McAllister? Ricky didn't get traded until Deuce's 2nd yr.

Nice try...2002 was his second year.Let me know when you're done ATTEMPTING to undermine my authority.

I said I was sorry and I misunderstood your post. I thought you were talking about drafting him as a rookie.

 

[Colin Dowling]

Deuce McCallister was a guy I glady passed on in the second round.  I had him ranked higher than Brown though because he b) had much less competition than Brown.

Less competition? Did NO have Ricky Williams on their team before Deuce McAllister? Ricky didn't get traded until Deuce's 2nd yr.

Nice try...2002 was his second year.Let me know when you're done ATTEMPTING to undermine my authority.

Let me know when you're done flip-flopping.How did you know Deuce had more talent than Brown when you don't consider college running in your analysis? Deuce had 15 carear carries before 2002.... How did you know he had more talent?Colin

 

[LHUCKS]

I'm still wondering what LHUCKS thought of Deuce McAllister pre-season 2002. Here's a guy who had talent, but clearly had injury concerns. He was "competing" with Lamar Smith and Ki-Jana Carter. (Its worth mentioning that Lamar Smith was a similarly useless runner as A-Smith, but was younger and brought in for the exact same reason - to offer the Saints som insurance if Deuce fell apart).Oh yeah, Deuce had fewer carries than Brown. THat year, many FF players saw opportunity + ability = FF production. I don't think Brown will be as good as Deuce, but the situation is almost EXACTLY the same.And no, you can't answer with "I saw Deuce play in college and he had vision!" because by your own admission, college doesn't matter. Am I right to conclude that you had McAllister in the low-30s of your 2002 RB rankings?TIA,Colin

Fair question Colin,I had McCallister ranked in the low 20's if my memory serves me correctly because I wasn't convinced he could play an entire season and that holds a lot of water in my rankings. Needless to say Deuce wasn't on any of my teams that year.Are you comparing Deuce to Brown? I think it's pretty clear Brown isn't Deuce.It's ok to pass on players, where you put yourself out of contention is when you bust on players in the early rounds.

 

[Enraged Nerfball]

I can't help myself. I am like a bug to a bug light SOMEBODY STOP ME!!

 

[Peens]

I'm still wondering what LHUCKS thought of Deuce McAllister pre-season 2002. Here's a guy who had talent, but clearly had injury concerns. He was "competing" with Lamar Smith and Ki-Jana Carter. (Its worth mentioning that Lamar Smith was a similarly useless runner as A-Smith, but was younger and brought in for the exact same reason - to offer the Saints som insurance if Deuce fell apart).Oh yeah, Deuce had fewer carries than Brown. THat year, many FF players saw opportunity + ability = FF production. I don't think Brown will be as good as Deuce, but the situation is almost EXACTLY the same.And no, you can't answer with "I saw Deuce play in college and he had vision!" because by your own admission, college doesn't matter. Am I right to conclude that you had McAllister in the low-30s of your 2002 RB rankings?TIA,Colin

Their are owners out there like LHUCKS who dont like to draft someone until they are "Proven". Unfortunately in the bussiness of Fantasy Football You Snooze, You lose alot of the times. I like Browns chances for success this year because He will most likely get 20+ carries a game and his competition is Old man/always out of shape Ant.Smith.

 

[JohnnyU]

Because I watched his games. 

Oh, that explains it. In that case, I admit you know more than me and most all other posters on this board about Brown's intangibles, because you watched him play. I'm embarrassed for you

a) "most all other posters" ...how do you know that? This thread is filled with enraged Brown owners, not "most all other posters"b) I'm "embarrased" for you as well since you took Brown too early. I hope you play with goldfish and not sharks.I hope you're around in four months when I bump this thread.

Oh, I play with plenty of sharks from this board and got my clocked cleaned in 2 leagues last year and did very well in 3. Your arguments against Chris Brown are full of emotion. Your statement "He lacks intangibles" because "I saw him play", is as close to guessing a person's intangibles as anyone else's. I doubt you are any more of an expert at determining a player's intangibles by watching him play than the next guy on this board. Your no more special than me or anyone else who post here.

 

[JohnnyU]

I'm still wondering what LHUCKS thought of Deuce McAllister pre-season 2002. Here's a guy who had talent, but clearly had injury concerns. He was "competing" with Lamar Smith and Ki-Jana Carter. (Its worth mentioning that Lamar Smith was a similarly useless runner as A-Smith, but was younger and brought in for the exact same reason - to offer the Saints som insurance if Deuce fell apart).Oh yeah, Deuce had fewer carries than Brown. THat year, many FF players saw opportunity + ability = FF production. I don't think Brown will be as good as Deuce, but the situation is almost EXACTLY the same.And no, you can't answer with "I saw Deuce play in college and he had vision!" because by your own admission, college doesn't matter. Am I right to conclude that you had McAllister in the low-30s of your 2002 RB rankings?TIA,Colin

Their are owners out there like LHUCKS who dont like to draft someone until they are "Proven". Unfortunately in the bussiness of Fantasy Football You Snooze, You lose alot of the times. I like Browns chances for success this year because He will most likely get 20+ carries a game and his competition is Old man/always out of shape Ant.Smith.

Pino, I agree with you, but that is too easy for some on this board. They have to dig deeper to justify their emotions.

 

[LHUCKS]

Deuce McCallister was a guy I glady passed on in the second round. I had him ranked higher than Brown though because he b) had much less competition than Brown.

Less competition? Did NO have Ricky Williams on their team before Deuce McAllister? Ricky didn't get traded until Deuce's 2nd yr.

Nice try...2002 was his second year.Let me know when you're done ATTEMPTING to undermine my authority.

Let me know when you're done flip-flopping.How did you know Deuce had more talent than Brown when you don't consider college running in your analysis? Deuce had 15 carear carries before 2002.... How did you know he had more talent?Colin

"Flip Flopping"??? on what?I didn't "know" that McCallister had more talent than Brown. Nobody could know.My qualitative analysis of McCallister's situation led me to believe that McCallister had relatively more talent than does Brown:a) the Saints would not have let Ricky go if they didn't think Deuce could handle it...and please don't compare old man Eddie to Rickyb) #23 overall pick in the NFL Draftl...Brown got nowhere near the praise by Scouts that Deuce gotAdditionally, the Saints didn't rush to get a 1000 yard rusher signed like the Titans did. Nothing about the Saints situation said RBBC. Everything about the Titans in '04 says RBBC.

 

[Colin Dowling]

Additionally, the Saints didn't rush to get a 1000 yard rusher signed like the Titans did. Nothing about the Saints situation said RBBC. Everything about the Titans in '04 says RBBC.

EVERYTHING about the Saints situation said RBBC, if you compare it to the Titans. They signed Lamar Smith. They had Ki-Jana at the top of the depth chart during camp, etc.

"Flip Flopping"??? on what?I didn't "know" that McCallister had more talent than Brown. Nobody could know.

So you use draft-position and draft scouting reports for your analysis but personally ignore college production that you saw with your own eyes? This is getting mundane, but it is at least worth noting that you admit that you completely missed the boat on Deuce McAllister, when it was a pretty big boat and it was clear to most people that it was about to leave harbor.Colin

 

[Enraged Nerfball]

Additionally, the Saints didn't rush to get a 1000 yard rusher signed like the Titans did. Nothing about the Saints situation said RBBC. Everything about the Titans in '04 says RBBC.

EVERYTHING about the Saints situation said RBBC, if you compare it to the Titans. They signed Lamar Smith. They had Ki-Jana at the top of the depth chart during camp, etc.

"Flip Flopping"??? on what?I didn't "know" that McCallister had more talent than Brown. Nobody could know.

So you use draft-position and draft scouting reports for your analysis but personally ignore college production that you saw with your own eyes? This is getting mundane, but it is at least worth noting that you admit that you completely missed the boat on Deuce McAllister, when it was a pretty big boat and it was clear to most people that it was about to leave harbor.Colin

This is getting mundane

Oh,we are wayyyy past mundane.

 

[LHUCKS]

Additionally, the Saints didn't rush to get a 1000 yard rusher signed like the Titans did. Nothing about the Saints situation said RBBC. Everything about the Titans in '04 says RBBC.

EVERYTHING about the Saints situation said RBBC, if you compare it to the Titans. They signed Lamar Smith. They had Ki-Jana at the top of the depth chart during camp, etc.

"Flip Flopping"??? on what?I didn't "know" that McCallister had more talent than Brown. Nobody could know.

So you use draft-position and draft scouting reports for your analysis but personally ignore college production that you saw with your own eyes? This is getting mundane, but it is at least worth noting that you admit that you completely missed the boat on Deuce McAllister, when it was a pretty big boat and it was clear to most people that it was about to leave harbor.Colin

Like I said, I had Deuce Ranked in the 20's which I knew was high enough to prevent him from being on any of my squads that year.Although, I may have "missed the boat" on Deuce what you are forgetting is I still drafted somebody else. It's ok to "miss the boat" on one player...what is important is that you make good picks, all of your picks don't have to be blockbusters to win a league. This is one of the major principles of my draft philosophy. All of the Brown owners can question it all they want...my philosophy is proven against experts and I'm confident it will be proven again this year. I'm in numerous leagues around here so my teams wont be hard to track.a) No Mercyb) SOS IIc) FBG Survivor II(Dodds is going down)d) MBSLe) SSLf) EBF InvitationalI back up my philosophy with results. If you don't respect that it's your perogative.I'm not bragging, I'm just providing data to support my philosophy is proven and will be proven again this year.

 

[Colin Dowling]

I back up my philosophy with results. If you don't respect that it's your perogative.

We're finally in agreement on something.COlin

 

[LHUCKS]

I back up my philosophy with results. If you don't respect that it's your perogative.

We're finally in agreement on something.COlin

Would that be my ranking of your MB/Staff squad?

 

[Furps]

Although, I may have "missed the boat" on Deuce what you are forgetting is I still drafted somebody else.

 

[Colin Dowling]

I back up my philosophy with results. If you don't respect that it's your perogative.

We're finally in agreement on something.COlin

Would that be my ranking of your MB/Staff squad?

No. It would be the fact that I don't respect your philosophy. Colin

 

[LHUCKS]

I back up my philosophy with results. If you don't respect that it's your perogative.

We're finally in agreement on something.COlin

Would that be my ranking of your MB/Staff squad?

No. It would be the fact that I don't respect your philosophy. Colin

The day will come Herd...mark my words.

 

[LHUCKS]

I'm still wondering what LHUCKS thought of Deuce McAllister pre-season 2002. Here's a guy who had talent, but clearly had injury concerns. He was "competing" with Lamar Smith and Ki-Jana Carter. (Its worth mentioning that Lamar Smith was a similarly useless runner as A-Smith, but was younger and brought in for the exact same reason - to offer the Saints som insurance if Deuce fell apart).Oh yeah, Deuce had fewer carries than Brown. THat year, many FF players saw opportunity + ability = FF production. I don't think Brown will be as good as Deuce, but the situation is almost EXACTLY the same.And no, you can't answer with "I saw Deuce play in college and he had vision!" because by your own admission, college doesn't matter. Am I right to conclude that you had McAllister in the low-30s of your 2002 RB rankings?TIA,Colin

Their are owners out there like LHUCKS who dont like to draft someone until they are "Proven". Unfortunately in the bussiness of Fantasy Football You Snooze, You lose alot of the times. I like Browns chances for success this year because He will most likely get 20+ carries a game and his competition is Old man/always out of shape Ant.Smith.

Pino, I agree with you, but that is too easy for some on this board. They have to dig deeper to justify their emotions.

When you're ready to discuss fantasy football let me know. Enough of the childish it just makes you look ridiculous.

 

[-OZ-]

Because I watched his games. 

Oh, that explains it. In that case, I admit you know more than me and most all other posters on this board about Brown's intangibles, because you watched him play. I'm embarrassed for you

a) "most all other posters" ...how do you know that? This thread is filled with enraged Brown owners, not "most all other posters"b) I'm "embarrased" for you as well since you took Brown too early. I hope you play with goldfish and not sharks.I hope you're around in four months when I bump this thread.

Oh, I play with plenty of sharks from this board and got my clocked cleaned in 2 leagues last year and did very well in 3. Your arguments against Chris Brown are full of emotion. Your statement "He lacks intangibles" because "I saw him play", is as close to guessing a person's intangibles as anyone else's. I doubt you are any more of an expert at determining a player's intangibles by watching him play than the next guy on this board. Your no more special than me or anyone else who post here.

I'll readily admit to not being a professional scout, or much better than average at judging the intangibles, so I might be wrong here, but I don't think Brown has the ability to be special. He can be productive, a decent RB2 at best, but not the next Deuce / Alexander / nameyourRBwhowaitiedayearbehindastudandbecameastud. You either have to love this time of year for speculation and boasting or hate the waiting. :clockticking:Hey guys - can we get a smiley of a guy looking at his watch impatiently?

 

[JohnnyU]

I'm still wondering what LHUCKS thought of Deuce McAllister pre-season 2002.  Here's a guy who had talent, but clearly had injury concerns.  He was "competing" with Lamar Smith and Ki-Jana Carter.  (Its worth mentioning that Lamar Smith was a similarly useless runner as A-Smith, but was younger and brought in for the exact same reason - to offer the Saints som insurance if Deuce fell apart).Oh yeah, Deuce had fewer carries than Brown. THat year, many FF players saw opportunity + ability = FF production.  I don't think Brown will be as good as Deuce, but the situation is almost EXACTLY the same.And no, you can't answer with "I saw Deuce play in college and he had vision!" because by your own admission, college doesn't matter.  Am I right to conclude that you had McAllister in the low-30s of your 2002 RB rankings?TIA,Colin

Their are owners out there like LHUCKS who dont like to draft someone until they are "Proven". Unfortunately in the bussiness of Fantasy Football You Snooze, You lose alot of the times. I like Browns chances for success this year because He will most likely get 20+ carries a game and his competition is Old man/always out of shape Ant.Smith.

Pino, I agree with you, but that is too easy for some on this board. They have to dig deeper to justify their emotions.

When you're ready to discuss fantasy football let me know. Enough of the childish it just makes you look ridiculous.

Discussing Chris Brown with you is useless. Let's just agree to disagree. I'm smart enough to know that I can't get you to change your mind about Brown, so I won't try. I know when I'm confronted with someone who likes to argue for arguments sake. Those are worthless conversations. Good luck this year with your teams.Oh, by the way, I'll bet you are the one who has looked ridiculous with this thread. I think it has already been mentioned by several posters.

 

[LHUCKS]

I'm still wondering what LHUCKS thought of Deuce McAllister pre-season 2002. Here's a guy who had talent, but clearly had injury concerns. He was "competing" with Lamar Smith and Ki-Jana Carter. (Its worth mentioning that Lamar Smith was a similarly useless runner as A-Smith, but was younger and brought in for the exact same reason - to offer the Saints som insurance if Deuce fell apart).Oh yeah, Deuce had fewer carries than Brown. THat year, many FF players saw opportunity + ability = FF production. I don't think Brown will be as good as Deuce, but the situation is almost EXACTLY the same.And no, you can't answer with "I saw Deuce play in college and he had vision!" because by your own admission, college doesn't matter. Am I right to conclude that you had McAllister in the low-30s of your 2002 RB rankings?TIA,Colin

Their are owners out there like LHUCKS who dont like to draft someone until they are "Proven". Unfortunately in the bussiness of Fantasy Football You Snooze, You lose alot of the times. I like Browns chances for success this year because He will most likely get 20+ carries a game and his competition is Old man/always out of shape Ant.Smith.

Pino, I agree with you, but that is too easy for some on this board. They have to dig deeper to justify their emotions.

When you're ready to discuss fantasy football let me know. Enough of the childish it just makes you look ridiculous.

Discussing Chris Brown with you is useless. Let's just agree to disagree. I'm smart enough to know that I can't get you to change your mind about Brown, so I won't try. I know when I'm confronted with someone who likes to argue for arguments sake. Those are worthless conversations. Good luck this year with your teams.Oh, by the way, I'll bet you are the one who has looked ridiculous with this thread. I think it has already been mentioned by several posters.

To each his own.

 

[JohnnyU]

Because I watched his games. 

Oh, that explains it. In that case, I admit you know more than me and most all other posters on this board about Brown's intangibles, because you watched him play. I'm embarrassed for you

a) "most all other posters" ...how do you know that? This thread is filled with enraged Brown owners, not "most all other posters"b) I'm "embarrased" for you as well since you took Brown too early. I hope you play with goldfish and not sharks.I hope you're around in four months when I bump this thread.

Oh, I play with plenty of sharks from this board and got my clocked cleaned in 2 leagues last year and did very well in 3. Your arguments against Chris Brown are full of emotion. Your statement "He lacks intangibles" because "I saw him play", is as close to guessing a person's intangibles as anyone else's. I doubt you are any more of an expert at determining a player's intangibles by watching him play than the next guy on this board. Your no more special than me or anyone else who post here.

I'll readily admit to not being a professional scout, or much better than average at judging the intangibles, so I might be wrong here, but I don't think Brown has the ability to be special. He can be productive, a decent RB2 at best, but not the next Deuce / Alexander / nameyourRBwhowaitiedayearbehindastudandbecameastud. You either have to love this time of year for speculation and boasting or hate the waiting. :clockticking:Hey guys - can we get a smiley of a guy looking at his watch impatiently?

Hawk, I agree with you. I don't think Brown will be as good as McAllister/Portis, and I do think he will be a servicable RB #2. I hope he does turn out to be as good as those two however. Unlike the other poster, I don't know how good he will be, but I have a good feeling about him, that if he stays healthy, he could do very well.

 

[JohnnyU]

I'm still wondering what LHUCKS thought of Deuce McAllister pre-season 2002.  Here's a guy who had talent, but clearly had injury concerns.  He was "competing" with Lamar Smith and Ki-Jana Carter.  (Its worth mentioning that Lamar Smith was a similarly useless runner as A-Smith, but was younger and brought in for the exact same reason - to offer the Saints som insurance if Deuce fell apart).Oh yeah, Deuce had fewer carries than Brown. THat year, many FF players saw opportunity + ability = FF production.  I don't think Brown will be as good as Deuce, but the situation is almost EXACTLY the same.And no, you can't answer with "I saw Deuce play in college and he had vision!" because by your own admission, college doesn't matter.  Am I right to conclude that you had McAllister in the low-30s of your 2002 RB rankings?TIA,Colin

Their are owners out there like LHUCKS who dont like to draft someone until they are "Proven". Unfortunately in the bussiness of Fantasy Football You Snooze, You lose alot of the times. I like Browns chances for success this year because He will most likely get 20+ carries a game and his competition is Old man/always out of shape Ant.Smith.

Pino, I agree with you, but that is too easy for some on this board. They have to dig deeper to justify their emotions.

When you're ready to discuss fantasy football let me know. Enough of the childish it just makes you look ridiculous.

Discussing Chris Brown with you is useless. Let's just agree to disagree. I'm smart enough to know that I can't get you to change your mind about Brown, so I won't try. I know when I'm confronted with someone who likes to argue for arguments sake. Those are worthless conversations. Good luck this year with your teams.Oh, by the way, I'll bet you are the one who has looked ridiculous with this thread. I think it has already been mentioned by several posters.

To each his own.

Yes, you are right this time.

 

[nightshift]

''Eddie did not ask to be released. He said that if you are going to release me, release me sooner rather than later,'' Schaffer said. ''The Titans weren't changing their position, so they released him and we all moved on.'' Sure sounds to me like he didn't want to leave . . .

Yeah, he wanted his $4.25 million. LOL.

FYI....ESPN Radio reports the incentives included in RB Eddie George's one-year contract could make the deal worth $3 million. The deal includes a $660,000 base salary, a $1.54 million signing bonus, and additional "reachable" incentives that total around $1 million. You talkin' about Respect? Respect my checkin' account, sucka!

 

[INTERGALACTIC SUPERSTAR]

Missed the game last night. How did the Brown kid look?TIA

 

[Phlash]

I wasn't impressed. He only rushed for 90 yards in the first half, down from his 100 in one half in Miami

 

[Mungo Burrows]

They pulled him at the end of the game, and put Antowain Smith in. I think that means Fisher doesn't trust him so his starting job might be in jeopardy. Consider yourself warned.

 

[Peens]

LHUCKS must love when people bump this thread up.

 

[Yah_Shoor_Yoobetchya]

LHUCKS must love when people bump this thread up.

I wonder how that Brown stuff tastes for LHUCKS. :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao:

 

[ScoobyDoo]

He runs way WAY TOO HIGH!!!!!!!! :rotflmao:

 

[LHUCKS]

Bump

 

[Kovax]

Bump

I read through this thread earlier this year. I also drafted Brown in the 3rd round. I'm a happy man.

 

[shadyridr]

If he didn't get those 2 big runs in the 1st 5 minutes of the game he would have had a horrible game.

 

[omally]

If he didn't get those 2 big runs in the 1st 5 minutes of the game he would have had a horrible game.

That is true for many great rb's and you want them to get the breakaway runs. Tiki and Alexander both had a couple great long runs too this past weekend. I don't think the coaches will complain about that.

 

[switz]

If he didn't get those 2 big runs in the 1st 5 minutes of the game he would have had a horrible game.

LOL!!!! :rotflmao: I'm so glad in my league we always subtract the best runs, ya know because that's how they do it in the NFL, it's more realistic that way.Sorry, Brown was getting 5-6 yards a pop, he would not have had a "horrible game", it would have been 25-82, not stellar, but far from "horrible"You must have missed out on drafting him, or your an alias for LHucks

 

[shadyridr]

Seriously guys. I was being sarcastic. I guess next time I'll hit you over the head with my sarcasm and stick at the end but I was trying to be subtle and funny. BTW I am a Chris Brown owner.

 

[switz]

Seriously guys. I was being sarcastic. I guess next time I'll hit you over the head with my sarcasm and stick at the end but I was trying to be subtle and funny. BTW I am a Chris Brown owner.

sorry, missed the sarcasm. Love bumping this thread for LHucks though... he dished out alot on me for taking Brown as my #1 RB... in the third round

 

[Waddy]

Fourth round pick baby!If it wasn't for him and Dunn I would be in Barlow First Rounders Anonymous right now.

 

[ScoobyDoo]

Fourth round pick baby!If it wasn't for him and Dunn I would be in Barlow First Rounders Anonymous right now.

:rotflmao:

 

[Pick]

LSUCKS = the new TommyGunz

 

[Marc Levin]

Don't forget - the season isn't over - his "cancer" will still at some point infect the entire locker room and that will make the team stop playing for him - right now they are just setting him up for a bigger fall.

 

[JohnnyU]

Don't forget - the season isn't over - his "cancer" will still at some point infect the entire locker room and that will make the team stop playing for him - right now they are just setting him up for a bigger fall.

excuse me? I certainly don't feel like reading all those posts from several months ago (again), but why would you call Brown a "Cancer". I've not heard anything negative about his character.

 

[ScoobyDoo]

excuse me? I certainly don't feel like reading all those posts from several months ago (again), but why would you call Brown a "Cancer". I've not heard anything negative about his character.

He's being sarcastic. Somebody made that part of their anti-Brown mantra in the pre-season. May have been LHUCKS himself.