Perrion Winfrey was THIS GUYS target for months. He wanted us to take him in the 2nd round.steve smiff sr was GUSHING about perrion winfrey on NFL network
good call.I think those wanting a trade-up are going to be disappointed though.
I really like him too.love the David Bell pick.
great hands. this kid's going to be a chain mover.
lol, i pulled up his highlight video.I really like him too.
More on Winfrey.
Austin Gayle@PFF_AustinGayle
Favorite Day 3 picks (1/2):
- No. 104 DI Perrion Winfrey, Browns
i'm not finding much on this with a google search. do you have any additional information?Bracie Smathers said:Winfrey has red flags.
Some do not like him, others do.
We got him with the 108th pick so he is considered a value on every board I've checked. The 'lowest' ranking I've found is 88, twenty spots higher than where we got him.
---------------------------------------------------
Browns: This is a franchise that’s unafraid to gamble on character risks, as we know. That trend continued with the selection of Oklahoma defensive tackle Perrion Winfrey 108th overall. Talent-wise, he is quite a value. Winfrey finished with 17 tackles for loss with the Sooners. As the scouts told Bob McGinn, though, there are red flags. “He has talent but he’s an absolute disaster off the field,” one said. “I don’t know if I trust him to really draft him.” I get the need to gamble on such prospects. You don’t win a Super Bowl with an ensemble of choir boys. Organizationally, it’s pretty clear that Cleveland is prepared to take these risks. Play with fire and you may win a Super Bowl or, like Jerry Jones has the last 26 years, you may only get burnt.
Wasn't expecting this.
----------------------------------
NFL Odds
NFL - AFC Division North - Winner (reg. season)
Pittsburgh Steelers+900
Cincinnati Bengals+210
Baltimore Ravens+210
Cleveland Browns+180
Odds look fine to me. Steelers as pretty much no chance, and the other 3 teams all about the same. Browns *slightly* better because of the QB acquisition, but still not favored against the field.Wasn't expecting this.
----------------------------------
NFL Odds
NFL - AFC Division North - Winner (reg. season)
Pittsburgh Steelers+900
Cincinnati Bengals+210
Baltimore Ravens+210
Cleveland Browns+180
Check out the projected win total.why not?
No trial till April 2023.until watson is suspended, he's playing 17+ for me. ..his suspension (if any) will come in the 2023 season.
Me too, but while it may be Mayfield contract related I'm a little side eyed about not adding anything else of consequence to the WR room. I expect more bodies to be added on the DL and think that should take priority to WR, but DPJ/Bell/Schwartz strikes me as a developmental goal for 2023; not the plan to compliment Cooper in 2022. And it would not surprise me to eventually see Weston beat out Schwartz.love the David Bell pick.
great hands. this kid's going to be a chain mover.
top tier QBs are supposed to make what you have better. isn’t that why they paid Watson the most NFL money ever?Me too, but while it may be Mayfield contract related I'm a little side eyed about not adding anything else of consequence to the WR room. I expect more bodies to be added on the DL and think that should take priority to WR, but DPJ/Bell/Schwartz strikes me as a developmental goal for 2023; not the plan to compliment Cooper in 2022. And it would not surprise me to eventually see Weston beat out Schwartz.
Yes, which is why I think it's a good goal for 2023. Week 1 2022 though...amnesiac said:top tier QBs are supposed to make what you have better. isn’t that why they paid Watson the most NFL money ever?
you’re not wrong, but I’m not convinced they are going to add anything more than a cheap, uninspiring veteran.Yes, which is why I think it's a good goal for 2023. Week 1 2022 though...
I think if they are then it's contingent on moving x% of Baker's salary.you’re not wrong, but I’m not convinced they are going to add anything more than a cheap, uninspiring veteran.
I heard that some dreams do come trueHad a dream where Baker was traded this Thursday, 5/12. No details. Posting here for a laugh.
the fact that he wasn’t traded during the draft likely means Mayfield won’t be moved for several more weeks as teams stare each other down and wait for circumstances to change, but then again, you never know.Had a dream where Baker was traded this Thursday, 5/12. No details. Posting here for a laugh.
Agreed, I'll be shocked if there's a move before at least a week after camp opens. I think it's (probably) fool hardy of teams with worse QB rooms, but not knowing the Browns actual asking price...maybe they are right to play chicken. They're losing install time though.the fact that he wasn’t traded during the draft likely means Mayfield won’t be moved for several more weeks as teams stare each other down and wait for circumstances to change, but then again, you never know.
i hope your dream proves true.
i don’t even gamble, but if you assume Watson plays that’s tempting.Right now currently -4.5
That is interesting....Watson has also secured a field there to continue offseason workouts.
Huh, another predictive index that is interesting.NFL Odds
NFL - AFC Division North - Winner (reg. season)
Pittsburgh Steelers+900
Cincinnati Bengals+210
Baltimore Ravens+210
Cleveland Browns+180
Clowney. Woohoo
Before Clowney was re-signed our EDGE was ranked 15th in the league.Priority is Clowney. He's a perfect fit, knows system/defense and 'played well/was productive'. The defense does things when he's in that can't be done by others. He's 'scary-good' setting the edge AND can deliver consistent pass rush.
Going for the all century - DNP team? Not sure, what you define as cheap but seems extremely unlikely considering the potential window (more of a peephole) the Cardinals are facing with Murray still on the roster, etc.Things are slow right now... Is there any way to acquire DeAndre Hopkins cheap, given his status?
Viska is the one I've been quietly hoping for.Going for the all century - DNP team? Not sure, what you define as cheap but seems extremely unlikely considering the potential window (more of a peephole) the Cardinals are facing with Murray still on the roster, etc.
It seems like you would be better served getting a guy who has underperformed like Laviska Shenault, Denzel Mims or even bargain shopping for a Brandin Cooks?
Dude is a stud and who knows about Mims, but I assume someone with the raw talent he has would thrive with Watson getting him the ball?Viska is the one I've been quietly hoping for.
Went to CU and always liked LaViska and would love to have him but now that Clowney is back, DT is priority #1 IMHO.Viska
From a spending perspective, agreed - if there's anything available before the Baker contract is behind us it's DT. A Ronnie Harrison esque trade for Viska doesn't impede that though.Went to CU and always liked LaViska and would love to have him but now that Clowney is back, DT is priority #1 IMHO.
I'd like to see what Watson can do with the WRs.
I like Bell, not sure we have much after Amari but I like Bell and I'd like to see what Watson can do with DPJ and Schwartz and the kid from Chicago.
IMHO, adding a three-down veteran DT would be the first thing I put on AB's to-do list, then???
Hmmnn.4 batted balls
Percentage of passes batted is probably a better stat. Baker had to be leading that oneHmmnn.
I would not have guessed these three QBs lead the league in passes batted down at the LOS last year.
----------------------
Aaron Schatz @FO_ASchatz
Here's a fun stat. Do you want to see who led the NFL in passes batted at the line last year? Josh Allen (6-5), Justin Herbert (6-6) and Ben Roethlisberger (6-5), in that order. Passes batted down have nothing to do with QB height.
I'll be surprised if the team can't easily get out of it after year 2 if the perpetual tease routine continues. This will lower his cap number for this year to maximize our roll over into next year.Not understanding how Njoku should be paid as a top 5 TE when he has not even given top 20 TE production over the last 5 years. I get wanting to keep your players but he took the team for a ride on this one.
Not sure its a statement on Chief's upside as a top-TE. I think its more of a statement that we aren't going to pay for a #2 WR in free agency.Not understanding how Njoku should be paid as a top 5 TE when he has not even given top 20 TE production over the last 5 years. I get wanting to keep your players but he took the team for a ride on this one.