What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Geno Smith Punched By Teammate out 6-10wks (1 Viewer)

mikmak8902 said:
I absolutely am not defending it and you show me one sentence I typed here that says I am. You just seem hell bent on making it look like I am.

You do realize you just quoted me saying "Not saying it's right in all scenarios" to correctly state it's "seldom right in any scenario". OK ... so that was important to get our percentages correct. Got it.

I think he's an idiot for punching Smith. I believe I just said that in the post you just replied to telling me I'm defending him. I also think Smith is an idiot for allowing this to escalate to this point and by the sounds of it, he helped it along by acting in an aggressive manner with this guy.

Listen, if you want to debate with me that's fine but don't lecture me about right and wrong while you're twisting my words to create an argument that simply isn't there.
I appreciate the clarification that you were not defending the linebacker and I recognize that you have called him an idiot several times in this thread. However what you intend and what you are saying don't always align in a web forum format.

When you say things like what I quoted below (and excuse me for pulling snippets and not the whole posts but that would just make this far too long, I don't believe that I removed any important context) it comes off as victim blaming and that doesn't sit very well with me (obviously).

Also, just so you know, I am well aware that no one in the history of the internet has ever won or lost a debate. So it is not my intent in any discussion to accomplish that.

That's one guy being bold enough to invade another guy's personal space in a disrespectful manner and getting put to sleep.
Geno was probably being a tool and got lit up.

If you don't want to get knocked out, stop mouthing off and getting into altercations with your teammates. Be a leader and learn how to diffuse situations like this as apposed to making them worse.
I don't know where you grew up but I learned at a very young age that a finger pointed in someone's face is loosely translated to "please knock me the ##### out".

In all seriousness, that's not what I expect out of my starting QB.

1. What's he doing in a "childish" argument with a teammate?

2. Why is he making said childish argument worse by demeaning said teammate instead of trying to diffuse the situation like a true leader would do?
mikmak8902 said:
In my experience, people don't get knocked out without reason.
mikmak8902 said:
I think the only thing we have to tidy up is the fact that only one of us thinks you shouldn't be surprised that you got laid out when you were in a heated argument pointing your finger in someone else's face. Not saying it's right in all scenarios ... just saying you shouldn't be surprised.
These quotes (and posts by many others in this thread) suggests that, with the facts we had at the time (Geno put his finger close to the LBs face), that it was Geno's fault for getting punched. That is victim blaming, plain and simple.

The simple truth is that putting your finger in someone's face is a non-violent action and a violent response is always inappropriate*. Sorry but you don't get to punch people just because they piss you off and, again with the facts we had at the time, that is exactly what the LB did. You don't get to do it over money, or if someone slept with your girlfriend or any other situation* where someone was non-violent towards you.

*I admit that I have not considered every single possible scenario but I am hard pressed to come up with a situation where someone putting their finger in my face would mandate me punching that person in the face. I can see wanting to do it but I can't see a situation where it would be the appropriate response.
I can't make it any clearer than this:

#1 - I blame the LB for punching him and being a complete idiot (if the accounts of what happened are true).

#2 - I blame Geno for being an ### and escalating the situation(if the accounts of what happened are true).

#2 can often result in #1 happening. Is it right? NO!!! Do I condone it? NO!!! Do I blame Geno for getting punched? NO!!!

Does it surprise me that he got punched with the alleged details that have been leaked? NO!!!

Is that victim blaming? I don't know. I don't really care. I know that sometimes when some people act like ###holes, other ###holes sometimes react in a violent matter. Especially when those ###holes have an occupation that rewards them on a daily basis for being violent. It's not rocket science ... it's simple cause and effect.

I don't think anyone is saying Geno deserved to be decked. They (at least I) are saying he certainly shouldn't have eliminated that from all possible outcomes when he decided to be a tool ... allegedly. And I certainly don't feel sorry for what happened to him just as I don't feel sorry for people that wrap themselves in bacon and walk into a tiger cage.

 
Somebody ####s my girlfriend and wags their finger in my face, and I'm probably not knocking them out, but I sure can see the response as justified. Because the only thing keeping me from it is the criminal justice system, which can certainly be amended a bit.

eta* Heck, there's a whole area of criminal law where if somebody's ####### your wife and you kill them, it was (at least up until recently) once considered justified. I forget the doctrine.
I understand the "want to" factor but what you want is irrelevant. In that specific scenario, you're not a victim (we're not talking rape here, which is definitely a scenario where I can see resorting to violence even if the appropriate response is to handle it through the criminal justice system) she cheated on you, there is obviously a problem with your relationship why do you get to punch him for that?

 
Somebody ####s my girlfriend and wags their finger in my face, and I'm probably not knocking them out, but I sure can see the response as justified. Because the only thing keeping me from it is the criminal justice system, which can certainly be amended a bit.

eta* Heck, there's a whole area of criminal law where if somebody's ####### your wife and you kill them, it was (at least up until recently) once considered justified. I forget the doctrine.
I understand the "want to" factor but what you want is irrelevant. In that specific scenario, you're not a victim (we're not talking rape here, which is definitely a scenario where I can see resorting to violence even if the appropriate response is to handle it through the criminal justice system) she cheated on you, there is obviously a problem with your relationship why do you get to punch him for that?
Yeah, I get that. And I should have stated that I agree with your point. I'm just saying there's a heat of passion aspect to it that society recognizes to your hypothetical because it's a pre-legal response in a way, and I'm not sure that many people would think that getting a finger wagged in their face after finding out a guy has ####ed her is appropriate from the other person. It's why there's an entire doctrine in crim law that excuses murder upon finding out (at the scene, IIRC) that a man is ####### your wife.

Anyway, I don't mean to make too much of a point about it. I'm just bored right now.

But it's likely the same as this case; unclean hands, all around.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I can't make it any clearer than this:


#1 - I blame the LB for punching him and being a complete idiot (if the accounts of what happened are true).

#2 - I blame Geno for being an ### and escalating the situation(if the accounts of what happened are true).

#2 can often result in #1 happening. Is it right? NO!!! Do I condone it? NO!!! Do I blame Geno for getting punched? NO!!!

Does it surprise me that he got punched with the alleged details that have been leaked? NO!!!

Is that victim blaming? I don't know. I don't really care. I know that sometimes when some people act like ###holes, other ###holes sometimes react in a violent matter. Especially when those ###holes have an occupation that rewards them on a daily basis for being violent. It's not rocket science ... it's simple cause and effect.

I don't think anyone is saying Geno deserved to be decked. They (at least I) are saying he certainly shouldn't have eliminated that from all possible outcomes when he decided to be a tool ... allegedly. And I certainly don't feel sorry for what happened to him just as I don't feel sorry for people that wrap themselves in bacon and walk into a tiger cage.
You don't need to make it clearer, I got it.

I think your points about Geno being a poor leader and immature and all the rest are probably spot on but they are also entirely irrelevant when it comes to the fact that he was attacked.

You still don't seem to want to acknowledge that blaming the victim (which, as far as we know Geno was the victim) for an act of violence committed on them is victim blaming. That is the only problem I have with most of these posts and it has nothing to do with Geno being a bad leader or immature or an idiot or whatever.

It isn't his fault that he got punched, as far as we know the only person responsible is the linebacker. He was in charge of his response and no one else. Until we hear that Geno actually took the first physically violent action (or even made a clear statement of "Let's go!" or something to that effect) that is the only person to blame for throwing the punch.

 
You still don't seem to want to acknowledge that blaming the victim (which, as far as we know Geno was the victim) for an act of violence committed on them is victim blaming. he first physically violent action (or even made a clear statement of "Let's go!" or something to that effect) that is the only person to blame for throwing the punch.
Because I don't blame Geno for getting punched. I blame Geno for being an ####### (allegedly). They are two completely separate things. It just so happens that being an ####### to an obviously unstable individual resulted in him getting punched.

If you want to connect those dots, that's fine with me. I'll sleep just fine at night.

 
Rubi said:
Since he is now referred to as "the linebacker",do you think the Jets vote "the linebacker" as their MVP after Fitzpatrick leads them into the playoffs?
Think the whole "the linebacker" has more to do with the unpronounceable, unspellable name he has. If Aldon Smith had decked his QB, we might all be talking about "Smith" and "the QB" just to avoid having to spell Kaepernick...

 
mikmak8902 said:
I'm sure this has been mentioned but TMZ is reporting that the altercation was about Geno not attending the dude's charity event.
From comments on Twitter, sounds like someone Geno was close to died and he no-showed the charity event because of that. Dude gets mad about the $600 spent on airfare for Geno and confronts him, Geno tells him he doesn't want to discuss it right then and there and starts to walk away and the guy punches him in the face.
I have read the reports about the reason why Geno no-showed. I wonder if he gave this guy a heads up. Still no reason alone to throw that punch but I'm betting there was more to the exchange than just "hey, let's not talk about this here".
That's my guess - if the kids camp had already begun and you have kids excited to meet an NFL* QB and he no shows without an explanatory call first I could see where IK would be steamed as he'd have been put in a rough spot to disappoint a group of kids. Geno cancelling is understandable under the circumstances but how he handled that cancellation is important imo.

-QG

 
t became about the fact that geno wasn’t necessarily apologetic and being in a way remorseful about the money when saying he was going to pay i.k. back. you know, he didn’t, and he was rather smug about it. so these guys got into it earlier in camp about this money.”

My report says geno put his finger in his face and told the guy, well, you’re not going to do anything about it.”

“This wasn’t the first time they had an issue over this same situation and nothing came from it the first time. you know, the first time they got into an argument, you know, words were said, disrespect thrown both ways, both guys separate and walk away. so when you have that situation happen one time, i’m sure a lot of people weren’t expecting it to get where it’s gone.”
 
My report says geno put his finger in his face and told the guy, well, you’re not going to do anything about it.”
This is the story I just heard on the radio too.

No sympathy for either guy. Geno got his. And the LB will probably get what's coming to him too. Even in the NFL you're not allowed to break someone's jaw with cheap shot (unless you're Hines Ward).

 
Last edited by a moderator:
My report says geno put his finger in his face and told the guy, well, youre not going to do anything about it.
This is the story I just heard on the radio too.

No sympathy for either guy. Geno got his. And the LB will probably get what's coming to him too. Even in the NFL you're not allowed to break someone's jaw with cheap shot (unless you're Hines Ward).
:goodposting: But good for "the linebacker". :thumbup: I bet that's the last time Geno says that to anyone. :lol:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
My report says geno put his finger in his face and told the guy, well, youre not going to do anything about it.
This is the story I just heard on the radio too.

No sympathy for either guy. Geno got his. And the LB will probably get what's coming to him too. Even in the NFL you're not allowed to break someone's jaw with cheap shot (unless you're Hines Ward).
:goodposting: But good for "the linebacker". :thumbup: I bet that's the last time Geno says that to anyone. :lol:
I bet that's the last words that don't sound like hrrrrrrr meeeeee likkkkkkk sipppiiiiiiiiieeee for a while.
 
Upon reflecting on the evidence for the last two days; Geno got what was coming. The guy is a tool. The Jets are also better off. Fitzgerald will not be bad throwing to Marshall.

 
funny how the real story is leaking out. You can clearly tell the team is not behind Geno and he really seems like a punk in this. If a guy paid for a ticket for you pay him back or split it with him but he has to try and disrespect the guy in the room and point a finger in your teammates face and say "you aren't going to do anything about it." That's just bush....and for a guy in his position that is supposed to be a leader it really shows his true colors and why this will likely have been his last chance to be a starting QB in the NFL.

 
Eyewitnesses told the Daily News that Geno Smith was "was up in (IK Enemkpali’s) face and pointed/touched his face" and "deserved it."
Sources told the New York Post that Enemkpali was furious at Smith for failing to reimburse the $600 that the linebacker shelled out for airline tickets and limos for Smith to attend a July 11 football camp for kids. Geno backed out a few days before the event due to the death of his brother's best friend. Regardless of the circumstances, breaking the starting quarterback's jaw in two places is never warranted. Although it seems some in the Jets' locker room don't see it that way. "That’ll get a man hit every time, especially one that hasn’t earned respect," a source said about the finger pointing. Aug 13 - 8:17 AM
Source: New York Daily News
What a POS.

 
Is anyone bothered by the incessant repeating by various "news" outlets that Smith was "sucker punched". I find it odd how often I have heard that term used or similar variants as if it were fact ever since the story broke and even after the initial rush of the craziness of it, I still heard ESPN peeps using that term as if it was an established fact.

Kind of disturbing and I wonder if it isn't done deliberately. Not sure what to make of it, but it has been bothering me ever since the story unfolded and I don't have any positive or negative feelings for Geno Smith, and frankly had never heard of IK before all of this.

Just very odd to me that the media, and yes I know they can do crazy things and leap to conclusions, would jump on that term so strongly when nobody even had a clear idea of what had transpired.

 
I bet the LB gets a four game suspension for being "generally aware" that he was deflating Geno's ego and knowing it was more likely than not that he had just knocked him the F#$k out.

 
Is anyone bothered by the incessant repeating by various "news" outlets that Smith was "sucker punched". I find it odd how often I have heard that term used or similar variants as if it were fact ever since the story broke and even after the initial rush of the craziness of it, I still heard ESPN peeps using that term as if it was an established fact.

Kind of disturbing and I wonder if it isn't done deliberately. Not sure what to make of it, but it has been bothering me ever since the story unfolded and I don't have any positive or negative feelings for Geno Smith, and frankly had never heard of IK before all of this.

Just very odd to me that the media, and yes I know they can do crazy things and leap to conclusions, would jump on that term so strongly when nobody even had a clear idea of what had transpired.
The first official report of it was by the coach and he used those words. I don;t think there's anything nefarious about the media repeating them, though now it seems that was likely a misrepresentation.

 
Is anyone bothered by the incessant repeating by various "news" outlets that Smith was "sucker punched". I find it odd how often I have heard that term used or similar variants as if it were fact ever since the story broke and even after the initial rush of the craziness of it, I still heard ESPN peeps using that term as if it was an established fact.
When you punch someone who has no expectation of getting hit (c'mon, someone punching the starting QB?) then it's a sucker punch.

 
Is anyone bothered by the incessant repeating by various "news" outlets that Smith was "sucker punched". I find it odd how often I have heard that term used or similar variants as if it were fact ever since the story broke and even after the initial rush of the craziness of it, I still heard ESPN peeps using that term as if it was an established fact.

Kind of disturbing and I wonder if it isn't done deliberately. Not sure what to make of it, but it has been bothering me ever since the story unfolded and I don't have any positive or negative feelings for Geno Smith, and frankly had never heard of IK before all of this.

Just very odd to me that the media, and yes I know they can do crazy things and leap to conclusions, would jump on that term so strongly when nobody even had a clear idea of what had transpired.
The first official report of it was by the coach and he used those words. I don;t think there's anything nefarious about the media repeating them, though now it seems that was likely a misrepresentation.
Bowles used that phrase and also said he wasn't there when it happened, so he either heard it from someone or applied his own judgment in calling it that.

 
Is anyone bothered by the incessant repeating by various "news" outlets that Smith was "sucker punched". I find it odd how often I have heard that term used or similar variants as if it were fact ever since the story broke and even after the initial rush of the craziness of it, I still heard ESPN peeps using that term as if it was an established fact.

Kind of disturbing and I wonder if it isn't done deliberately. Not sure what to make of it, but it has been bothering me ever since the story unfolded and I don't have any positive or negative feelings for Geno Smith, and frankly had never heard of IK before all of this.

Just very odd to me that the media, and yes I know they can do crazy things and leap to conclusions, would jump on that term so strongly when nobody even had a clear idea of what had transpired.
The first official report of it was by the coach and he used those words. I don;t think there's anything nefarious about the media repeating them, though now it seems that was likely a misrepresentation.
Bowles used that phrase and also said he wasn't there when it happened, so he either heard it from someone or applied his own judgment in calling it that.
all of that is fine

but the first report from the team on this incident used that phrase, right or wrong. That's why it stuck in the media.For the record it is not really being portrayed as that now, form all i have heard. so i kind of think it is all a non-issue

 
Is anyone bothered by the incessant repeating by various "news" outlets that Smith was "sucker punched". I find it odd how often I have heard that term used or similar variants as if it were fact ever since the story broke and even after the initial rush of the craziness of it, I still heard ESPN peeps using that term as if it was an established fact.
When you punch someone who has no expectation of getting hit (c'mon, someone punching the starting QB?) then it's a sucker punch.
Unless you buy into the story that Smith said "what are you going to do about it?" first which would make it the opposite of a sucker punch.

 
Enemkpali was just claimed off waivers by the Bills (per ESPN via NFLN)
:lmao:

I love it just for the troll factor if nothing else.
I dunno. I was kind of hoping the NFL would start shying away from bad characters like this guy but I guess the owners don't care that their league is full of thugs.
Punching somebody doesn't make you a thug.
in a work setting, over a dispute about money? Maybe "thug" is a bit strong, but it's close.

 
Is anyone bothered by the incessant repeating by various "news" outlets that Smith was "sucker punched". I find it odd how often I have heard that term used or similar variants as if it were fact ever since the story broke and even after the initial rush of the craziness of it, I still heard ESPN peeps using that term as if it was an established fact.
When you punch someone who has no expectation of getting hit (c'mon, someone punching the starting QB?) then it's a sucker punch.
Unless you buy into the story that Smith said "what are you going to do about it?" first which would make it the opposite of a sucker punch.
Apparently he said "You're not going to do anything about it!" which is quite a different statement.

Not sure why people are focusing on that particular aspect anyway. Clearly Geno has lost the team and apparently he isn't a particularly likable guy but that doesn't change the fact that he is the victim here. Geno should have been a much better person than he apparently is, and he should have acted like a leader instead of a jerk but until I hear that he threw a punch or said something to the effect of "Let's go!" to the LB then he is a victim. A lot of people think he "got what he deserved", whatever that means...probably Jets fans, but that doesn't change the fact that he is the victim here.

Simple test of that fact would be to see which one of them could successfully file criminal charges.

 
Enemkpali was just claimed off waivers by the Bills (per ESPN via NFLN)
:lmao:

I love it just for the troll factor if nothing else.
I dunno. I was kind of hoping the NFL would start shying away from bad characters like this guy but I guess the owners don't care that their league is full of thugs.
Punching somebody doesn't make you a thug.
in a work setting, over a dispute about money? Maybe "thug" is a bit strong, but it's close.
And over $600 no less. The league minimum for a rookie is $435,000 this season.

Maybe not a thug but he's definitely no Norman Einstein.

 
Is anyone bothered by the incessant repeating by various "news" outlets that Smith was "sucker punched". I find it odd how often I have heard that term used or similar variants as if it were fact ever since the story broke and even after the initial rush of the craziness of it, I still heard ESPN peeps using that term as if it was an established fact.
When you punch someone who has no expectation of getting hit (c'mon, someone punching the starting QB?) then it's a sucker punch.
Unless you buy into the story that Smith said "what are you going to do about it?" first which would make it the opposite of a sucker punch.
Apparently he said "You're not going to do anything about it!" which is quite a different statement.

Not sure why people are focusing on that particular aspect anyway. Clearly Geno has lost the team and apparently he isn't a particularly likable guy but that doesn't change the fact that he is the victim here. Geno should have been a much better person than he apparently is, and he should have acted like a leader instead of a jerk but until I hear that he threw a punch or said something to the effect of "Let's go!" to the LB then he is a victim. A lot of people think he "got what he deserved", whatever that means...probably Jets fans, but that doesn't change the fact that he is the victim here.

Simple test of that fact would be to see which one of them could successfully file criminal charges.
he clearly knew the dude was upset and Geno, instead of trying to diffuse the situation, chose to poke his finger in is face and called him out in the locker room in front of the team. Knowing the volatility and testosterone of some of these players that's like throwing gas on a fire so if you want to play the tough guy you have to expect that someone may call you on it. This is a situation that Geno was a major contributor to the result on a few levels. I don't think he should have gotten his jaw broken but it sounds like he needs an ### whoopin. Some humility may do him some good.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
So, this is different the Dez throwing a punch because IK is better at it? The result of the action more import then the action itself?

 
I love how some people constantly draw comparisons to their workplace.

Does your boss also get in your face, cuss you out and tell you to run around the building when you make a mistake?

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top