Andy Dufresne
Footballguy
Can I get this pinned somewhere?Casserly was on ESPN radio in NY earlier today.... he basically said they did everything they could to trade down, but no team was willing to match the value chart.
Can I get this pinned somewhere?Casserly was on ESPN radio in NY earlier today.... he basically said they did everything they could to trade down, but no team was willing to match the value chart.
Well, maybe you should take less than the value chart??Casserly was on ESPN radio in NY earlier today.... he basically said they did everything they could to trade down, but no team was willing to match the value chart.
Why take less value and take the chance of missing out on the player they wanted all along? Not saying this was the right thing to do but I am getting the sense that Reggie Bush has been drinking a little too much of his own kool aid and it rubbed the Texans the wrong way. What I read yesterday is that he was offered 10% more than what Alex Smith got last year and he balked at it.Well, maybe you should take less than the value chart??Casserly was on ESPN radio in NY earlier today.... he basically said they did everything they could to trade down, but no team was willing to match the value chart.
Interesting move here. The guy has ten years in front of him but they write him off before his first training camp. Barry Sanders missed quite a bit of time as a rookie.Am I the only one that is not suprised they didn't take Bush?
I agree actually, if they really liked Mario as their guy, and believed that Mario > Player X + Extra Draft PicksWhy take less value and take the chance of missing out on the player they wanted all along?Well, maybe you should take less than the value chart??Casserly was on ESPN radio in NY earlier today.... he basically said they did everything they could to trade down, but no team was willing to match the value chart.
Yah, I don't get why seemingly every team is married to the value chart.*newsflash*Well, maybe you should take less than the value chart??Casserly was on ESPN radio in NY earlier today.... he basically said they did everything they could to trade down, but no team was willing to match the value chart.
Really???I do too. New team name and jersey really blow.God I miss the Oilers.....
never thought I'd say that.....![]()
![]()
![]()
Fair enough, but that doesn't make a ton of sense IMO.The Saints have Jammal Brown (a RT in college) and Jon Stinchcomb or Ben Archibald at the other tackle spot. Having Ferguson would be an enormous upgrade.Can I get this pinned somewhere?Casserly was on ESPN radio in NY earlier today.... he basically said they did everything they could to trade down, but no team was willing to match the value chart.
Do you think he'll be as excited as Eli if the Saints keep the pick."Saints not looking to trade pick, but will listen to trade offers"
Bush was the top player on the draft board of 21 of 26 NFL teams polled by The Dallas Morning News this month.http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dw...t.16351f7a.htmlI'm not sure where to begin...1) A 6'6", 300 pound, 2-way defensive end isn't an "unsexy" pickI don't think Mario is as good as advertised. He was not impressive in college. He got most of his sacks against bad teams in garbage time. He was playing opposite an absolute stud in Manny Lawson (who I think has a good chance at DROY) and very good defensive tackles. He has great size but I think he's a better fit as a 3-4 end and Houston is switching to a 4-3.I think this will be devastating to the Texans from a fan standpoint. He's a very unsexy pick. The fans were already upset at them dissing hometown favorite Vince Young, and now rather than grabbing the biggest name in college football they grab a defensive end who only had 14 sacks?Hey Exalted...why do you think this was an "idiot" move?Here's what we know...Word is it's more than they offered Bush.Idiots.This smacks of being cheap.
The Houston Texans are the Tampa Bay Devil Rays of the NFL.
Somebody throw a bat at Casserly. I'll bet his hair doesn't move.Williams signed a huge deal with $26.5 million guaranteed.
1) For weeks Houston has maintained it held Mario and Bush in equal regard
2) All things being equal, DE was a bigger need for Houston
3) All things being equal, an All Pro DE is worth more than an All Pro RB
4) Ron Wolf reported that six out of six GMs he's close with rated Williams the best player, not Bush
5) Some questionable, and yet-to-be-understood issues have arisen with Bush in the last week...Mario Williams is a clean slate
While I agree with ou that Bush PROBABLY will make them regret this move...it's hardly something that's an overtly bad decision.
Courtney Brown pt. 2.
2) Winning is the cure all for fan support
3) One player doesn't hurt ticket sales..again, Houston already sells out every game and is a top 5 revenue team and that's WITH a losing record every year
4) Here's a hint...it's not Mario that was good because of Manny, it's the other way around
5) Only 14 sacks!?!?? He had 14.5 sacks which was 4th in the entire nation. Only seven players in NCAA D-1 had 10 or more sacks this year.
If NFL GMs based their draft decisions on what the consensus fans wanted, they would be out of their jobs VERY quickly. The Eagles fans hated the McNabb pick. The Colts hated taking James over Ricky Williams. Rams fans hated the selection of Orlando Pace 1st overall. If Mario Williams is as dominant a DE as a great many personnel executives expect, they'll LOVE the guy.My phone has been ringing off the hook with Houston fans who are sick to their stomach. The move is definitely going to hurt fan support.1) Houston is one of the top-five revenue generating teams in the NFL already
2) Houston sells out every game
3) NFL teams don't keep jersey sales, it's split amongst the teams
4) They're not giving Mario Williams a discount
That's fine -- if you KNOW Bush will be Michael Jordan, which you don't.Bush could have an ACME anvil fall on him after the draft. Nothing is guaranteed.I agree with Irvin on this point:
"You don't pass on Michael Jordan to draft Patrick Ewing."
![]()
A) you also don't know that Mario is EwingB) Nobody said guaranteed...everything is a game of percentages.That's fine -- if you KNOW Bush will be Michael Jordan, which you don't.Bush could have an ACME anvil fall on him after the draft. Nothing is guaranteed.I agree with Irvin on this point:
"You don't pass on Michael Jordan to draft Patrick Ewing."
![]()
Wasn't Michael Vick the latest "Michael Jordan"....? He'll never live up to expectations.
Bush was the top player on the draft board of 21 of 26 NFL teams polled by The Dallas Morning News this month.
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dw...t.16351f7a.html
Suddenly this pick is making more sense!Michael Irvin is![]()
![]()
on ESPN about what a stupid move it was by Houston.
![]()
I'm shocked only because I just looked up and realized it is 2am.[officially] .... Merry Christmas, everyone!Am I the only one totally shocked?
After 600 posts, we can start to hide our pr0n in here....This thread has 10,000+ Views.....that is an amazing stat.
After 600 posts, we can start to hide our pr0n in here....This thread has 10,000+ Views.....that is an amazing stat.![]()
Yep, saw that myself, I have been posting in this thread since around 5pm.....now it is 11 PM, time to go to bed I guess.......I'm shocked only because I just looked up and realized it is 2am.[officially] .... Merry Christmas, everyone!Am I the only one totally shocked?![]()
Depends - If my team was the seahawks, I'd be okay with it. You know, Mario might just be the best pkayer in the draft.IF someone a month ago told you that your team would trade away their draft picks to land the #1 overall pick and THEN told you they would take Mario, seriously, how would you react?
I hope Bob McNair will still be able to afford some of the "little extras" for his wife.you are dead to me. And I mean Dead with a Capital D! You will NEVER get a cent from me if you #### this up!!!!
I hope Bob McNair gets stuck by the Rail Car tomorrow.I hope Bob McNair will still be able to afford some of the "little extras" for his wife.you are dead to me. And I mean Dead with a Capital D! You will NEVER get a cent from me if you #### this up!!!!
Yea, I love how NOBODY in ANY draft a month ago had Mario in their top 5. This guy didn't even show up for 50% of his games. Nobody even though of Mario 6 months ago as a top 10.I'm going to enjoy laughing and watching the Texans do NOTHING, meanwhile waching Babbin, Bucanno and Mario do absolutely NOTHING this year.Depends - If my team was the seahawks, I'd be okay with it. You know, Mario might just be the best pkayer in the draft.IF someone a month ago told you that your team would trade away their draft picks to land the #1 overall pick and THEN told you they would take Mario, seriously, how would you react?
Newsflash, Mario looks to be a done deal:The Houston Texans signed NC St. defensive end Mario Williams to a six-year, $54 million contract, making him the No. 1 pick in the NFL draft.What if the Saints wanted Mario and now Casserly is talking trade with the Saints?
Irvin has no sense of history (or clue); Jordan and Ewing weren't even drafted in the same year. In addition, Ewing was everyone's top prospect in 1985. In fact, there were allegations that the lottery had been rigged to give the Knicks a better chance to get Ewing. If Irvin wanted to make a meaningful analogy, he could compare Jordan and Olajuwon, but Irvin would still be wrong. Jordan was a good college player, but no one knew he would become what he became; Olajuwon was a more sure-fire prospect. (And in fact is a two-time NBA champion and a Hall of Famer in his own right).I agree with Irvin on this point:
"You don't pass on Michael Jordan to draft Patrick Ewing."
I'm having a hard time following the analogy for a ton of reasons. What exactly makes Mario Williams = Patrick Ewing, Hakeem Olajuwon, or well, any NBA center?Irvin has no sense of history (or clue); Jordan and Ewing weren't even drafted in the same year. In addition, Ewing was everyone's top prospect in 1985. In fact, there were allegations that the lottery had been rigged to give the Knicks a better chance to get Ewing. If Irvin wanted to make a meaningful analogy, he could compare Jordan and Olajuwon, but Irvin would still be wrong. Jordan was a good college player, but no one knew he would become what he became; Olajuwon was a more sure-fire prospect. (And in fact is a two-time NBA champion and a Hall of Famer in his own right).I agree with Irvin on this point:
"You don't pass on Michael Jordan to draft Patrick Ewing."
Now, if Irvin wants to argue Jordan vs. Sam Bowie, he might have something useful to say.
you're missing the point, He's saying Bush is that once in a lifetime player and Mario is a great player...that's all.I'm having a hard time following the analogy for a ton of reasons. What exactly makes Mario Williams = Patrick Ewing, Hakeem Olajuwon, or well, any NBA center?Irvin has no sense of history (or clue); Jordan and Ewing weren't even drafted in the same year. In addition, Ewing was everyone's top prospect in 1985. In fact, there were allegations that the lottery had been rigged to give the Knicks a better chance to get Ewing. If Irvin wanted to make a meaningful analogy, he could compare Jordan and Olajuwon, but Irvin would still be wrong. Jordan was a good college player, but no one knew he would become what he became; Olajuwon was a more sure-fire prospect. (And in fact is a two-time NBA champion and a Hall of Famer in his own right).I agree with Irvin on this point:
"You don't pass on Michael Jordan to draft Patrick Ewing."
Now, if Irvin wants to argue Jordan vs. Sam Bowie, he might have something useful to say.
I'm only halfway through the thread so I'm not sure if this has been answered. But once the league approves the deal, the pick is in the books and the Saints are free to start negotiating with prospective draft choices -- i.e., the Saints are on the clock. The Texans cannot change their minds about drafting Mario Williams any more than they can change their minds about drafting David Carr -- once the deal is signed and approved by the league, the selection is deemed to have been made.NO, YOU'RE MISSING MY POINT! I'm asking if it is "official." Official meaning that its already locked in stone. I'm not trying to be sarcastic here. I'm asking a serious question: Is this pick now already made and will be enforced NO MATTER WHAT or is this just a verbal committment.
I think this is a key question and very important.
Atlanta didn't trade the Brees pick. Brees was drafted with the 1st pick in the 2nd round, which always belonged to the Chargers.What San Diego got for the #1 pick was:Do you think Atlanta regrets trading picks that led to LT and Brees for Vick?
Vick is so popular that I bet they don't.
Bush is so electrifying that even if he underperforms like Vick it still would have been good for the Texas franchise. The upside is huge and the downside ain't that bad.
But what the hell do I know?