Todd Andrews
Footballguy
Started him when Calvin was out!
				
			 ) vs DHB (0.7 pts
  ) vs DHB (0.7 pts   )
 )I actually started him *because* he was playing SEA and I figured that Sherman would be busy with Wayne. Not sure if that's how it went down as I didn't watch the game very closely. I don't think this game changes that much, he's still a boom or bust type of player. Although, I would love more consistency.That was pretty amazing to watch. He was so fast and quick, it looked like he was toying with DB's from time to time.
Would have been that much better if he could reliably catch balls that hit him in the hands.
Kudos to the few that started him. I see by online manager stats that not many owners did, this week. Looks like Hilton is indeed emerging, though I doubt it did many much good this week. I'm sure the handful of DHB drafters dropped him weeks ago, and I wish luck to those of you moving Hilton back into your lineups next week.
That's just seems typical for TY, so I think snap counts might just be misleading anyway.TY did his damage (on my bench, of course) on just 5 catches. Trying to gauge if it was fluky or indicative of his time on field.
Oh Jurb.....where'd you go? How's DHB working out for you?I'd bet my bottom dollar that the reason no one is singing DHB's praises anymore and bragging about what a 'great value pick he was in the 13th round' is that they've now cut him and realized their error. Hilton may be hit or miss, but that sure beats miss or miss worse, which is Bay's entire career.need2know said:Funny how all those dhb supporters have disappeared. Last weeks game was the first of many for ty this year. There will be some stinkers thrown in, hes not a wr1, but this guy is a stud. Hes a great wr 2/3 because his ceiling is as high as any wr. But you do have to play him every week. Dont look at matchups, you will miss out
Reggie Wayne - 97%NajehHejan said:Does anyone have the TY versus DHB snap counts for last week? TY did his damage (on my bench, of course) on just 5 catches. Trying to gauge if it was fluky or indicative of his time on field.
Wow, very encouraging, thanks. Safe to assume that OC Pep Hamilton is scrapping his base 2TE set due to the injury to Dwayne Allen and knowing he needs his best playmaker on the field? The game was close all day so not like they were in catch up mode.Reggie Wayne - 97%DHB - 88%NajehHejan said:Does anyone have the TY versus DHB snap counts for last week? TY did his damage (on my bench, of course) on just 5 catches. Trying to gauge if it was fluky or indicative of his time on field.
TY - 71%
Oh Jurb.....where'd you go? How's DHB working out for you?I'd bet my bottom dollar that the reason no one is singing DHB's praises anymore and bragging about what a 'great value pick he was in the 13th round' is that they've now cut him and realized their error. Hilton may be hit or miss, but that sure beats miss or miss worse, which is Bay's entire career.need2know said:Funny how all those dhb supporters have disappeared. Last weeks game was the first of many for ty this year. There will be some stinkers thrown in, hes not a wr1, but this guy is a stud. Hes a great wr 2/3 because his ceiling is as high as any wr. But you do have to play him every week. Dont look at matchups, you will miss out
 
  
 Exactly.Oh Jurb.....where'd you go? How's DHB working out for you?need2know said:Funny how all those dhb supporters have disappeared. Last weeks game was the first of many for ty this year. There will be some stinkers thrown in, hes not a wr1, but this guy is a stud. Hes a great wr 2/3 because his ceiling is as high as any wr. But you do have to play him every week. Dont look at matchups, you will miss out
I'd bet my bottom dollar that the reason no one is singing DHB's praises anymore and bragging about what a 'great value pick he was in the 13th round' is that they've now cut him and realized their error. Hilton may be hit or miss, but that sure beats miss or miss worse, which is Bay's entire career.
I know I'm one who said DHB looked like the better value at a pricetag of zero. Still does, based on my leauges' results.
The DHB owner cut bait and added the KC defense that week. The Hilton owner hasn't gotten a single decent week out of his investment yet, although I suppose the two decent weeks sitting on the pine will look nice in the post-season recap.
Congrats on getting an unstartable player for free.You guys understand DHB was free and that people were paying for Hilton, right? And how did Hilton work out those first few weeks?
 
 Yeah, the injury to Allen certainly changed the complection of things. That was pointed out by myself and several others before the season and once the injury occurred. What's laughable is that every league I play in but one had the Hilton owner benching him. He's been benched due to his underperformance to this point. So yeah, while a few guys are in here pounding their chest after a good week, those of us who said his value was inflated are still laughing. Those points will look good on a season recap. The reality is, they did nothing for owners who had already benched him out of frustration.Wow, very encouraging, thanks. Safe to assume that OC Pep Hamilton is scrapping his base 2TE set due to the injury to Dwayne Allen and knowing he needs his best playmaker on the field? The game was close all day so not like they were in catch up mode.Reggie Wayne - 97%DHB - 88%NajehHejan said:Does anyone have the TY versus DHB snap counts for last week? TY did his damage (on my bench, of course) on just 5 catches. Trying to gauge if it was fluky or indicative of his time on field.
TY - 71%
I know I didn't. I've always said that DHB could be a good value and that T.Y.'s hype was getting out of control. But I also said that his run the 2nd half of last season was no joke. I thought he'd have great potential at some point this year if things continued like last year. Turns out the Indy Offense didn't toss the ball around early this year. When they throw, though, Hilton's producing.Were people touting him as having potential to finish as a WR2, or to draft him as one? I thought the hype was that you could get a potential WR2 for WR3 price.
I drafted him as WR3 and started him every week. I don't think it's terribly relevant that you've seen lots of people bench him. WR3s are not consistent. That's what makes them WR3s. You draft the ones you like and stick with them for awhile. In fact no WRs are *really* consistent. You pick who you think will score the most points over the season, ignore the weekly ratings, and start them.
Did anyone in this thread actually go into their drafts prepared to take him as their second WR?
I drafted him as a WR2 in almost all of my leagues. And I did so after drafting a QB, handful of RBs, a WR1, and a TE in most cases. I paid 7th round prices for a guy I expected to be y WR2 and it's turned out really well. Fwiw, I grabbed Josh Gordon as my WR3 in most leagues with fill-ins for the first couple of weeks.Were people touting him as having potential to finish as a WR2, or to draft him as one? I thought the hype was that you could get a potential WR2 for WR3 price.
I drafted him as WR3 and started him every week. I don't think it's terribly relevant that you've seen lots of people bench him. WR3s are not consistent. That's what makes them WR3s. You draft the ones you like and stick with them for awhile. In fact no WRs are *really* consistent. You pick who you think will score the most points over the season, ignore the weekly ratings, and start them.
Did anyone in this thread actually go into their drafts prepared to take him as their second WR?
These comparisons never make sense to me.... You can pick any player at any given timeframe and do the same thing.... For example, here are the players DHB has outperformed this year, where he was drafted later than them:Yeah, DHB is awful - just as predicted. Players that have outperformed DHB so far this year:
Kris Durham
Kevin Ogletree
Marvin Jones
Jermaine Kearse
Dwayne Harris
Ace Sanders
Martin Keshawn
I always enjoy your posts, Saint. I'm not sure what you're getting at here, though.Saint said:These comparisons never make sense to me.... You can pick any player at any given timeframe and do the same thing.... For example, here are the players DHB has outperformed this year, where he was drafted later than them:Yeah, DHB is awful - just as predicted. Players that have outperformed DHB so far this year:
Kris Durham
Kevin Ogletree
Marvin Jones
Jermaine Kearse
Dwayne Harris
Ace Sanders
Martin Keshawn
Roddy White
Cordarrelle Patterson
Ryan Broyles
Kenny Britt
Riley Cooper
My point is these lists are meaningless. What means something is whether or not he was in your lineup and performed to expectations based on where you drafted. I agree with the other folks... TY was huge last week, no doubt about it. His one week performance though, jumped him over 30 other wide receivers in top performers.... Let's look at how TY and DHB stacked up in terms of WR #s for the last five weeks for a 12-team FPC league with PPR scoring.
TY (Drafted WR29 @ 7.04) DHB (Drafted WR60 @ 14.06)Week: Weekly WR Rank Cumulative WR Rank Weekly WR Rank Cumulative WR Rank 1 WR78 WR78 WR69 WR69 2 WR18 WR40 WR92 WR88 3 WR90 WR63 WR42 WR76 4 WR47 WR57 WR60 WR74 5 WR3 WR28 WR93 WR82Read into the chart what you will, but basically Hilton scored twice above the draft owner's expectations and it is only because of his monster game in Week 5 that he is back around the total point expectation for that draft spot. DHB scored twice above the owner's expectations but overall has performed below expectation for his draft spot. Chances are most TY owners won in week 5, probably won in week 2, and lost in the other 3 weeks, for a record of 2-3, whereas the DHB owners probably never used him at all since he was a bye week filler or a wild card pick in the later rounds.
Yeah, this is pretty funny. Brett Favre is free too but I'm not getting anything out of him in a league either.Congrats on getting an unstartable player for free.You guys understand DHB was free and that people were paying for Hilton, right? And how did Hilton work out those first few weeks?
Here's how I am interpreting what I am reading from the stats. In terms of the overall value of the player in terms of "draft spot", such as TY as WR 29 and DHB as WR60, neither player has performed as expected up through 5 weeks. Although, the huge week for TY in week 5, put him close to expected draft value of WR29. If he performed similarly to his earlier weeks, he would still be hurting his owners. I would suspect that most people that drafted TY in rounds 6/7 have expected TY to be a weekly starter in the lineup, whereas those that drafted DHB did not have the same expectation. This is where the rub occurs.I always enjoy your posts, Saint. I'm not sure what you're getting at here, though.Are you saying only that DHB has performed better according to his draft position when compared to T.Y.? If so, I agree. ** I actually disagree. DHB has performed worse than his draft position of WR60. **
Are you saying that DHB was a better draft pick for a team than T.Y.? If so, I disagree. ** Nope. I would argue both players were drafted too high, although TY's big game in week 5 put him close to expectations. Feast/famine with him right now. **
I still think T.Y. was drafted too high at the beginning of the season. I actually thought, wrongly, that DHB might of gone too low, as well. But even if T.Y. was drafted too high, I term value as how a player helps your team win.
Take out the factor of who an owner might of missed on in order to draft T.Y. I see your point there. All I'm saying is T.Y. can help you win a game (or lose a game). DHB can only help you lose a game, so far.
I use T.Y. when I need to roll the dice on a big game (maybe my opponent is a powerhouse, or one of his players blew up in the Thursday game, or my team gets hammered with a BYE week or injuries). Roll the dice and put in T.Y.
He shouldn't be used if you need consistancy in your WR spot. (I would argue that a draft spot in round 6 or 7, many teams may be seeking consistency and not situational player here.) But that could change as the year goes on. I see upside here. The only downside I see is the offensive philosophy holding him back - but I think that might be changing a bit? ** Perhaps. Those that drafted TY to be a every week starter and have not given up on him, are shouting his praises. Those that drafted him to be a consistent, probably had him on the bench and are now debating whether or not to plug him back in. Personally, I agree with you and think the mindset may be changing. Hopefully he tanks again and then I will offer a trade deal for the guy on the whim that he is feast / famine similar to VJax. **
I think this is an easy win for T.Y. so far. Although I never was in to comparing DHB and Hilton - two drastically different players in my opinion.
Had to look it up, but TY is exactly WR 29 in my PPR league right now. DHB is WR 83Here's how I am interpreting what I am reading from the stats. In terms of the overall value of the player in terms of "draft spot", such as TY as WR 29 and DHB as WR60, neither player has performed as expected up through 5 weeks. Although, the huge week for TY in week 5, put him close to expected draft value of WR29. If he performed similarly to his earlier weeks, he would still be hurting his owners. I would suspect that most people that drafted TY in rounds 6/7 have expected TY to be a weekly starter in the lineup, whereas those that drafted DHB did not have the same expectation. This is where the rub occurs.I always enjoy your posts, Saint. I'm not sure what you're getting at here, though.
Are you saying only that DHB has performed better according to his draft position when compared to T.Y.? If so, I agree. ** I actually disagree. DHB has performed worse than his draft position of WR60. **
Are you saying that DHB was a better draft pick for a team than T.Y.? If so, I disagree. ** Nope. I would argue both players were drafted too high, although TY's big game in week 5 put him close to expectations. Feast/famine with him right now. **
I still think T.Y. was drafted too high at the beginning of the season. I actually thought, wrongly, that DHB might of gone too low, as well. But even if T.Y. was drafted too high, I term value as how a player helps your team win.
Take out the factor of who an owner might of missed on in order to draft T.Y. I see your point there. All I'm saying is T.Y. can help you win a game (or lose a game). DHB can only help you lose a game, so far.
I use T.Y. when I need to roll the dice on a big game (maybe my opponent is a powerhouse, or one of his players blew up in the Thursday game, or my team gets hammered with a BYE week or injuries). Roll the dice and put in T.Y.
He shouldn't be used if you need consistancy in your WR spot. (I would argue that a draft spot in round 6 or 7, many teams may be seeking consistency and not situational player here.) But that could change as the year goes on. I see upside here. The only downside I see is the offensive philosophy holding him back - but I think that might be changing a bit? ** Perhaps. Those that drafted TY to be a every week starter and have not given up on him, are shouting his praises. Those that drafted him to be a consistent, probably had him on the bench and are now debating whether or not to plug him back in. Personally, I agree with you and think the mindset may be changing. Hopefully he tanks again and then I will offer a trade deal for the guy on the whim that he is feast / famine similar to VJax. **
I think this is an easy win for T.Y. so far. Although I never was in to comparing DHB and Hilton - two drastically different players in my opinion.
If a team drafted TY to be an every week starter, they've been hurting so far. with the exception of 2 weeks. If you drafted TY to be a situational upside player, then I think you are in a great position, although I would question if you are drafting a situational player in round 6/7, that seems too early IMO.
The real question for me: Which TY is showing up next week?
I made a point of telling people that you need to start him every week or else he shouldn't be on your team. If you start him every week as your WR3 you can expect him to outproduce those numbers. It was those who expected consistent WR2 numbers every week who are disappointed by him.If a team drafted TY to be an every week starter, they've been hurting so far. with the exception of 2 weeks. If you drafted TY to be a situational upside player, then I think you are in a great position, although I would question if you are drafting a situational player in round 6/7, that seems too early IMO. Based on the FPC draft data used above, I can tell you that the owner that drafted him started him every week for the first 3 weeks, then benched him. He missed last week's huge game as he is trying to improve consistency out of his WR2 spot.
Yup. In the FPC league, TY is WR28 and DHB is WR82 currently. DHB has severely underperformed where he was drafted as WR60. TY was drafted as WR29 and he is currently at WR28, which is good. The scary part to me is in week 4, he was WR57. What a difference one week makes.Had to look it up, but TY is exactly WR 29 in my PPR league right now. DHB is WR 83
Ok, seems we are on the same page here. The only thing we disagreed on was if DHB had performed better for his draft position and I honestly hadn't been following DHB at all. I was just guessing. I suppose he's doing worse than I thought.Here's how I am interpreting what I am reading from the stats. In terms of the overall value of the player in terms of "draft spot", such as TY as WR 29 and DHB as WR60, neither player has performed as expected up through 5 weeks. Although, the huge week for TY in week 5, put him close to expected draft value of WR29. If he performed similarly to his earlier weeks, he would still be hurting his owners. I would suspect that most people that drafted TY in rounds 6/7 have expected TY to be a weekly starter in the lineup, whereas those that drafted DHB did not have the same expectation. This is where the rub occurs.I always enjoy your posts, Saint. I'm not sure what you're getting at here, though.Are you saying only that DHB has performed better according to his draft position when compared to T.Y.? If so, I agree. ** I actually disagree. DHB has performed worse than his draft position of WR60. **
Are you saying that DHB was a better draft pick for a team than T.Y.? If so, I disagree. ** Nope. I would argue both players were drafted too high, although TY's big game in week 5 put him close to expectations. Feast/famine with him right now. **
I still think T.Y. was drafted too high at the beginning of the season. I actually thought, wrongly, that DHB might of gone too low, as well. But even if T.Y. was drafted too high, I term value as how a player helps your team win.
Take out the factor of who an owner might of missed on in order to draft T.Y. I see your point there. All I'm saying is T.Y. can help you win a game (or lose a game). DHB can only help you lose a game, so far.
I use T.Y. when I need to roll the dice on a big game (maybe my opponent is a powerhouse, or one of his players blew up in the Thursday game, or my team gets hammered with a BYE week or injuries). Roll the dice and put in T.Y.
He shouldn't be used if you need consistancy in your WR spot. (I would argue that a draft spot in round 6 or 7, many teams may be seeking consistency and not situational player here.) But that could change as the year goes on. I see upside here. The only downside I see is the offensive philosophy holding him back - but I think that might be changing a bit? ** Perhaps. Those that drafted TY to be a every week starter and have not given up on him, are shouting his praises. Those that drafted him to be a consistent, probably had him on the bench and are now debating whether or not to plug him back in. Personally, I agree with you and think the mindset may be changing. Hopefully he tanks again and then I will offer a trade deal for the guy on the whim that he is feast / famine similar to VJax. **
I think this is an easy win for T.Y. so far. Although I never was in to comparing DHB and Hilton - two drastically different players in my opinion.
If a team drafted TY to be an every week starter, they've been hurting so far. with the exception of 2 weeks. If you drafted TY to be a situational upside player, then I think you are in a great position, although I would question if you are drafting a situational player in round 6/7, that seems too early IMO. Based on the FPC draft data used above, I can tell you that the owner that drafted him started him every week for the first 3 weeks, then benched him. He missed last week's huge game as he is trying to improve consistency out of his WR2 spot.
The real question for me: Which TY is showing up next week?
 
 I am watching this aspect very closely. It may be that the Colts already are coming to the realization that they are not a heavy run team that can pound the ball butReally disappointing start to the season for DHB. Not getting separation, dropping passes, etc he's basically invisible out there as a pass catcher. Hilton should start seeing more snaps per game soon, especially when Pep realizes that Indy doesn't have the personnel for a run-heavy scheme
If you started him against Seattle. If you benched him that game he's still in the 50's. I checked 10 leagues and he was only started against Seattle in 2 of them - both were teams were at the bottom of the standing.Yup. In the FPC league, TY is WR28 and DHB is WR82 currently. DHB has severely underperformed where he was drafted as WR60. TY was drafted as WR29 and he is currently at WR28, which is good. The scary part to me is in week 4, he was WR57. What a difference one week makes.Had to look it up, but TY is exactly WR 29 in my PPR league right now. DHB is WR 83
The WR 28 or WR 50 stuff is overblown. In 6 games, he's had two great games and 4 games where he didn't even reach double digits in PPR, including two games that were abysmal. The two games where he was the star were against stout defenses. The Hilton owners likely didn't play them those weeks and started him the other weeks. If that is the assumption, Hilton's probably hurt his owners more than he's helped them. I'd split the difference and allow that most owners benefitted from his week 2 performance, but after two straight clunkers had him on the bench when he blew up against Seattle.If you started him against Seattle. If you benched him that game he's still in the 50's. I checked 10 leagues and he was only started against Seattle in 2 of them - both were teams were at the bottom of the standing.Yup. In the FPC league, TY is WR28 and DHB is WR82 currently. DHB has severely underperformed where he was drafted as WR60. TY was drafted as WR29 and he is currently at WR28, which is good. The scary part to me is in week 4, he was WR57. What a difference one week makes.Had to look it up, but TY is exactly WR 29 in my PPR league right now. DHB is WR 83
I do find it interesting that Irsay commented that he wanted to win more SBs with a run heavy offense as opposed to a pass heavy attack. Makes me think Irsay has more to do with their decision to play conservative than I expected.I am watching this aspect very closely. It may be that the Colts already are coming to the realization that they are not a heavy run team that can pound the ball butReally disappointing start to the season for DHB. Not getting separation, dropping passes, etc he's basically invisible out there as a pass catcher. Hilton should start seeing more snaps per game soon, especially when Pep realizes that Indy doesn't have the personnel for a run-heavy scheme
it is certainly eating into the passing attempts and, in my opinion, the flow, of the passing game. It makes me a bit uneasy if I am a Wayne or Hilton owner.
With that being said, in regards to Hilton specifically, I think it is becoming evident that Hilton is 1A to Wayne. He is garnering more targets and since he can run inside or outside routes, he has that same versatility. I like Hilton going forward and going down the stretch this season we will see the corner turned where he is no longer a boom or bust player but will soon be a reliable 7+ targets a week player who will produce with that volume.§
I don't think the Colts will have the luxury of running Trent 30 times this week. Should be fun and he T.Y. has a good shot at a big game. If Terrance Williams can do it...Thoughts on TY production against the Broncos? Has all the makings of a shootout against a high flying offense and the league's last ranked pass D. Pep won't break our heart and run Trent straight into the line 30 times, will he?
He sucks is what happened. He is a one trick pony....if he does not catch a bomb he is useless. In a PPR league, I would not touch him with a 10 feet pole.2 for 27, what happened?
