Skippers is a stand alone independent bar, down by the river, the place you go for pitchers of beer after your softball game.* Carlos is just driving around all day instead of going to work and keeping it a secret from everyone. It’s really rough to him - his anxiety must be building immensely. But also seems believable. In this song, it finally spills over for him.
(I've Been) Searchin' So Long is the first song on side 3. Wishing You Were Here is the first song on side 4.This record is great.24. (I've Been) Searchin' So Long
Album: Chicago VII (1974)
Writer: James Pankow
Lead vocals: Peter Cetera
Released as a single? Yes (US #9)
This one is a slow burn. Keep telling yourself: "wait for it ... wait for it ... wait for it." Like Wishing You Were Here from the same album, this ballad is clearly influenced by the Beach Boys, and Cash Box compared it to Yes (it's definitely not prog, though). I can also see a scenario where the Bee Gees record it. Lushly arranged with strings (arranged by composer Jimmie Haskell), horns and electric piano, the song gracefully glides along for three minutes and then kicks things up a notch. The real good stuff begins at 3:15, where the tempo picks up and the vocals gain soul and urgency, with Peter Cetera deploying his "gritty Paul McCartney" voice at times. At 4:00 we get the triumphant Terry Kath guitar solo, but it's brief and not mixed any higher than the horns and strings. This is music that makes you feel.
The lyrics were designed that way as well. James Pankow: "'(I've Been) Searchin' So Long' was a song about finding myself. I was starting to figure out what I was put on this earth for. I don't think anybody in the band had written a song about the quest to meet that person inside and find out what he was all about, what his ideals were. I just had to talk about who I was and what I was feeling at the time. I felt after it was recorded that maybe other people could relate to that, 'cause the '70s was a time for soul-searching, it was a time for discovery, and I think that song was probably indicative of what a lot of young people were feeling at that time."'
… Searching (don't you know I'm)
For an answer
To the question
Oh yeah
"Who am I?"
Maybe (maybe it's true)
It's only natural (it's only natural baby, yeah)
Good things
In life
Take a long time (yeah yeah)
While some ballads don't translate well to the stage, this one always has because of its dynamics and how its ending can serve as a launching point into something else, often the salsa instrumental Mongonucleosis that follows it on Chicago VII. In fact, that pair is appearing in the band's setlists this year.
Live version from 1977 by itself: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIESk4Dwrng
Live version from 1977 with Mongonucleosis: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Awmhz7SqsTY
Leonid and Friends version (with orchestra): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XEDatFQ3m98
At #23: I'm inconsistent with how I handle the multi-part suites, so in this case, while the entire suite doesn't hold together well enough to be included in total, two consecutive sections from it are powerful enough to land in my top 31.
It's funny how the brain works. In my mind this song is the second part of a suite that begins with "Wishing You Were Here". I can't recall how the two were ordered on the LP, even though I owned it. But, in my mind, the two will always be linked. Just gorgeous pieces of music.
Sigur Ros sounded like gibberish (although this one has been the best one from them IMO, sorry haven't been a fan of this group thus far).
I am younger by Queen standards - 51, so the later albums had a lot more influence on my than the earlier albums. There are plenty of good songs on the earlier albums than are "not well known" but I am a little more partial to the later work.I've noticed a lot of the Queen songs selected so far have come from their last two albums, The Miracle and Innuendo. Wondering if @snellman is just more into this period than the classic Queen catalogue or if we're just getting these songs out of the way before getting to the real "meat".
Either way, they're been a nice addition to the mix and as I've said previously, I'm glad some classic rock artists are mixed in with some of the newer acts.
I have no idea who the other guy is. I'm way too lazy to do the research. It sounds a little like Johnny Bristol to me, but it could have been some anonymous background singer. Motown did that a lot. So did Stevie later on with one of his biggest hits when he had autonomy over his records.Biggest surprise of the round - Stevie's cover of Blowin' in the Wind. Never heard this before from him. Excellent. Who is singing with him on that?
Wikipedia says:I have no idea who the other guy is. I'm way too lazy to do the research. It sounds a little like Johnny Bristol to me, but it could have been some anonymous background singer. Motown did that a lot. So did Stevie later on with one of his biggest hits when he had autonomy over his records.Biggest surprise of the round - Stevie's cover of Blowin' in the Wind. Never heard this before from him. Excellent. Who is singing with him on that?
I’m enjoying the Clutch songs so far. Totally new to me and such a broad range of styles. Really interesting group to me so far.No love for my last Clutch pick so not expecting any for this one as they sound very similar. In hindsight I probably should've cut 1 of them for something off their self titled album
The intro piqued my interest in Juggernaut, but when the singing started it wasn't my thing. I've liked some Clutch songs in the countdown.No love for my last Clutch pick so not expecting any for this one as they sound very similar. In hindsight I probably should've cut 1 of them for something off their self titled album
I tend to agree with those that dig the music but get turned off a bit by the vocals. I liked his voice on the more bluesy numbers but when he tries to to “heavy”, it’s tougher for me to listen to.The intro peaked my interest in Juggernaut, but when the singing started it wasn't my thing. I've liked some Clutch songs in the countdown.No love for my last Clutch pick so not expecting any for this one as they sound very similar. In hindsight I probably should've cut 1 of them for something off their self titled album
I went back and re-listened to some and I was mistaken. The one you submitted at #30 has been my favorite so far.Sigur Ros sounded like gibberish (although this one has been the best one from them IMO, sorry haven't been a fan of this group thus far).
May I ask what specifically you don't like? Not trying to question you or anything. I just like to get honest feedback , good or bad, when I introduce people to the band. Most of the negative feedback I get is the vocals are a little too falsetto or the songs take too long to develop.
On a separate note. I need to get back into listening to the Foo Fighters. Just an all around near perfect rock and roll band.
I’ve been enjoying Sigur Ros much more than you, but obviously most of what you’ve mentioned could be off putting to some/many. I’m big with lyrics as well, but the fact they have such a soothing ethereal quality, the voice as another instrument works for me here.. They sound like ethereal soundscapes that might play in the background of a spa. While I am sure many will find that soothing, I keep looking for something to tap my foot to or bob my head.
I went back and re-listened to some and I was mistaken. The one you submitted at #30 has been my favorite so far.Sigur Ros sounded like gibberish (although this one has been the best one from them IMO, sorry haven't been a fan of this group thus far).
May I ask what specifically you don't like? Not trying to question you or anything. I just like to get honest feedback , good or bad, when I introduce people to the band. Most of the negative feedback I get is the vocals are a little too falsetto or the songs take too long to develop.
On a separate note. I need to get back into listening to the Foo Fighters. Just an all around near perfect rock and roll band.
I don't wish to fill the thread with negativity or take away from other's experience, but since you asked, I will elaborate a little. I think you hit the nail on the head regarding the vocals. I am not a huge fan of that high/falsetto sound. In fact, it wasn't nearly as prominent in #30 as some of the others...perhaps why I liked it better. I do not mind the technique as a highlight integrated into a piece, but when it is the only show in town it grows weary on me after a bit. I think the falsetto combined with the lyrics being in a foreign language, or non linguistic, takes away some of the pleasure for me. It is essentially impossible for me to follow any sort of story or interpret any sort of metaphoric deeper meaning. Is there value in the vocal quality itself? Sure. The voice can be a beautiful instrument. But the combination here just isn't resonating for me. I am having a hard time connecting to the Jorge Ben Jor content for this reason as well. However, I find the Jorge Ben Jor material more pleasing to the ear musically. When listening to music, I love a cool guitar riff, bass line, rhythmic percussion, a jazzy horn...something that establishes a hook. I am not finding much of any hook in many of the Sigur Ros songs thus far. #29 Haffsol and #26 Svo hljott seem like a "smear" of sound to me...almost synthetic. They sound like ethereal soundscapes that might play in the background of a spa. While I am sure many will find that soothing, I keep looking for something to tap my foot to or bob my head.
I'll keep listening through the countdown and try to give them a fair shake. We have a lot more music to go. Maybe something will catch my attention and grow on me.
Lyrics for me depend on mood. Sometimes I’m down for something that want to spend time focusing on the lyrics and think about some deeper meaning. I do a lot of my music listening while either working or reading, and music becomes more the background noise (that sweet spot between wanting to give it some attention, but not too much attention that it distracts me from my task).I’ve been enjoying Sigur Ros much more than you, but obviously most of what you’ve mentioned could be off putting to some/many. I’m big with lyrics as well, but the fact they have such a soothing ethereal quality, the voice as another instrument works for me here.. They sound like ethereal soundscapes that might play in the background of a spa. While I am sure many will find that soothing, I keep looking for something to tap my foot to or bob my head.
I doubt they’d ever be in heavy rotation for me, but as I’ve said a time or two before, I look forward to their playlist at the end.
Lyrics for me depend on mood. Sometimes I’m down for something that want to spend time focusing on the lyrics and think about some deeper meaning. I do a lot of my music listening while either working or reading, and music becomes more the background noise (that sweet spot between wanting to give it some attention, but not too much attention that it distracts me from my task).I’ve been enjoying Sigur Ros much more than you, but obviously most of what you’ve mentioned could be off putting to some/many. I’m big with lyrics as well, but the fact they have such a soothing ethereal quality, the voice as another instrument works for me here.. They sound like ethereal soundscapes that might play in the background of a spa. While I am sure many will find that soothing, I keep looking for something to tap my foot to or bob my head.
I doubt they’d ever be in heavy rotation for me, but as I’ve said a time or two before, I look forward to their playlist at the end.
Classical music my usual go-to for that, but foreign (or non-) language stuff can frequently be something a bit new and different than maybe some old standbys that already know the lyrics to by heart such that don’t focus on them. My Jorge Ben songs here a bit more up tempo than usual concentration music, but still can put me in a good groove.
There are only 3 songs left with this style of vocals so hopefully I/they can pull you back in. And I know where you're coming from, I have the same problem with Phish and The Hold Steady- really like most of the music but not the vocalists. Today's Phish was by far my fav due to having a different lead singerI tend to agree with those that dig the music but get turned off a bit by the vocals. I liked his voice on the more bluesy numbers but when he tries to to “heavy”, it’s tougher for me to listen to.The intro peaked my interest in Juggernaut, but when the singing started it wasn't my thing. I've liked some Clutch songs in the countdown.No love for my last Clutch pick so not expecting any for this one as they sound very similar. In hindsight I probably should've cut 1 of them for something off their self titled album
Definitely a talented band and I’m sure they’re great live.
TIME TO CHIME ...
Of Lilies and Remains/Departure
"but otb, they're kinda the same 'song', what gives putting them in sequence"?
very astute - if not painfully obvious - observation, dear reader.
Bauhouac? Kerouhaus?
these two needed to be slotted back to back - and belly to belly - in an exercise such as this, where the great majority are not the least bit familiar with the catalog.
to be more user friendly, would kinda be akin to a poster including "You Know My Name, Look Up The Number" and "Revolution #9" in their Beatles top 31, to showcase their more experimental and avant garde/absurdist side ... though, to be fair here, those 2 are a snippet outta 200+ tunes, whereas the 'haus culled maybe 1/5th of that output ... so, to me, the Bauhaus oddities are more reflective of the specific studio moods and vibes that were swirling about the group at those particular times of recording.
the Kerouac stream of consciousness sitch i cited may not resonate at all here with some of y'all, and that's Archie with me, 'cuz i see it in spades - (these were staples of mine when i were indulging the party powder) - toss in a heaping helping of Mr. Poe, and a certain artifice that matches Charlie McKenzie at the finger snapping coffee house (excuse me, but i believe i ordered the large cappuccino), and WALA!
suffice to say that these two are not widely considered jewels of the oeuvre, though "Lilies" remained a live staple, largely due to it's more conventional construct, whereas "Departure" is just and unhinged kowtow to their whimsy.
during the sessions for their last proper release in '83 (i do not recognize the '08 album), Murphy were sidelined with pneumonia, and were still struggling with his grandiosity ... and the smack. when he returned to the studio he were quite taken aback that the Haskin bros and Ash had already laid down a ton of the work sans his presence ... one of the reasons why i think he camped it up on "Departure" like the Lydon/Bowie hybrid on 'roids he were ... interestingly enough, the song title and the album it came off of ("Burning From the Inside") hint at the deterioration of the outfit, proper ... and it proved to be prophetic, as it would take 15 years for them to reunite for a comeback tour, and 25 yrs before hitting the studio again.
the seeds of Tones on Tail and Love and Rockets are really taking sprout, and bassist David J was proving to be a major force ... and he has been the star of the seven i've rolled out thus far.
in putting this together i was not looking to just creep the obvious, though, with their abbreviated work, it's kinda impossible - but i do consider this an honest 31 song dissection of this band as per my 40 year immersion ... it will be as indulgent and bombastic and free of f**** to give, much like the career the lads laid on us.
we've had: embracing of the absurd with "Party of the First Part"/foray into space and dub with "Paranoia, Paranoia"/a lushly arranged Murphy lament in "All We Ever Wanted Was Everything"/a legit post-punk floor riot in "Dancing"/a nod to the Hammer-esque, Victorian horror ambience with "The Three Shadows Part I"/the sci-fi with a toe tag vibe of "Mask" ... and now the two free form excursions - lots to dive in to with this lot, the lads had no fear of worming out they pigeonhole any COTdamn way they saw fit - this i love.
btw, i saw @simey likened "Lilies" to a B-52s kinda feel ... it were a direct homage to Cale & the Velvets, who they were huge devotees of (surprise!), but, thru power of suggestion, i think i see her point - i woulda never made that connection, so it's very cool to know that when fresh ears fall on this work that it can elicit such an off kilter comparision - which i like.
![]()
I think it was that time that sports team won the championship.We are the Champions - Queen; I think I've heard this one before as it seemed vaguely familiar. Seriously, though, still a great song 46 years on
Let me know how that turns out. I took my 2 kids to see them when the youngest was about 14 years old. But they were already (forced to be) fans by then.The Decemberist- Raincaot song- My 14 just walked by and said she liked the sound of this one... she is now looking up other Decemberist songs. daily win!
She has discovered down by the water and Crane wife... #prouddadLet me know how that turns out. I took my 2 kids to see them when the youngest was about 14 years old. But they were already (forced to be) fans by then.The Decemberist- Raincaot song- My 14 just walked by and said she liked the sound of this one... she is now looking up other Decemberist songs. daily win!![]()
I am still down. Heavy Clutch reminds me so much of Helmet's sound.There are only 3 songs left with this style of vocals so hopefully I/they can pull you back in. And I know where you're coming from, I have the same problem with Phish and The Hold Steady- really like most of the music but not the vocalists. Today's Phish was by far my fav due to having a different lead singerI tend to agree with those that dig the music but get turned off a bit by the vocals. I liked his voice on the more bluesy numbers but when he tries to to “heavy”, it’s tougher for me to listen to.The intro peaked my interest in Juggernaut, but when the singing started it wasn't my thing. I've liked some Clutch songs in the countdown.No love for my last Clutch pick so not expecting any for this one as they sound very similar. In hindsight I probably should've cut 1 of them for something off their self titled album
Definitely a talented band and I’m sure they’re great live.
#24- The Stranglers - Duchess
- YouTube
Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.m.youtube.com
Year - 1978
Album - The Raven
UK Chart position - 14
Vocals - Hugh Cornwell
Key Lyric - Duch of the terrace knows all her heritage
Says she's Henry's kid
Knows all her history in the family
Needs a man, god forbid
God forbid
Interesting Points
1- This song is about Hugh Cornwell’s dalliance with a direct descendant of Henry VIII. She allegedly lived alone in a huge mansion. She had a constant stream of upper class potential suitors, who she rebuffed in favour of low life junkie rock star.
2- The band dressed up as choirboys for the video, which was enough for the BBC to ban the video. Meanwhile there was rampant paedophilia at the TV station running unchecked
3- This album was the first clear departure from punk and Duchess was the lead single. The evolution from Black and White to the Raven to The Gospel according to the Meninblack is fascinating. This may be one of their most commercial accessible songs, but just lacks a little bite
4- A funny lyric is “And the Rodney's are queuing up”.
5- When The Manic Street Preachers' 1998 single "If You Tolerate This Your Children Will Be Next" was released, many commented on its similarities to this song. Stranglers singer Hugh Cornwall commented to Classic Rockmagazine: "It was bandied around when it came out. I think the publishing companies involved have musicologists who study these things and decide whether to take action. No action was taken, so obviously it didn't resemble it that much. It doesn't bother me. Everyone plagiarises everything anyway. It's the nature of the beast."What a Rodney is in this case is man “with no "breeding" (You know the type...) who trail around marriageable aristocratic chicks, to try and buy into "class" / nobility. Why "Rodney"? Because, nobody with any class / breeding whatsoever would call their son "Rodney"”
Summary to date
Year
1977 - 3
1978 - 2
1979 - 2
1980 - 0
1981 - 0
1982 - 0
1983 - 0
1984 - 0
1985 - 0
1986 - 0
1987 - 0
1988 - 1
1989 - 0
1990 onwards - 0
Where to find
Rattus Norvegicus - 3/9
No More Heroes - 0/11
Black and White - 1/12
The Raven - 2/11
The Gospel According to the Meninblack - 0/10
La Folie - 0/11
Feline - 0/9
Aural Sculpture - 0/11
Dreamtime - 0/10
All Live and All of the Night - 1/13
10 - 0/10
1991 onwards - 0
B Sides - 0
Greatest Hits - 0
Standalone Single - 1
Running Vocal Count
Hugh Cornwell - 5
Jean-Jacques Burnel - 3
Other - 0
Rundown
#31 - Walk on By
#30 - Ugly
#29 - All Day and All of the Night
#28 - Meninblack
#27 - Goodbye Toulouse
#26 - Princess of the Streets
#25 - Sweden (All Quiet on the Eastern Front)
#24 - Duchess
Next we go back to their roots and they tell us who they are from the get go
Yes. Page McConnell.Is this a different singer on the Phish track?
This was my reaction as well.Elliott Smith - had to double check to make sure I didn’t fast forward to Simon & Garfunkel.
We are middle-aged dummies and we're through being cool.This is the kind of Chicago song I dig- that might be uncool or so uncool it's actually cool? idk
Eliminate the ninnies and the twits.We are middle-aged dummies and we're through being cool.This is the kind of Chicago song I dig- that might be uncool or so uncool it's actually cool? idk
I prefer to think of it as expanding the definition.We are middle-aged dummies and we're through being cool.This is the kind of Chicago song I dig- that might be uncool or so uncool it's actually cool? idk
just an fyi that the TS list is chronological.My two favorite Taylor Swift songs, “The 1” and “My Tears Richochet” have already been selected. I prefer the “Long Pond” version of both songs.
I honestly believe these are two of the finest songs of the 21st century. They’re that good.
Speak for yourselfWe are middle-aged dummies and we're through being cool.This is the kind of Chicago song I dig- that might be uncool or so uncool it's actually cool? idk
Yeah, some of us were never cool in the first place.Speak for yourselfWe are middle-aged dummies and we're through being cool.This is the kind of Chicago song I dig- that might be uncool or so uncool it's actually cool? idk![]()
Or were the only cool person they knew.Yeah, some of us were never cool in the first place.Speak for yourselfWe are middle-aged dummies and we're through being cool.This is the kind of Chicago song I dig- that might be uncool or so uncool it's actually cool? idk![]()
Is this a different singer on the Phish track?