What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Mike McCarthy will be a flop as Packers HC (1 Viewer)

McCarthy is a great coach. He lost a game it happens. He did not fail to read the fake kick he did not miss read the hail mary on 2 pt conversion he did not fumble the onside kick why should he be fired because Packers fans are upset they lost? Those same fans would be complaining if he didnt kick the field goals and got stopped each time.

 
McCarthy is a great coach. He lost a game it happens. He did not fail to read the fake kick he did not miss read the hail mary on 2 pt conversion he did not fumble the onside kick why should he be fired because Packers fans are upset they lost? Those same fans would be complaining if he didnt kick the field goals and got stopped each time.
If the Packers fired McCarthy and went with an up and comer I would be happy. If they fired him and went with a retread that is currently out of work I would be annoyed. He isn't the worst coach in the league, but he is far from the best.

NFL coaches are mostly the same. Very few of them give their team an identity. Mccarthy goes for it on 4th and 1 against detroit, but settles here, twice. Is Seattle's rush defense better than Detroit's? Nope.

I could cut him a tiny bit of slack on that first one because things were a little chaotic and the team was riled up. Got a stupid penalty, were basically on the second trip going in. I could listen to an argument that coming away with no points would have been tough to swallow. I disagree, but would at least understand the logic.

 
Is anyone really implying that the Packers should fire McCarthy after the NFC Champ game? If so, that's a bit extreme.

With that said, I think the team would be best served if he gave up play calling duties. To me it's clear that he's got too much on his plate which is effecting his ability to make optimal situational decisions during games. It almost seems as if he has a chokehold on his pre-game gameplan regardless of what's actually happening on the field.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
His game plan had his team up 12 points, on the road in Seattle against the best D in the league...with 4 minutes to go and his opponent having 1 timeout.

A lot of hindsight and couch coaching going on here.
The 5 turnovers (at least 3 of which had absolutely zero to do with scheme) got him that 12 point lead.

"His game plan" left at least 4 points on the field in the first half (maybe more), and cost them a key stop on a 3rd and 19 when he only rushed 3. Change either of those and that onside kick means nothing.
This.

Like I said earlier. McCarthy is a very good coach that coached a bad game. It happens.
He errs on the side of conservative decisionmaking all the time. It's a continuing problem.

As for the person who called it "hindsight," I'm guessing you weren't checking social media when the Packers kicked those two FGs in early 4th and goal situations. He was lit up, and rightfully so. It was an impossibly easy call to go for the TD even in the "average" NFL situation, let alone on the road when you're a > TD underdog. I'd blame the entire organization for giving him the latitude to make such terrible decisions- the front office has to sit down a coach who continues to make those kind of mistakes and explain to him why it's just not an option. It's almost "punt on third down" stupid.

 
Added some thoughts in bold.
Sho: just popping back to *nod* to your earlier comment. The point of the play-by-play post was to emphasize that McCarthy/Rodgers never ever looked at throwing or running at Sherman. So both overly conservative (imo) AND just plain stupid. Lack of killer instinct here. Going back to my first comment in this thread, when you see a glaring weakness...you don't ignore it and just figure...ah shucks, we got this game in hand. You exploit it for all it's worth!

 
Is anyone really implying that the Packers should fire McCarthy after the NFC Champ game? If so, that's a bit extreme.

With that said, I think the team would be best served if he gave up play calling duties. To me it's clear that he's got too much on his plate which is effecting his ability to make optimal situational decisions during games. It almost seems as if he has a chokehold on his pre-game gameplan regardless of what's actually happening on the field.
Yeah I don't think too many Packer fans are suggesting that but maybe taking a little bit of accountability for the epic meltdown would be nice. He's a decent coach who like many had a bad day...it's certainly not all on him.

 
His game plan had his team up 12 points, on the road in Seattle against the best D in the league...with 4 minutes to go and his opponent having 1 timeout.

A lot of hindsight and couch coaching going on here.
The 5 turnovers (at least 3 of which had absolutely zero to do with scheme) got him that 12 point lead.

"His game plan" left at least 4 points on the field in the first half (maybe more), and cost them a key stop on a 3rd and 19 when he only rushed 3. Change either of those and that onside kick means nothing.
This.

Like I said earlier. McCarthy is a very good coach that coached a bad game. It happens.
He errs on the side of conservative decisionmaking all the time. It's a continuing problem.

As for the person who called it "hindsight," I'm guessing you weren't checking social media when the Packers kicked those two FGs in early 4th and goal situations. He was lit up, and rightfully so. It was an impossibly easy call to go for the TD even in the "average" NFL situation, let alone on the road when you're a > TD underdog. I'd blame the entire organization for giving him the latitude to make such terrible decisions- the front office has to sit down a coach who continues to make those kind of mistakes and explain to him why it's just not an option. It's almost "punt on third down" stupid.
I'm sure if he had gone for it and been stopped, coming away with no points and giving all the momentum back to the home crowd, the armchair fantasy coaches on social media would have lauded his decision.

 
His game plan had his team up 12 points, on the road in Seattle against the best D in the league...with 4 minutes to go and his opponent having 1 timeout.

A lot of hindsight and couch coaching going on here.
The 5 turnovers (at least 3 of which had absolutely zero to do with scheme) got him that 12 point lead.

"His game plan" left at least 4 points on the field in the first half (maybe more), and cost them a key stop on a 3rd and 19 when he only rushed 3. Change either of those and that onside kick means nothing.
5 turnovers...ok...why do you think 3 of them had zero to do with scheme. I give you the special teams fumbles. But the first...was tipped, sure. Why? Because the ball had to be out front because the coverage was very good.

Left them at least 4 points on the board? How so? Oh, you assume they score from the 1...can't make that assumption. Had they gone for it...they could have left 3 points on the field.

I agree only rushing 3 sucked...that is not McCarthy's game plan...that one comes from the DC and you won't see me ever defend that type of play by Capers. Said in that thread I didn't want them going passive on D and I believe they did in the 4th after having a great defensive plan for the rest of the game.

But you also just can't assume "change those and xxx doesn't matter". Say they rush 5...and one of them hits Wilson in the head and its automatic first anyway...and even if they rush 5...they could still convert. I hate the call, but you can't factually state had they changed the call Seattle would not have converted (same as you can't say if they went for it at the GL that they would have scored a TD).

 
And stated he had no regrets about the play calling. Nice to know he feels he is infallible. What an arrogant coach.
I have no regrets about his play calling. He called a good game that got them a lead in perhaps the toughest stadium to play in against perhaps an all-time great defense.
As a Packer fan I'm absolutely stunned anyone is content with the game he called yesterday. Like Carter said he's a good coach who had a bad day...it happens just sucked it happened in the NFC championship game. He certainly wasn't the only one who had a bad day.
Not completely content...but it does not bother me as bad as some.

I think not going at Sherman after the injury was bad.

And lost in all of this and so far escaping criticism? Rodgers. He did not have a great day. Timing was off...that INT to Sherman early was terrible. And as I read from McGinn I think...what great plays did he make?

This loss was not on any one thing...there were an avalanche of screwups down the board. D, special teams, coaches, QB, all of them.

 
McCarthy is a great coach. He lost a game it happens. He did not fail to read the fake kick he did not miss read the hail mary on 2 pt conversion he did not fumble the onside kick why should he be fired because Packers fans are upset they lost? Those same fans would be complaining if he didnt kick the field goals and got stopped each time.
If the Packers fired McCarthy and went with an up and comer I would be happy. If they fired him and went with a retread that is currently out of work I would be annoyed. He isn't the worst coach in the league, but he is far from the best.

NFL coaches are mostly the same. Very few of them give their team an identity. Mccarthy goes for it on 4th and 1 against detroit, but settles here, twice. Is Seattle's rush defense better than Detroit's? Nope.

I could cut him a tiny bit of slack on that first one because things were a little chaotic and the team was riled up. Got a stupid penalty, were basically on the second trip going in. I could listen to an argument that coming away with no points would have been tough to swallow. I disagree, but would at least understand the logic.
Difference in playing on the road vs. at home IMO.

and how did that go going for it against Detroit? They stopped them at least once down there on 4th didn't they?

 
Added some thoughts in bold.
Sho: just popping back to *nod* to your earlier comment. The point of the play-by-play post was to emphasize that McCarthy/Rodgers never ever looked at throwing or running at Sherman. So both overly conservative (imo) AND just plain stupid. Lack of killer instinct here. Going back to my first comment in this thread, when you see a glaring weakness...you don't ignore it and just figure...ah shucks, we got this game in hand. You exploit it for all it's worth!
I agree it was one of the biggest blunders and its on MM and on Rodgers both.

 
And stated he had no regrets about the play calling. Nice to know he feels he is infallible. What an arrogant coach.
I have no regrets about his play calling. He called a good game that got them a lead in perhaps the toughest stadium to play in against perhaps an all-time great defense.
As a Packer fan I'm absolutely stunned anyone is content with the game he called yesterday. Like Carter said he's a good coach who had a bad day...it happens just sucked it happened in the NFC championship game. He certainly wasn't the only one who had a bad day.
Not completely content...but it does not bother me as bad as some.

I think not going at Sherman after the injury was bad.

And lost in all of this and so far escaping criticism? Rodgers. He did not have a great day. Timing was off...that INT to Sherman early was terrible. And as I read from McGinn I think...what great plays did he make?

This loss was not on any one thing...there were an avalanche of screwups down the board. D, special teams, coaches, QB, all of them.
For Shame, you are going straight to hell...or at least some dark dirty room in the basement of lambeau where they keep the non-believers.

 
McCarthy is a great coach. He lost a game it happens. He did not fail to read the fake kick he did not miss read the hail mary on 2 pt conversion he did not fumble the onside kick why should he be fired because Packers fans are upset they lost? Those same fans would be complaining if he didnt kick the field goals and got stopped each time.
Some of Belichick's "genius" isn't brilliant schemes it's drilling the small things into his players. Like when your job is to block on an onside kick you don't jump in front of the teams best wr who is waiting to catch the ball. Guarantee an idiot like that is cut immediately.

Hard to give the packers a lot of credit for getting the lead because seattle really just handed it to them. No way you should ever lose a game when the other team turns it over 5 times.

 
Packers got every break imaginable and couldn't win it.
Uh, Seattle got a ton of breaks, too, most notably the onsides kick, the 2-point conversion, the coin flip, and even the winning TD. You know, every important play at the end of the game.

 
McCarthy is a great coach. He lost a game it happens. He did not fail to read the fake kick he did not miss read the hail mary on 2 pt conversion he did not fumble the onside kick why should he be fired because Packers fans are upset they lost? Those same fans would be complaining if he didnt kick the field goals and got stopped each time.
Some of Belichick's "genius" isn't brilliant schemes it's drilling the small things into his players. Like when your job is to block on an onside kick you don't jump in front of the teams best wr who is waiting to catch the ball. Guarantee an idiot like that is cut immediately.

Hard to give the packers a lot of credit for getting the lead because seattle really just handed it to them. No way you should ever lose a game when the other team turns it over 5 times.
 
His game plan had his team up 12 points, on the road in Seattle against the best D in the league...with 4 minutes to go and his opponent having 1 timeout.

A lot of hindsight and couch coaching going on here.
The 5 turnovers (at least 3 of which had absolutely zero to do with scheme) got him that 12 point lead.

"His game plan" left at least 4 points on the field in the first half (maybe more), and cost them a key stop on a 3rd and 19 when he only rushed 3. Change either of those and that onside kick means nothing.
This.

Like I said earlier. McCarthy is a very good coach that coached a bad game. It happens.
He errs on the side of conservative decisionmaking all the time. It's a continuing problem.

As for the person who called it "hindsight," I'm guessing you weren't checking social media when the Packers kicked those two FGs in early 4th and goal situations. He was lit up, and rightfully so. It was an impossibly easy call to go for the TD even in the "average" NFL situation, let alone on the road when you're a > TD underdog. I'd blame the entire organization for giving him the latitude to make such terrible decisions- the front office has to sit down a coach who continues to make those kind of mistakes and explain to him why it's just not an option. It's almost "punt on third down" stupid.
I'm sure if he had gone for it and been stopped, coming away with no points and giving all the momentum back to the home crowd, the armchair fantasy coaches on social media would have lauded his decision.
Yup, absolutely. At least the ones I follow would have lauded the decision regardless of result. You're talking about between 4 and 5 expected points if you go for it vs 2.9 expected points if you try the FG. And even in the unlikely event of failure you still likely get 20+ yards of field position in a high-leverage area, where play calls restricted in order to avoid a safety and you still may come away with a safety or get the ball back on the opponents' side of the 50. This is the easiest call of the game. McCarthy flat-out blew it. He should be forced to account for it; it's stupid that we force coaches to account for "risky calls" that fail but not "safe calls" that backfire, even when they backfire dramatically like we see here.

 
His game plan had his team up 12 points, on the road in Seattle against the best D in the league...with 4 minutes to go and his opponent having 1 timeout.

A lot of hindsight and couch coaching going on here.
The 5 turnovers (at least 3 of which had absolutely zero to do with scheme) got him that 12 point lead.

"His game plan" left at least 4 points on the field in the first half (maybe more), and cost them a key stop on a 3rd and 19 when he only rushed 3. Change either of those and that onside kick means nothing.
This.

Like I said earlier. McCarthy is a very good coach that coached a bad game. It happens.
He errs on the side of conservative decisionmaking all the time. It's a continuing problem.

As for the person who called it "hindsight," I'm guessing you weren't checking social media when the Packers kicked those two FGs in early 4th and goal situations. He was lit up, and rightfully so. It was an impossibly easy call to go for the TD even in the "average" NFL situation, let alone on the road when you're a > TD underdog. I'd blame the entire organization for giving him the latitude to make such terrible decisions- the front office has to sit down a coach who continues to make those kind of mistakes and explain to him why it's just not an option. It's almost "punt on third down" stupid.
I'm sure if he had gone for it and been stopped, coming away with no points and giving all the momentum back to the home crowd, the armchair fantasy coaches on social media would have lauded his decision.
Yup, absolutely. At least the ones I follow would have lauded the decision regardless of result. You're talking about between 4 and 5 expected points if you go for it vs 2.9 expected points if you try the FG. And even in the unlikely event of failure you still likely get 20+ yards of field position in a high-leverage area, where play calls restricted in order to avoid a safety and you still may come away with a safety or get the ball back on the opponents' side of the 50. This is the easiest call of the game. McCarthy flat-out blew it. He should be forced to account for it; it's stupid that we force coaches to account for "risky calls" that fail but not "safe calls" that backfire, even when they backfire dramatically like we see here.
But McCarthy's decisions didn't backfire. Playing as an 8.5 point underdog on the road against a champion team that crushed the Packers in week 1, he had his team in a position where a win was almost certain, where only the most improbable series of events could cost the game. This with his star QB having an off day (generously described). It took a stunning, unbelievable lack of focus and failure to execute on the part of several players to achieve this result.

 
His game plan had his team up 12 points, on the road in Seattle against the best D in the league...with 4 minutes to go and his opponent having 1 timeout.

A lot of hindsight and couch coaching going on here.
The 5 turnovers (at least 3 of which had absolutely zero to do with scheme) got him that 12 point lead.

"His game plan" left at least 4 points on the field in the first half (maybe more), and cost them a key stop on a 3rd and 19 when he only rushed 3. Change either of those and that onside kick means nothing.
This.

Like I said earlier. McCarthy is a very good coach that coached a bad game. It happens.
He errs on the side of conservative decisionmaking all the time. It's a continuing problem.

As for the person who called it "hindsight," I'm guessing you weren't checking social media when the Packers kicked those two FGs in early 4th and goal situations. He was lit up, and rightfully so. It was an impossibly easy call to go for the TD even in the "average" NFL situation, let alone on the road when you're a > TD underdog. I'd blame the entire organization for giving him the latitude to make such terrible decisions- the front office has to sit down a coach who continues to make those kind of mistakes and explain to him why it's just not an option. It's almost "punt on third down" stupid.
I'm sure if he had gone for it and been stopped, coming away with no points and giving all the momentum back to the home crowd, the armchair fantasy coaches on social media would have lauded his decision.
Yup, absolutely. At least the ones I follow would have lauded the decision regardless of result. You're talking about between 4 and 5 expected points if you go for it vs 2.9 expected points if you try the FG. And even in the unlikely event of failure you still likely get 20+ yards of field position in a high-leverage area, where play calls restricted in order to avoid a safety and you still may come away with a safety or get the ball back on the opponents' side of the 50. This is the easiest call of the game. McCarthy flat-out blew it. He should be forced to account for it; it's stupid that we force coaches to account for "risky calls" that fail but not "safe calls" that backfire, even when they backfire dramatically like we see here.
But McCarthy's decisions didn't backfire. Playing as an 8.5 point underdog on the road against a champion team that crushed the Packers in week 1, he had his team in a position where a win was almost certain, where only the most improbable series of events could cost the game. This with his star QB having an off day (generously described). It took a stunning, unbelievable lack of focus and failure to execute on the part of several players to achieve this result.
If he'd made the correct decisions on those plays his team would have had a better chance of winning the game. His team did not win the game. Therefore they backfired. The unlikelihood of the comeback that followed doesn't make the decision any less stupid.

Say my team is up by 20 points with five minutes left in the fourth quarter and I decide to punt on first down. The other team runs right through my defense and scores a TD, recovers the onside kick that bounces off seven of my players' hands, scores another TD because my team can't tackle anyone all of a sudden, recovers another onside kick because my special teams guys just forgot to get into onside recover formation, and scores another TD because my cornerback tackles a WR before the ball arrives in the end zone on 4th down on a ball he wouldn't have caught anyway. The stunning, unbelievable lack of focus and failure to execute on the part of my players necessary to achieve this result doesn't change the fact that punting on first down was incredibly stupid.

Also, being heavy dogs on the road to a team that crushed you earlier in the season is all the more reason to go for the TD there. You have to assume your opportunities to score will be limited and that they will eventually generate opportunities of their own so you have to take "risks" when the opportunity presents itself. Although I hesitate to call a no-brainer like going for it on 4th and goal from the 1 a "risk." It's a common sense move.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
McCarthy is a great coach. He lost a game it happens. He did not fail to read the fake kick he did not miss read the hail mary on 2 pt conversion he did not fumble the onside kick why should he be fired because Packers fans are upset they lost? Those same fans would be complaining if he didnt kick the field goals and got stopped each time.
If the Packers fired McCarthy and went with an up and comer I would be happy. If they fired him and went with a retread that is currently out of work I would be annoyed. He isn't the worst coach in the league, but he is far from the best.

NFL coaches are mostly the same. Very few of them give their team an identity. Mccarthy goes for it on 4th and 1 against detroit, but settles here, twice. Is Seattle's rush defense better than Detroit's? Nope.

I could cut him a tiny bit of slack on that first one because things were a little chaotic and the team was riled up. Got a stupid penalty, were basically on the second trip going in. I could listen to an argument that coming away with no points would have been tough to swallow. I disagree, but would at least understand the logic.
Difference in playing on the road vs. at home IMO.

and how did that go going for it against Detroit? They stopped them at least once down there on 4th didn't they?
I don't understand this logic. I disagree with coaching 4th and 1 differently regardless of whether you are home or away. That being said, why would you try to minimize risk/reward when you are the away team? If you were going to alter your strategy it should be the other way around. Minimize risk when you are the favorite, maximize reward when you are the dog.

It would be like a less skilled heavyweight boxer with one heck of a right never going for the knockout and trying to grind out a 12 round decision. Sure you may go the distance, but you aren't increasing your chances to win.

 
His game plan had his team up 12 points, on the road in Seattle against the best D in the league...with 4 minutes to go and his opponent having 1 timeout.

A lot of hindsight and couch coaching going on here.
The 5 turnovers (at least 3 of which had absolutely zero to do with scheme) got him that 12 point lead.

"His game plan" left at least 4 points on the field in the first half (maybe more), and cost them a key stop on a 3rd and 19 when he only rushed 3. Change either of those and that onside kick means nothing.
This.

Like I said earlier. McCarthy is a very good coach that coached a bad game. It happens.
He errs on the side of conservative decisionmaking all the time. It's a continuing problem.

As for the person who called it "hindsight," I'm guessing you weren't checking social media when the Packers kicked those two FGs in early 4th and goal situations. He was lit up, and rightfully so. It was an impossibly easy call to go for the TD even in the "average" NFL situation, let alone on the road when you're a > TD underdog. I'd blame the entire organization for giving him the latitude to make such terrible decisions- the front office has to sit down a coach who continues to make those kind of mistakes and explain to him why it's just not an option. It's almost "punt on third down" stupid.
I'm sure if he had gone for it and been stopped, coming away with no points and giving all the momentum back to the home crowd, the armchair fantasy coaches on social media would have lauded his decision.
Yup, absolutely. At least the ones I follow would have lauded the decision regardless of result. You're talking about between 4 and 5 expected points if you go for it vs 2.9 expected points if you try the FG. And even in the unlikely event of failure you still likely get 20+ yards of field position in a high-leverage area, where play calls restricted in order to avoid a safety and you still may come away with a safety or get the ball back on the opponents' side of the 50. This is the easiest call of the game. McCarthy flat-out blew it. He should be forced to account for it; it's stupid that we force coaches to account for "risky calls" that fail but not "safe calls" that backfire, even when they backfire dramatically like we see here.
But McCarthy's decisions didn't backfire. Playing as an 8.5 point underdog on the road against a champion team that crushed the Packers in week 1, he had his team in a position where a win was almost certain, where only the most improbable series of events could cost the game. This with his star QB having an off day (generously described). It took a stunning, unbelievable lack of focus and failure to execute on the part of several players to achieve this result.
I can't help but think what the narrative would be if GB had hung on and won the game 19-7. No points given up by the defense. Everybody would be in here praising McCarthy on what a great game plan he had to shut out the Seahawks, a huge favorite in the game playing at home. Of course, there are some that would still have something to ##### about. It's very easy to criticize the results of plays after you know the end result.

 
And stated he had no regrets about the play calling. Nice to know he feels he is infallible. What an arrogant coach.
I have no regrets about his play calling. He called a good game that got them a lead in perhaps the toughest stadium to play in against perhaps an all-time great defense.
As a Packer fan I'm absolutely stunned anyone is content with the game he called yesterday. Like Carter said he's a good coach who had a bad day...it happens just sucked it happened in the NFC championship game. He certainly wasn't the only one who had a bad day.
Not completely content...but it does not bother me as bad as some.

I think not going at Sherman after the injury was bad.

And lost in all of this and so far escaping criticism? Rodgers. He did not have a great day. Timing was off...that INT to Sherman early was terrible. And as I read from McGinn I think...what great plays did he make?

This loss was not on any one thing...there were an avalanche of screwups down the board. D, special teams, coaches, QB, all of them.
For Shame, you are going straight to hell...or at least some dark dirty room in the basement of lambeau where they keep the non-believers.
I might be...but it needs to be said.

He didn't have a very good game and really made no great plays.

He has authority to change things at the line and didn't...he had to have seen Sherman out there holding his arm and didn't test it at all on that side.

As I said...this was a loss on all levels and anyone blaming just Bostick or Slocum or McCarthy or Capers needs to open their eyes.

 
parasaurolophus said:
McCarthy is a great coach. He lost a game it happens. He did not fail to read the fake kick he did not miss read the hail mary on 2 pt conversion he did not fumble the onside kick why should he be fired because Packers fans are upset they lost? Those same fans would be complaining if he didnt kick the field goals and got stopped each time.
If the Packers fired McCarthy and went with an up and comer I would be happy. If they fired him and went with a retread that is currently out of work I would be annoyed. He isn't the worst coach in the league, but he is far from the best.

NFL coaches are mostly the same. Very few of them give their team an identity. Mccarthy goes for it on 4th and 1 against detroit, but settles here, twice. Is Seattle's rush defense better than Detroit's? Nope.

I could cut him a tiny bit of slack on that first one because things were a little chaotic and the team was riled up. Got a stupid penalty, were basically on the second trip going in. I could listen to an argument that coming away with no points would have been tough to swallow. I disagree, but would at least understand the logic.
Difference in playing on the road vs. at home IMO.

and how did that go going for it against Detroit? They stopped them at least once down there on 4th didn't they?
I don't understand this logic. I disagree with coaching 4th and 1 differently regardless of whether you are home or away. That being said, why would you try to minimize risk/reward when you are the away team? If you were going to alter your strategy it should be the other way around. Minimize risk when you are the favorite, maximize reward when you are the dog.

It would be like a less skilled heavyweight boxer with one heck of a right never going for the knockout and trying to grind out a 12 round decision. Sure you may go the distance, but you aren't increasing your chances to win.
Id have to go back and see if its something I have read or heard somewhere about coaches and changing how they do things on the road vs. home.

I remember this type of situation being mentioned.

At home...you are a little more aggressive. If you don't make the TD...you have them backed up in your own stadium and feel better about it or something like that.

 
His game plan had his team up 12 points, on the road in Seattle against the best D in the league...with 4 minutes to go and his opponent having 1 timeout.

A lot of hindsight and couch coaching going on here.
The 5 turnovers (at least 3 of which had absolutely zero to do with scheme) got him that 12 point lead.

"His game plan" left at least 4 points on the field in the first half (maybe more), and cost them a key stop on a 3rd and 19 when he only rushed 3. Change either of those and that onside kick means nothing.
This.

Like I said earlier. McCarthy is a very good coach that coached a bad game. It happens.
He errs on the side of conservative decisionmaking all the time. It's a continuing problem.

As for the person who called it "hindsight," I'm guessing you weren't checking social media when the Packers kicked those two FGs in early 4th and goal situations. He was lit up, and rightfully so. It was an impossibly easy call to go for the TD even in the "average" NFL situation, let alone on the road when you're a > TD underdog. I'd blame the entire organization for giving him the latitude to make such terrible decisions- the front office has to sit down a coach who continues to make those kind of mistakes and explain to him why it's just not an option. It's almost "punt on third down" stupid.
I'm sure if he had gone for it and been stopped, coming away with no points and giving all the momentum back to the home crowd, the armchair fantasy coaches on social media would have lauded his decision.
Yup, absolutely. At least the ones I follow would have lauded the decision regardless of result. You're talking about between 4 and 5 expected points if you go for it vs 2.9 expected points if you try the FG. And even in the unlikely event of failure you still likely get 20+ yards of field position in a high-leverage area, where play calls restricted in order to avoid a safety and you still may come away with a safety or get the ball back on the opponents' side of the 50. This is the easiest call of the game. McCarthy flat-out blew it. He should be forced to account for it; it's stupid that we force coaches to account for "risky calls" that fail but not "safe calls" that backfire, even when they backfire dramatically like we see here.
But McCarthy's decisions didn't backfire. Playing as an 8.5 point underdog on the road against a champion team that crushed the Packers in week 1, he had his team in a position where a win was almost certain, where only the most improbable series of events could cost the game. This with his star QB having an off day (generously described). It took a stunning, unbelievable lack of focus and failure to execute on the part of several players to achieve this result.
I can't help but think what the narrative would be if GB had hung on and won the game 19-7. No points given up by the defense. Everybody would be in here praising McCarthy on what a great game plan he had to shut out the Seahawks, a huge favorite in the game playing at home. Of course, there are some that would still have something to ##### about. It's very easy to criticize the results of plays after you know the end result.
Exactly...get that INT...and now say the 4 minute offense works like it did against Dallas the week before (or other weeks this year) where they ran effectively and could run down the clock or run it out.

Are people still complaining about it?

Of course not.

Then again...if my Aunt had balls she'd be my uncle.

I would prefer that is how it happened...but it didn't.

 
And stated he had no regrets about the play calling. Nice to know he feels he is infallible. What an arrogant coach.
I have no regrets about his play calling. He called a good game that got them a lead in perhaps the toughest stadium to play in against perhaps an all-time great defense.
As a Packer fan I'm absolutely stunned anyone is content with the game he called yesterday. Like Carter said he's a good coach who had a bad day...it happens just sucked it happened in the NFC championship game. He certainly wasn't the only one who had a bad day.
Not completely content...but it does not bother me as bad as some.

I think not going at Sherman after the injury was bad.

And lost in all of this and so far escaping criticism? Rodgers. He did not have a great day. Timing was off...that INT to Sherman early was terrible. And as I read from McGinn I think...what great plays did he make?

This loss was not on any one thing...there were an avalanche of screwups down the board. D, special teams, coaches, QB, all of them.
For Shame, you are going straight to hell...or at least some dark dirty room in the basement of lambeau where they keep the non-believers.
I might be...but it needs to be said.

He didn't have a very good game and really made no great plays.

He has authority to change things at the line and didn't...he had to have seen Sherman out there holding his arm and didn't test it at all on that side.

As I said...this was a loss on all levels and anyone blaming just Bostick or Slocum or McCarthy or Capers needs to open their eyes.
Not to give Rodgers a pass but according to Bill Scott on 5 of the 6 final offensive plays (3rd and 16 being the lone exception) they had their multiple TE extra offensive lineman in. Rodgers could not check out of a run play in those instances.

With that being said Rodgers had a bad game and deserves his fair share of the blame. I've been hard on McCarthy mainly because Packer playoff loses are becoming a disturbing trend...5 seasons in a row now. Another season or two ending with a bad loss I'd really hope they'd make a change. It would be a major disappointment for Rodgers to get to only 1 Super Bowl and I fear the Packers have peaked under McCarthy's leadership. I really hope I'm wrong.

 
And stated he had no regrets about the play calling. Nice to know he feels he is infallible. What an arrogant coach.
I have no regrets about his play calling. He called a good game that got them a lead in perhaps the toughest stadium to play in against perhaps an all-time great defense.
As a Packer fan I'm absolutely stunned anyone is content with the game he called yesterday. Like Carter said he's a good coach who had a bad day...it happens just sucked it happened in the NFC championship game. He certainly wasn't the only one who had a bad day.
Not completely content...but it does not bother me as bad as some.

I think not going at Sherman after the injury was bad.

And lost in all of this and so far escaping criticism? Rodgers. He did not have a great day. Timing was off...that INT to Sherman early was terrible. And as I read from McGinn I think...what great plays did he make?

This loss was not on any one thing...there were an avalanche of screwups down the board. D, special teams, coaches, QB, all of them.
For Shame, you are going straight to hell...or at least some dark dirty room in the basement of lambeau where they keep the non-believers.
I might be...but it needs to be said.

He didn't have a very good game and really made no great plays.

He has authority to change things at the line and didn't...he had to have seen Sherman out there holding his arm and didn't test it at all on that side.

As I said...this was a loss on all levels and anyone blaming just Bostick or Slocum or McCarthy or Capers needs to open their eyes.
Not to give Rodgers a pass but according to Bill Scott on 5 of the 6 final offensive plays (3rd and 16 being the lone exception) they had their multiple TE extra offensive lineman in. Rodgers could not check out of a run play in those instances.

With that being said Rodgers had a bad game and deserves his fair share of the blame. I've been hard on McCarthy mainly because Packer playoff loses are becoming a disturbing trend...5 seasons in a row now. Another season or two ending with a bad loss I'd really hope they'd make a change. It would be a major disappointment for Rodgers to get to only 1 Super Bowl and I fear the Packers have peaked under McCarthy's leadership. I really hope I'm wrong.
Im talking the whole 2nd half though...not just the last 6.

 
His game plan had his team up 12 points, on the road in Seattle against the best D in the league...with 4 minutes to go and his opponent having 1 timeout.

A lot of hindsight and couch coaching going on here.
The 5 turnovers (at least 3 of which had absolutely zero to do with scheme) got him that 12 point lead.

"His game plan" left at least 4 points on the field in the first half (maybe more), and cost them a key stop on a 3rd and 19 when he only rushed 3. Change either of those and that onside kick means nothing.
This.

Like I said earlier. McCarthy is a very good coach that coached a bad game. It happens.
He errs on the side of conservative decisionmaking all the time. It's a continuing problem.

As for the person who called it "hindsight," I'm guessing you weren't checking social media when the Packers kicked those two FGs in early 4th and goal situations. He was lit up, and rightfully so. It was an impossibly easy call to go for the TD even in the "average" NFL situation, let alone on the road when you're a > TD underdog. I'd blame the entire organization for giving him the latitude to make such terrible decisions- the front office has to sit down a coach who continues to make those kind of mistakes and explain to him why it's just not an option. It's almost "punt on third down" stupid.
I'm sure if he had gone for it and been stopped, coming away with no points and giving all the momentum back to the home crowd, the armchair fantasy coaches on social media would have lauded his decision.
Yup, absolutely. At least the ones I follow would have lauded the decision regardless of result. You're talking about between 4 and 5 expected points if you go for it vs 2.9 expected points if you try the FG. And even in the unlikely event of failure you still likely get 20+ yards of field position in a high-leverage area, where play calls restricted in order to avoid a safety and you still may come away with a safety or get the ball back on the opponents' side of the 50. This is the easiest call of the game. McCarthy flat-out blew it. He should be forced to account for it; it's stupid that we force coaches to account for "risky calls" that fail but not "safe calls" that backfire, even when they backfire dramatically like we see here.
But McCarthy's decisions didn't backfire. Playing as an 8.5 point underdog on the road against a champion team that crushed the Packers in week 1, he had his team in a position where a win was almost certain, where only the most improbable series of events could cost the game. This with his star QB having an off day (generously described). It took a stunning, unbelievable lack of focus and failure to execute on the part of several players to achieve this result.
But his decisions did backfire. It will go down as one of the biggest coaching choke jobs in NFL playoff history, right up there with the Oilers/Bills in '93. It was like a legendary Martyball meltdown. These coaches bring the bad luck on themselves due to making bad decisions at several points in the game. At least after that Oilers game there was some accountability, as the DC got fired the following day.

 
Finally those pictures that Slocum had of "Mike Sherman with a Super Bowl" aka Mike McCarthy dont mean anything. Can't believe this guy was kept around this long. McCarthy needs to take a long look at his poor play calling inside the five. Everyone knows the John Khun play or we are going five wide, need to get creative.

 
McCarthy is a great coach. He lost a game it happens. He did not fail to read the fake kick he did not miss read the hail mary on 2 pt conversion he did not fumble the onside kick why should he be fired because Packers fans are upset they lost? Those same fans would be complaining if he didnt kick the field goals and got stopped each time.
If the Packers fired McCarthy and went with an up and comer I would be happy. If they fired him and went with a retread that is currently out of work I would be annoyed. He isn't the worst coach in the league, but he is far from the best.

NFL coaches are mostly the same. Very few of them give their team an identity. Mccarthy goes for it on 4th and 1 against detroit, but settles here, twice. Is Seattle's rush defense better than Detroit's? Nope.

I could cut him a tiny bit of slack on that first one because things were a little chaotic and the team was riled up. Got a stupid penalty, were basically on the second trip going in. I could listen to an argument that coming away with no points would have been tough to swallow. I disagree, but would at least understand the logic.
Difference in playing on the road vs. at home IMO.

and how did that go going for it against Detroit? They stopped them at least once down there on 4th didn't they?
I don't understand this logic. I disagree with coaching 4th and 1 differently regardless of whether you are home or away. That being said, why would you try to minimize risk/reward when you are the away team? If you were going to alter your strategy it should be the other way around. Minimize risk when you are the favorite, maximize reward when you are the dog.

It would be like a less skilled heavyweight boxer with one heck of a right never going for the knockout and trying to grind out a 12 round decision. Sure you may go the distance, but you aren't increasing your chances to win.
bolded is obv correct. its quite humorous how many ppl think backwardly.

 
Rotoworld:

Coach Mike McCarthy is "considering" giving up his role as the Packers' offensive play-caller.
McCarthy has been adamant in the past about remaining the play-caller for Aaron Rodgers and Co., but after he was extremely passive in the NFC title game against the Seahawks, settling for two short field goals instead of going for touchdowns, he's now considering taking a step back. OC Tom Clements would be the obvious in-house favorite to take on an expanded role, as the Packers aren't going to bring anyone in from the outside. QBs coach Alex Van Pelt is another option. McCarthy would then become an overseer.

Source: ESPN Wisconsin
Feb 8 - 4:59 PM
 
I don't think giving up play calling duties means he gives up making the decision to go or kick. That rotoworld blurb is a bit off IMO.

 
Packers are promoting Tom Clements to assistant head coach and Edgar Bennett to OC. Clements will take over play calling duties.

Wonder if Clements or Bennett got an offer elsewhere.

 
I don't think giving up play calling duties means he gives up making the decision to go or kick. That rotoworld blurb is a bit off IMO.
I agree but I think more focus should have been on the horrible playcalling in the 2nd half. That's where they really gave the game away. You have Aaron Rodgers, try to score don't try to kill the clock with a 2 score lead in the 3rd quarter.

 
Packers are promoting Tom Clements to assistant head coach and Edgar Bennett to OC. Clements will take over play calling duties.

Wonder if Clements or Bennett got an offer elsewhere.
Hadn't heard about them...I think they blocked a request to interview Van Pelt.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top