You mean chewing his mitts ?I did not end up watching this one. Tapped out due to the streaming issues during the undercards. Probably could have switched over to my phone or tablet, but didn't care that much.Will be watching this one.
Is it even worth watching?
No. Maybe just the 1st round. Other than that it was pretty boring. Tyson just kind of stood there with his mitts up the whole time.
Supposedly north of 100M viewers tuned in which is SB type numbers and approaching half of their total subscribers. Viewers for their regular NFL games will be way less and they're not likely to have issues there.Lots of people losing their jobs over this buffering fiasco.2 unreal fights (especially Porter/Serrano) made the night worthwhile. But it was followed by one of the biggest money grab farces in the history of sports. Anybody paying money to watch Paul fight these clown shows should have their head examined. At least this was free. And Netflix proved they have technical issues streaming live events. They couldn’t host a SuperBowl, that’s for sure.
Supposedly north of 100M viewers tuned in which is SB type numbers and approaching half of their total subscribers. Viewers for their regular NFL games will be way less and they're not likely to have issues there.Lots of people losing their jobs over this buffering fiasco.2 unreal fights (especially Porter/Serrano) made the night worthwhile. But it was followed by one of the biggest money grab farces in the history of sports. Anybody paying money to watch Paul fight these clown shows should have their head examined. At least this was free. And Netflix proved they have technical issues streaming live events. They couldn’t host a SuperBowl, that’s for sure.
Last year they did a live episode of the reality show "Love is Blind", and that also crashed their system. So no idea why they thought they could handle this fight. I don't know the viewership numbers that show got but it could be in line with NFL expectations, so not a positive sign.
Supposedly north of 100M viewers tuned in which is SB type numbers and approaching half of their total subscribers. Viewers for their regular NFL games will be way less and they're not likely to have issues there.Lots of people losing their jobs over this buffering fiasco.2 unreal fights (especially Porter/Serrano) made the night worthwhile. But it was followed by one of the biggest money grab farces in the history of sports. Anybody paying money to watch Paul fight these clown shows should have their head examined. At least this was free. And Netflix proved they have technical issues streaming live events. They couldn’t host a SuperBowl, that’s for sure.
Last year they did a live episode of the reality show "Love is Blind", and that also crashed their system. So no idea why they thought they could handle this fight. I don't know the viewership numbers that show got but it could be in line with NFL expectations, so not a positive sign.
Looks like viewership for the fight was around 60 million which is quite a bit more than a typical NFL game (~15 million for MNF or a featured Sunday afternoon game, ~20 million for Sunday Night Football).
That was a software bug that they didn't catch until they went live. Sometimes that happens but it wasn't lack of capacity which this seemed to be.Supposedly north of 100M viewers tuned in which is SB type numbers and approaching half of their total subscribers. Viewers for their regular NFL games will be way less and they're not likely to have issues there.Lots of people losing their jobs over this buffering fiasco.2 unreal fights (especially Porter/Serrano) made the night worthwhile. But it was followed by one of the biggest money grab farces in the history of sports. Anybody paying money to watch Paul fight these clown shows should have their head examined. At least this was free. And Netflix proved they have technical issues streaming live events. They couldn’t host a SuperBowl, that’s for sure.
Last year they did a live episode of the reality show "Love is Blind", and that also crashed their system. So no idea why they thought they could handle this fight. I don't know the viewership numbers that show got but it could be in line with NFL expectations, so not a positive sign.
I'm also concerned about who the announcers and hosts will be for the Christmas NFL games.
The boxing ones were subpar.
Instead of Rosie Perez do we get Sarah Jessica Parker?
IN!I'm also concerned about who the announcers and hosts will be for the Christmas NFL games.
The boxing ones were subpar.
Instead of Rosie Perez do we get Sarah Jessica Parker?
Drunk Joe Namath and an AI-voicebot of Howard Cosell
Fight ends with a KO or someone taps out is the only way to get around the horrible judging I guessthe problem with boxing IMO is exactly what happened in the womens' fight. Wrong person won on the cards, though Taylor defended better. Serrano threw 130 more punches and landed a higher percentage. She had 48 more landed power punches. And she did so while getting headbutted three times minimum with a nasty gash from them. It's not like a bad strike call by an ump or a holding penalty on the LT. There is no way to overcome the finality of judges deciding you lose. See Roy Jones in the Olympics, and various gymnasts screwed by Russian judges. Taylor's reaction showed she was even surprised she won. Impressively Serrano threw 73 punches in 2 mins in round 2. That's insane
Jake threw multiple upper cuts.I didn't get to watch, because I was in the ER (I am OK), but do we think Tyson's reaction time just has really eroded with age, or was he holding back? There were a few opportunities where he slipped a hook and had a chance for a traditional Tyson combo, but he barely moved. I also read a rumor they agreed no uppercuts -- did they throw any? I only saw a few clips.
Netflix announced that it was 60 million households, not 60 million viewers. If it was 60 million households, the viewership would be significantly higher. The numbers you are quoting for the NFL are viewers, not households.
Looks like viewership for the fight was around 60 million which is quite a bit more than a typical NFL game (~15 million for MNF or a featured Sunday afternoon game, ~20 million for Sunday Night Football).
and households might actually mean devices. I know where I was watching it, we had 4 devices going. We were watching it on my buddies tv, but once the issues started, 3 of us turned off our wifi connection and used our cell service to stream it on our phone. one of us broadcast it from his phone to the tv and we watched it that way, as choppy as it was.Netflix announced that it was 60 million households, not 60 million viewers. If it was 60 million households, the viewership would be significantly higher. The numbers you are quoting for the NFL are viewers, not households.
Looks like viewership for the fight was around 60 million which is quite a bit more than a typical NFL game (~15 million for MNF or a featured Sunday afternoon game, ~20 million for Sunday Night Football).
Note that the Netflix household number was a world wide number, not US only.
Jake threw multiple upper cuts.I didn't get to watch, because I was in the ER (I am OK), but do we think Tyson's reaction time just has really eroded with age, or was he holding back? There were a few opportunities where he slipped a hook and had a chance for a traditional Tyson combo, but he barely moved. I also read a rumor they agreed no uppercuts -- did they throw any? I only saw a few clips.
Tyson was fine in the first round and then his legs gave out. Roy Jones Jr called it out immediately when he saw Tyson was near dead in his movement.
I don't think Tyson was holding back. I think he was in great shape for a 58 year old but that is meaningless when you are facing some one 30 years younger in even better shape. All of Tyson's energy from the 2nd round on went into defense.
From my understanding, Netflix knows how many devices per household are being used. Netflix does not know how many people per household are watching. They use a rough estimation per household for internal numbers of viewers.and households might actually mean devices.
That was a software bug that they didn't catch until they went live. Sometimes that happens but it wasn't lack of capacity which this seemed to be.Supposedly north of 100M viewers tuned in which is SB type numbers and approaching half of their total subscribers. Viewers for their regular NFL games will be way less and they're not likely to have issues there.Lots of people losing their jobs over this buffering fiasco.2 unreal fights (especially Porter/Serrano) made the night worthwhile. But it was followed by one of the biggest money grab farces in the history of sports. Anybody paying money to watch Paul fight these clown shows should have their head examined. At least this was free. And Netflix proved they have technical issues streaming live events. They couldn’t host a SuperBowl, that’s for sure.
Last year they did a live episode of the reality show "Love is Blind", and that also crashed their system. So no idea why they thought they could handle this fight. I don't know the viewership numbers that show got but it could be in line with NFL expectations, so not a positive sign.
The SW bug was the Love is Blind live event. This event was capacity.That was a software bug that they didn't catch until they went live. Sometimes that happens but it wasn't lack of capacity which this seemed to be.Supposedly north of 100M viewers tuned in which is SB type numbers and approaching half of their total subscribers. Viewers for their regular NFL games will be way less and they're not likely to have issues there.Lots of people losing their jobs over this buffering fiasco.2 unreal fights (especially Porter/Serrano) made the night worthwhile. But it was followed by one of the biggest money grab farces in the history of sports. Anybody paying money to watch Paul fight these clown shows should have their head examined. At least this was free. And Netflix proved they have technical issues streaming live events. They couldn’t host a SuperBowl, that’s for sure.
Last year they did a live episode of the reality show "Love is Blind", and that also crashed their system. So no idea why they thought they could handle this fight. I don't know the viewership numbers that show got but it could be in line with NFL expectations, so not a positive sign.
I'm not buying the software bug. I had major buffering that started during the Porter/Serrano fight and started Googling for solutions. The one that worked for me was to VPN to a European server where it was the middle of the night. Once I VPN'ed into Spain, it was fine. Zero issues.
That doesn't point to software to me, that points to capacity on the US servers.
Yeah it was survival mode. And Paul for all intensive purposes laid back. He could have really pressed the issue and even put him away on an easy TKO at worst and he didn't press the issue out of respect. He did not want Mike Tyson remembered for being knocked out by a YouTube influencer.Jake threw multiple upper cuts.I didn't get to watch, because I was in the ER (I am OK), but do we think Tyson's reaction time just has really eroded with age, or was he holding back? There were a few opportunities where he slipped a hook and had a chance for a traditional Tyson combo, but he barely moved. I also read a rumor they agreed no uppercuts -- did they throw any? I only saw a few clips.
Tyson was fine in the first round and then his legs gave out. Roy Jones Jr called it out immediately when he saw Tyson was near dead in his movement.
I don't think Tyson was holding back. I think he was in great shape for a 58 year old but that is meaningless when you are facing some one 30 years younger in even better shape. All of Tyson's energy from the 2nd round on went into defense.
Early it seemed like Paul was a bit scared and stayed at arms length so he didn't run into any punches. I thought he fought the whole fight that way. I guess you can construe it as respect and taking it easy on Tyson and it may have been. My initial impression was that Paul was scared of Tyson's power so he stayed away and Tyson had no legs so he couldn't force the issue. Either way it was a bit of a dud especially after the two fights leading up to it.Yeah it was survival mode. And Paul for all intensive purposes laid back. He could have really pressed the issue and even put him away on an easy TKO at worst and he didn't press the issue out of respect. He did not want Mike Tyson remembered for being knocked out by a YouTube influencer.Jake threw multiple upper cuts.I didn't get to watch, because I was in the ER (I am OK), but do we think Tyson's reaction time just has really eroded with age, or was he holding back? There were a few opportunities where he slipped a hook and had a chance for a traditional Tyson combo, but he barely moved. I also read a rumor they agreed no uppercuts -- did they throw any? I only saw a few clips.
Tyson was fine in the first round and then his legs gave out. Roy Jones Jr called it out immediately when he saw Tyson was near dead in his movement.
I don't think Tyson was holding back. I think he was in great shape for a 58 year old but that is meaningless when you are facing some one 30 years younger in even better shape. All of Tyson's energy from the 2nd round on went into defense.
It was a win for both of them in the pocket book and honestly public opinion.
The two title fights on the undercard were outstanding. It was a successful card.
Yeah it was survival mode. And Paul for all intensive purposes laid back. He could have really pressed the issue and even put him away on an easy TKO at worstJake threw multiple upper cuts.I didn't get to watch, because I was in the ER (I am OK), but do we think Tyson's reaction time just has really eroded with age, or was he holding back? There were a few opportunities where he slipped a hook and had a chance for a traditional Tyson combo, but he barely moved. I also read a rumor they agreed no uppercuts -- did they throw any? I only saw a few clips.
Tyson was fine in the first round and then his legs gave out. Roy Jones Jr called it out immediately when he saw Tyson was near dead in his movement.
I don't think Tyson was holding back. I think he was in great shape for a 58 year old but that is meaningless when you are facing some one 30 years younger in even better shape. All of Tyson's energy from the 2nd round on went into defense.
Most long time fight fans think Paul carried Tyson to the decision but I don’t think it was anything more than a way to get an easy decision with zero chance of getting in any trouble once it was clear Tyson lost any mobility.Yeah it was survival mode. And Paul for all intensive purposes laid back. He could have really pressed the issue and even put him away on an easy TKO at worst and he didn't press the issue out of respect. He did not want Mike Tyson remembered for being knocked out by a YouTube influencer.Jake threw multiple upper cuts.I didn't get to watch, because I was in the ER (I am OK), but do we think Tyson's reaction time just has really eroded with age, or was he holding back? There were a few opportunities where he slipped a hook and had a chance for a traditional Tyson combo, but he barely moved. I also read a rumor they agreed no uppercuts -- did they throw any? I only saw a few clips.
Tyson was fine in the first round and then his legs gave out. Roy Jones Jr called it out immediately when he saw Tyson was near dead in his movement.
I don't think Tyson was holding back. I think he was in great shape for a 58 year old but that is meaningless when you are facing some one 30 years younger in even better shape. All of Tyson's energy from the 2nd round on went into defense.
It was a win for both of them in the pocket book and honestly public opinion.
The two title fights on the undercard were outstanding. It was a successful card.
I say he carried him because man it was painfully obvious how dead Mike's legs were.....he had nothing left after the first round. Paul could have hammered away at him and he also had him in trouble a short time (forgot which round). But I think Paul was being highly respectful of the moment and it allowed Mike to exit Boxing on a graceful note in how he overcame a bleeding ulcer and lot's of health issues and he was able to go technically 5 rounds with a 27 year old in shape guy. I am grateful he did not get hurt at all. That was my primary concern.Most long time fight fans think Paul carried Tyson to the decision but I don’t think it was anything more than a way to get an easy decision with zero chance of getting in any trouble.Yeah it was survival mode. And Paul for all intensive purposes laid back. He could have really pressed the issue and even put him away on an easy TKO at worst and he didn't press the issue out of respect. He did not want Mike Tyson remembered for being knocked out by a YouTube influencer.Jake threw multiple upper cuts.I didn't get to watch, because I was in the ER (I am OK), but do we think Tyson's reaction time just has really eroded with age, or was he holding back? There were a few opportunities where he slipped a hook and had a chance for a traditional Tyson combo, but he barely moved. I also read a rumor they agreed no uppercuts -- did they throw any? I only saw a few clips.
Tyson was fine in the first round and then his legs gave out. Roy Jones Jr called it out immediately when he saw Tyson was near dead in his movement.
I don't think Tyson was holding back. I think he was in great shape for a 58 year old but that is meaningless when you are facing some one 30 years younger in even better shape. All of Tyson's energy from the 2nd round on went into defense.
It was a win for both of them in the pocket book and honestly public opinion.
The two title fights on the undercard were outstanding. It was a successful card.
Really? It was obvious.Yeah it was survival mode. And Paul for all intensive purposes laid back. He could have really pressed the issue and even put him away on an easy TKO at worstJake threw multiple upper cuts.I didn't get to watch, because I was in the ER (I am OK), but do we think Tyson's reaction time just has really eroded with age, or was he holding back? There were a few opportunities where he slipped a hook and had a chance for a traditional Tyson combo, but he barely moved. I also read a rumor they agreed no uppercuts -- did they throw any? I only saw a few clips.
Tyson was fine in the first round and then his legs gave out. Roy Jones Jr called it out immediately when he saw Tyson was near dead in his movement.
I don't think Tyson was holding back. I think he was in great shape for a 58 year old but that is meaningless when you are facing some one 30 years younger in even better shape. All of Tyson's energy from the 2nd round on went into defense.
Couldn’t disagree more.
You can find many of the answers to your questions when Paul fought Tommy Fury who was similar age and similar boxing experience and similar skill level.it was totally disappointing and I agree that it looked like acting by tyson he would stand there and do his bob and weave and no one would advance on the other just seemed like it was scripted and boring but i see that guys like todem take the other direction and maybe that is the worst part of jake paul is that we will never know what is real and what is fake that pile of crap should just fight someone who is even a low level comparable age comparable weight fighter and let us see what is real take that to the bank brohans
Jake threw multiple upper cuts.I didn't get to watch, because I was in the ER (I am OK), but do we think Tyson's reaction time just has really eroded with age, or was he holding back? There were a few opportunities where he slipped a hook and had a chance for a traditional Tyson combo, but he barely moved. I also read a rumor they agreed no uppercuts -- did they throw any? I only saw a few clips.
Tyson was fine in the first round and then his legs gave out. Roy Jones Jr called it out immediately when he saw Tyson was near dead in his movement.
I don't think Tyson was holding back. I think he was in great shape for a 58 year old but that is meaningless when you are facing some one 30 years younger in even better shape. All of Tyson's energy from the 2nd round on went into defense.
This is totally true but I do believe that if Tyson could have gotten inside he could/would have showed this. However, it was painfully obvious he had no legs and couldn't cut off the ring or move to get inside. Could have been planned by Paul but I think that if Paul allowed Tyson inside we could have seen some of this and Paul was scared to let it happen.I think anyone who was confused by Tyson's performance probably isn't considering the fact that the pre-fight promos showed Tyson doing seemingly vicious combos for about 5-10 seconds.
so he lost to a real boxer got it take that to the bank brohanYou can find many of the answers to your questions when Paul fought Tommy Fury who was similar age and similar boxing experience and similar skill level.it was totally disappointing and I agree that it looked like acting by tyson he would stand there and do his bob and weave and no one would advance on the other just seemed like it was scripted and boring but i see that guys like todem take the other direction and maybe that is the worst part of jake paul is that we will never know what is real and what is fake that pile of crap should just fight someone who is even a low level comparable age comparable weight fighter and let us see what is real take that to the bank brohans
i hear you i am dealing with nerve damage from my back injuries in my left leg and it is no joke i feel like half the man i was in terms of mobility but surprisingly twice the man i was when it comes to loving up my lady take that to the bank brochachosThis is totally true but I do believe that if Tyson could have gotten inside he could/would have showed this. However, it was painfully obvious he had no legs and couldn't cut off the ring or move to get inside. Could have been planned by Paul but I think that if Paul allowed Tyson inside we could have seen some of this and Paul was scared to let it happen.I think anyone who was confused by Tyson's performance probably isn't considering the fact that the pre-fight promos showed Tyson doing seemingly vicious combos for about 5-10 seconds.
As a guy around Tyson's age that was fairly athletic in my younger days, I definitely have felt what I saw in Tyson. My legs just don't work like they used to even if the mind and other aspects (hand speed for Tyson) appear to be intact to some degree. But when the legs don't get you there the other stuff doesn't matter. That's what I saw in this case.
And barely a real boxer at that. If you look at Fury’s record, the only two people who are well known enough to have a wiki, are Paul and KSI (who is effectively the same as Paul)so he lost to a real boxer got it take that to the bank brohanYou can find many of the answers to your questions when Paul fought Tommy Fury who was similar age and similar boxing experience and similar skill level.it was totally disappointing and I agree that it looked like acting by tyson he would stand there and do his bob and weave and no one would advance on the other just seemed like it was scripted and boring but i see that guys like todem take the other direction and maybe that is the worst part of jake paul is that we will never know what is real and what is fake that pile of crap should just fight someone who is even a low level comparable age comparable weight fighter and let us see what is real take that to the bank brohans
Just saw the viewership numbers. Record breaking. 65 millions? Damn
Netflix has a 360 billion dollar market cap. They can and will get this fixed.Handling capacity for an event like this is a real challenge. Good luck convincing shareholders and executives to invest a ton of money into the infrastructure needed to handle these one time high capacity events completely seamlessly.
You see this a lot in massively multiplayer video games. When a popular game launches, everyone and their mother is trying to login and play which cause huge issues usually. But this demand only lasts for a few days. These companies arent going to invest in the infrastructure to handle the load needed for only a few days/weeks of the game's lifespan. They just try to handle as best they can.
The comments in here to short the stock or get out were quite funny. I was thinking just the opposite. It's clearly fixable and will get done. WAY more importantly, is the fact that they themselves underestimated such demand, which sure surprised me. That's telling and great long-term when you think about it.Netflix has a 360 billion dollar market cap. They can and will get this fixed.Handling capacity for an event like this is a real challenge. Good luck convincing shareholders and executives to invest a ton of money into the infrastructure needed to handle these one time high capacity events completely seamlessly.
You see this a lot in massively multiplayer video games. When a popular game launches, everyone and their mother is trying to login and play which cause huge issues usually. But this demand only lasts for a few days. These companies arent going to invest in the infrastructure to handle the load needed for only a few days/weeks of the game's lifespan. They just try to handle as best they can.
Second episode of the Upshot Tyson series is out and its fantastic. Here's the twitter intro thread, including the hilarious interview he did with a 14 year old girl last week in which he explains why life is meaningless then drops an F-bomb: https://x.com/upshottowers/status/1858500226450956624?s=61One of my favorite podcasts is doing a two-part series on Tyson. Great first episode released yesterday --> https://open.spotify.com/episode/2qiBwFbWQJ4FoXmYkDwpIl?si=8f3bf6e3433e437a
The year is 1977. An 11-year-old Mike Tyson is high on acid, terrorising the people of Brooklyn with a world war one bayonet.
Little did they know, this wild-eyed urchin is destined to become the youngest heavyweight champion in history.
He robbed houses, got his prison counsellor pregnant, and made Brad Pitt beg for his life.
This is the story of the scariest man on the planet…