LHUCKS
Footballguy
Players renegotiate current contracts on a continual basis in the NFL...what makes the Eagles special? Just this past week Neil Rackers renegotiated his.Was TO "Toxic, petulant, divisive..." before or after the Eagles refused to pay his fair market value?Funny, I thought TO already had a signed contract with the Eagles.So for some reason the Eagles would have been "smart" to give in to TO's demands, rather than face a toxic, petulant, divisive, team criticizing, chemisty destroying malcontent?Would they have faced his negative attributes if they would have met him in the middle on salary demands?Just a wild guess, but I think the Eagles Mgmt. realized that TO was an on field talent they wouldn't be able to replace.
But apparently they decided that TO's negative attributes outweighed his one positive attribute (namely physical talent).![]()
![]()

Last edited by a moderator: