Capella
Footballguy
1000% agree. At the point I would just prefer the play to be wrong, especially after touchdowns. Bring it in for the playoffs.These replays need to be 30 seconds max
1000% agree. At the point I would just prefer the play to be wrong, especially after touchdowns. Bring it in for the playoffs.These replays need to be 30 seconds max
You may be joking but I honestly think that IS the solution. Same goes for Monday/Sunday nights as well.Obviously the solution is to have 2 Thursday night games every week.![]()
The Bears-Buccs game was played in under three hours.The NFL made some changes in the structure of breaks in the attempts to speed up the game (see link below). Does anyone know if the average game time has dropped at all this season based on the changes?
http://deadline.com/2017/03/nfl-changes-fewer-commercial-breaks-roger-goodell-1202048785/
That was a tough catch.Bills-Panthers summary:
First 59 minutes: Nothing
Final minute: Blown call negates a Buffalo first down and kneecaps their final drive.
Final play: Rookie WR drops game-winning TD pass.
NFL 2017
While true, there are other ways to measure a sports overall attention from fans. The NFL is likely going to have a massive ratings advantage over other sports for a very long time, but say in the case of the NBA, the impact and fan attention extends far beyond actual games.I was pretty much with you until this.
The NBA just had it's dream Finals scenario and it's ratings finally approached an average regular season primetime game. That is a ####load of ground to make up.
In this manner the NFL resembles a certain popular cable news network which caters to a particular demographic. Changing the way is does business in an attempt to attract new fans risks alienating its base. So they can't really change and the base ever so slightly diminishes at the hands of Father Time. But this will take a long time to happen for both the NFL and Fox News.While true, there are other ways to measure a sports overall attention from fans. The NFL is likely going to have a massive ratings advantage over other sports for a very long time, but say in the case of the NBA, the impact and fan attention extends far beyond actual games.
For example, the front page of ESPN currently is a story about LeBron and Kyrie. That's with the NFL season new and likely at the near height of fan interest and the NBA should not be eating up headline space. The NBA is the year-round sport right now. The NFL used to be. Remember when the NFL offseason used to be interesting? Now, it's offseason is dominated with back-up QB protests and whichever high profile player Goodell is going to try to take down.
The NBA dominates right now in terms of storylines and stars. Now, that sort of thing doesn't direcly put cash in owners' pockets (which is why the NFL doesn't care about it), but over time, it's going to matter.
What the NFL dominates is game to game ratings. And that thing they dominate is part of an ever shrinking base and they seem to have no plan to adjust to a changing public. As those ratings continue to decline, what's left? It's a boring sport that's awful to watch, far worse to attend, and they've successfully prevented their players from becoming marketable stars (what other League actively goes after their biggest stars now that Selig is gone?).
NBA seems to be winning in terms of public interest and storylines right now, and then MLB is dominating the live game experience. MLB is nearly irrelevant to much of the public, but they also draw about 5X as many fans to games as the NFL does. Even as TV contracts dry up, MLB has that to work with. Point is, other sports have something to hang their hat on. NFL is built on live TV viewing, and the public is less and less interested in live, commercial laden TV viewing these days.
I don't know how we'll define what the top sport is, and the NFL will have a ratings advantage for a long time, but surely, the NFL is losing the public's overall interest rapidly.
The Olympics maybe arent on the same scale but has taken a dump lately.In this manner the NFL resembles a certain popular cable news network which caters to a particular demographic. Changing the way is does business in an attempt to attract new fans risks alienating its base. So they can't really change and the base ever so slightly diminishes at the hands of Father Time. But this will take a long time to happen for both the NFL and Fox News.
I don't know if any of us who are alive now have ever witnessed a wildly popular entity like the NFL slowly erode and it will be really interesting from an economic and social perspective to see how the league deals with it.
Which one?Bills-Panthers summary:
First 59 minutes: Nothing
Final minute: Blown call negates a Buffalo first down and kneecaps their final drive.
Final play: Rookie WR drops game-winning TD pass.
NFL 2017
The situation also suggests why we should be keeping an eye on Japan with its aging and shrinking population, aversion to immigration and rural flight to the cities. Not many places have faced those kinds of demographic developments before and thrived; if they can pull it off without economic collapse there will be valuable lessons in how they did it.The Olympics maybe arent on the same scale but has taken a dump lately.
Golf was struggling between tiger and jack and rallied. Not sure how golf is doing overall right now. May be ok.
But yeah a top top sport hitting the skids is unusual. Has the potential to cause many side effects.
The NFL has a major problem and they are too arrogant to see it.
2. Commercials, stupid penalties and long stoppages kill the game. End of story. They need to revamp all 3 of those things.
When it comes to commercials, it's widely known that most stoppages are for commercials. Each team gets 3 timeouts a half. That's fine. A break at end of quarter, fine. But we are past the point in society where having a commercial break is acceptable. Consumers are doing everything they can to get around commercials. The NFL, granted, has its hands tied because its wealth is a direct benefit from the massive tv package.
Same for me but I switched to soccer.True Story:
Illegally streaming the Viking Steelers game Sunday. Steelers score, 2+ minutes of commercials, Kickoff, 2 minutes of commercials. Vikes 3 and out (took less than 2 minuets) Punt, 2+ minutes of commercials.
I changed to the Twins game.
Redzone channel. No commercials.True Story:
Illegally streaming the Viking Steelers game Sunday. Steelers score, 2+ minutes of commercials, Kickoff, 2 minutes of commercials. Vikes 3 and out (took less than 2 minuets) Punt, 2+ minutes of commercials.
I changed to the Twins game.
Now...imagine paying $200+ for tickets for your family, parking, concessions, and swag to actually attend the game in person...and having to sit through the breaks.True Story:
Illegally streaming the Viking Steelers game Sunday. Steelers score, 2+ minutes of commercials, Kickoff, 2 minutes of commercials. Vikes 3 and out (took less than 2 minuets) Punt, 2+ minutes of commercials.
I changed to the Twins game.
I actually think this is a lot of it. It used to be the NFL could market QBs and RBs. Now RBs are a commodity with an expiration date and the non-top 10 QBs are nameless faces. That's helped their bottom line as it's kept guaranteed contracts out of the sport as it's severely tilted the owner-employee dynamic, but in the long term it's problematic especially as younger kids in this you-tube world tend to root for players over teams (look no further than the fans that followed Durant versus the fans that followed AP).pollardsvision said:While true, there are other ways to measure a sports overall attention from fans. The NFL is likely going to have a massive ratings advantage over other sports for a very long time, but say in the case of the NBA, the impact and fan attention extends far beyond actual games.
For example, the front page of ESPN currently is a story about LeBron and Kyrie. That's with the NFL season new and likely at the near height of fan interest and the NBA should not be eating up headline space. The NBA is the year-round sport right now. The NFL used to be. Remember when the NFL offseason used to be interesting? Now, it's offseason is dominated with back-up QB protests and whichever high profile player Goodell is going to try to take down.
The NBA dominates right now in terms of storylines and stars. Now, that sort of thing doesn't direcly put cash in owners' pockets (which is why the NFL doesn't care about it), but over time, it's going to matter.
What the NFL dominates is game to game ratings. And that thing they dominate is part of an ever shrinking base and they seem to have no plan to adjust to a changing public. As those ratings continue to decline, what's left? It's a boring sport that's awful to watch, far worse to attend, and they've successfully prevented their players from becoming marketable stars (what other League actively goes after their biggest stars now that Selig is gone?).
NBA seems to be winning in terms of public interest and storylines right now, and then MLB is dominating the live game experience. MLB is nearly irrelevant to much of the public, but they also draw about 5X as many fans to games as the NFL does. Even as TV contracts dry up, MLB has that to work with. Point is, other sports have something to hang their hat on. NFL is built on live TV viewing, and the public is less and less interested in live, commercial laden TV viewing these days.
I don't know how we'll define what the top sport is, and the NFL will have a ratings advantage for a long time, but surely, the NFL is losing the public's overall interest rapidly.
Well the Chargers temp stadium only holds ~28K soooooWelcome back to LA, NFL!
LA attendance: Chargers - 25,381 Rams - 56,612 NFL combined - 81,993 USC v. Texas - 84,714
The NFL can't fill a stadium that only has 28k seats in Los Angeles? Sad.Well the Chargers temp stadium only holds ~28K sooooo
However 30-40% were Miami fans
You sure the commute wasn't the main reason?Now...imagine paying $200+ for tickets for your family, parking, concessions, and swag to actually attend the game in person...and having to sit through the breaks.
One reason my dad got rid of his St. Louis Rams season tickets after 15 years was for this reason. Going to the games are a draaaaaag with the breaks.
The capacity of Stub Hub for the Chargers is 30k. I don't know if they jacked up the prices though to try and account for the smaller capacity.Well the Chargers temp stadium only holds ~28K sooooo
and that was the announced attendance, not the actual attendance. That 56k would have been more than 50% capacity but the pictures show it was far far from 50% full.Rams - 56,612
Also read parking was $100The capacity of Stub Hub for the Chargers is 30k. I don't know if they jacked up the prices though to try and account for the smaller capacity.
What ever they are doing it is not working.
Wow. The Chargers are not much of a draw.Welcome back to LA, NFL!
LA attendance: Chargers - 25,381 Rams - 56,612 NFL combined - 81,993 USC v. Texas - 84,714
This is true. Also the team's been mediocre to bad for several years now, management sucks, and they might have the worst ownership in football.Also read parking was $100![]()
Thats the cheapest option for Dallas fwiw. And there is plenty of parking.Also read parking was $100![]()
There's a LA Metro stop a block away from the Coliseum.Yeah but who cares about parking costs when you live in a city like LA with amazing public transportation
Tell me about it. I like all the people who sit around me, and phone/text/email with them even outside of the games. But during games, I have to spend two minutes at a time actually TALKING. Face-to-face. To people.Now...imagine paying $200+ for tickets for your family, parking, concessions, and swag to actually attend the game in person...and having to sit through the breaks.
One reason my dad got rid of his St. Louis Rams season tickets after 15 years was for this reason. Going to the games are a draaaaaag with the breaks.
Yeah that is crazy! Dan Patrick was telling people to just stay home. The panel was figuring around 500 bucks to take a family to the game, parking, food. Or, buy a nice flat screen and watch in the comfort of your own home.holy crap...
That'd be a hell of a walk to Carson from there.There's a LA Metro stop a block away from the Coliseum.
I probably wouldn't bother to walk the block if you gave me a ticket to a Rams gameThat'd be a hell of a walk to Carson from there.
I'm sure there are good public transport options to get to stubhub center too, it was just a joke. Thanks for setting me straight.
A few million people won't either at the low, low price of $6/ticket.I probably wouldn't bother to walk the block if you gave me a ticket to a Rams game
He lives south of St. Louis.You sure the commute wasn't the main reason?
Still can't believe the Raiders are now the LV Raiders.Am I the only one that only realized SD moved when I looked at my first fantasy cheat sheet? I swear that got like zero press. I thought they put it off indefinitely.
No.This is true. Also the team's been mediocre to bad for several years now, management sucks, and they might have the worst ownership in football.
Sincerely, a lifelong Charger fan.
1
The majority of LA born NFL fans are Raider fans. The Rams played in Anaheim, which is basically a different country, before they left a generation a ago. Now they're back playing in what was the Raiders home stadium. What's left of that Rams fanbase from 20 years ago (not much) is unlikely to trek it to South Central and the Coliseum. It's going to take time to build that following but I'm confident once the new stadium is there, they'll be fine. You just can't expect LA to fill, or even halfway fill, a 90K seat stadium for a "home" team not many people out here care about (yet).Welcome back to LA, NFL!
LA attendance: Chargers - 25,381 Rams - 56,612 NFL combined - 81,993 USC v. Texas - 84,714
My god.....what do normal people do? Take an Uber to Humperdinks and walk from there? That's egregious. Actually, for the Oregon/OSU game, I think my buddy did actually park at Humperdinks and we took a bus? I was a little tipsy. Memories unclear.Thats the cheapest option for Dallas fwiw. And there is plenty of parking.
Good post, Nipsey.The majority of LA born NFL fans are Raider fans. The Rams played in Anaheim, which is basically a different country, before they left a generation a ago. Now they're back playing in what was the Raiders home stadium. What's left of that Rams fanbase from 20 years ago (not much) is unlikely to trek it to South Central and the Coliseum. It's going to take time to build that following but I'm confident once the new stadium is there, they'll be fine. You just can't expect LA to fill, or even halfway fill, a 90K seat stadium for a "home" team not many people out here care about (yet).
As far as the Chargers go, they're playing in Carson, which is also in a different universe than LA proper. Nobody here is a Charger fan. They're playing in a soccer stadium. Nobody really wants them here. That being said, once they get into the new stadium people will come. As far as the $100 parking goes, that was for a tailgate lot. For USC games at the Coliseum, to get those premiere tailgate lot parking passes next to the stadium it takes a ridiculous donation, in the thousands of dollars. I'm sure you can find parking somewhere near the stadium in Carson for far less than 100 bucks. The spotlight on the $100 for parking story seems to be part of this calculated negative campaign being conducted by an SD based anti-Spanos/NFL faction. They put up these three billboards right near the stadium.
It's really not far to compare the NFL attendance to that of USC's attendance. They've been in the Coliseum forever and the school is right across the street. The fans know what the deal is and the tailgate for those games is a blast. It's an up year so home attendance is going to be high.
Bottom line, it's unfair to judge the NFL's move to LA after only a few weeks. You have two teams with non-existent fanbases playing in stadiums they don't belong in. The sportsbars in LA are packed on NFL Sundays and most of the people out here are transplants rooting for the teams they grew up following. It's a city full of frontrunners though so if and when the Rams/Chargers turn it around the stadium will be rocking with we're #1 $75 foam fingers. Angelinos like new, trendy, upscale things so I guarantee the new stadium will sell out when it opens in 2020 or whenever it does.