If you have time listen to the presser. He pretty much answered your exact question. Said he watched every pass.Maybe I'm missing something, but isn't Bradford a sub-60% passer for his career?
Could buy the WRs part of the equation, but over a career? I just don't quite buy it. Maybe a new system will help him, but I don't think he's some super accurate passer.If you have time listen to the presser. He pretty much answered your exact question.Maybe I'm missing something, but isn't Bradford a sub-60% passer for his career?
Said he watched every pass.
Said some times QB's are not accurate and WR's make good catches
Said stats lie. Could be WR's gaukt dropped passes etc
Listen to it.
Haven't seen a reaction like this since Altamont."There's some bad acid going around".That's what it's like in philly right nowwhat's it like in Philly right now?Chip, when asked about trading up for mariota: "let's dispell that right now. We would never mortgage our future to trade up for Mariota."
He said they ONLY dealt with the Rams for Nick too.Could buy the WRs part of the equation, but over a career? I just don't quite buy it. Maybe a new system will help him, but I don't think he's some super accurate passer.If you have time listen to the presser. He pretty much answered your exact question.Said he watched every pass.Maybe I'm missing something, but isn't Bradford a sub-60% passer for his career?
Said some times QB's are not accurate and WR's make good catches
Said stats lie. Could be WR's gaukt dropped passes etc
Listen to it.
I'll agree stats don't tell the whole story, but production is production. You cant skew that.If you have time listen to the presser. He pretty much answered your exact question.Said he watched every pass.Maybe I'm missing something, but isn't Bradford a sub-60% passer for his career?
Said some times QB's are not accurate and WR's make good catches
Said stats lie. Could be WR's fault dropped passes etc
Listen to it if you can
Production from NFL HC Chip Kelly is way different than ours.I'll agree stats don't tell the whole story, but production is production. You cant skew that.If you have time listen to the presser. He pretty much answered your exact question.Said he watched every pass.Maybe I'm missing something, but isn't Bradford a sub-60% passer for his career?
Said some times QB's are not accurate and WR's make good catches
Said stats lie. Could be WR's fault dropped passes etc
Listen to it if you can
I listened. The first round pick was a bs response back at Eskin.THIS
@MikeClayNFL: Chip answers every question with detail and even throws in some extra. Response is that everything he said is a lie. Why even talk?
He was asked that question additional times and answered the same way.I listened. The first round pick was a bs response back at Eskin.THIS
@MikeClayNFL: Chip answers every question with detail and even throws in some extra. Response is that everything he said is a lie. Why even talk?
I'll be honest, I like that deal way more than the deal Gore got.@AdamSchefter: Eagles and former Chargers RB Ryan Mathews officially have reached agreement on 3-year, $11.5 million deal that includes $5M gtd, per source
Why? You have Sproles, Polk and now Mathews. Unless they plan on putting Sproles in the Slot at WR or something.@PSchrags: Sources tell me Eagles are now "very much" in play in the DeMarco Murray chase.
####.Just when I started feeling better about this.@PSchrags: Sources tell me Eagles are now "very much" in play in the DeMarco Murray chase.
Spending that amount of money on RB's is just stupid.Maybe they drop Polk or Sproles?
Not when you have it and want to run the ball.Spending that amount of money on RB's is just stupid.Maybe they drop Polk or Sproles?
Well I also think GB would have been better off spending that money on defense. Cobb isn't a big/dominant WR.Not when you have it and want to run the ball. Like saying re Packers are stupid for having 2 WR's making 10+ million.Spending that amount of money on RB's is just stupid.Maybe they drop Polk or Sproles?
If they can Murray at $7mil or so, I feel much better having Mathews and Murray over McCoy for the same price.Not when you have it and want to run the ball. Like saying re Packers are stupid for having 2 WR's making 10+ million.Spending that amount of money on RB's is just stupid.Maybe they drop Polk or Sproles?
For smarter teams that's starting RB money.On ESPN they're saying Mathews money is that of a depth guy.
Sure, but hasn't he already turned down that much from Dallas?If they can Murray at $7mil or so, I feel much better having Mathews and Murray over McCoy for the same price.Not when you have it and want to run the ball. Like saying re Packers are stupid for having 2 WR's making 10+ million.Spending that amount of money on RB's is just stupid.Maybe they drop Polk or Sproles?
Roughly the same as Ingram the first two years.@AdamSchefter: Eagles and former Chargers RB Ryan Mathews officially have reached agreement on 3-year, $11.5 million deal that includes $5M gtd, per source
But has anyone offered that to him on the market? He has the Jags, Raiders and Eagles. Which team gives you a chance to stick it to Jerruh twice a year?Sure, but hasn't he already turned down that much from Dallas?If they can Murray at $7mil or so, I feel much better having Mathews and Murray over McCoy for the same price.Not when you have it and want to run the ball. Like saying re Packers are stupid for having 2 WR's making 10+ million.Spending that amount of money on RB's is just stupid.Maybe they drop Polk or Sproles?
i agree. i think that Mathews should at least match Gore's productivity for that time-frame and has the higher upside. and for less dead money if he does get hurt.I'll be honest, I like that deal way more than the deal Gore got.@AdamSchefter: Eagles and former Chargers RB Ryan Mathews officially have reached agreement on 3-year, $11.5 million deal that includes $5M gtd, per source
orly?College roommates in college
This logic is baffling. That's like saying I could never afford this Bentley if it wasn't totaled.@ZBerm: Chip: "If [bradford] never tore his ACL, he'd never be traded. ...The injury rate in the NFL is 100%. Just depends on the severity of it."
Guess we're drafting that CB out of Oregon then.@smartfootball: In presser Chip implies that signing injured players is a way to get value/buy low on players in FA; implies alternative is just to outspend
The way i look at it is we got Bradford for McCoy. Spin it how you want Chippy, spending 13m on a questionable QB who doesnt bring that much more to the table than Nick Foles is bewildering. To me at least.@ZBerm: Chip Kelly on McCoy trade: "The way we looked at it is we got Kiko Alonso and Byron Maxwell for LeSean McCoy.
Yes. His exact words were "you have to give up something to get something"Isn't Foles also coming off of an injury and this "sold low"?
He definitely had more natural talent as a passer than Foles.@ZBerm: Chip: "We wouldn't have traded for him if we didn't think he had a tremendous upside as a QB. ...We've done our due diligence."
@ZBerm: Chip on Bradford:"He's one of the most accurate throwers when you see him throw the football. I think he's smart. I think he's wired right."
But he gave up the cheaper, younger QB with better numbers and added the higher draft pick.Yes. His exact words were "you have to give up something to get something"Isn't Foles also coming off of an injury and this "sold low"?