What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

*Official 2015 Philadelphia Eagles* - Winning when it doesnt count (4 Viewers)

Yeah a 4/3 would be better for everyone except maybe Kendricks.
This is what I was wondering, we still have the personnel is a switch back reasonable? Is there a reason alot of the league has gone 3-4 or is it just coach preferences?

Also looking at this year's draft it looks like once again we are bad in a year with no top QB talent, if I'm wrong who? I assume we go Oline stud in the 1st then bring in some retreads? I would say sign Bradford too along w the project FA.

 
Yeah a 4/3 would be better for everyone except maybe Kendricks.
This is what I was wondering, we still have the personnel is a switch back reasonable? Is there a reason alot of the league has gone 3-4 or is it just coach preferences? Also looking at this year's draft it looks like once again we are bad in a year with no top QB talent, if I'm wrong who? I assume we go Oline stud in the 1st then bring in some retreads? I would say sign Bradford too along w the project FA.
It's not as simple as signing Bradford. You need to give him at least $18mil per year for about 2-4 year contract. As mediocre to terrible as he's been, he'll be the best available in an awful Free Agent year.

 
Yeah a 4/3 would be better for everyone except maybe Kendricks.
This is what I was wondering, we still have the personnel is a switch back reasonable? Is there a reason alot of the league has gone 3-4 or is it just coach preferences? Also looking at this year's draft it looks like once again we are bad in a year with no top QB talent, if I'm wrong who? I assume we go Oline stud in the 1st then bring in some retreads? I would say sign Bradford too along w the project FA.
It's not as simple as signing Bradford. You need to give him at least $18mil per year for about 2-4 year contract. As mediocre to terrible as he's been, he'll be the best available in an awful Free Agent year.
That's what I figure is we will have to keep him with a Dalton/Kaep like contract with outs in it and take a risk on someone else that you hope pays off like a Tyrod.

 
This team needs to just lose out. The only way to get a stud QB is through the draft. Finishing 7-9 or 6-10 may get them a good pick but not sure that gets them a franchise QB.

 
This team needs to just lose out. The only way to get a stud QB is through the draft. Finishing 7-9 or 6-10 may get them a good pick but not sure that gets them a franchise QB.
I don't watch alot of NCAA so you might have better input but from what I've read next year's class sucks.

 
This team needs to just lose out. The only way to get a stud QB is through the draft. Finishing 7-9 or 6-10 may get them a good pick but not sure that gets them a franchise QB.
I don't watch alot of NCAA so you might have better input but from what I've read next year's class sucks.
I also have no clue how good the QB class is but my point is that the Eagles will need to get as high a draft pick as possible and then hope for some luck in the draft. The problem is they've been a pretty good team for the past 5-6 years so they haven't been able to get that replacement for Mcnabb. Maybe Eagles fans will have to suffer for the next couple years but hopeful that results in them getting a stud QB.

 
This team needs to just lose out. The only way to get a stud QB is through the draft. Finishing 7-9 or 6-10 may get them a good pick but not sure that gets them a franchise QB.
Like Brady, Rodgers, Wilson, Brees, Romo, Big Ben??Or young guy like Dalton or Teddy ect...? (Should have just stayed pat ;) ) But, if you can evaluate talent then it doesn't matter where you pick. Now if you're busy thinking Matt Barkely is worth a draft pick then it doesn't matter where you pick either. You just get the benefit of doubt from fans/media while your high pick is stinking up the joint.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
This team needs to just lose out. The only way to get a stud QB is through the draft. Finishing 7-9 or 6-10 may get them a good pick but not sure that gets them a franchise QB.
Like Brady, Rodgers, Wilson, Brees, Romo, Big Ben??Or young guy like Dalton or Teddy ect...? (Should have just stayed pat ;) ) But, if you can evaluate talent then it doesn't matter where you pick. Now if you're busy thinking Matt Barkely is worth a draft pick then it doesn't matter where you pick either. You just get the benefit of doubt from fans/media while your high pick is stinking up the joint.
Well sure talent evaluation is obviously the most important factor but a high draft pick will definitely improve the POS. who are the current franchise QBs in football? Brady, Rodgers, Ben, Dalton, Luck, Rivers, P. Manning (ok not anymore but he has been for most of his career), Romo, Eli, Cam, Brees, Wilson, Palmer? How many of these guys were drafted in the first round?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This team needs to just lose out. The only way to get a stud QB is through the draft. Finishing 7-9 or 6-10 may get them a good pick but not sure that gets them a franchise QB.
Like Brady, Rodgers, Wilson, Brees, Romo, Big Ben??Or young guy like Dalton or Teddy ect...? (Should have just stayed pat ;) ) But, if you can evaluate talent then it doesn't matter where you pick. Now if you're busy thinking Matt Barkely is worth a draft pick then it doesn't matter where you pick either. You just get the benefit of doubt from fans/media while your high pick is stinking up the joint.
Well sure talent evaluation is obviously the most important factor but a high draft pick will definitely improve the POS. who are the current franchise QBs in football? Brady, Rodgers, Ben, Dalton, Luck, Rivers, P. Manning (ok not anymore but he has been for most of his career), Romo, Eli, Cam, Brees, Wilson, Palmer? How many of these guys were drafted in the first round?
A better question is who was drafted in the top 10?

Brady - 199th overall

Rodgers - 24th overall

Roethlesberger - 11th overall

Dalton - 35th overall

Luck - 1st overall

Rivers - 4th overall

Peyton - 1st overall

Romo - Undrafted

Eli - 1st overall

Cam - 1st overall

Brees - 32nd overall

Wilson - 75th overall

Palmer - 1st overall

 
This team needs to just lose out. The only way to get a stud QB is through the draft. Finishing 7-9 or 6-10 may get them a good pick but not sure that gets them a franchise QB.
Like Brady, Rodgers, Wilson, Brees, Romo, Big Ben??Or young guy like Dalton or Teddy ect...? (Should have just stayed pat ;) ) But, if you can evaluate talent then it doesn't matter where you pick. Now if you're busy thinking Matt Barkely is worth a draft pick then it doesn't matter where you pick either. You just get the benefit of doubt from fans/media while your high pick is stinking up the joint.
Well sure talent evaluation is obviously the most important factor but a high draft pick will definitely improve the POS. who are the current franchise QBs in football? Brady, Rodgers, Ben, Dalton, Luck, Rivers, P. Manning (ok not anymore but he has been for most of his career), Romo, Eli, Cam, Brees, Wilson, Palmer? How many of these guys were drafted in the first round?
A better question is who was drafted in the top 10?

Brady - 199th overall

Rodgers - 24th overall

Roethlesberger - 11th overall

Dalton - 35th overallLuck - 1st overallRivers - 4th overall Peyton - 1st overall

Romo - UndraftedEli - 1st overall Cam - 1st overall

Brees - 32nd overall

Wilson - 75th overallPalmer - 1st overall
Looking at that list, you really have to beat the media into submission to get respect as a QB not drafted top-5. You still hear trade rumors about Brady. He was like a hair away from selling life insurance. Wilson and Big Ben supposedly won rigs as "game managers" and one was too small. Dalton has Red hair and can't win a playoff game and doesn't have the arm strength. Romo can't win. Favre was a 2nd and traded. Kurt Warner was "BENCHED" for Matt ####### Lienart and had to bag groceries for a living. Rodgers took too many sacks. He was passed up by the 9ers(A. Smith) when he played for Cal! I can go days on bust. It's something to think about before you sign off on the next group think loved/hated QB or when we blindly think a coach with no track record at all comes and dismantle a successful teams talent again for no reason. You don't get points for bringing in players in ESPN top-100 here. We had a QB who showed more than enough to develop. We didn't have the coach that took the media onslaught for not having a QB that was preordained. We're ####ed until we find a QB. Then we need a OLine to protect that asset. An easy schedule would help after that, but anything else is icing.

 
This team needs to just lose out. The only way to get a stud QB is through the draft. Finishing 7-9 or 6-10 may get them a good pick but not sure that gets them a franchise QB.
Like Brady, Rodgers, Wilson, Brees, Romo, Big Ben??Or young guy like Dalton or Teddy ect...? (Should have just stayed pat ;) ) But, if you can evaluate talent then it doesn't matter where you pick. Now if you're busy thinking Matt Barkely is worth a draft pick then it doesn't matter where you pick either. You just get the benefit of doubt from fans/media while your high pick is stinking up the joint.
Well sure talent evaluation is obviously the most important factor but a high draft pick will definitely improve the POS. who are the current franchise QBs in football? Brady, Rodgers, Ben, Dalton, Luck, Rivers, P. Manning (ok not anymore but he has been for most of his career), Romo, Eli, Cam, Brees, Wilson, Palmer? How many of these guys were drafted in the first round?
A better question is who was drafted in the top 10?

Brady - 199th overall

Rodgers - 24th overall

Roethlesberger - 11th overall

Dalton - 35th overall

Luck - 1st overall

Rivers - 4th overall

Peyton - 1st overall

Romo - Undrafted

Eli - 1st overall

Cam - 1st overall

Brees - 32nd overall

Wilson - 75th overall

Palmer - 1st overall
right...but the list of QB's drafted later that are bad is much longer. The Weeden, Freeman, Losman, Kolb, Clausen, Henne, Beck, Stanton, McCoy, Mallett, etc...

 
This team needs to just lose out. The only way to get a stud QB is through the draft. Finishing 7-9 or 6-10 may get them a good pick but not sure that gets them a franchise QB.
Like Brady, Rodgers, Wilson, Brees, Romo, Big Ben??Or young guy like Dalton or Teddy ect...? (Should have just stayed pat ;) ) But, if you can evaluate talent then it doesn't matter where you pick. Now if you're busy thinking Matt Barkely is worth a draft pick then it doesn't matter where you pick either. You just get the benefit of doubt from fans/media while your high pick is stinking up the joint.
Well sure talent evaluation is obviously the most important factor but a high draft pick will definitely improve the POS. who are the current franchise QBs in football? Brady, Rodgers, Ben, Dalton, Luck, Rivers, P. Manning (ok not anymore but he has been for most of his career), Romo, Eli, Cam, Brees, Wilson, Palmer? How many of these guys were drafted in the first round?
A better question is who was drafted in the top 10?Brady - 199th overall

Rodgers - 24th overall

Roethlesberger - 11th overall

Dalton - 35th overall

Luck - 1st overall

Rivers - 4th overall

Peyton - 1st overall

Romo - Undrafted

Eli - 1st overall

Cam - 1st overall

Brees - 32nd overall

Wilson - 75th overall

Palmer - 1st overall
right...but the list of QB's drafted later that are bad is much longer. The Weeden, Freeman, Losman, Kolb, Clausen, Henne, Beck, Stanton, McCoy, Mallett, etc...
Same for QBs drafted in the top 10.

RG3, Tannenhill, Locker, Gabbert, Bradford, Sanchez, Jamarcus, Young, Leinart, A Smith, Leftwich, David Carr and Joey Harrington.

All top 10.

 
Pick up Rowe for you IDP guys. He can tackle and will get you some PD. Stock up

Start all usual suspect vs this secondary, including the flex guys coming up like Floyd, Lafell and give Watkins a bump.
If you make it to the Fantasy SuperBowl in Week 16 and you have DeSean Jackson, for God's sake start him. I'd expect 150 yards receiving and a TD.

 
I went back through the numbers, Chip Kelly's record without Nick Foles is a complete joke. I thought I'd be more pissed at him being benched, but I'm not. This is typical of the NFL/media.

Foles 15-4 winning record(78.95%), threw for 40TD/12INTs, nearly set NFL effectncy records in 2013, won a division and a probowl MVP, 90 career QB rate and didn't get sacked much with an awful Oline

Without Foles Chip's QBs are 9-16(36%), 34TD/32INTs, and 1-8 record vs winning teams(Foles was 4-1).

Kids career is basically over, and Chip is back to being mocked like he was before Foles. I would normally write a whole article, but the numbers don't support any other argument for two second.
Take it to the Foles thread. He's a joke
Shameless bump(with updates!). Foles is hated so much that something like this isn't even worth reporting. Chip actually looks brilliant for trading the guy who won 78.95% of his games and we're cool with the results.In less games, Foles has 8 more TDs and 20 less picks. Chip would probably be worth firing by now if his teams performance w/o Foles held up over 3 seasons. What a joke
LOL Still on the Foles kick, huh? Talk about being a joke.The guy was so horrible in St Louis that the Rams would rather play a concussed Keenum than put him back in. Was listening to NFL Network last week and they said that Foles' QB play this year was far and away the worst in the league. But feel free to still cry about him being traded away. And the Rams are on the hook for 25 million over two years! Ouch
Updated! Ouch
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I went back through the numbers, Chip Kelly's record without Nick Foles is a complete joke. I thought I'd be more pissed at him being benched, but I'm not. This is typical of the NFL/media.

Foles 15-4 winning record(78.95%), threw for 40TD/12INTs, nearly set NFL effectncy records in 2013, won a division and a probowl MVP, 90 career QB rate and didn't get sacked much with an awful Oline

Without Foles Chip's QBs are 9-16(36%), 34TD/32INTs, and 1-8 record vs winning teams(Foles was 4-1).

Kids career is basically over, and Chip is back to being mocked like he was before Foles. I would normally write a whole article, but the numbers don't support any other argument for two second.
Take it to the Foles thread. He's a joke
Shameless bump(with updates!). Foles is hated so much that something like this isn't even worth reporting. Chip actually looks brilliant for trading the guy who won 78.95% of his games and we're cool with the results.In less games, Foles has 8 more TDs and 20 less picks. Chip would probably be worth firing by now if his teams performance w/o Foles held up over 3 seasons. What a joke
LOL Still on the Foles kick, huh? Talk about being a joke.The guy was so horrible in St Louis that the Rams would rather play a concussed Keenum than put him back in. Was listening to NFL Network last week and they said that Foles' QB play this year was far and away the worst in the league. But feel free to still cry about him being traded away. And the Rams are on the hook for 25 million over two years! Ouch
Updated! Ouch
Pretty strange choice of posts to bump. Keenum still the starter unless he can't pass concussion protocol. With your boy holding a clipboard and asking if he needs water.
 
The Eagles are the 6th team in NFL history to allow 2 QBs to throw for 5 TDs with no INTs. And they let it happen in 5 days.
which is why it's so infuriating that Kelly didn't make one single move with his staff. Can't tell if he thinks that would be an admission of failure or if he just doesn't care because he has one foot out the door.
 
Ok guys so you can all take this with a grain of salt of course but I have a friend who works at the NovaCare center who I see a few times a year. They are not involved with coaching the team or anything like that (outreach program) but are there daily and get to interact with the players and have first hand knowledge of what's going on down there.

Here are some snippets of the conversation I had:

Kelly has lost most of the team. The food situation enough is pretty telling. The cafeteria is stocked with all healthy food but certain players if they are not at their target weight, have to eat prepackaged meals (in addition to the smoothies). These men HATE this. Furthermore, they take out their frustrations on the cafeteria workers. So even those people are pissed at Chip. Chip himself, if you haven't noticed is gaining quite a bit of weight. He won't eat a single vegetable and loves cheesteaks. His first year there, he was frequently scene running but no more. You remember Andy had Taco Tuesday and Fats Food Friday and Andy's a big guy. But for Chip to preach all of this nutrition stuff and be a fat slob--it's galling.

They HATE the sleep,monitor which is really a 24/7 tracking device. My friend said it's one thing for an 18-22 playing for a shot at the pros but once you're grown up and have millions these guys don't give a crap.

I asked if they thought Lurie will fire him and they said they didn't know only that you can't believe how much money Lurie poured I to changing EVRYTHING at the facility.

I remember talking to this person when Chip forts got there and they said, "I don't know how good they will be but you will not believe the shape they will be in. They removed every piece of equipment and re-fitted everything with Chip's sports science division. It evidently cost Lurie a ton.

I said my line about "not since reverened Jim Jones himself has a group of people been more duped by kool aid than the eagle fan base." They laughed and said "that's perfect, yep."

So, take those nuggets for what they are worth.

 
Pick up Rowe for you IDP guys. He can tackle and will get you some PD. Stock up

Start all usual suspect vs this secondary, including the flex guys coming up like Floyd, Lafell and give Watkins a bump.
If you make it to the Fantasy SuperBowl in Week 16 and you have DeSean Jackson, for God's sake start him. I'd expect 150 yards receiving and a TD.
Like he won't be hurt again by then.

 
Just looked at this years QB FA class, no choice but to bring Bradford back and maybe bring in a guy like Taj Boyd and see what he has. Then take 1 in the draft as well. Who else could be cut beside Kap and RG Knee?

 
Pick up Rowe for you IDP guys. He can tackle and will get you some PD. Stock up

Start all usual suspect vs this secondary, including the flex guys coming up like Floyd, Lafell and give Watkins a bump.
If you make it to the Fantasy SuperBowl in Week 16 and you have DeSean Jackson, for God's sake start him. I'd expect 150 yards receiving and a TD.
Like he won't be hurt again by then.
The two games he's played against The Eagles he's done very well, over 100 yards each game with a TD or two. If healthy he's a great FF start for someone in their league Super Bowl.
 
Pick up Rowe for you IDP guys. He can tackle and will get you some PD. Stock up

Start all usual suspect vs this secondary, including the flex guys coming up like Floyd, Lafell and give Watkins a bump.
If you make it to the Fantasy SuperBowl in Week 16 and you have DeSean Jackson, for God's sake start him. I'd expect 150 yards receiving and a TD.
Like he won't be hurt again by then.
The two games he's played against The Eagles he's done very well, over 100 yards each game with a TD or two. If healthy he's a great FF start for someone in their league Super Bowl.
Sure he will definitely be motivated but the guy can't finish a game this year. If he plays though Billy Davis will probably put a LB on him.

 
Here are some snippets of the conversation I had:

Kelly has lost most of the team. The food situation enough is pretty telling. The cafeteria is stocked with all healthy food but certain players if they are not at their target weight, have to eat prepackaged meals (in addition to the smoothies). These men HATE this. Furthermore, they take out their frustrations on the cafeteria workers. So even those people are pissed at Chip. Chip himself, if you haven't noticed is gaining quite a bit of weight. He won't eat a single vegetable and loves cheesteaks. His first year there, he was frequently scene running but no more. You remember Andy had Taco Tuesday and Fats Food Friday and Andy's a big guy. But for Chip to preach all of this nutrition stuff and be a fat slob--it's galling.

They HATE the sleep,monitor which is really a 24/7 tracking device. My friend said it's one thing for an 18-22 playing for a shot at the pros but once you're grown up and have millions these guys don't give a crap.
Not being an Eagles fan, I didn't know they were controlled to that extent by Kelly.

That's nuts. No wonder he's losing the players.

 
GoBirds said:
thayman said:
GoBirds said:
dcgangstas said:
ShaHBucks said:
Pick up Rowe for you IDP guys. He can tackle and will get you some PD. Stock up

Start all usual suspect vs this secondary, including the flex guys coming up like Floyd, Lafell and give Watkins a bump.
If you make it to the Fantasy SuperBowl in Week 16 and you have DeSean Jackson, for God's sake start him. I'd expect 150 yards receiving and a TD.
Like he won't be hurt again by then.
The two games he's played against The Eagles he's done very well, over 100 yards each game with a TD or two. If healthy he's a great FF start for someone in their league Super Bowl.
Sure he will definitely be motivated but the guy can't finish a game this year. If he plays though Billy Davis will probably put a LB on him.
He's finished the couple of games he's played this year and is likely on the WW in most leagues. If you've got an open roster spot now's a good time to stash him.
 
GoBirds said:
thayman said:
GoBirds said:
dcgangstas said:
ShaHBucks said:
Pick up Rowe for you IDP guys. He can tackle and will get you some PD. Stock up

Start all usual suspect vs this secondary, including the flex guys coming up like Floyd, Lafell and give Watkins a bump.
If you make it to the Fantasy SuperBowl in Week 16 and you have DeSean Jackson, for God's sake start him. I'd expect 150 yards receiving and a TD.
Like he won't be hurt again by then.
The two games he's played against The Eagles he's done very well, over 100 yards each game with a TD or two. If healthy he's a great FF start for someone in their league Super Bowl.
Sure he will definitely be motivated but the guy can't finish a game this year. If he plays though Billy Davis will probably put a LB on him.
:lmao:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
fatness said:
Kwai Chang Caine said:
Here are some snippets of the conversation I had:

Kelly has lost most of the team. The food situation enough is pretty telling. The cafeteria is stocked with all healthy food but certain players if they are not at their target weight, have to eat prepackaged meals (in addition to the smoothies). These men HATE this. Furthermore, they take out their frustrations on the cafeteria workers. So even those people are pissed at Chip. Chip himself, if you haven't noticed is gaining quite a bit of weight. He won't eat a single vegetable and loves cheesteaks. His first year there, he was frequently scene running but no more. You remember Andy had Taco Tuesday and Fats Food Friday and Andy's a big guy. But for Chip to preach all of this nutrition stuff and be a fat slob--it's galling.

They HATE the sleep,monitor which is really a 24/7 tracking device. My friend said it's one thing for an 18-22 playing for a shot at the pros but once you're grown up and have millions these guys don't give a crap.
Not being an Eagles fan, I didn't know they were controlled to that extent by Kelly.

That's nuts. No wonder he's losing the players.
I made a Schiano comparison before the season. You can do all this controlling ####, but you'd better win.

 
Just not seeing adjustments that you'd think you should see, offense or defense. Thing not working - stop doing the thing! Still leaving CB's out to dry, still running Murray on sweeps, etc.

 
Just not seeing adjustments that you'd think you should see, offense or defense. Thing not working - stop doing the thing! Still leaving CB's out to dry, still running Murray on sweeps, etc.
Agreed. Put Sam under center, run Murray between the tackles and set up some play action. On the few occasions this has happened, it was successful. Offense looked better running and passing. IMO if you insist on running 100% of the offense out of the shotgun, then you are better off featuring Mathews.

In any event, the defensive scheme is a head scratcher in general as I cannot recall receivers running so wide open, with as much frequency as they have, anywhere outside of the arena league or the Big 12. Why pay the money for big, press corners and then not press cover anyone? Inexplicable from a fan's POV.

 
https://twitter.com/RapSheet/status/670955169270599681

Rapoport tweet - Kelly 'intent on fixing team. Considering all options.'

To what does this allude? Lineups/personnel/formations? Player management? Coaching staff? Practice routines? 'In-house' day-to-day stuff?

Pretty much at the point where if he doesn't make major adjustments to some or all of the above, it's insanity and indicative that he's unable/unwilling to do the job.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Chip should take the USC job if it's offered to him. It's a top 5 job in all of college football. He can be a hero there.

 
While I appreciate the desire to get Gruden's awful commentary off MNF, he's about the last guy I'd want to run the show. His latter years in TB displayed a fundamental lack of ability to use talent properly. Which we've had enough of this year.

 
Well professional athletes are the biggest ####### babies on the planet. My company has experience with building tech for pro athletes. The strength and conditioning coaches hate working with the athletes. They think they know everything and honestly most don't work hard and ##### all the time.

Not saying Chip is 'right' but the LAST population you could convince of a science-based strict personal regimen is a professional athlete.

 
Well professional athletes are the biggest ####### babies on the planet. My company has experience with building tech for pro athletes. The strength and conditioning coaches hate working with the athletes. They think they know everything and honestly most don't work hard and ##### all the time.

Not saying Chip is 'right' but the LAST population you could convince of a science-based strict personal regimen is a professional athlete.
Couldn't agree more. The industry I'm in I've worked with a few. They are usually pretty chill but kinda do their own thing.

I've said this before and some have disagreed but I think it is a COLOSSAL mistake to try to train pro athletes like the military. Two completely different mind sets.

 
Well professional athletes are the biggest ####### babies on the planet. My company has experience with building tech for pro athletes. The strength and conditioning coaches hate working with the athletes. They think they know everything and honestly most don't work hard and ##### all the time.

Not saying Chip is 'right' but the LAST population you could convince of a science-based strict personal regimen is a professional athlete.
Couldn't agree more. The industry I'm in I've worked with a few. They are usually pretty chill but kinda do their own thing. I've said this before and some have disagreed but I think it is a COLOSSAL mistake to try to train pro athletes like the military. Two completely different mind sets.
There's BBQ Friday's if you play for the Cheifs
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Is it safe to say that Davis kept his job? They would have done it by now if they were going to this week, no?
I don't care if they keep him to finish the season, but no way we can keep him around in the off season.

Side note: Imagine we still have Maclin and DJax. Sigh...

 
It's crazy that we are still one game out of first place. Brutal schedule coming up though, so doesn't even really matter. Just makes it even more painful in that if we would have even won 1 game of those 3 vs sub-500 teams, we'd be in first.

 
It's crazy that we are still one game out of first place. Brutal schedule coming up though, so doesn't even really matter. Just makes it even more painful in that if we would have even won 1 game of those 3 vs sub-500 teams, we'd be in first.
I just knew you would post this. :lmao:

 
It's crazy that we are still one game out of first place. Brutal schedule coming up though, so doesn't even really matter. Just makes it even more painful in that if we would have even won 1 game of those 3 vs sub-500 teams, we'd be in first.
I just knew you would post this. :lmao:
post what? How crazy it is how bad our div is, but that we still have no chance?

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top