Henry Ford
Footballguy
Someone should start an inquiry and get to the bottom of this.That is all good, so treat is as such. When such a report is deemed 'credible' don't take it to mean anything more than probable cause.
Someone should start an inquiry and get to the bottom of this.That is all good, so treat is as such. When such a report is deemed 'credible' don't take it to mean anything more than probable cause.
People in the intelligence community responsibility is not to decide fitness for the job.Seriously? Everyone that is a part of the United States should have the responsibility of calling out the President for being unfit for the job.
Bill Barr sounds like the right man for the job!Someone should start an inquiry and get to the bottom of this.
Yes. And people should wait for the evidence of said inquiry before concluding that many of the inuendo in the report are true.Someone should start an inquiry and get to the bottom of this.
"The bear looked at the hunter and said: "You're not here for the hunting, are you?"I get 10 responses in 10 minutes and I only responded to three of them 5 minutes later. Good lord this place sucks.
Perhaps people should wait on the investigation before calling parts of the complaint innuendo and/or heresyYes. And people should wait for the evidence of said inquiry before concluding that many of the inuendo in the report are true.
Well we now know that only Republican whistle blowers can whistle blow a Republican president, otherwise it's just hearsay and a witch hunt!"If people would only stop blowing the whistle on Trump, there wouldn't be any evidence against him!"
You misspelled "heresy"Well we now know that only Republican whistle blowers can whistle blow a Republican president, otherwise it's just hearsay and a witch hunt!
Then stop coming here. Seriously. Why would you keep going somewhere that causes you such angst?Good lord this place sucks.
He could go to FFT where most people would agree with everything he says or he could find other people who share his opinions and get them to post here to even things out some.Then stop coming here. Seriously. Why would you keep going somewhere that causes you such angst?
Rats fleeing sinking ships.
Exactly. If you want to be stroked by other blind Trump supporters, go over to Reddit or something.Then stop coming here. Seriously. Why would you keep going somewhere that causes you such angst?
Then why are you here all of the time? You’re here nearly as much as I am. But I hang around because I like it and I don’t pretend I’m a victim. If I thought the place sucked I wouldn’t be here. I don’t waste my valuable entertainment time on things that suck. Why do you?I get 10 responses in 10 minutes and I only responded to three of them 5 minutes later. Good lord this place sucks.
I am not sure why people post this. He believes what he believes and maybe he is not as intellectually rigorous as you may think. Maybe you need to reevaluate how you view him...I love how you use this forum, which you constantly claim is a partisan cesspool hopelessly biased against Trump, to spread a bunch of partisan innuendo and heresy about the complaint itself, specifically that it's full of "partisan inuendo and heresy"
I'm curious though, my dear jon, how someone as intellectually rigorous as yourself, and having the level of skepticism you claim here:
and here:
could claim anything one way or another about what the whistle blower report is or isn't when you haven't read it yourself.
Please be better.
And probable cause then triggers an investigation, including subpoenas, searching for hidden evidence and questioning potential witnesses. If only someone would do that here, huh? Instead, they're conducting a coup by investigating, issuing subpoenas, searching for hidden evidence and questioning potential witnesses. I can see why you're upset.That is all good, so treat is as such. When such a report is deemed 'credible' don't take it to mean anything more than probable cause.
Some of the evidence was already released by the President. People are entitled to consider what that evidence means.Yes. And people should wait for the evidence of said inquiry before concluding that many of the inuendo in the report are true.
Also, and you may have heard this, two people from that country and associated with the personal lawyer he tried to get involved in all of this were caught trying to flee the country rather than testify in the inquiry. That's public knowledge and worthy of consideration.Yes. And people should wait for the evidence of said inquiry before concluding that many of the inuendo in the report are true.
They were fleeing political persecution!Also, and you may have heard this, two people from that country and associated with the personal lawyer he tried to get involved in all of this were caught trying to flee the country rather than testify in the inquiry. That's public knowledge and worthy of consideration.
I can’t wait til we get to hear the details of what he said to the Ukrainian President.Yes. And people should wait for the evidence of said inquiry before concluding that many of the inuendo in the report are true.
His defenses are inexhaustible and fortunately don't have to be compatible with each other.Fiona Hill testifying today:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2019/10/14/politics/who-is-fiona-hill/index.html
What she says could destroy Trump’s latest defense- for the umpteenth time.
All the defenses will be destroyed. That’s why many of the GOP are choosing to stay quiet rather than offer up an excuse. They know that there’s a pretty good chance that it will be destroyed the next day.Fiona Hill testifying today:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2019/10/14/politics/who-is-fiona-hill/index.html
What she says could destroy Trump’s latest defense- for the umpteenth time.
Trump is the political epitome of outkicking your coverage.I’m not saying any posters in particular but the talking points were already outrun by this weekend. Aside from the IG, Sondland, Yovanovitch, Volker and soon Hill have all validated the WBer’s claims in real time under oath.
And partisan. Even the Trump appointees side with the Dems and the Deep State.Yeah, but people under oath are untrustworthy
Ahhhh, it's the old "Keep firing prosecutors until they stop investigating you" strategy. Worked out great for Nixon.
Remember when he wrote that thread letting everyone know he was leaving for good?Then stop coming here. Seriously. Why would you keep going somewhere that causes you such angst?
Strange though that they went to Transylvania.They were fleeing political persecution!
I would like to see video of this peas.Do you think its right that Donald Trump is using spies to infiltrate Congressional hearings?
Matt Gaetz was ejected from Fiona Hill's closed-door deposition. The House parliamentarian told Gaetz he's not allowed to attend the hearing because he doesn't sit on any of the panels that are conducting the impeachment inquiry.
"Partisan heresy"I’m not saying any posters in particular but the talking points were already outrun by this weekend. Aside from the IG, Sondland, Yovanovitch, Volker and soon Hill have all validated the WBer’s claims in real time under oath.
To be fair, he was probably just drunk and stumbled into the wrong room.Do you think its right that Donald Trump is using spies to infiltrate Congressional hearings?
Matt Gaetz was ejected from Fiona Hill's closed-door deposition. The House parliamentarian told Gaetz he's not allowed to attend the hearing because he doesn't sit on any of the panels that are conducting the impeachment inquiry.
I really just don’t get this argument at all especially when it’s compounded by the same people saying it over and over again. If it “sucks” and is a “cesspool” why continue to frequent it? To be clear Jon I’m not trying to run you off, I appreciate your engagement and want it to continue but the victim role and complaining don’t make sense and are hollow.I get 10 responses in 10 minutes and I only responded to three of them 5 minutes later. Good lord this place sucks.
Remember a few decades ago when Nunes was playing this role for the Trump administration? What was that, 1952 or something?Do you think its right that Donald Trump is using spies to infiltrate Congressional hearings?
Matt Gaetz was ejected from Fiona Hill's closed-door deposition. The House parliamentarian told Gaetz he's not allowed to attend the hearing because he doesn't sit on any of the panels that are conducting the impeachment inquiry.
Birds of a feather...
Nunes decades ago I will NEVER not enjoy posting that picRemember a few decades ago when Nunes was playing this role for the Trump administration? What was that, 1952 or something?
That guy definitely gets voted off first in a Survivor season.Nunes decades ago I will NEVER not enjoy posting that pic
You mean the impeachable acts started prior to 2016? I'm a little confused by your post unless you mistakenly believe that these investigations should be happening.So we have moved on from Russia? What is the next "insurance policy" after Ukraine? Don't get me wrong, I think every POTUS could be impeached if you spend enough time and effort. But this effort started prior to 2016.
Reasoning like this has shamed our military and law enforcement agencies.So we have moved on from Russia? What is the next "insurance policy" after Ukraine? Don't get me wrong, I think every POTUS could be impeached if you spend enough time and effort. But this effort started prior to 2016.
Those stinkin' Libs started working on Trump's impeachment back before he was nominated, and maybe before he was even a candidate. Wouldn't surprise me if Obama's grandmother was working on it at the same time she was faking his birth announcement in the Hawaii newspapers. See, she know Barack would run for president and she though maybe Trump would run at the same time so she needed to set him up for impeachment, just in case.You mean the impeachable acts started prior to 2016? I'm a little confused by your post unless you mistakenly believe that these investigations should be happening.
And, no, we haven't "moved on" from Russia, not if there's dirt there (and I think there is). and wtf is an "insurance policy." Your post looks less informed the more I look at it.
How is that even possible. Just last week the closed door hearings were being done in some top secret bunker that only allowed Democrats.Do you think its right that Donald Trump is using spies to infiltrate Congressional hearings?
Matt Gaetz was ejected from Fiona Hill's closed-door deposition. The House parliamentarian told Gaetz he's not allowed to attend the hearing because he doesn't sit on any of the panels that are conducting the impeachment inquiry.
Thanks for your response. I am a little confused about the bolded. Don't you believe the investigations should be happening?You mean the impeachable acts started prior to 2016? I'm a little confused by your post unless you mistakenly believe that these investigations should be happening.
And, no, we haven't "moved on" from Russia, not if there's dirt there (and I think there is). and wtf is an "insurance policy." Your post looks less informed the more I look at it.