Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
*** OFFICIAL *** In-Season Dynasty Trade Thread (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter doowain
- Start date
SoCalBroncoFan
Footballguy
12 team dynasty league 1/2/3/1/1 PPR
Team A gave:
Stevan Ridley
Coby Fleener
Team B gave:
Le'Veon Bell
Team A gave:
Stevan Ridley
Coby Fleener
Team B gave:
Le'Veon Bell
Skeletore Eh
Footballguy
Gore
Seattle d
For
Markus Wheaton
2014 2nd (right now would be 2.02)
Titans d
Seattle d
For
Markus Wheaton
2014 2nd (right now would be 2.02)
Titans d
Adam Harstad
Moderator
Adam Harstad
Moderator
You know that I'm a big Jordy Nelson fan, and I spent a couple of pages defending his placement in my top-10 dynasty WRs, but... I don't know about that. I also happen to be a bit higher than the consensus on Ridley and Richardson, and Wilson is one of the highest-upside lottery tickets around. I suppose it's a sign of a good trade when I find it hard to really commit to either side of it. Nelson's great value, but that Ridley/Richardson/Wilson group is a potential grand slam.
Adam Harstad
Moderator
Adam Harstad
Moderator
That's the problem with only outlawing trades that are collusion; some trades aren't collusion, but should still be outlawed. The Brute Squad might not have colluded there at all, he might have just woken up one morning, checked his incoming trade offers, and realized he'd hit the lottery. That doesn't matter. That's clearly a trade by a team with priorities other than being competitive.
Adam Harstad
Moderator
Early 2nd or late 2nd? I'd take anything in the 18+ range for Maclin without hesitating. Honestly, I'd probably take anything in the 19-24 range for him, too, but an early second would be a no-brainer.
Adam Harstad
Moderator
Seeing a lot of junk trades for Crabtree recently. I'm wondering what's prompting them all all of a sudden, I suppose just people realizing he's coming back soon and the window might be closing. Either way, I'm coming down on the Crabtree side of pretty much every trade that has his name in it.
ConnSKINS26
Footballguy
I agree with you. I was uncomfortable making the offer, really, although I was willing to do it to get Jordy.
If one of those guys is a consistent, healthy RB1 for 3 years or so, the deals even I think. If more than one of them pan out, then it's a huge win for the other side.
Adam Harstad
Moderator
That'd be a decent trade in non-PPR, but it's a mess in PPR. Give me Bell by a lot.
I was on the side getting Julius Thomas and actually proffered all three pieces to the three I gave up. I like Percy, but I don't see him getting as many receptions in Seattle. That defense/team is too good for him to rack up the garbage time points/short throws behind the LOS like he did in Minnesota.
Still like him to be a top 15 WR, just not the top ten guy some are expecting. I think Julius' value will only continue to rise once he gets passed the initial shock/unexpected production stage and Decker probably leaving this offseason.
cstu
Footballguy
That's a mistake IMO. If Maclin re-signs with the Eagles he's much more talented than Cooper who is putting up WR1 numbers.
EBF
Footballguy
Just did an interesting one. 14 teams. 1 QB, 2 RB, 3 WR, 1 TE, 1 FLEX. 6 pts per passing TD. 0.75/1/1.25 PPR for RB/WR/TE.
So slight bump to QB and TE.
Gave:
QB Tony Romo
WR Cecil Shorts
Got:
TE Jordan Reed
QB Jay Cutler
QB Terrelle Pryor
Not sure I love it, but I felt Reed/Cutler for Shorts/Reed was close to a wash. Rather have Reed than Shorts in this format. Rather have Romo than Cutler. Given the choice, I'd rather have the better player at WR/TE than QB, so that made a difference. I think I can always get a good QB if I need one, but a top pass catcher can be a little harder to acquire. Also felt that Reed would give me a lot more flexibility in trades than either Romo or Shorts, as I know a lot of people are high on him.
So slight bump to QB and TE.
Gave:
QB Tony Romo
WR Cecil Shorts
Got:
TE Jordan Reed
QB Jay Cutler
QB Terrelle Pryor
Not sure I love it, but I felt Reed/Cutler for Shorts/Reed was close to a wash. Rather have Reed than Shorts in this format. Rather have Romo than Cutler. Given the choice, I'd rather have the better player at WR/TE than QB, so that made a difference. I think I can always get a good QB if I need one, but a top pass catcher can be a little harder to acquire. Also felt that Reed would give me a lot more flexibility in trades than either Romo or Shorts, as I know a lot of people are high on him.
Last edited by a moderator:
Adam Harstad
Moderator
I'm operating under the assumption that Maclin is very unlikely to re-sign with the Eagles. Have you heard anything to the contrary?
Also, Cooper's WR1 numbers are a total fluke. Over a long enough timeframe, I would expect Cooper's lucky breaks to even out a bit, and I'd expect him to settle into a fantasy WR3-type range.
thaniz
Footballguy
Three trades in a 14 team league.
Team A trades
A. Rodgers
Team B trades
Ryan Fitzpatrick
Two 1st round picks, one is the number 1 overall.
Team A is 7-4, Team B 8-3.
Team A trades
Maurice Jones-Drew
Dwayne Bowe
Team B trades
Trent Richardson
Team B is 5-6, team A is 4-7.
And the last one,
Team A trades
Adrian Peterson
Team B trades
Michael Griffin
Three first round picks in 2014.
Team A is 7-4 (the same team that traded away Aaron Rodgers also get rid of AP, so that team now has 5(!) first round picks in 2014.) Team B is 5-6 (Team B is the same team that traded away Trent Richardson)
Comments?
Team A trades
A. Rodgers
Team B trades
Ryan Fitzpatrick
Two 1st round picks, one is the number 1 overall.
Team A is 7-4, Team B 8-3.
Team A trades
Maurice Jones-Drew
Dwayne Bowe
Team B trades
Trent Richardson
Team B is 5-6, team A is 4-7.
And the last one,
Team A trades
Adrian Peterson
Team B trades
Michael Griffin
Three first round picks in 2014.
Team A is 7-4 (the same team that traded away Aaron Rodgers also get rid of AP, so that team now has 5(!) first round picks in 2014.) Team B is 5-6 (Team B is the same team that traded away Trent Richardson)
Comments?
Last edited by a moderator:
valhallan
Footballguy
Me too. Top 10 pick, demonstrated top 10 ability, bona fide number 1 on his team with a rocket-armed one-read quarterback. Neither of them, nor the coach, will be leaving for several years. No brainer.
undercover
Footballguy
10 Team Standard
Team A gave...Cutler, Rice, Pierce, 2014 1st and 3rd
Team B gave....Charles and Wright
Team A is making a run at the championship this year....
Team A gave...Cutler, Rice, Pierce, 2014 1st and 3rd
Team B gave....Charles and Wright
Team A is making a run at the championship this year....
undercover
Footballguy
10 Team Standard
Team A gave D. Brown and 2014 1st (late)
Team B gave Moreno
Team A is trying to secure 1st place in league and make run at Championship this year.
Team A gave D. Brown and 2014 1st (late)
Team B gave Moreno
Team A is trying to secure 1st place in league and make run at Championship this year.
Denver724
Footballguy
Agreed. I have him on a few teams and really want to see where he ends up (and does) next year and beyond.
Dr. Octopus
Footballguy
Minnesota was generally not a bad team during the time Harvin was there - certainly not a team that was always in garbage time - and I don't know what correlation you're trying to make between having a good defense and throwing bubble screens or screens in the flat, if anything I would think teams with good defenses would do it more often,whoDATT said:
Last edited by a moderator:
Ace Matherton
Footballguy
14 teams .5 PPR IDP
Got Drew Brees & Roddy White
Gave 2014 1st (12-14 pick) + 3 2014 2nds (10-14th picks in that round) + Cutler
Had Vick, Palmer and Campbell as my QB's and am sitting in first place
QB was my only need and I have depth everywhere else. I really like this draft class and it may hurt me long term but QB has been my issue for years.
Got Drew Brees & Roddy White
Gave 2014 1st (12-14 pick) + 3 2014 2nds (10-14th picks in that round) + Cutler
Had Vick, Palmer and Campbell as my QB's and am sitting in first place
QB was my only need and I have depth everywhere else. I really like this draft class and it may hurt me long term but QB has been my issue for years.
FUBAR
Footballguy
King of the Jungle
Footballguy
FUBAR
Footballguy
Does it matter? Seastrunk seems worth it easily to me, but if Evans or Watkins land in Indy, Carolina, Detroit, New England... I could see either becoming the better choice in some formats.
I know I'm ecstatic to have the 1.03 in a large league where QBs have extra value. Wouldn't trade it for Rice and Nicks.
JohnnyU
Footballguy
Not saying because my league mates visit this board, but there are at least 3 players I like, possibly 4. I have a good chance in landing 2 of the top 4 and possibly 3 of the top 5.
Tau837
Footballguy
10 team standard
Team A gave up:
Glennon, Mike TBB QB
Boldin, Anquan SFO WR
Smith, Torrey BAL WR
Team B gave up:
Stafford, Matthew DET QB
I am not involved in the trade. Team A is 9-2 and the current #1 seed, but had only Eli/Manuel/Vick at QB. Team B is 4-6 and is not likely to make the playoffs.
Team A gave up:
Glennon, Mike TBB QB
Boldin, Anquan SFO WR
Smith, Torrey BAL WR
Team B gave up:
Stafford, Matthew DET QB
I am not involved in the trade. Team A is 9-2 and the current #1 seed, but had only Eli/Manuel/Vick at QB. Team B is 4-6 and is not likely to make the playoffs.
BearsFan4Life
Footballguy
10 teamer ..this is baddd deal for B .. I own Stafford in 14 Teamer and would instantly reject
FUBAR
Footballguy
Rebuilding; I dealt:
Mike Glennon, Rashad Jennings, and Phillip Wheeler
for
Julian Edelman, Rod Streater, Matt Elam, late (10-12) 2014 1st and 2nd
Not that it's all that relevant to the trade, but I now have 4 1sts (2, 3-6, 10-12, 10-12) and the 2.02, 12 team IDP.
Mike Glennon, Rashad Jennings, and Phillip Wheeler
for
Julian Edelman, Rod Streater, Matt Elam, late (10-12) 2014 1st and 2nd
Not that it's all that relevant to the trade, but I now have 4 1sts (2, 3-6, 10-12, 10-12) and the 2.02, 12 team IDP.
Last edited by a moderator:
King of the Jungle
Footballguy
FUBAR
Footballguy
The question and curiousity makes sense, but even if I didn't have a target, I'd do that trade (for the 1.01) rather easily.
cstu
Footballguy
I like Stafford but it's too easy to get similar numbers from another QB in 10 team league.
The Bandit
Footballguy
Stafford is the #3 QB this year, is 25, a former #1 overall pick and has the best WR in the game to throw to. He's probably my dynasty #2 QB right now after Rodgers.
He was traded for 3 players that probably wouldn't even crack most teams starting lineups in a 10 teamer. That's bad.
Nugget
Footballguy
I was the owner that traded for Stafford. I think it worked well for both - the Stafford owner had RGIII and I was weak at QB. Boldin and Torrey are in the starting lineup for Team B this week.
I normally start Dez, Calvin, and Welker at WR, then would pick one of Amendola, Cameron, T.Smith, Boldin, or B. Tate as a flex. I don't feel I lost much at WR.
I get Stafford to shore up the QB spot plus cleared 2 extra roster spots for flyers/playoff matchup defenses.
Win/win.
Tau837
Footballguy
There is no question that your team improved via the trade, so you don't really need to justify why it helps you. The question is why the other team made the deal.
By your own post here, the other owner has RGIII, so Glennon becomes a backup. The fact that Smith and Boldin are in the other team's lineup this week is immaterial IMO... his team is out of the playoffs for this year. Will Boldin be a long term starter? No. So a realistic view of the trade for next year and beyond is that it was Glennon (backup) and Smith (starter) for Stafford. Doesn't seem even close to worth it for the other team IMO.
deadlyrange0321
Footballguy
12 Team PPR, 1QB 1RB 1WR 1TE 3FLEX
Team A trades:
Matt Stafford
Team B trades:
Colin Kaepernick
2014 1st Rd Pick (Likely in 7-10 range)
Team A trades:
Matt Stafford
Team B trades:
Colin Kaepernick
2014 1st Rd Pick (Likely in 7-10 range)
Similar threads
