What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Official Subscriber Contest (1 Viewer)

I think I have monkeyed with my lineup, well over 250 times.

Right now I finally have what I want-I wish I could send it off (So I don't mess around more)

2 QB's-Both solid starters

5 RB's-I'm very comfortable with what I have

7 WR's-Not a strength 2 serviceable players, 3 so so WR's and 2 deep threat types.

2 TE's-Both heavy on the value proposition. Not high performers currently.

3 K's-Who cares, just don't over spend.

3 D's-Very solid options and not expensive.

22 players-Spent it all.

Edit-Re-did my QB's (251 times) :bag:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think I have monkeyed with my lineup, well over 250 times.Right now I finally have what I want-I wish I could send it off (So I don't mess around more)2 QB's-Both solid starters5 RB's-I'm very comfortable with what I have7 WR's-Not a strength 2 serviceable players, 3 so so WR's and 2 deep threat types.2 TE's-Both heavy on the value proposition. Not high performers currently.3 K's-Who cares, just don't over spend.3 D's-Very solid options and not expensive.22 players-Spent it all.Edit-Re-did my QB's (251 times) ;)
3 QB's- Stud, Underated on a run team, and whachootalkinboutwillis7 RB's- Playmaker on run team, ppr bowling ball, mix of backups and young talent7 WR's- 2 consistant top notch players, underachiever, and rookies and bit players(downfall of this team)3 TE's- Peyton's boy, Mr Glass, and youngin hoping to explode2 K's- 2 loser kickers on loser teams2 D's- They might not be good but they're fast
 
I've been alternating between 23/24 deep...the problem I have this year is I don't see a Slaton on the roster at RB...forcing me to spend more there than I'd like...well, there's one guy, but not as much of a slam dunk as Slaton was.That could be good and bad.
:confused: was it just 2 years ago where Frank Gore was incredibly cheap? This year, I agree, I'm not seeing an easy choice at RB - a few I like a lot for their price, but no RB real good real cheap.
 
I really think I've settled in on a final lineup

24/250

2 QB 1 stud

7 RB 1 stud who's cuffed

8 WR 2 studs

3 TE 1 stud

2 K

2 D 1 stud

Byes are front loaded.

Would love to fit Lefty in, but the bye isn't good. Would need to shake the whole roster to work him in.

 
I really think I've settled in on a final lineup24/2502 QB 1 stud7 RB 1 stud who's cuffed8 WR 2 studs3 TE 1 stud2 K2 D 1 studByes are front loaded.Would love to fit Lefty in, but the bye isn't good. Would need to shake the whole roster to work him in.
Might as well say it; I have Leftwich in right now but mostly because I went cheap on the other QBs.I've been going back and forth on studs vs. quality depth, just haven't decided yet.
 
Last year I had the ultimate strategy at QB, going all in on Warner to be a stud. I spent $10 on 3 QB's and had great production there every week. I was able to spend big on Moss (Brady's injury) and LT which did not pan out as well as expected, and was eliminated week 10 due to lack of production at WR and RB. If I had picked the right studs I would have gone further. I don't see an opportunity like that exists this year to save that big at a key position. Definitely some great value picks out there, but nothing like the opportunity that Warner gave last year.

 
I really think I've settled in on a final lineup24/2502 QB 1 stud7 RB 1 stud who's cuffed8 WR 2 studs3 TE 1 stud2 K2 D 1 studByes are front loaded.Would love to fit Lefty in, but the bye isn't good. Would need to shake the whole roster to work him in.
Might as well say it; I have Leftwich in right now but mostly because I went cheap on the other QBs.I've been going back and forth on studs vs. quality depth, just haven't decided yet.
He'll be on the majority of the rosters. I'd rather be a different than the masses, like the guy who won this last year without Warner.
 
He'll be on the majority of the rosters. I'd rather be a different than the masses, like the guy who won this last year without Warner.
You already said you'd love to fit Lefty in but couldn't due to the bye conflict.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ok i spent alot of time trying to figure out value plays as well as bye weeks conflicts for the whole team.

Spent 249 on 24 guys

3QB's (STUD-Underrated-upside backup)

7RB's (STUD-and the rest all the hyped and fav sleepers of FBG, shouldnt be to hard to figure out)

7WR's (2nd tier STUD-Upcoming STUD-old man-F&L-Rookie of the Year-and some solid sleepers)

3TE's (nice stragedy here...i have 2 that everyone will have rostered and one that will fly under the radar)

2K's

2DEF's (top dawgs)

I dont think i will be changing it too much...(ok i might be lying, this #### so addictive to changing)

 
I created a program to run millions of simulations on last years data to come up with optimal position count, and dollar values per position.

I'll be disappointed if I don't make the $$$ again...

My team consists of 24 players:

3 QB, swinging for the fences with all 3

5 RB, one second tier RB, 2 FBG favs, 2 gambles

9 WR, with only 1 above $12, mostly high-upside guys and several feast or famine type guys

3 TE, 2 value picks and one gamble

2 PK, both are studs

2 TD, both are studs

 
I created a program to run millions of simulations on last years data to come up with optimal position count, and dollar values per position.I'll be disappointed if I don't make the $$$ again...My team consists of 24 players:3 QB, swinging for the fences with all 35 RB, one second tier RB, 2 FBG favs, 2 gambles 9 WR, with only 1 above $12, mostly high-upside guys and several feast or famine type guys3 TE, 2 value picks and one gamble2 PK, both are studs2 TD, both are studs
Cant wait for you to post this team after everything is locked.
 
I created a program to run millions of simulations on last years data to come up with optimal position count, and dollar values per position.
Nice....the "simulation" schtick...great shtick.
If we could predict this year's performance on last years, we would all be psychic. I imagine it does provide some intelligent guidance, but you still have to find those cheap nuggets that turn to gold and which good players will step up to elite status.
 
He'll be on the majority of the rosters. I'd rather be a different than the masses, like the guy who won this last year without Warner.
You already said you'd love to fit Lefty in but couldn't due to the bye conflict.
Good point, my statement was confusing. There's a delicate balance between grabbing the value plays and having a roster unique enough to separate yourself in the finals.
 
I stink at this game every year. However, I selected my team early and quite a few of my cheaper guys have looked really good in the preseason & have won their perspective jobs or the backup position.

QB: Stud (top 3 guy) and solid backup than won the job in camp.

RB: 3 starters in the $20 range & 4 cheap backs (1 has won the starting job and another has a good shot).

WR: 2 top 20 WR's, 2 cheap #1 WR's for their respected teams, and other WR's (few rookies & a few #2 guys with upside)

TE: 2 mid-tier guys ranked in the 8-12 range.

K: stud & cheap backup

D: 2 cheaper D's.

As always - you have to get lucky on some gambles and your team needs to stay healthy to have a chance to win. Is this my year? Chances are - NO.

 
I created a program to run millions of simulations on last years data to come up with optimal position count, and dollar values per position.
Nice....the "simulation" schtick...great shtick.
If we could predict this year's performance on last years, we would all be psychic. I imagine it does provide some intelligent guidance, but you still have to find those cheap nuggets that turn to gold and which good players will step up to elite status.
It was mostly to confirm my belief to load up on players in positions with high standard deviations in weekly points. It doesn't say anything about which actual players to take. Consistency is overrated. I'd rather have two players who could score between 2 and 20 points a week, over one player who will consistently put up 10.
 
Spent er all!!

2QB's - Studs

6RB's - Stud, Rookie, Old Vet and Fliers

8WR's - All over the map

2TE's - Economical but talented

3PK's - They play in the NFL, so they'll have to do

2TD's - They're pretty good

:popcorn:

 
Consistency is overrated. I'd rather have two players who could score between 2 and 20 points a week, over one player who will consistently put up 10.
not bad in theory, but what happens in week 9 when both score 2 points and you're booted because of it?
 
I miss the deadline for this every year but finally I'm in. After much laboring, my breakdown is:

2 QB - stud and vet

6 RB - 2 studs, 1 midrange, 3 longshots

7 WR - 3 good ones, 4 longshots

3 TE - 2 good ones, 1 longshot

3 PK - all about average

3 Def - all about average

 
Predictions for most owned by position:

QB - B Leftwich 4

RB - E James 1

WR - P Harvin 5

TE - J Finley 3

K - J Hanson 1

TD - Broncos 1

 
I will bite...first time subscriber, so first time in this league:

QB - Aaron Rodgers - GB/5 - $27

QB - David Garrard - JAX/7 - $18

RB - Ryan Grant - GB/5 - $24

RB - Ray Rice - BAL/7 - $21

RB - Leon Washington - NYJ/9 - $12

RB - Glen Coffee - SF/6 - $2

RB - James Davis - CLE/9 - $2

RB - Edgerrin James - SEA/7 - $1

RB - Chris Brown - HOU/10 - $1

WR - Greg Jennings - GB/5 - $32

WR - Eddie Royal - DEN/7 - $26

WR - Vincent Jackson - SD/5 - $21

WR - Derrick Mason - BAL/7 - $9

WR - Nate Washington - TEN/7 - $6

WR - Nate Burleson - SEA/7 - $5

WR - Percy Harvin - MIN/9 - $5

TE - Dallas Clark - IND/6 - $18

TE - Brent Celek - PHI/4 - $7

PK - Neil Rackers - ARI/4 - $3

PK - Jeff Reed - PIT/8 - $2

PK - Olindo Mare - SEA/7 - $1

TD - Arizona Cardinals - ARI/4 - $3

TD - Green Bay Packers - GB/5 - $3

TD - New Orleans Saints - NO/5 - $1

 
now that I see that team with the byes...looks like I need to do something about week 7. Maybe drop Gerrard for Hill and Leftwich and use the 3 extra bucks to try to solve the bye problem at WR.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
FUBAR said:
gpalmer said:
Consistency is overrated. I'd rather have two players who could score between 2 and 20 points a week, over one player who will consistently put up 10.
not bad in theory, but what happens in week 9 when both score 2 points and you're booted because of it?
I think the point is that at week 9 having 2 guys combine for 20 points probably isn't going to be enough to get through the cut...where as having 2 guys that could combine for 40 gives them a better chance. Bring this out to your 8 key scoring positions (QB, 2RB, 3wr, 1 TE and 1 Flex) you have a chance to score 160, instead of a most likely probability of scoring 80 (and not making the cut).In addition, by loading up on these guys you don't need to start everyone every week or are faced with the chance of choosing the wrong one since it's best ball. So if 2 of them score 2's for the week, the idea is that you'll have 2 score 20 as well.
 
Predictions for most owned by position:QB - B Leftwich 4RB - E James 1WR - P Harvin 5TE - J Finley 3K - J Hanson 1TD - Broncos 1
Agree that this is a pretty good guess...I only have 1 of them right now....however I don't think any of them are really going to make a difference.I think you're wrong on the WR, but I'm not going to say who i think it is. :thumbdown:
 
Remade my team today, most likely the last time barring some injury or other shocking news:

Qb: spent $29, 1 Top 3 (imo) potential player, 1 hope my top player doesn't get hurt player

RB; Spent $98 1 Stud, 1 Quality Back, 2 hit or misses (week by week), 1 vet

WR: Spent $100 2 low tier studs, 1 solid vet, 2 hit or misses (this is for a season, they'll live up to the hype or they won't), 1 rookie, 1 long shot

TE: spent $17 1 upper-mid pack guy, 1 sleeper

K: Spent $2 2 $1 Kickers

Def: Spent $4 3 defenses

Here's my rationale:

QB-> You need a qb that can score a ton of points, but didn't want to pay top dollar for it. The back up should give me steady performances to limit the downside of my QB1

RB -> Went back and forth between a 3 mid-tier or a stud and 1 mid-tier. With the 2 hit or misses on the roster I figured the 3rd mid-tier would just leave points on the bench more often than not.

WR -> with ppr i wanted players that are thrown to consitently, but also had big play potential (i.e. multiple td game possibilities). Also took some chances on up and coming players and some who i think will greatly outplay their cost.

TE -> Even with the 1.5 ppr I believe it's important to have a good tight end not necessarily a great one.

K -> was toying with having 3 and hoping that one each week had a big game. In the end, i don't think it matters too much. I took 2 kickers who i think will have a lot of FG opportunities.

Def -> Have gone the stud route and the cheapskate route before. I decided it was better more defenses to increase the chance of 1 having a score.

All in all, i believe I'm susceptible to injury as i don't have much depth. But I'm in it to win the top prize not get into the money, so i'm ok with the risk I'm taking. i took mostly guys who can carry my team if they have a big week.

 
Predictions for most owned by position:QB - B Leftwich 4RB - E James 1WR - P Harvin 5TE - J Finley 3K - J Hanson 1TD - Broncos 1
Pretty good guesses, I agree with WR/TE/K/TD just because of their priceI really can't see someone winning this contest with Leftwich or Edge on their roster. For QB/RB I'd say:QB - M Sanchez 9RB - C Wells 15 or L Washington 12
 
3QBs - committee approach

6RBs - 3 mids, 2 rookies & James

6WRs - 2 studs, 1 mid, 1 sleeper, 1 rookie & a poke 'n hope

3TEs - 1 comeback player of the year, 1 Finley & 1 turd

2Ks - had to have 2 with different bye weeks

3TDs - 2 mids & 1 low

$250 of pure genius :shrug:

For those of you predicting I have Sanchez, Leftwich, James & Finley.

 
I will bite...first time subscriber, so first time in this league:QB - Aaron Rodgers - GB/5 - $27QB - David Garrard - JAX/7 - $18RB - Ryan Grant - GB/5 - $24RB - Ray Rice - BAL/7 - $21RB - Leon Washington - NYJ/9 - $12RB - Glen Coffee - SF/6 - $2RB - James Davis - CLE/9 - $2RB - Edgerrin James - SEA/7 - $1RB - Chris Brown - HOU/10 - $1WR - Greg Jennings - GB/5 - $32WR - Eddie Royal - DEN/7 - $26WR - Vincent Jackson - SD/5 - $21WR - Derrick Mason - BAL/7 - $9WR - Nate Washington - TEN/7 - $6WR - Nate Burleson - SEA/7 - $5WR - Percy Harvin - MIN/9 - $5TE - Dallas Clark - IND/6 - $18TE - Brent Celek - PHI/4 - $7PK - Neil Rackers - ARI/4 - $3PK - Jeff Reed - PIT/8 - $2PK - Olindo Mare - SEA/7 - $1TD - Arizona Cardinals - ARI/4 - $3TD - Green Bay Packers - GB/5 - $3TD - New Orleans Saints - NO/5 - $1
Hey bro, keep us udated on this team if you can make it past the 5th week. :bag:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The time for preseason injuries and other surprises has passed, and it looks like we're headed for a much more diverse set of rosters than we've ever had previously. Kudos to Dodds for good price-setting, and kudos to whoever/whatever is responsible for keeping the league's players pretty healthy this preseason.

These numbers will change in the next few days, but....

Last year: Warner was 51% owned.

This year: top QB is 28% owned, next is 16%.

Last year: Slaton 57%, Ricky Williams 49%, Rice 44%

This year: top RBs are at 32, 30, and 28

The distributions of ownership at WR, TE, K, and D are very similar to last year's.

 
The time for preseason injuries and other surprises has passed, and it looks like we're headed for a much more diverse set of rosters than we've ever had previously. Kudos to Dodds for good price-setting, and kudos to whoever/whatever is responsible for keeping the league's players pretty healthy this preseason. These numbers will change in the next few days, but....Last year: Warner was 51% owned. This year: top QB is 28% owned, next is 16%. Last year: Slaton 57%, Ricky Williams 49%, Rice 44%This year: top RBs are at 32, 30, and 28The distributions of ownership at WR, TE, K, and D are very similar to last year's.
Surprising. I didn't see as many sure bargains as last year, but there is a RB I thought would be on at least 60% of the rosters.
 
might roll with this

QB - Tom Brady - NE/8 - $37

QB - Mark Sanchez - NYJ/9 - $9

RB - LaDainian Tomlinson - SD/5 - $40

RB - DeAngelo Williams - CAR/4 - $37

RB - Chris Wells - ARI/4 - $15

RB - Leon Washington - NYJ/9 - $12

RB - Edgerrin James - SEA/7 - $1

WR - Randy Moss - NE/8 - $42

WR - Marques Colston - NO/5 - $28

WR - Chris Henry - CIN/8 - $12

WR - Chansi Stuckey - NYJ/9 - $4

WR - Sam Hurd - DAL/6 - $1

WR - Roscoe Parrish - BUF/9 - $1

WR - Josh Cribbs - CLE/9 - $1

TE - Desmond Clark - CHI/5 - $5

TE - Daniel Graham - DEN/7 - $1

PK - Jay Feely - NYJ/9 - $1

PK - Shaun Suisham - WAS/8 - $1

TD - Cincinnati Bengals - CIN/8 - $1

TD - New Orleans Saints - NO/5 - $1

Total value: 250

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks to Joe and Dodds for creating the most frustratingly fun and time consuming fantasy football game on earth!

 
Injuries seem to kill me in this thing every year, so I like the extra 4 spots.

Think I'll likely be going with the following:

QB (3) - $75 - Expecting big numbers from here all season

RB (7) - $59 - NO STUDS...quantity over high quality...Mostly complementary guys who are in good/great PPR situations...injuries to top guys will make this a strength with many unique names

WR (7) - $60 - Like RB, went with quantity over high quality...With PPR, I should be OK here and couple picks are looking very good with preseason finished!

TE (3) - $43 - Could be 3 of the top targeted TEs this season...at 1.5 PPR and considering TDs regressing back up to the mean, this may be the strength of my team.

PK (2) - $4 - Two kickers. I just hope neither pulls a Grammatica.

DEF (2) - $9 - Personal choice for special teams points and the preseason's best D.

Now to sit back and watch my team go down in flames again...

 
QB: 3@$37--two mid-range plus Leftwich

RB: 7@$96--Tomlinson, two mids, four cheap backups

WR: 8@$101--Led by Ochocinco, two other mids, two overlooked starters, three upside players

TE: 2@$8--Couldn't justify Gonzo this year with the team switch

K: 2@$4--Longwell, of course

D: 2@$4--Green Bay is my sleeper D pick

 
QB: 3@$37--two mid-range plus LeftwichRB: 7@$96--Tomlinson, two mids, four cheap backupsWR: 8@$101--Led by Ochocinco, two other mids, two overlooked starters, three upside playersTE: 2@$8--Couldn't justify Gonzo this year with the team switchK: 2@$4--Longwell, of courseD: 2@$4--Green Bay is my sleeper D pick
I have a feeling that all of us picking two "mid range" QBs are picking the same ones...
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top