What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Official*** Washington Redskins 2015 Offseason Thread (1 Viewer)

QB/Cousins trade? - Another team is going to want Cousins as a backup maybe for a 4th/5th rounder. He's far better than many other backups out there. It probably isn't smart to move him for personnel reasons, but I think it's smart to move him for the mindset of RG3 and even the coaches.
I think the Redskins can get a 7th round pick at best for Cousins at this point. Earlier in the offseason, Bruce Allen said he received no call about Cousins. It was reported that last year, Cleveland offered a 4th round pick for Cousins and the Redskins turned it down. Did Cousins do anything to raise his trade value in the last year?

If the Redskins really want to get rid of Cousins, cutting him is the most likely way to go. Most likely, Cousins will play out the final year of his contract with the Redskins and then leave. He will probably sign on somewhere as a 3rd string QB and try to work his way up the depth chart. If he keeps up all the I want to compete for a starting position talk, I could see him not being able to find a team as a free agent. Cousins has been disruptive in this regard since day 1.

 
McCloughan just announced in his pre-draft presser that RG3's option is going to be picked up for 2016
So if Gruden/Griffin is not successful in 2015, does that mean Gruden is gone next year?
Probably depends on how successful the team is. But i think if rg3 is given his shot, which it seems he will get, and he is unsuccessful, then might as well let Gruden go and let McCloughan build his team starting with his HC.

 
McCloughan just announced in his pre-draft presser that RG3's option is going to be picked up for 2016
So if Gruden/Griffin is not successful in 2015, does that mean Gruden is gone next year?
The 2016 option is only guaranteed for injury. Griffin can be cut if he doesn't play well.
Gotcha. Thanks for the info.
And I believe the injury would have to keep him out of the whole 2016 season

 
McCloughan just announced in his pre-draft presser that RG3's option is going to be picked up for 2016
So if Gruden/Griffin is not successful in 2015, does that mean Gruden is gone next year?
If QB play is similar to last year I expect Gruden to be gone.
I don't think picking up Griffin's option has anything to do with Gruden.

On the option, it is not clear to me when it become guaranteed. For instance, if Griffin blows out his knee in week 2 and has a 10-12 month recovery, he could easily be available for week 1 of 2016. If the guarantee does not kick in, the Redskin are not on the hook for much. My guess is that is Griffin is consistently playing poorly by week 8, he will get benched and they will not risk a major injury with him.

As far as Gruden is concerned, it looks like he is getting a mulligan. He turned over almost the entire defensive coaching staff and hired a QB coach. Presumably, these are the coaches he wants. If the team falters like it did last year, or the QBs all play as bad as they did last year, his job could be in serious jeopardy. I think he needs one QB to step up and develop. But is does not necessarily be Griffin.

 
I heard part of McCloughan's press conference. First of all, I love everything he says.

Outside of Griffin's option, the big takeaways are:

1. He wants big, powerful offensive linemen. Bill Callahan is implementing a power running game. My interpretation: the zone blocking from Mike Shanahan is a thing of the past.

2. He sure sounds like he is drafting best player available. He keeps saying we need football players.

3. He is open to trading down, but said there are also risks in trading down from 5. He does not want to miss an elite player there.

4. The draft board is pretty much set. The draft room is actually pretty laid back place because all the work is already done. The only time things get stirred up is when teams call asking about a trade.

5. He is confident in finding players in every round. It is not a crap shoot for him.

6. The dumbest question came from a woman who asked if he thinks there will be starters that fall to the 2nd round.

 
Marvelous said:
thayman said:
dhockster said:
MattFancy said:
McCloughan just announced in his pre-draft presser that RG3's option is going to be picked up for 2016
So if Gruden/Griffin is not successful in 2015, does that mean Gruden is gone next year?
If QB play is similar to last year I expect Gruden to be gone.
I don't think picking up Griffin's option has anything to do with Gruden.

On the option, it is not clear to me when it become guaranteed. For instance, if Griffin blows out his knee in week 2 and has a 10-12 month recovery, he could easily be available for week 1 of 2016. If the guarantee does not kick in, the Redskin are not on the hook for much. My guess is that is Griffin is consistently playing poorly by week 8, he will get benched and they will not risk a major injury with him.

As far as Gruden is concerned, it looks like he is getting a mulligan. He turned over almost the entire defensive coaching staff and hired a QB coach. Presumably, these are the coaches he wants. If the team falters like it did last year, or the QBs all play as bad as they did last year, his job could be in serious jeopardy. I think he needs one QB to step up and develop. But is does not necessarily be Griffin.
I don't the the option has much if anything to do with Gruden either. I was just responding to the poster who asked if Gruden would be around after 2015. I think Gruden's fate is completely tied into improved QB play. All the QB's looked like garbage the more they played last year. If that's the case again he's done at the end of the year.

 
Marvelous said:
On the option, it is not clear to me when it become guaranteed. For instance, if Griffin blows out his knee in week 2 and has a 10-12 month recovery, he could easily be available for week 1 of 2016. If the guarantee does not kick in, the Redskin are not on the hook for much.

My guess is that is Griffin is consistently playing poorly by week 8, he will get benched and they will not risk a major injury with him.
Definitely going to be on a short leash now.

 
Here is a very interesting article on the composition of the Redskin's personnel department, past McCloughan personnel departments, and changes the Redskins may make. Part 1 also covered how other NFL personnel departments are configured.

http://www.hogshaven.com/2015/4/28/8500749/building-the-new-redskins-front-office-part-2

Part 1 stated the Redskins have a smaller personnel department than most teams. They have less college scouts than nearly every team. And they have more pro scouts than most teams. Not surprising, given how much the team has emphasized free agency and de-emphasized the draft.

 
Just a reminder to everyone that the plan for the draft is BPA. We all know that's how McCloughan operates and it shouldn't be a surprise. Please don't freak out if you think they didn't fill certain needs. We already know that's a possibility.

TIA

 
Lot of chatter about teams trying to trade up to #5. Who knows if that will happen or not.

The only way I wouldn't be happy tonight is if they take Mariota

 
Maybe trade back if a team is interesting in cooper, assuming he slides to 5. Pick up a few picks, but dont slide down too far so we can still get Dupree or another pass rusher. That's what id like to see early in the draft. Maybe even fowler at 5, if they can't trade back.

 
Just a reminder to everyone that the plan for the draft is BPA. We all know that's how McCloughan operates and it shouldn't be a surprise. Please don't freak out if you think they didn't fill certain needs. We already know that's a possibility.

TIA
Every year there are posts about how terrible a draft is because they did not draft a certain position in the later rounds.

The goal is to get football players. And after the 2nd round, they usually aren't immediate starter/impact players.

I suspect McCloughan will draft lots OL, DL, and pass rushers. It looks like he thinks teams are built in the trenches. Once again, the exact opposite of the Redskin way of doing things.

 
Lot of chatter about teams trying to trade up to #5. Who knows if that will happen or not.

The only way I wouldn't be happy tonight is if they take Mariota
Same here. Guess I'd add a RB would piss me off too, and wouldn't be too happy with a WR, but ok with that. Just no QB or RB and I'll trust the decision. Fowler or trade down would be my hope.

 
Just a reminder to everyone that the plan for the draft is BPA. We all know that's how McCloughan operates and it shouldn't be a surprise. Please don't freak out if you think they didn't fill certain needs. We already know that's a possibility.

TIA
Once again, the exact opposite of the Redskin way of doing things.
This is what we've wanted for years. In Scot we trust!

 
They took the best O-lineman in the draft and OL is a need. Who knows if they could have traded down and got him...doubtful though.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
It is clear with that pick that they are all in on Super Bob and priority #1 is protecting him. It is definitely not a bad pick given how awful the line is.

 
Guard or tackle, I'm pretty much indifferent. If he fills the void that has existed on the right side of this offensive line for a couple years, ill be satisfied. It continues the trend of Scot focusing on the trenches, which is wonderful thing. Not sexy, but practical.

 
Granted I haven't followed the draft as much this year but he's tied for the 4th best rated player according to espn's scouts.inc w/ a 93 score. :shrug:

Not sure how you could be upset with the pick unless you were related to Tyler Polumbus.

 
Im happy with the pick. Dont know a ton about him, but i know we need OL and he looks good and versatile!
hes a big strong guy with great character but will get abused if they play him at RT, williams falls and we pass on him for a running game guard at 5th overall?!? those 1v1 in a phone booth guys are a dime a dozen in the mid rounds. did you see the jets war room smiling and laughing their asses off?

 
Guard or tackle, I'm pretty much indifferent. If he fills the void that has existed on the right side of this offensive line for a couple years, ill be satisfied. It continues the trend of Scot focusing on the trenches, which is wonderful thing. Not sexy, but practical.
Allowed a LOT of QB sacks and hits, no?

 
Yeah, he's terrible that's why he was considered the top O-lineman in the draft.

You guys be happier if we reached for this tackle out of miami like the giants just did? Obviously Scherff wasn't slipping past them so there goes the trade down scenarios.

 
I was surprised by the pick. But that is good in that the Redskins never tipped off what they were going to do in the draft.

I thought they may have been able to trade down and still get him. Then again, maybe McCloughan has Sherff much higher than anyone else on the draft board and needed to take him.

If he can play both guard and tackle, there is a bigger need a tackle. Moses is questionable to be ready by the season opener and will miss the full off season. Compton is marginal at best.

At RG, there are a lot of signs that the team likes Chris Chester much more than the fans do.

 
He's not going to bust which is good. I'm not sure his feet are quick enough to even play RT. I've seen him projected as a guard. I guess terrible is to strong. I have no idea what kind of trades they were looking at either.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top