The Commish
Footballguy
Might want to dig just a LITTLE bit deeper than one particular network and then just one of their platforms unless you're saying their podcast subscriptions/participation, website, and radio are included in your assertion. I'd like to see YOUR evidence of that. We can also talk about the audiences too, but that feels like piling on.You are the one ignoring all the evidence, behavior etc so you can cling to your feel-good solution.I don't know what this means honestly. If you want to ignore all the evidence, behavior etc. go for it....I'm not stopping youIt’s not about eyeballs it’s about people pulling the strings behind the scenes.Right....for the reasons I statedWRONGAt some point, people will realize the "media" in this country "covers" what will get your eyeballs on their page and stay there for as long as possible. This doesn't move the needle in any meaningful way nationally....not with our rather self-absorbed audiences.
They will cover what they are told to cover and not cover what they are told to stay out of.![]()
![]()
I will give you a prime example- CNN spent 4 years tanking their rankings in order to “go after” President Trump. If it was about eyeballs, they would have changed tack and behaved more like the market leader - Fox News. It’s clearly not about eyeballs.
ETA: And I want to be CRYSTAL clear....it's about TIME spent on the site on the podcast etc. They couldn't care less if one person is there for 8 hours a day or 8 people are there for an hour a day. SM set the tone and flat out told us this is the driver. The "media" lapped it up quickly. This isn't a secret. Not sure why you wouldn't believe them.
Last edited:



