Gaffney Looked like he got both feet down before his knee hit out of the endzone. However, I did think the ball moved once he hit the ground. Was that enough to overturn it? Who knows. Regardless, it should have been reviewed.
I still don't get this. Why do people think it wasn't even looked at? There was a little refs conference, so why is it not feasible that the replay booth had time to look at the corner of the end zone angle and decided there was no need to stop play. I would assume that the replay booth is replaying plays all the time during the 2 minute period with no coach challenges.
Personally, I didn't see the ball move at all and it was obvious the first time we saw the "good" angle that he got both feet in bounds, so I think a replay official could have looked at that one time and decided no need for a full review.