This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
You mentioned my Mom there. FYI she is deceased.Snitches get stitches, same old Squisy. See my post at :e: about you, I think you're probably ill in that way.
Really? This was your last post, outside of the report, report, report one after I told you she is deceased.
to report, report, report, IMO.
Sorry, dude, you keep bringing up my dead Mom. Nothing you post anywhere can make that sweet. Maybe some day you will understand.Seems like desperate
I was once your "idol" as you said, so you know me better than that. Also my recent post over there is sweet, check it out since you are so obsessed with all that.
money.never.sleeps said:
In defense of money never sleeps I dont understand this post either. I took it to mean Brock Osweiler was worst QB in league right now and that he would be benched and his backup must be from rutgers. When I look at the texans roster I dont see any QBs from rutgers. In fact I dont see any players from Rutgers on their roster and I dont see any QBs in the entire league from Rutgers.fantasycurse42 said:
Not sure why I am going to try, but why not.
What do I say?
I can only imagine how many
emojis I would get, if I cited Google as being an authoritative source.
Everybody knows you go to the opening google blurb for all sports related knowledge. Not espn.com, not nfl.com, not the home page of the team the guy plays for. Nope!!!! You quick google search and read nothing else!
A blurb?
The super high IQ poster then responded by confusing Player Y & Player Z. We can argue about Rutgers/Pitt or whatever you would like, but the basis of the comment remains regardless of that outcome.
When you are in hole, quit digging...A blurb?
You want to argue semantics? You're now missing the crux of the comment as much as the self-stated Mensa member.
Very simple comment, I'll remove names to make it even easier.
The super high IQ poster then responded by confusing Player Y & Player Z. We can argue about Rutgers/Pitt or whatever you would like, but the basis of the comment remains regardless of that outcome.
In this equation, regardless of school, Player Y's name is irrelevant. It could be Tom Savage, Jimmy Hoffa, or Big Bird - the outcome will always equal Y > X > Z. For a Mensa member, I'd expect him to differentiate Y & Z, which he didn't.
Your defense of MC Gas Money accompanied by the worst addition to this community liking your posts is stellar though.
I was just honestly antagonizing from the get go because of the constant self righteous scribblings he lays out... eventhough I don't really care.
Just awful.
You don't care?
Just think it was a simple purposely antagonistic alcohol+ sleepy pills comment "Brock osweiler went to asu?" that led to all of this ...
Where did I point out how smart I am?Just think it was a simple purposely antagonistic alcohol+ sleepy pills comment "Brock osweiler went to asu?" that led to all of this ...
And in turn telling everyone how smart you are and how others are dumb .
I know - how weird!Pretty surprised that we didn't see a thread title update this afternoon
He was pretty awful today. A couple blown coverages by the Saints (hello) but otherwise he looked like Ricky Vaughn on a bender.
And Blaine Gabbert would have been better? Even with garbage time would he throw for 398 yards? My point. which was obtusely overlooked was that he added something to the offense Gabbert doesn't have, the deep ball. Doesn't make him a good QB or even a better QB than Gilbert, but it does add something to the offense, which was why Chip Kelley made the switch.
I think you're right about the deep ball but he badly missed deep today. His big TDs were short-mid range outlets which got housed because the Saints did not scheme anyone to cover after the primary cover man dropped off. Second half adjustments fixed that. Guy's got a ridiculous arm but he reminds of those athletic QBs who can drill it through a brick wall but have no touch or placement. If anything today he should have run more.
Odd we had a nice wrap up exchange, but then you delete it and plug this in to challenge me on a game I watched every play of. RW is notorious for lousy analysis. Those passes were not 'long' passes. Why don't you at least take the trouble to find the plays on NFL video?
Kaepernick rips Saints for 398 passing yards
Colin Kaepernick completed 24-of-39 passes for 398 yards with two touchdowns and one interception and rushed five times for 23 yards with one lost fumble Sunday in the 49ers' Week 9 loss to the Saints.
He was sacked once for a five-yard loss. To give this some context, it's important to know that Kaepernick had thrown for 330 yards all SEASON prior to Sunday’s outburst. Kaepernick could do no wrong in the first half, shredding the Saints for 286 yards on 14-of-18 passing. Unfortunately Kap cooled off when New Orleans dialed up the blitz in the second half. In the fourth quarter, he lost a fumble on fourth down at the Saints’ 10-yard line, though a bad snap was to blame. Kaepernick made his living off long passes, delivering touchdown throws of 47 and 65 yards in the second quarter. Teams have been gashing New Orleans through the air all season so it’s no surprise that Kaepernick had his best game against them. He’ll face a much tougher challenge next week against the Cardinals.
I am 100 percent certain you saw the plays. I am not sure why squisy has to act like such a know-it-all jerk even when he has no idea what he is talking about.
Blake Bortles has had some solid fantasy outings as well, so I've heard.He scored 49 fantasy points and carried me to victory!
I trust what people who get paid to do this for a living say over someone on a message board. And to refresh your memory, the OP has seen every 49er games for the last 5 years, but didn't give Kaep a chance to regain the starters role over Gabbert, so seeing all the playis not necessarily the last word on the subject.
Dude, Saints is one of the most level-headed trusted posters on this board, and as his screen name would indicate he follows the Saints closely. I would bet you any amount of money if video highlights were found of those two TD passes were shown, they would prove Saint's characterization of the plays than some rotoworld reporter who probably is just looking at stats sheets. You come across as a first class jerk in questioning the honesty of Saints. Go away please.
Talk about a first class jerk. Can you ever make any argument without a using Straw Man? I didn't question his honesty. Please. I questioned his analysis and if the way he has predicted the significance of emails as far as dooming the Clinton campaign is any indicator, then it should be questioned. As evidenced by FC24 and others here, how they view Kaep from a political standpoint bleeds into how they view him as a player.
Let's review what you just said.... "I trust what people who get paid to do this for a living say over someone on a message board".....that comes across as calling him a liar. You are the worst poster this forum has ever seen.
JFC. Trust meaning trusting their judgment and analytical ability, not their honesty. I don't think any paid football analyst is more honest in what say over Saints or that they are telling the truth while he is lying. Please. I just think they are probably better analysts. You twist everything that someone says into something else and if you are like this outside of this forum, then you must be insufferable to be around in your personal life
Oh please, you searched out for quotes to prove he was wrong and then you used emoticons to taunt him. Here is a website which analyzed the 65-yard touchdown pass. It just has still shots, but the play started at the 35 yard line, then a photo shows the WR with the ball and running at the 50 yard line. So he threw the ball maybe 15 yards down field. I would say that Saints nailed it and the Rotoworld reporter was full of crap just looking at stat sheets. See link here.
I wasn't taunting him. That was directed at FC24, noted 49ers expert, who was clueless about Kaep regaining the starting position - wasn't aware that Kaep could still throw the deep ball.
So you were engaged in a conversation with Saints and we are suppose to believe your post was targeted to a guy who hadn't posted in 10 days and you BOLDED statements which you were attempting to disprove Saints statements. Saints was not even really disagreeing with you, he was just reporting what he saw. You are really clueless to how you come across. You need to lighten up and stop acting like some know-it-all. And you owe an apology to Saints instead of keep debating this.
