cdclopper
Footballguy
Why are ppl so mad about this suggestion. Pretty weird, ngl.It's likely that he's benched for performance, and everyone is lying about his injury, cause some rando suggested it?
Come on
Why are ppl so mad about this suggestion. Pretty weird, ngl.It's likely that he's benched for performance, and everyone is lying about his injury, cause some rando suggested it?
Come on
Why are ppl so mad about this suggestion. Pretty weird, ngl.It's likely that he's benched for performance, and everyone is lying about his injury, cause some rando suggested it?
Come on
Why are ppl so mad about this suggestion. Pretty weird, ngl.It's likely that he's benched for performance, and everyone is lying about his injury, cause some rando suggested it?
Come on
I mean, welcome to the internet in 2025.It's likely that he's benched for performance, and everyone is lying about his injury, cause some rando suggested it?
Come on
This is the rational response. How dare you.Why are ppl so mad about this suggestion. Pretty weird, ngl.It's likely that he's benched for performance, and everyone is lying about his injury, cause some rando suggested it?
Come on
If JJM is 100% healthy, it makes zero sense that the Vikings would have said goodbye to Darnold and Cousins to then give up on McCarthy as their new QB after a 1-1 start in a game where half the offensive line got hurt.

This is the rational response. How dare you.Why are ppl so mad about this suggestion. Pretty weird, ngl.It's likely that he's benched for performance, and everyone is lying about his injury, cause some rando suggested it?
Come on
If JJM is 100% healthy, it makes zero sense that the Vikings would have said goodbye to Darnold and Cousins to then give up on McCarthy as their new QB after a 1-1 start in a game where half the offensive line got hurt.
![]()
Yeah why would they bench a quarterback whos not playing well. That never happens.Why are ppl so mad about this suggestion. Pretty weird, ngl.It's likely that he's benched for performance, and everyone is lying about his injury, cause some rando suggested it?
Come on
If JJM is 100% healthy, it makes zero sense that the Vikings would have said goodbye to Darnold and Cousins to then give up on McCarthy as their new QB after a 1-1 start in a game where half the offensive line got hurt.
It makes perfect sense considering how bad he has looked.Why are ppl so mad about this suggestion. Pretty weird, ngl.It's likely that he's benched for performance, and everyone is lying about his injury, cause some rando suggested it?
Come on
If JJM is 100% healthy, it makes zero sense that the Vikings would have said goodbye to Darnold and Cousins to then give up on McCarthy as their new QB after a 1-1 start in a game where half the offensive line got hurt.
Yeah why would they bench a quarterback whos not playing well. That never happens.Why are ppl so mad about this suggestion. Pretty weird, ngl.It's likely that he's benched for performance, and everyone is lying about his injury, cause some rando suggested it?
Come on
If JJM is 100% healthy, it makes zero sense that the Vikings would have said goodbye to Darnold and Cousins to then give up on McCarthy as their new QB after a 1-1 start in a game where half the offensive line got hurt.
It makes perfect sense considering how bad he has looked.Why are ppl so mad about this suggestion. Pretty weird, ngl.It's likely that he's benched for performance, and everyone is lying about his injury, cause some rando suggested it?
Come on
If JJM is 100% healthy, it makes zero sense that the Vikings would have said goodbye to Darnold and Cousins to then give up on McCarthy as their new QB after a 1-1 start in a game where half the offensive line got hurt.

RedraftIn dynasty? Huh. I was a hold but if you say so2-4 weeks wow. He’s a drop
lol
True story - my brother was a dual major in computer science & German in college. After he graduated he moved to Germany to work for SAP as a software translator. SAP makes software for Wang computers.This is the rational response. How dare you.Why are ppl so mad about this suggestion. Pretty weird, ngl.It's likely that he's benched for performance, and everyone is lying about his injury, cause some rando suggested it?
Come on
If JJM is 100% healthy, it makes zero sense that the Vikings would have said goodbye to Darnold and Cousins to then give up on McCarthy as their new QB after a 1-1 start in a game where half the offensive line got hurt.
![]()
Sorry, I should have gone with:
"Went on a date with a supermodel. It was great. She was smart and funny and charming. We had a great connection and then she took me back to her mansion and gave me the greatest night in the bedroom in my entire life. The second date, she came to get me in her limo with her chauffeur, and took me to a red-carpet Hollywood premiere. But the movie stunk and while we were in there the chauffeur got into an accident trying to park and we had to uber back. One good date, one lousy date, I think I'm going to dump her."
You left out the part where you found out she put the wang in Wang Computers.

he wasnt just bad in New York, he was also bad in Carolina. from what I can tell his first good season was in Minny. and in the years he was starting prior to that, he never played a full season. He topped out at 13 GP. whether thats because of injury or benching I dont remember. but assuming its injury that also makes durability a legit issue for him.I would expect nothing less from a person that wrote off Sam Darnold as a terrible QB because of his play with the Jets. It has been 2 weeks and you are writing off JJ McCarthy.Which would be asinine in my opinion. I think its more likely he was playing through the injury already, and it got worse against Atlanta given all the sacks (and possibly explains some of the sacks) I highly doubt a 1-1 team who knew they were developing their QB, is just gonna willingly decide to hand the reigns to a guy who wasn't even on the roster a month ago.Ruled out already? Sounds like a benching.
He held the ball an average of 3.2 seconds. I don’t believe he threw more than five passes to the left side of the field, which is where he was wildly inaccurate in college.
They were running the ball on first and second down when they trailed by two scores with ten minutes left. Their total attempts on the year are 41, which is the fewest in the NFL.
They buried him. They didn’t let him play. Their PROE was -7.1 last game and was worse (I used AI but will get official numbers) last night. They’ve run the fewest plays of any team (I think).
![]()
J.J. McCarthy and Vikings offense’s process to be tested following Falcons loss
Expecting the first-year starter to take the reins and light up the NFL would have been foolish.www.nytimes.com
They’re saying it’s a high ankle sprain and he’s out 2-4 weeks?
Uh . . .
he wasnt just bad in New York, he was also bad in Carolina. from what I can tell his first good season was in Minny. and in the years he was starting prior to that, he never played a full season. He topped out at 13 GP. whether thats because of injury or benching I dont remember. but assuming its injury that also makes durability a legit issue for him.I would expect nothing less from a person that wrote off Sam Darnold as a terrible QB because of his play with the Jets. It has been 2 weeks and you are writing off JJ McCarthy.Which would be asinine in my opinion. I think its more likely he was playing through the injury already, and it got worse against Atlanta given all the sacks (and possibly explains some of the sacks) I highly doubt a 1-1 team who knew they were developing their QB, is just gonna willingly decide to hand the reigns to a guy who wasn't even on the roster a month ago.Ruled out already? Sounds like a benching.
He held the ball an average of 3.2 seconds. I don’t believe he threw more than five passes to the left side of the field, which is where he was wildly inaccurate in college.
They were running the ball on first and second down when they trailed by two scores with ten minutes left. Their total attempts on the year are 41, which is the fewest in the NFL.
They buried him. They didn’t let him play. Their PROE was -7.1 last game and was worse (I used AI but will get official numbers) last night. They’ve run the fewest plays of any team (I think).
![]()
J.J. McCarthy and Vikings offense’s process to be tested following Falcons loss
Expecting the first-year starter to take the reins and light up the NFL would have been foolish.www.nytimes.com
They’re saying it’s a high ankle sprain and he’s out 2-4 weeks?
Uh . . .
Nobody was predicting a breakout season for Darnold last year. Nobody.
to that end, I'm glad hes turned it around. but I dont necessarily blame someone for writing him off. At the time all the info available indicated he was likely a bust.

agreed.Please let's keep this 100% on football and not arguing with other posters and what they said previously.
Yeah. I don’t need anyone pulling up my prediction for Jameis and OBJ from 10 years back. Let’s just say I light have compared them to couple of great 49ers.agreed.Please let's keep this 100% on football and not arguing with other posters and what they said previously.
We have all said stupid stuff at one point or another.
what we dont need is someone going back in time to pull up a 3 year old quote where we were wrong. Nobody cares what happened 3 years ago. and All of us make bad calls and say stupid things from time to time. its called being human.
Lets maybe be a little more forgiving on that front. and if you guys wanna fight, do it in private emails so the rest of us dont have to suffer through it.
Per usual, the middle stance is the reasonable take here. He hasn’t looked good at all. It remains to be seen whether that’s because he’s overrated, he’s not ready, he’s been playing hurt, his supporting cast is letting him down, or it’s some combination of the four.This guy looks really bad. I have him in dynasty with not much else & deeply regretting it. The week 1 game where everyone fawned over him, well look what the Lions did to Chicago.
Aug 31st, 2024he wasnt just bad in New York, he was also bad in Carolina. from what I can tell his first good season was in Minny. and in the years he was starting prior to that, he never played a full season. He topped out at 13 GP. whether thats because of injury or benching I dont remember. but assuming its injury that also makes durability a legit issue for him.I would expect nothing less from a person that wrote off Sam Darnold as a terrible QB because of his play with the Jets. It has been 2 weeks and you are writing off JJ McCarthy.Which would be asinine in my opinion. I think its more likely he was playing through the injury already, and it got worse against Atlanta given all the sacks (and possibly explains some of the sacks) I highly doubt a 1-1 team who knew they were developing their QB, is just gonna willingly decide to hand the reigns to a guy who wasn't even on the roster a month ago.Ruled out already? Sounds like a benching.
He held the ball an average of 3.2 seconds. I don’t believe he threw more than five passes to the left side of the field, which is where he was wildly inaccurate in college.
They were running the ball on first and second down when they trailed by two scores with ten minutes left. Their total attempts on the year are 41, which is the fewest in the NFL.
They buried him. They didn’t let him play. Their PROE was -7.1 last game and was worse (I used AI but will get official numbers) last night. They’ve run the fewest plays of any team (I think).
![]()
J.J. McCarthy and Vikings offense’s process to be tested following Falcons loss
Expecting the first-year starter to take the reins and light up the NFL would have been foolish.www.nytimes.com
They’re saying it’s a high ankle sprain and he’s out 2-4 weeks?
Uh . . .
Nobody was predicting a breakout season for Darnold last year. Nobody.
to that end, I'm glad hes turned it around. but I dont necessarily blame someone for writing him off. At the time all the info available indicated he was likely a bust.![]()
Darnold gonna throw for 4,500 & 28!
This entire forum is people disagreeing with other's opinions.Too many people are being far too defensive in here. It’s not very interesting to read the thread if only one point of view is tolerated.
I disagree.This entire forum is people disagreeing with other's opinions.Too many people are being far too defensive in here. It’s not very interesting to read the thread if only one point of view is tolerated.
It's a pretty out there opinion that the Vikings made up an injury to hide JJ, so if people question it, that should be expected.
If people cannot abide having someone question their hot takes, maybe they should dial down the spice on their little truth bombs.
This entire forum is people disagreeing with other's opinions.Too many people are being far too defensive in here. It’s not very interesting to read the thread if only one point of view is tolerated.
It's a pretty out there opinion that the Vikings made up an injury to hide JJ, so if people question it, that should be expected.
If people cannot abide having someone question their hot takes, maybe they should dial down the spice on their little truth bombs.
WHATI know you’re not referring to any hot take I threw out there, because I haven’t made any. Aside from the whole “made up injury” angle
All stans are a special kind of defensive about their guys.This entire forum is people disagreeing with other's opinions.Too many people are being far too defensive in here. It’s not very interesting to read the thread if only one point of view is tolerated.
It's a pretty out there opinion that the Vikings made up an injury to hide JJ, so if people question it, that should be expected.
If people cannot abide having someone question their hot takes, maybe they should dial down the spice on their little truth bombs.
I know you’re not referring to any hot take I threw out there, because I haven’t made any. Aside from the whole “made up injury” angle, I think, having read this thread for months, that JJ McCarthy fans are a special kind of defensive of their guy.
WHATI know you’re not referring to any hot take I threw out there, because I haven’t made any. Aside from the whole “made up injury” angle
I found the MOP alias, fellas.
Wentz will play well for a game or 2 maybe, then flame out. He will come out slinging and then eventually fall apart. Maybe just maybe he will target Hockenson.Is it wrong to root for Wentz to be amazing just to watch the world burn? I mean if he elevates JJ and Hock back to top 12 guys at their respective positions, it'll certainly buy him some fans at the very least.
If the other POV is a nonsensical conspiracy theory about being benched when he has a high ankle sprain, then no one should tolerate that POV.Too many people are being far too defensive in here. It’s not very interesting to read the thread if only one point of view is tolerated.
If the other POV is a nonsensical conspiracy theory about being benched when he has a high ankle sprain, then no one should tolerate that POV.Too many people are being far too defensive in here. It’s not very interesting to read the thread if only one point of view is tolerated.
I didn’t pretend anything. That’s the only POV I’m rejecting.If the other POV is a nonsensical conspiracy theory about being benched when he has a high ankle sprain, then no one should tolerate that POV.Too many people are being far too defensive in here. It’s not very interesting to read the thread if only one point of view is tolerated.
Keep pretending that’s the only POV that has been consistently rejected in this thread. It’s a straw man argument.
I didn’t pretend anything. That’s the only POV I’m rejecting.If the other POV is a nonsensical conspiracy theory about being benched when he has a high ankle sprain, then no one should tolerate that POV.Too many people are being far too defensive in here. It’s not very interesting to read the thread if only one point of view is tolerated.
Keep pretending that’s the only POV that has been consistently rejected in this thread. It’s a straw man argument.
I have no idea what you’re referring to other than that.
That’s false. I never suggested that the Vikings were using McCarthy’s injury as an excuse to bench him.I didn’t pretend anything. That’s the only POV I’m rejecting.If the other POV is a nonsensical conspiracy theory about being benched when he has a high ankle sprain, then no one should tolerate that POV.Too many people are being far too defensive in here. It’s not very interesting to read the thread if only one point of view is tolerated.
Keep pretending that’s the only POV that has been consistently rejected in this thread. It’s a straw man argument.
I have no idea what you’re referring to other than that.
Yes they will. He is their future and needs as much time on the field as he can get.what people thought: Would the Vikings hand the keys back to McCarthy, given how bad he’s been thus far?
I was commenting on the topic, not on you.I didn’t pretend anything. That’s the only POV I’m rejecting.If the other POV is a nonsensical conspiracy theory about being benched when he has a high ankle sprain, then no one should tolerate that POV.Too many people are being far too defensive in here. It’s not very interesting to read the thread if only one point of view is tolerated.
Keep pretending that’s the only POV that has been consistently rejected in this thread. It’s a straw man argument.
I have no idea what you’re referring to other than that.
You’re responding directly to me and by quoting me when I say people are far too defensive of McCarthy in this thread and are not tolerating differing viewpoints.
You’re latching onto *one viewpoint* thrown out by *other* posters that he’s not actually injured, or not injured as much as the Vikings may want us to believe. By latching onto just that one conspiracy theory you’re oversimplifying and exaggerating your argument (to me directly, mind you) that the overly defensive nature of this thread is justified.
Leave me specifically out of it if you have an issue with that viewpoint because I didn’t start it nor did I support it and it has very little to do with my post about the defensiveness in here.
He actually wasn’t - came up limping after a couple of the sacks.-mobile and moving well on the 2nd to last play of the game
I wasn’t even replying to you.That’s false. I never suggested that the Vikings were using McCarthy’s injury as an excuse to bench him.
He actually wasn’t - came up limping after a couple of the sacks.-mobile and moving well on the 2nd to last play of the game
It’s easy to agree with a point when it’s not true.
Is there anything more after the play? I got no skin in the game, but adrenaline and pain meds can really do wonders until that swelling kicks in.He actually wasn’t - came up limping after a couple of the sacks.-mobile and moving well on the 2nd to last play of the game
It’s easy to agree with a point when it’s not true.
Now, I am taking it as an article of faith this is the last play, but there was never a spot I saw him limping, doesn't mean he didn't injure it but I will say this is a flag to me.
I actually did see him limping. I also saw him get up kind of woozy and feared he may have had concussion (the play where the defender came in unabated and JJM’s helmet was halfway up his face).He actually wasn’t - came up limping after a couple of the sacks.-mobile and moving well on the 2nd to last play of the game
It’s easy to agree with a point when it’s not true.
Now, I am taking it as an article of faith this is the last play, but there was never a spot I saw him limping, doesn't mean he didn't injure it but I will say this is a flag to me.
I have no skin in the game, but if it was a high ankle sprain, which a multi week absence ruled out on the Monday, I dont personally think he's moving like that and there would be a sign of injury.I actually did see him limping. I also saw him get up kind of woozy and feared he may have had concussion (the play where the defender came in unabated and JJM’s helmet was halfway up his face).He actually wasn’t - came up limping after a couple of the sacks.-mobile and moving well on the 2nd to last play of the game
It’s easy to agree with a point when it’s not true.
Now, I am taking it as an article of faith this is the last play, but there was never a spot I saw him limping, doesn't mean he didn't injure it but I will say this is a flag to me.
I have zero doubt he got the hell beat out of him & at the time of that run play/tackle I feared he was hurt in real time - that said, it’s been a theme that he needs to learn to slide, which I yelled at the television several times. On that play he should have tried to dive out of bounds instead of running right into 2 guys.
So yeah - not defending his style, but he absolutely got wrapped up on that one and awkwardly so.
Sad but true. Last game, the Vikings were starting their 2rd string center and their 3rd string LT. It going to be ugly.C Wentz isn't going to win any games. Opinion. 10th year in the NFL-not a reclamation project like Baker or Darnold.
For Kevin O'Connell the QB well runs dry this time.
The OL is Swiss cheese right now. No one in that organization is putting those sacks on JJM.I have no skin in the game, but if it was a high ankle sprain, which a multi week absence ruled out on the Monday, I dont personally think he's moving like that and there would be a sign of injury.I actually did see him limping. I also saw him get up kind of woozy and feared he may have had concussion (the play where the defender came in unabated and JJM’s helmet was halfway up his face).He actually wasn’t - came up limping after a couple of the sacks.-mobile and moving well on the 2nd to last play of the game
It’s easy to agree with a point when it’s not true.
Now, I am taking it as an article of faith this is the last play, but there was never a spot I saw him limping, doesn't mean he didn't injure it but I will say this is a flag to me.
I have zero doubt he got the hell beat out of him & at the time of that run play/tackle I feared he was hurt in real time - that said, it’s been a theme that he needs to learn to slide, which I yelled at the television several times. On that play he should have tried to dive out of bounds instead of running right into 2 guys.
So yeah - not defending his style, but he absolutely got wrapped up on that one and awkwardly so.
I can believe he's played 7 dreadful quarters in the NFL(one good one against the sad sack bears) and I did see KOC kind of yelling at him coming off the field. This is a soft landing for all, but I guess we will see if he's sitting out of practice or just doing backup work in that capacity.
I have yoyo'ed like a mofo on him, didn't like the talent coming in, I thought he turned a corner and now I dont know what to think of him. Beyond he needs a lot more work.
Exactly this. I was shocked to learn Purdy was hurt. Then I was absolutely floored to learn it would be a multi-week injury.For the people pushing the conspiracy theories, Brock Purdy finished the game 1 vs Seattle and didn't play in week 2 so post game injuries are real.
Well, that sucks for us Jefferson owners and anyone with other shares in this passing game.Yes they will. He is their future and needs as much time on the field as he can get.what people thought: Would the Vikings hand the keys back to McCarthy, given how bad he’s been thus far?
You should be more concerned about the OL.Well, that sucks for us Jefferson owners and anyone with other shares in this passing game.Yes they will. He is their future and needs as much time on the field as he can get.what people thought: Would the Vikings hand the keys back to McCarthy, given how bad he’s been thus far?
Watching the past two games, I have little confidence McCarthy can support high-end WR1 production. Ditto for Hockenson’s TE1 and Addison’s WR2 prospects.
That’s fair. But, decent QBs can and do produce with suspect offensive line play. Stafford and Rodgers were drafted way after McCarthy. Do we think they’d be this bad? We could throw other names in there too. So, when you put the onus on the OL, you’re also saying something about your valuation of McCarthy.You should be more concerned about the OL.Well, that sucks for us Jefferson owners and anyone with other shares in this passing game.Yes they will. He is their future and needs as much time on the field as he can get.what people thought: Would the Vikings hand the keys back to McCarthy, given how bad he’s been thus far?
Watching the past two games, I have little confidence McCarthy can support high-end WR1 production. Ditto for Hockenson’s TE1 and Addison’s WR2 prospects.