If it were a trade, I wonder if Akers would be thrown in for a different RB.
No idea really but his time would obviously be up in LA and you could see a valid reason why Carolina would want him back as part of the package if they moved CMC on idea they are getting him through end of his age 24 season, through end of 2023, and it's only going to run just a little over $2Million total and with their lack of draft picks that makes some sense.
One team your question makes me think about is the Vikings on a trade of Akers centered around getting Mattison back as part of the trade.
My theory would be that Mcvay is frustrated with his RB's and Kevin O'Connell knows and likes Akers(I have no idea if this is true, just spitballing) and that the Vikings would see benefit in Akers versus Mattison on idea that Mattison is a FA and they would have Akers locked up next season for fairly cheap.
All speculation now but sure does sound far more likely then not that Akers time is up and the Rams make some kind of move and to me the bigger question would it be a major move for like a CMC, a smaller deal for the likes of Mattison/Hunt or a really cheap deal like for a D'Ernest type or some kind of deal similar to what they did last year for Sony. Or maybe they'll go 2-4 and say screw it, we suck this year and we'll just roll with what we got.