What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

RB Quinshon Judkins, CLE (2 Viewers)


“On July 12th, at approximately 9 a.m., Fort Lauderdale Police Officers responded to the 1500 block of West Cypress Creek Road in reference to a delayed battery," the Fort Lauderdale Police statement, released by Sergeant David Soika, said. "Officers arrived on scene and spoke with the victim. During their preliminary investigation it was determined a battery had occurred. The officers made contact with the suspect and placed him into custody. He was transported to Broward County Main Jail. The suspect has been identified as Quinshon Judkins, DOB 10/29/2003 and has been charged with Misdemeanor Battery (Domestic) FSS 784.03-1a1.
 

“On July 12th, at approximately 9 a.m., Fort Lauderdale Police Officers responded to the 1500 block of West Cypress Creek Road in reference to a delayed battery," the Fort Lauderdale Police statement, released by Sergeant David Soika, said. "Officers arrived on scene and spoke with the victim. During their preliminary investigation it was determined a battery had occurred. The officers made contact with the suspect and placed him into custody. He was transported to Broward County Main Jail. The suspect has been identified as Quinshon Judkins, DOB 10/29/2003 and has been charged with Misdemeanor Battery (Domestic) FSS 784.03-1a1.
So really nothing if misdemeanor
 

“On July 12th, at approximately 9 a.m., Fort Lauderdale Police Officers responded to the 1500 block of West Cypress Creek Road in reference to a delayed battery," the Fort Lauderdale Police statement, released by Sergeant David Soika, said. "Officers arrived on scene and spoke with the victim. During their preliminary investigation it was determined a battery had occurred. The officers made contact with the suspect and placed him into custody. He was transported to Broward County Main Jail. The suspect has been identified as Quinshon Judkins, DOB 10/29/2003 and has been charged with Misdemeanor Battery (Domestic) FSS 784.03-1a1.
So really nothing if misdemeanor
You never know when it comes to Goodell.
 

“On July 12th, at approximately 9 a.m., Fort Lauderdale Police Officers responded to the 1500 block of West Cypress Creek Road in reference to a delayed battery," the Fort Lauderdale Police statement, released by Sergeant David Soika, said. "Officers arrived on scene and spoke with the victim. During their preliminary investigation it was determined a battery had occurred. The officers made contact with the suspect and placed him into custody. He was transported to Broward County Main Jail. The suspect has been identified as Quinshon Judkins, DOB 10/29/2003 and has been charged with Misdemeanor Battery (Domestic) FSS 784.03-1a1.
So really nothing if misdemeanor
Not sure why you'd say that.

Deshaun Watson essentially missed 28 games and he was not charged with a crime. Antonio Brown missed 23 games and mainly over an allegation which went to civil trial, was not convicted of anything.
 
But he has NOT SIGNED!
How can your employer punish you when you are not under contract??

I realize the “guarantee” aspect is part of the issue but he is Not an NFL employee
 
But he has NOT SIGNED!
How can your employer punish you when you are not under contract??

I realize the “guarantee” aspect is part of the issue but he is Not an NFL employee
Should ask grok..of course he can be punished.

"
Quinshon Judkins, arrested on July 12, 2025, in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, for misdemeanor domestic violence and battery, faces potential consequences from both the NFL and the Cleveland Browns, despite not having signed his rookie contract.
NFL Discipline: Under the NFL's Personal Conduct Policy, the baseline punishment for domestic violence is a six-game suspension, which could be applied regardless of contract status once the criminal case concludes. The NFL could also place Judkins on the Commissioner’s Exempt List (paid leave) during the investigation, a decision driven by the severity of charges and public relations concerns. This process does not depend on a signed contract, as the policy applies to all players under league jurisdiction.
Team Implications: As an unsigned draft pick (the only unsigned Cleveland Browns pick from the 2025 NFL Draft), Judkins’ contract negotiations may be complicated by this incident, particularly regarding guaranteed money. However, the Browns can still impose team-level discipline or adjust their roster plans, potentially elevating other running backs like Jerome Ford or Dylan Sampson.
Legal Context: Judkins is charged with a first-degree misdemeanor in Florida, carrying potential penalties of up to one year in jail, one year of probation, and a $1,000 fine. He is presumed innocent until proven guilty, and his initial court appearance was scheduled for July 13, 2025. The outcome of the legal process will likely influence any NFL or team actions.
In summary, Judkins can face NFL discipline and team-related consequences regardless of his unsigned contract, though the timing and extent depend on the resolution of his legal case and league investigation.
"
 
Details around Judkins’ arrest continue to emerge. On Sunday, Sergeant David Soika of the Fort Lauderdale Police Department Media Relations Unit shared that upon arriving at the scene where the reported crime took place, officers determined after speaking to the victim that a battery occurred, which led to the arrest of Judkins soon after. The rookie second-rounder remained in police custody overnight and is scheduled to have an initial hearing on Sunday. As ProFootballTalk’s Mike Florio points out, Judkins is sure to face scrutiny from the NFL under the league’s Personal Conduct Policy, while Florio also notes that “the baseline punishment for a battery is six games,” which can vary based on other factors. Judkins has not yet signed his rookie deal, and will likely take less guaranteed money than he hoped for following his arrest, which could cause a trickle-down effect for the 29 other rookie second-rounders who have yet to sign their deal.
Judkins was expected to compete for the Browns’ RB1 spot in training camp, and while he will still get a chance to do so, fantasy managers should remain open to the possibility of a suspension being handed down at some point this season.
 
I'm still lost how this effects other players. First thing I'm having my agent do is tell teams to throw out that contract when talking about mine because of the arrest.

You just need one or two guys to make that the new president. Or precedent.**
 
Last edited:
Obviously, this is a terrible situation and if he did anything he's a pretty terrible guy but as a Ford owner this is fairly good news.
 

“On July 12th, at approximately 9 a.m., Fort Lauderdale Police Officers responded to the 1500 block of West Cypress Creek Road in reference to a delayed battery," the Fort Lauderdale Police statement, released by Sergeant David Soika, said. "Officers arrived on scene and spoke with the victim. During their preliminary investigation it was determined a battery had occurred. The officers made contact with the suspect and placed him into custody. He was transported to Broward County Main Jail. The suspect has been identified as Quinshon Judkins, DOB 10/29/2003 and has been charged with Misdemeanor Battery (Domestic) FSS 784.03-1a1.
So really nothing if misdemeanor
You never know when it comes to Goodell.
Zeke got suspended for 6 games what again ?
 
Bonded out of jail but that does not tell us anything.

Should we not be able to see a police report soon? I feel like that will tell us a whole lot, at least with respect to what the NFL decides to do.
 
Accusation is odd to me but police and judge must see some merit in it.

His accuser is basically saying they got off the plane and he starts off their multiple day get away by immediately committing battery, but she sat on it for 5 days while she celebrated her birthday and just waited till probably the day he or they had to leave to report it?


 
Obviously, Time will tell what to make of the situation.

I've moved Judkins down several spots in my best ball RB rankings.
It sucks because I went 2 QB, 4 WR in my start-up, and I’m waiting for 7.04 (4 picks) and Judkins was on my short list of RB to target here.

But that said, he wasn’t my 1st choice - I was more hoping that someone else would take him at the turn.
 
Accusation is odd to me but police and judge must see some merit in it.

His accuser is basically saying they got off the plane and he starts off their multiple day get away by immediately committing battery, but she sat on it for 5 days while she celebrated her birthday and just waited till probably the day he or they had to leave to report it?


That is strange
 
Accusation is odd to me but police and judge must see some merit in it.

His accuser is basically saying they got off the plane and he starts off their multiple day get away by immediately committing battery, but she sat on it for 5 days while she celebrated her birthday and just waited till probably the day he or they had to leave to report it?


Sounds like true love
 

Judkins has not yet been placed in front of a judge either.

Either it's true and something did happen but the victim didn't feel like she was in danger and didn't care enough or this is a false accusation. The waiting several days thing is pretty sus.
 
Accusation is odd to me but police and judge must see some merit in it.

His accuser is basically saying they got off the plane and he starts off their multiple day get away by immediately committing battery, but she sat on it for 5 days while she celebrated her birthday and just waited till probably the day he or they had to leave to report it?


The math isn't mathing here. Is the victim also trying to get a restraining order? Maybe they felt in danger until it ended?

It really depends on what the victim decides to do as to if this is bull or not
 
Accusation is odd to me but police and judge must see some merit in it.

His accuser is basically saying they got off the plane and he starts off their multiple day get away by immediately committing battery, but she sat on it for 5 days while she celebrated her birthday and just waited till probably the day he or they had to leave to report it?


That’s…weird.

IIRC, police are obligated to make the arrest upon report in some states? Might just be that.
 
Accusation is odd to me but police and judge must see some merit in it.

His accuser is basically saying they got off the plane and he starts off their multiple day get away by immediately committing battery, but she sat on it for 5 days while she celebrated her birthday and just waited till probably the day he or they had to leave to report it?


That’s…weird.

IIRC, police are obligated to make the arrest upon report in some states? Might just be that.
In the public statement the police in scene determined a battery occurred.

:shrug:
 
Accusation is odd to me but police and judge must see some merit in it.

His accuser is basically saying they got off the plane and he starts off their multiple day get away by immediately committing battery, but she sat on it for 5 days while she celebrated her birthday and just waited till probably the day he or they had to leave to report it?


That’s…weird.

IIRC, police are obligated to make the arrest upon report in some states? Might just be that.
In the public statement the police in scene determined a battery occurred.

:shrug:
Also the judge said he had probable cause that a battery had occurred.

Which is all a long way from guilty, but....


While I'm going to be dubious about an accusation where someone "celebrates" with someone for 4-5 days after having a battery offense committed against them by that person the fact the police and judge saw something to back up her claim obviously adds some credence to it.

Also it dawned on me that one of those patent statements by Judkins or his reps with one of those forceful denials in the matter has yet to come out and he got arrested yesterday early yesterday morning.
 
Accusation is odd to me but police and judge must see some merit in it.

His accuser is basically saying they got off the plane and he starts off their multiple day get away by immediately committing battery, but she sat on it for 5 days while she celebrated her birthday and just waited till probably the day he or they had to leave to report it?


That’s…weird.

IIRC, police are obligated to make the arrest upon report in some states? Might just be that.
In the public statement the police in scene determined a battery occurred.

:shrug:
I’ve seen this be as little as a bruise.

I’m not defending him by any means. I’m just saying we’ve seen stuff like this turn into nothing.

And even if it is something, cooler heads often prevail and maybe the woman doesn’t press charges.

Hey, maybe he’s guilty as **** - not saying he isn’t. It’s just very premature to assume any outcomes is all I’m saying.
 
Not for nuthin, he just went 7.02 in my start-up draft. His ADP is 57 (46-68) so at 74 that’s a bit past. If this blows over that’s gonna be a value.
 
Accusation is odd to me but police and judge must see some merit in it.

His accuser is basically saying they got off the plane and he starts off their multiple day get away by immediately committing battery, but she sat on it for 5 days while she celebrated her birthday and just waited till probably the day he or they had to leave to report it?


That’s…weird.

IIRC, police are obligated to make the arrest upon report in some states? Might just be that.
In the public statement the police in scene determined a battery occurred.

:shrug:
Also the judge said he had probable cause that a battery had occurred.

Which is all a long way from guilty, but....


While I'm going to be dubious about an accusation where someone "celebrates" with someone for 4-5 days after having a battery offense committed against them by that person the fact the police and judge saw something to back up her claim obviously adds some credence to it.

Also it dawned on me that one of those patent statements by Judkins or his reps with one of those forceful denials in the matter has yet to come out and he got arrested yesterday early yesterday morning.
Idk if you watched the Diddy trail, but I think it's a really stark reminder that people can be abused and then party with their abuser.

This is why I said it depends on what the victim does next.
 
Accusation is odd to me but police and judge must see some merit in it.

His accuser is basically saying they got off the plane and he starts off their multiple day get away by immediately committing battery, but she sat on it for 5 days while she celebrated her birthday and just waited till probably the day he or they had to leave to report it?


That’s…weird.

IIRC, police are obligated to make the arrest upon report in some states? Might just be that.
In the public statement the police in scene determined a battery occurred.

:shrug:
Also the judge said he had probable cause that a battery had occurred.

Which is all a long way from guilty, but....


While I'm going to be dubious about an accusation where someone "celebrates" with someone for 4-5 days after having a battery offense committed against them by that person the fact the police and judge saw something to back up her claim obviously adds some credence to it.

Also it dawned on me that one of those patent statements by Judkins or his reps with one of those forceful denials in the matter has yet to come out and he got arrested yesterday early yesterday morning.
Idk if you watched the Diddy trail, but I think it's a really stark reminder that people can be abused and then party with their abuser.

This is why I said it depends on what the victim does next.
I was all over the Diddy trial and I was just posting about some things about it that are similar before I saw your post.

But tbh that's why Diddy got off of the two major charges. When the defense was able to show a pattern that the plaintiffs were willing participants is why he prevailed on two major charges which would have put him away for likely 10+ years.

I know when I was following the Diddy trial I thought he was an epic scumbag but I could not get upset at the verdict because if I was a member of the jury I don't think I could have reached a "beyond reasonable doubt" guilty verdict after seeing them willingly remain with him time after time. Hate to say it but it seemed painfully obvious to me that while they might not have liked it, they got rewarded in various means that it made it worth their while. Until it wasn't, then they felt bad and wanted retribution. Right now I feel the same way, I have a hard time buying a guilty verdict or thinking he did much wrong if you are going to hang around him for 4-5 days after. That just does not compute to me and I don't buy the "safety' angle as I imagine she had plenty of time in 4-5 days to seek safety.
 
Accusation is odd to me but police and judge must see some merit in it.

His accuser is basically saying they got off the plane and he starts off their multiple day get away by immediately committing battery, but she sat on it for 5 days while she celebrated her birthday and just waited till probably the day he or they had to leave to report it?


That’s…weird.

IIRC, police are obligated to make the arrest upon report in some states? Might just be that.
In the public statement the police in scene determined a battery occurred.

:shrug:
Also the judge said he had probable cause that a battery had occurred.

Which is all a long way from guilty, but....


While I'm going to be dubious about an accusation where someone "celebrates" with someone for 4-5 days after having a battery offense committed against them by that person the fact the police and judge saw something to back up her claim obviously adds some credence to it.

Also it dawned on me that one of those patent statements by Judkins or his reps with one of those forceful denials in the matter has yet to come out and he got arrested yesterday early yesterday morning.
Idk if you watched the Diddy trail, but I think it's a really stark reminder that people can be abused and then party with their abuser.

This is why I said it depends on what the victim does next.
I was all over the Diddy trial and I was just posting about some things about it that are similar before I saw your post.

But tbh that's why Diddy got off of the two major charges. When the defense was able to show a pattern that the plaintiffs were willing participants is why he prevailed on two major charges which would have put him away for likely 10+ years.

I know when I was following the Diddy trial I thought he was an epic scumbag but I could not get upset at the verdict because if I was a member of the jury I don't think I could have reached a "beyond reasonable doubt" guilty verdict after seeing them willingly remain with him time after time. Hate to say it but it seemed painfully obvious to me that while they might not have liked it, they got rewarded in various means that it made it worth their while. Until it wasn't, then they felt bad and wanted retribution. Right now I feel the same way, I have a hard time buying a guilty verdict or thinking he did much wrong if you are going to hang around him for 4-5 days after. That just does not compute to me and I don't buy the "safety' angle as I imagine she had plenty of time in 4-5 days to seek safety.
Honestly? From all accounts it even seems like apples and oranges here. Diddy is powerful, Judkins might be big man on campus but he's just an NFL rookie. But there's a lot of people who knee jerk to the "but she didn't run away" when running away can be hard for someone in an abusive situation. Which we don't know it isn't yet. So I'm holding off to see if it's a single incident or a pattern of behavior.

I have to agree with you on the majority of your points though.
 
Accusation is odd to me but police and judge must see some merit in it.

His accuser is basically saying they got off the plane and he starts off their multiple day get away by immediately committing battery, but she sat on it for 5 days while she celebrated her birthday and just waited till probably the day he or they had to leave to report it?


That’s…weird.

IIRC, police are obligated to make the arrest upon report in some states? Might just be that.
In the public statement the police in scene determined a battery occurred.

:shrug:
Also the judge said he had probable cause that a battery had occurred.

Which is all a long way from guilty, but....


While I'm going to be dubious about an accusation where someone "celebrates" with someone for 4-5 days after having a battery offense committed against them by that person the fact the police and judge saw something to back up her claim obviously adds some credence to it.

Also it dawned on me that one of those patent statements by Judkins or his reps with one of those forceful denials in the matter has yet to come out and he got arrested yesterday early yesterday morning.
Idk if you watched the Diddy trail, but I think it's a really stark reminder that people can be abused and then party with their abuser.

This is why I said it depends on what the victim does next.
I was all over the Diddy trial and I was just posting about some things about it that are similar before I saw your post.

But tbh that's why Diddy got off of the two major charges. When the defense was able to show a pattern that the plaintiffs were willing participants is why he prevailed on two major charges which would have put him away for likely 10+ years.

I know when I was following the Diddy trial I thought he was an epic scumbag but I could not get upset at the verdict because if I was a member of the jury I don't think I could have reached a "beyond reasonable doubt" guilty verdict after seeing them willingly remain with him time after time. Hate to say it but it seemed painfully obvious to me that while they might not have liked it, they got rewarded in various means that it made it worth their while. Until it wasn't, then they felt bad and wanted retribution. Right now I feel the same way, I have a hard time buying a guilty verdict or thinking he did much wrong if you are going to hang around him for 4-5 days after. That just does not compute to me and I don't buy the "safety' angle as I imagine she had plenty of time in 4-5 days to seek safety.
Honestly? From all accounts it even seems like apples and oranges here. Diddy is powerful, Judkins might be big man on campus but he's just an NFL rookie. But there's a lot of people who knee jerk to the "but she didn't run away" when running away can be hard for someone in an abusive situation. Which we don't know it isn't yet. So I'm holding off to see if it's a single incident or a pattern of behavior.

I have to agree with you on the majority of your points though.
Judkins has probably been making a million plus the last few years and this is the only thing likely in his way of a getting about $12m more guaranteed. I think he's a long way from what we think of as old school BMOG. That's life changing money to a lot of people even if they can just get a little piece of it or have some generosity come their way. That seems like apples to apples to me but their are levels to this stuff.
 
Accusation is odd to me but police and judge must see some merit in it.

His accuser is basically saying they got off the plane and he starts off their multiple day get away by immediately committing battery, but she sat on it for 5 days while she celebrated her birthday and just waited till probably the day he or they had to leave to report it?


That’s…weird.

IIRC, police are obligated to make the arrest upon report in some states? Might just be that.
In the public statement the police in scene determined a battery occurred.

:shrug:
Also the judge said he had probable cause that a battery had occurred.

Which is all a long way from guilty, but....


While I'm going to be dubious about an accusation where someone "celebrates" with someone for 4-5 days after having a battery offense committed against them by that person the fact the police and judge saw something to back up her claim obviously adds some credence to it.

Also it dawned on me that one of those patent statements by Judkins or his reps with one of those forceful denials in the matter has yet to come out and he got arrested yesterday early yesterday morning.
Idk if you watched the Diddy trail, but I think it's a really stark reminder that people can be abused and then party with their abuser.

This is why I said it depends on what the victim does next.
I was all over the Diddy trial and I was just posting about some things about it that are similar before I saw your post.

But tbh that's why Diddy got off of the two major charges. When the defense was able to show a pattern that the plaintiffs were willing participants is why he prevailed on two major charges which would have put him away for likely 10+ years.

I know when I was following the Diddy trial I thought he was an epic scumbag but I could not get upset at the verdict because if I was a member of the jury I don't think I could have reached a "beyond reasonable doubt" guilty verdict after seeing them willingly remain with him time after time. Hate to say it but it seemed painfully obvious to me that while they might not have liked it, they got rewarded in various means that it made it worth their while. Until it wasn't, then they felt bad and wanted retribution. Right now I feel the same way, I have a hard time buying a guilty verdict or thinking he did much wrong if you are going to hang around him for 4-5 days after. That just does not compute to me and I don't buy the "safety' angle as I imagine she had plenty of time in 4-5 days to seek safety.
Honestly? From all accounts it even seems like apples and oranges here. Diddy is powerful, Judkins might be big man on campus but he's just an NFL rookie. But there's a lot of people who knee jerk to the "but she didn't run away" when running away can be hard for someone in an abusive situation. Which we don't know it isn't yet. So I'm holding off to see if it's a single incident or a pattern of behavior.

I have to agree with you on the majority of your points though.
Judkins has probably been making a million plus the last few years and this is the only thing likely in his way of a getting about $12m more guaranteed. I think he's a long way from what we think of as old school BMOG. That's life changing money to a lot of people even if they can just get a little piece of it or have some generosity come their way. That seems like apples to apples to me but their are levels to this stuff.
You're right, I hadn't even considered the money he'd already made. Still not used to college kids earning money.
 
Accusation is odd to me but police and judge must see some merit in it.

His accuser is basically saying they got off the plane and he starts off their multiple day get away by immediately committing battery, but she sat on it for 5 days while she celebrated her birthday and just waited till probably the day he or they had to leave to report it?


That’s…weird.

IIRC, police are obligated to make the arrest upon report in some states? Might just be that.
In the public statement the police in scene determined a battery occurred.

:shrug:
Also the judge said he had probable cause that a battery had occurred.

Which is all a long way from guilty, but....


While I'm going to be dubious about an accusation where someone "celebrates" with someone for 4-5 days after having a battery offense committed against them by that person the fact the police and judge saw something to back up her claim obviously adds some credence to it.

Also it dawned on me that one of those patent statements by Judkins or his reps with one of those forceful denials in the matter has yet to come out and he got arrested yesterday early yesterday morning.
Idk if you watched the Diddy trail, but I think it's a really stark reminder that people can be abused and then party with their abuser.

This is why I said it depends on what the victim does next.
I was all over the Diddy trial and I was just posting about some things about it that are similar before I saw your post.

But tbh that's why Diddy got off of the two major charges. When the defense was able to show a pattern that the plaintiffs were willing participants is why he prevailed on two major charges which would have put him away for likely 10+ years.

I know when I was following the Diddy trial I thought he was an epic scumbag but I could not get upset at the verdict because if I was a member of the jury I don't think I could have reached a "beyond reasonable doubt" guilty verdict after seeing them willingly remain with him time after time. Hate to say it but it seemed painfully obvious to me that while they might not have liked it, they got rewarded in various means that it made it worth their while. Until it wasn't, then they felt bad and wanted retribution. Right now I feel the same way, I have a hard time buying a guilty verdict or thinking he did much wrong if you are going to hang around him for 4-5 days after. That just does not compute to me and I don't buy the "safety' angle as I imagine she had plenty of time in 4-5 days to seek safety.
Honestly? From all accounts it even seems like apples and oranges here. Diddy is powerful, Judkins might be big man on campus but he's just an NFL rookie. But there's a lot of people who knee jerk to the "but she didn't run away" when running away can be hard for someone in an abusive situation. Which we don't know it isn't yet. So I'm holding off to see if it's a single incident or a pattern of behavior.

I have to agree with you on the majority of your points though.
Judkins has probably been making a million plus the last few years and this is the only thing likely in his way of a getting about $12m more guaranteed. I think he's a long way from what we think of as old school BMOG. That's life changing money to a lot of people even if they can just get a little piece of it or have some generosity come their way. That seems like apples to apples to me but their are levels to this stuff.
You're right, I hadn't even considered the money he'd already made. Still not used to college kids earning money.
It’s a very different college landscape financially speaking.
 
Too high for me in redraft, he's right there with Hampton, Harvey & Henderson in that RB2/3 range. There's no knowing for sure, but I have the others having landed in better situations. Bhayshul Tuten's fit in Jacksonville is interesting. Late rounder Tahj Brooks will likely be buried on Cincy's depth chart but if he's pushed to the practice squad, that equates to being on every team's roster.
 
Too high for me in redraft, he's right there with Hampton, Harvey & Henderson in that RB2/3 range. There's no knowing for sure, but I have the others having landed in better situations. Bhayshul Tuten's fit in Jacksonville is interesting. Late rounder Tahj Brooks will likely be buried on Cincy's depth chart but if he's pushed to the practice squad, that equates to being on every team's roster.
I would press the brakes on Tuten. You have 2 established RBs ahead of him and Tuten already reportedly had fumbling issues in mini camp. Fumbling was a massive problem for him in college. I don’t think he’s ready for the league yet.
 
Too high for me in redraft, he's right there with Hampton, Harvey & Henderson in that RB2/3 range. There's no knowing for sure, but I have the others having landed in better situations. Bhayshul Tuten's fit in Jacksonville is interesting. Late rounder Tahj Brooks will likely be buried on Cincy's depth chart but if he's pushed to the practice squad, that equates to being on every team's roster.
I would press the brakes on Tuten. You have 2 established RBs ahead of him and Tuten already reportedly had fumbling issues in mini camp. Fumbling was a massive problem for him in college. I don’t think he’s ready for the league yet.
The ony thing Bigsby has established is that he is a JAG. They will find a way to get Tuten's speed on the field.
 
Too high for me in redraft, he's right there with
Hampton
,
Harvey
&
Henderson
in that RB2/3 range. There's no knowing for sure, but I have the others having landed in better situations.
Bhayshul Tuten
's fit in Jacksonville is interesting. Late rounder
Tahj Brooks
will likely be buried on Cincy's depth chart but if he's pushed to the practice squad, that equates to being on every team's roster.
I would press the brakes on
Tuten
. You have 2 established RBs ahead of him and
Tuten
already reportedly had fumbling issues in mini camp. Fumbling was a massive problem for him in college. I don’t think he’s ready for the league yet.
The ony thing
Bigsby
has established is that he is a JAG. They will find a way to get
Tuten
's speed on the field.
I agree that Tank is generally a JAG but he improved a lot. 2.6 to 4.6 ypc. They trusted him with 150 touches. Now that was a different staff and ETN was hurt all year but he at least showed he was better than his rookie year which was one of the worst seasons I've ever seen for a RB. However, Tank also fumbled 4 times which isn't great on just 150 touches. In college, Tuten fumbed 9 times his last 2 years in college on just 406 touches and fumbled his first touch of Jags minicamp. To me it points to ETN being the best value for redraft. Based on what we had seen from ETN previously in his career, I have to think his shoulder and hamstring injury played a big role in him struggling so much in 2024.

So to tie this back to QJ, I totally agree that his draft price (even pre-arrest) was too high given the quality of the offense he is on and fact he's probably not a big pass catcher. I would take Henderson, Harvey, Hampton and Williams over QJ. That said, I still like him over Tuten.
 
But he has NOT SIGNED!
How can your employer punish you when you are not under contract??

I realize the “guarantee” aspect is part of the issue but he is Not an NFL employee
Then how do the Browns own his rights?
Owning the players "rights to play in the NFL" is not the same as being under contract "IN" the NFL.
Yes, this is a gray area on how to handle the punishment or PR side of it.
But it is a challenge for both sides.
 
Posting our Drew Davenport (he is a lawyer) and his thoughts on the situation:

I'm getting a lot of questions about the Quinshon Judkins court appearance this morning. I'm actively attempting to run that down but there are no reports yet about what happened at the hearing.The only change is that his bond was set at $2,500 and the website says the Surety Bond is Pending. That says to me that he's still in jail and waiting for his release after posting bond.That's a pretty low bond amount for a violent charge, but I'm also not a practicing attorney in that jurisdiction.I'll stay on it for you.

He also has a much longer video up on TikTok about the situation that I will link HERE
 
Even if he is exonerated of the charges and does not face any NFL suspension, not a good look at all for Judkins given that the franchise is still reeling from the Watson disaster. Obviously the way the NFL goes, if Judkins is all that, he's going to play plenty. But it's also possible that the team keeps him under bubble wrap for a bit to let the PR implications settle down.
 
Too high for me in redraft, he's right there with Hampton, Harvey & Henderson in that RB2/3 range. There's no knowing for sure, but I have the others having landed in better situations. Bhayshul Tuten's fit in Jacksonville is interesting. Late rounder Tahj Brooks will likely be buried on Cincy's depth chart but if he's pushed to the practice squad, that equates to being on every team's roster.
I would press the brakes on Tuten. You have 2 established RBs ahead of him and Tuten already reportedly had fumbling issues in mini camp. Fumbling was a massive problem for him in college. I don’t think he’s ready for the league yet.
The ony thing Bigsby has established is that he is a JAG. They will find a way to get Tuten's speed on the field.
You keep saying this but makes no sense. He played really well last year. Seem to be holding his rookie year against him. Some RBs take a year to acclimate.
 
Too high for me in redraft, he's right there with Hampton, Harvey & Henderson in that RB2/3 range. There's no knowing for sure, but I have the others having landed in better situations. Bhayshul Tuten's fit in Jacksonville is interesting. Late rounder Tahj Brooks will likely be buried on Cincy's depth chart but if he's pushed to the practice squad, that equates to being on every team's roster.
I would press the brakes on Tuten. You have 2 established RBs ahead of him and Tuten already reportedly had fumbling issues in mini camp. Fumbling was a massive problem for him in college. I don’t think he’s ready for the league yet.
The ony thing Bigsby has established is that he is a JAG. They will find a way to get Tuten's speed on the field.
You keep saying this but makes no sense. He played really well last year. Seem to be holding his rookie year against him. Some RBs take a year to acclimate.
He won't help you in the receiving game and seems to not be much of a dynamic runner. He's easily replaceable. If I'm wrong I'll own it, but I don't think I am. One thing I'll give him however, is that I can see Tuten taking more away from Etienne than Bigsby, who will have more of a power role. I can see him doing well at the goal line for several TDs.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top