What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Report: Matt Leinart in danger of losing job (1 Viewer)

Very possible Anderson bombs in Chicago (being on the road, with no Fitz and seeming likely he'll be handing to Hightower & not Beanie the majority of the time).

Game 3 of preseason last year as the backup QB vs. the Pack here at UoP-- Leinart threw for 350 yards and 3 TD's. History could repeat itself :thumbup:

While I don't blame Whiz for making the move, I do think Matt gives the Cards a better shot to win this year as a game manager. (Only shot I see the Cards finally above .500 is on the back of Beanie).

 
Forget it then. You feel free to root against him and I'll root for him. The fact that you think Dan Dickley is an insider does say a lot though :)
And down goes Card Trader. Kutta...kutta...kutta!!! :boxing:
:goodposting: Did I miss the start of the season?!
We can still make the bet if you'd like. Heck, I'd even consider taking you up on that injury exception now...
Little late for that, you ####ed out on the injury exception and lost what now looks like a golden opportunity to obtain a free $1k.
It must suck to be wrong so often, especially about the team you root for.Good luck to you this year.
 
It must suck to be wrong so often, especially about the team you root for.Good luck to you this year.
Still upset you didn't make the bet? :unsure: Funny...if Leinart doesn't start and doesn't throw for 3k this year that will make a grand total of 1 time I've been wrong about the team I root for, here on FBG. You however have been wrong numerous times, all topped off with calling Dan Bickley an insider.See you at the stadium, be sure to stop by the tailgate and say hi! :)
 
It must suck to be wrong so often, especially about the team you root for.Good luck to you this year.
Still upset you didn't make the bet? :lmao: Funny...if Leinart doesn't start and doesn't throw for 3k this year that will make a grand total of 1 time I've been wrong about the team I root for, here on FBG. You however have been wrong numerous times, all topped off with calling Dan Bickley an insider.See you at the stadium, be sure to stop by the tailgate and say hi! :)
:confused:
 
Forgive me if this has already been posted. It's from 7 pm last night.

Report: Real chance Cards could cut Leinart

NFL Network's Mike Lombardi reports that there is a real chance Matt Leinart will be released at final cuts.

The report is similar to a recent suggestion Lombardi made in an NFL.com column, but he sounds more confident now. "They aren't going to carry four quarterbacks," said Lombardi, who indicated Leinart will be released if the Cards see a QB they want hit the waiver wire in September. They could also opt to keep both rookies Max Hall and John Skelton behind Derek Anderson. Neither Skelton nor Hall would make it through waivers unclaimed. Aug. 27 - 7:26 pm et

 
Cards fans, say it with me: J-E-F-F G-A-R-C-I-A

"If it smells like a Cardinal, and looks like a Cardinal, by golly, it's a Cardinal!"

 
Cardinals QB

Derek Anderson; 21 plays, 7-12 94 yards 1td 0int 111.1 rating

Matt Leinart; 17 plays, 9-10 84 yards 1td 0 int 135.0 rating

Combined; 38 plays, 16-22 178 yards 2td 0int 126.7 rating

Not a bad night for the guys, should help settle down the local hysteria.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Cardinals QB Derek Anderson; 21 plays, 7-12 94 yards 1td 0int 111.1 ratingMatt Leinart; 17 plays, 9-10 84 yards 1td 0 int 135.0 ratingCombined; 38 plays, 16-22 178 yards 2td 0int 126.7 ratingNot a bad night for the guys, should help settle down the local hysteria.
:thumbup:
 
Article in today's AZ Republic.

There is plenty of tangible evidence for Cardinals coach Ken Whisenhunt and his staff to consult as they pick a quarterback to start the regular season.

Since May, every second of every practice and game has been recorded on video. Passes have been charted, knowledge of the offense tested, footwork dissected.

Yet, it's the intangibles that have the biggest impact on Whisenhunt's decision to pick Derek Anderson or Matt Leinart. Command of the huddle. Team chemistry. Leadership. The trust of his teammates.

There are no columns for those on the statistics sheets.

Whisenhunt didn't name a starter after the 14-9 victory over the Bears on Saturday night in Chicago, nor did he provide a timeline for doing so.

"The starting quarterback evaluation covers more than just this game, Whisenhunt said. "We've had a lot of practices, and there are a lot of things that will be taken into account in making this decision."

The decision is most likely already made, and signs point to Anderson being the choice. Why else would Whisenhunt risk benching Leinart, who has been the starter since the day Kurt Warner announced his retirement?

It's not a move a head coach makes if he's convinced the other players have implicit trust in Leinart.

Saturday night was the first access reporters had to players since Whisenhunt announced the change on Thursday. The Cardinals travelled from Nashville to Chicago on Friday, and players were off limits.

Not that it mattered much. The party line from players would have been the same Thursday as it was Saturday: We like whomever Whisenhunt chooses.

One of Whisenhunt's strengths as a coach has been keeping a constant, accurate read on his team's emotions and vital signs. Teammates have all said positive things about Leinart the past few months, but when did you ever hear or read one of them say Leinart absolutely could take them to the heights Warner did?

Maybe the tepid endorsements had something to do Whisenhunt's approach with Leinart. The coach never went all in with him, so why would the players.

The Cardinals spent the off-season looking for other options at quarterback. They tried to trade for San Diego's Charlie Whitehurst in the off-season. Some inside the organization felt the team should have made a stronger push to sign former Rams starter Marc Bulger. Neither would have been brought here solely to fill the backup's job.

The Cardinals weren't sure about Leinart and wanted alternatives.

Meanwhile, Leinart did all he could do hang on to the job. His work ethic was beyond reproach all off-season, so he was stunned Thursday morning when Whisenhunt told him the job was no longer his.

In evaluating both quarterbacks, coaches and fans can see what they want to see.

Leinart is an efficient, accurate passer who has completed 82 percent of his passes in the preseason. Or, he is skittish, checks down too soon and has a high completion percentage because he rarely throws downfield.

Anderson is a strong-armed, strong-willed quarterback with a great upside. Or, he is given to wild inaccuracy that will cause fans to bless him and curse him within the same set of downs.

Whatever the decision, it likely already has been made, just not announced. There is little to learn of the two quarterbacks this week.

The Cardinals have only two full practices between now and Thursday, when they play the Redskins in the final preseason game. Starters usually play only a series or two in this game, and Redskins coach Mike Shanahan typically doesn't play his at all.

The biggest question to be answered this week is either how Leinart will react if he gets his old job back, or what the Cardinals do with him if he has lost it again.

It might be difficult for Leinart to reassume the role of the jilted, but understanding suitor again.

It's likely the Cardinals would try to obtain something in a trade instead of releasing him. A new team probably would want to restructure a contract that pays Leinart $2.45 million this year and calls for him to make an additional $10.5 million in 2011.

Parting with Leinart would leave the Cardinals without an experienced backup. Coaches have made no secret of their love of undrafted rookie Max Hall, but is he ready to become the backup behind Anderson, who has struggled since making the Pro Bowl with the Browns in 2007?

Those are tough questions, and Whisenhunt's gut will provide answers, not the video from practice sessions.
 
This is shaping up to be a disaster this year and I'm avoiding all Cards this year (or at least where I would take them).

 
This is shaping up to be a disaster this year and I'm avoiding all Cards this year (or at least where I would take them).
Aside from the Leinart/Anderson discussion is that the Cardinals have turned over several other positions and really looks like the bottom could fall out sooner than later.

Coming In: S Kerry Rhodes, OLB Joey Porter, G Alan Faneca, G Rex Hadnot, K Jay Feely, LB Paris Lenon, QB Derek Anderson, CB/RS Justin Miller



Going Out: WR Anquan Boldin, QB Kurt Warner, CB Bryant McFadden, S Antrell Rolle, LB Karlos Dansby, WR Jerheme Urban, DE Bert Berry, OLB Chike Okeafor, WR Sean Morey, T Mike Gandy

 
Peter King had a note this morning about how the Titans players (who practiced with the Cards) were predicting Leinart would check down on passing plays.

 
Peter King had a note this morning about how the Titans players (who practiced with the Cards) were predicting Leinart would check down on passing plays.
One of them supposedly said something about "betting a buffalo nickel that he would check down." For some reason I can't imagine an NFL cornerback saying that. It's just strange.
 
FYI - Wiz was on the radio this morning and said he still has not made a decision, but that it comes down to more than just preseason games, though the games help. He said they are looking at leadership, team chemistry, practices since spring, etc. The way he was talking felt to me that Anderson was going to be the guy, but we will have to wait and see a little longer. He did not give a timetable for making the decision.

 
if he goes with Anderson, Leinart is pretty much done there.

if he goes with Leinart to start the season, he's got more options.

if (big if) there's not much separation between the two in the coaches' eyes, seems like Leinart would be a better way to hedge his bet.

 
if he goes with Anderson, Leinart is pretty much done there.if he goes with Leinart to start the season, he's got more options.if (big if) there's not much separation between the two in the coaches' eyes, seems like Leinart would be a better way to hedge his bet.
His hands aren't tied either way IMO. Anderson was the incumbent starter in Cleveland, they gave the job to Quinn, and then had no problem pulling Quinn and going back to the incumbent. I think if Anderson stinks up the joint, he can put Leinart back in and see what happens. And let's not forget, there's still one game to go.
 
if he goes with Anderson, Leinart is pretty much done there.if he goes with Leinart to start the season, he's got more options.if (big if) there's not much separation between the two in the coaches' eyes, seems like Leinart would be a better way to hedge his bet.
But there is NO way the Cards are keeping Leinart past this year. They are not going to pay him the money he is due. No way.It's not like he's Kurt Warner where you know he has one more year but might take you to the promised land. If Wiz plays Leinart, the Cards will be extremely lucky to make the playoffs. Everyone (even LHUCKS and Bostonfred) agrees with that I think. And Leinart will be gone next year anyway. Why not play the guy that at least might be around next year so you don't completely suck for two straight years?My prediction is that Anderson will be named the starter and Leinart will be cut or traded. I can't imagine Leinart being happy backing up Anderson, and I don't see the Cards cutting Hall or Skelton or carrying four QB's. I'm not sure what other options they have.
 
It's not like he's Kurt Warner where you know he has one more year but might take you to the promised land. If Wiz plays Leinart, the Cards will be extremely lucky to make the playoffs. Everyone (even LHUCKS and Bostonfred) agrees with that I think. And Leinart will be gone next year anyway. Why not play the guy that at least might be around next year so you don't completely suck for two straight years?My prediction is that Anderson will be named the starter and Leinart will be cut or traded. I can't imagine Leinart being happy backing up Anderson, and I don't see the Cards cutting Hall or Skelton or carrying four QB's. I'm not sure what other options they have.
The Cards have improved their run blocking, which would play well with a short passing game in the regular season. Expectations are low and teams won't be bringing their A game the way they did with Warner and the defending NFC champs. The defense has had some turnover but they're not in dire straits. They've lost some notable talent, but improved in other areas. And remember, Warner was hardly lights out last year. He put up above average numbers, and got dinged up. I don't think the Cards are a 12 win team, but I wouldn't be shocked if they pulled off 8 or 9 wins with Leinart under center, especially with their soft schedule. And if Leinart got the job, and led them to a week one win against the Rams, I think we might see a very real change in his demeanor, which could lead to some momentum. It's hard to blame someone for needing a confidence boost after leading his team to a national championship for a player friendly coach and getting told he was the #1 pick, only to drop to #10, get stuck behind a hall of famer, and get ripped in the media for completing over 80% of his passes this preseason. If he wins this job - which he deserves to on the quality of his play compared to Anderson's this preseason - he will be a more confident quarterback, and suddenly he'll be throwing to Fitzgerald again, so the guys he's checking down to will be that much more open, and the deep ball will be there, and all kinds of good stuff might happen. There is a much more compelling upside case with this player than you seem to believe.
 
It's not like he's Kurt Warner where you know he has one more year but might take you to the promised land. If Wiz plays Leinart, the Cards will be extremely lucky to make the playoffs. Everyone (even LHUCKS and Bostonfred) agrees with that I think. And Leinart will be gone next year anyway. Why not play the guy that at least might be around next year so you don't completely suck for two straight years?My prediction is that Anderson will be named the starter and Leinart will be cut or traded. I can't imagine Leinart being happy backing up Anderson, and I don't see the Cards cutting Hall or Skelton or carrying four QB's. I'm not sure what other options they have.
The Cards have improved their run blocking, which would play well with a short passing game in the regular season. Expectations are low and teams won't be bringing their A game the way they did with Warner and the defending NFC champs. The defense has had some turnover but they're not in dire straits. They've lost some notable talent, but improved in other areas. And remember, Warner was hardly lights out last year. He put up above average numbers, and got dinged up. I don't think the Cards are a 12 win team, but I wouldn't be shocked if they pulled off 8 or 9 wins with Leinart under center, especially with their soft schedule. And if Leinart got the job, and led them to a week one win against the Rams, I think we might see a very real change in his demeanor, which could lead to some momentum. It's hard to blame someone for needing a confidence boost after leading his team to a national championship for a player friendly coach and getting told he was the #1 pick, only to drop to #10, get stuck behind a hall of famer, and get ripped in the media for completing over 80% of his passes this preseason. If he wins this job - which he deserves to on the quality of his play compared to Anderson's this preseason - he will be a more confident quarterback, and suddenly he'll be throwing to Fitzgerald again, so the guys he's checking down to will be that much more open, and the deep ball will be there, and all kinds of good stuff might happen. There is a much more compelling upside case with this player than you seem to believe.
more excuses... meanwhile Leinart is questioning why he was demoted and declaring himself the winner publicly.
 
A lot of local media have questioned whether or not Leinart has been given a fair shot...I personally don't think that he has.

That being said, Anderson has looked better overall and as a Cards fan, I just want the best guy on the field.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
A lot of local media have questioned whether or not Leinart has been given a fair shot...I personally don't think that he has.That being said, Anderson has looked better overall and as a Cards fan, I just want the best guy on the field.
I don't want to jinx anything, but this post appears to be a breakthrough.
 
It's not like he's Kurt Warner where you know he has one more year but might take you to the promised land. If Wiz plays Leinart, the Cards will be extremely lucky to make the playoffs. Everyone (even LHUCKS and Bostonfred) agrees with that I think. And Leinart will be gone next year anyway. Why not play the guy that at least might be around next year so you don't completely suck for two straight years?My prediction is that Anderson will be named the starter and Leinart will be cut or traded. I can't imagine Leinart being happy backing up Anderson, and I don't see the Cards cutting Hall or Skelton or carrying four QB's. I'm not sure what other options they have.
The Cards have improved their run blocking, which would play well with a short passing game in the regular season. Expectations are low and teams won't be bringing their A game the way they did with Warner and the defending NFC champs. The defense has had some turnover but they're not in dire straits. They've lost some notable talent, but improved in other areas. And remember, Warner was hardly lights out last year. He put up above average numbers, and got dinged up. I don't think the Cards are a 12 win team, but I wouldn't be shocked if they pulled off 8 or 9 wins with Leinart under center, especially with their soft schedule. And if Leinart got the job, and led them to a week one win against the Rams, I think we might see a very real change in his demeanor, which could lead to some momentum. It's hard to blame someone for needing a confidence boost after leading his team to a national championship for a player friendly coach and getting told he was the #1 pick, only to drop to #10, get stuck behind a hall of famer, and get ripped in the media for completing over 80% of his passes this preseason. If he wins this job - which he deserves to on the quality of his play compared to Anderson's this preseason - he will be a more confident quarterback, and suddenly he'll be throwing to Fitzgerald again, so the guys he's checking down to will be that much more open, and the deep ball will be there, and all kinds of good stuff might happen. There is a much more compelling upside case with this player than you seem to believe.
more excuses... meanwhile Leinart is questioning why he was demoted and declaring himself the winner publicly.
Gotta admire Leinart's confidence in the face of facts :thumbdown:Sort of Clemens-esque actually. :rolleyes:
 
more excuses... meanwhile Leinart is questioning why he was demoted and declaring himself the winner publicly.
There is a rather fine line between the strong confidence you want in a QB and the delusional insanity you don't.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So for those like bostonfred and LHUCKS who think Leinart either hasn't been given a fair shot or deserves to be the starter this year or both... if he is released, what are your expectations? If he hasn't been treated fairly, the implication is that he is good enough to start, which means he should be good enough to start somewhere else, right? Is that what you expect?

 
LHUCKS said:
A lot of local media have questioned whether or not Leinart has been given a fair shot...I personally don't think that he has.

That being said, Anderson has looked better overall and as a Cards fan, I just want the best guy on the field.
:shrug: :confused: :confused:
 
I think he sucks as much as the rest of you and will laugh when Lhucks is proven wrong again. That said, you've got to give him a shot. You got to make sure he's a bust in the arena before cutting him. You don't want risk him becoming Moon, Gannon, etc

 
I think he sucks as much as the rest of you and will laugh when Lhucks is proven wrong again. That said, you've got to give him a shot. You got to make sure he's a bust in the arena before cutting him. You don't want risk him becoming Moon, Gannon, etc
We'll take our chances.
 
So for those like bostonfred and LHUCKS who think Leinart either hasn't been given a fair shot or deserves to be the starter this year or both... if he is released, what are your expectations? If he hasn't been treated fairly, the implication is that he is good enough to start, which means he should be good enough to start somewhere else, right? Is that what you expect?
You're misrepresenting my position. First, I don't think I've said anything about him being treated unfairly. Teams do what's in their best interests. They don't owe Leinart anything more than the guaranteed money in his contract and the salary he's earning in whatever role they choose to put him in. Second, I haven't said that he's "good enough to start", or even that he's "good". I've questioned people who used his numbers to say he was "bad" or had regressed the last couple years. I've said that his numbers in mop up duty are skewed by the game conditions in which he entered. I think we'd agree that if a backup QB comes in for four plays and has three rushes for -2 yards, it's not really a measure of his talent. If a backup QB comes in partway through a blowout loss in bad weather, he may not put up the best numbers, either. Or if he finds out the day of the game that he's going to be starting after the team prepared for Warner all week. Third, I've said that a number of other QBs have been in similar situations - getting limited experience in their first several years in the league, holding a clipboard for a top QB, and getting a chance to start later in their career - and exploded. Aaron Rodgers is a notable recent example, but there are plenty of others. Peyton Manning bucked that trend by starting right away and playing well. Since then, it's somehow become more common. The conventional wisdom before Manning was to have young QBs learn on the sidelines. We don't know what kind of numbers Leinart could put up in a real gameplan. Fourth, I've said that the guy throwing to Fitzgerald is probably a good fantasy option. I believe that Fitzgerald is one of the best, if not the best, receivers in the league. His combination of size, talent, character and work ethic is the prototype for what GMs look for in a receiver. I believe that Leinart would put up good individual numbers and lead the team to wins in the Arizona offense with Fitzgerald, and I believe that we'd have seen even better numbers from him than his already insane >80% pass completion percentage if the team hadn't shut Fitzgerald down. Lastly, the implication is not that he's "good enough to start", but that Arizona - the team that drafted him with a first round pick, paid him a huge contract for the #10 pick, sat through his rookie season, benched Kurt Warner in favor of getting him experience, and groomed at the expense of carrying another QB on their roster - should see what they have before parting ways with him. I don't know what should happen if or when he leaves Arizona - there are substantially more than 32 players in the world who are capable of playing quarterback at a nearly elite level, and there are substantially fewer than 32 who are capable of playing at an elite level year in and year out. Would KC be wise to start Leinart instead of Matt Cassel or Tyler Thigpen? I don't know - it comes down to what you want in a player who would run your offense, and what you think you can teach Leinart to be. I think with good coaching and the right situation, Leinart - and many others on the fringes of starting in the league - could be good. Leinart has a chance to be in that situation this year, on a team with a top receiver, two good backs and an improved run blocking offensive line. If he gets the chance to start, I think he could be successful. I don't know what situation you're imagining for him in your hypothetical, but sure, I think he could be successful somewhere else if given a chance in the right situation.
 
I don't know what situation you're imagining for him in your hypothetical, but sure, I think he could be successful somewhere else if given a chance in the right situation.
I guess I thought I'd made that clear, but just to make sure:1. I don't think he can be successful in his current situation in Arizona. I think if he gets appreciable playing time this year, he will perform poorly.2. I don't think he can be successful in any other situation. Although there are other teams that have QBs who are not successful in their existing situations, so I suppose it is possible he can be equally unsuccessful in such situations (e.g., Cleveland, Buffalo).
 
So for those like bostonfred and LHUCKS who think Leinart either hasn't been given a fair shot or deserves to be the starter this year or both... if he is released, what are your expectations? If he hasn't been treated fairly, the implication is that he is good enough to start, which means he should be good enough to start somewhere else, right? Is that what you expect?
You're misrepresenting my position. First, I don't think I've said anything about him being treated unfairly. Teams do what's in their best interests. They don't owe Leinart anything more than the guaranteed money in his contract and the salary he's earning in whatever role they choose to put him in. Second, I haven't said that he's "good enough to start", or even that he's "good". I've questioned people who used his numbers to say he was "bad" or had regressed the last couple years. I've said that his numbers in mop up duty are skewed by the game conditions in which he entered. I think we'd agree that if a backup QB comes in for four plays and has three rushes for -2 yards, it's not really a measure of his talent. If a backup QB comes in partway through a blowout loss in bad weather, he may not put up the best numbers, either. Or if he finds out the day of the game that he's going to be starting after the team prepared for Warner all week. Third, I've said that a number of other QBs have been in similar situations - getting limited experience in their first several years in the league, holding a clipboard for a top QB, and getting a chance to start later in their career - and exploded. Aaron Rodgers is a notable recent example, but there are plenty of others. Peyton Manning bucked that trend by starting right away and playing well. Since then, it's somehow become more common. The conventional wisdom before Manning was to have young QBs learn on the sidelines. We don't know what kind of numbers Leinart could put up in a real gameplan. Fourth, I've said that the guy throwing to Fitzgerald is probably a good fantasy option. I believe that Fitzgerald is one of the best, if not the best, receivers in the league. His combination of size, talent, character and work ethic is the prototype for what GMs look for in a receiver. I believe that Leinart would put up good individual numbers and lead the team to wins in the Arizona offense with Fitzgerald, and I believe that we'd have seen even better numbers from him than his already insane >80% pass completion percentage if the team hadn't shut Fitzgerald down. Lastly, the implication is not that he's "good enough to start", but that Arizona - the team that drafted him with a first round pick, paid him a huge contract for the #10 pick, sat through his rookie season, benched Kurt Warner in favor of getting him experience, and groomed at the expense of carrying another QB on their roster - should see what they have before parting ways with him. I don't know what should happen if or when he leaves Arizona - there are substantially more than 32 players in the world who are capable of playing quarterback at a nearly elite level, and there are substantially fewer than 32 who are capable of playing at an elite level year in and year out. Would KC be wise to start Leinart instead of Matt Cassel or Tyler Thigpen? I don't know - it comes down to what you want in a player who would run your offense, and what you think you can teach Leinart to be. I think with good coaching and the right situation, Leinart - and many others on the fringes of starting in the league - could be good. Leinart has a chance to be in that situation this year, on a team with a top receiver, two good backs and an improved run blocking offensive line. If he gets the chance to start, I think he could be successful. I don't know what situation you're imagining for him in your hypothetical, but sure, I think he could be successful somewhere else if given a chance in the right situation.
That's a good post Fred.One thing that is missing is what some of us have been saying quite a few times in this thread - that Leinart just doesn't have the leadership ability and the "moxie" to be a successful QB. It's not necessarily the stats, though those are not impressive. It's the weak arm. It's the attitude. It's the lack of offseason work ethic. It's that his teammates don't believe in him. It's his "entitlement" attitude.I agree with you that given the correct situation right out of college and the right coaching, he might have made it as a serviceable NFL QB (if that's what you are saying). A lot of the things he doesn't have maybe could have been coached into him. But after watching him for the last four years it is obvious to me that, whatever the reasons, he just does not click with this team and the coaches. If he changes his attitude and work ethic and goes to a team that believes in him, maybe he would have a shot to make it.
 
I agree with you that given the correct situation right out of college and the right coaching, he might have made it as a serviceable NFL QB (if that's what you are saying). A lot of the things he doesn't have maybe could have been coached into him.
It's not like Arizona has been the Detroit Lions or the Cleveland Browns the past 4 years. Leinart's "situation" was better than what most NFL QBs have been given, and yet he was never able to do anything with it. Joey Harrington and David Carr would have killed to get Leinart's opportunity.
 
LHUCKS said:
A lot of local media have questioned whether or not Leinart has been given a fair shot...I personally don't think that he has.That being said, Anderson has looked better overall and as a Cards fan, I just want the best guy on the field.
lol
 
LHUCKS said:
A lot of local media have questioned whether or not Leinart has been given a fair shot...I personally don't think that he has.
I think 4 years is enough time to evaluate a guy you've had in your organization. How many more years would it take to get a proper evaluation?
 
Matt Leinart-QB-Cardinals Aug. 31 - 8:12 am et

Matt Leinart is more likely to be cut than traded.

Leinart's contract, which has him earning $2.485 million in 2010 and $7.36 million in 2011, isn't something another team will want to take on. The Cardinals won't keep four quarterbacks, and they don't want to cut either Max Hall or John Skelton. The end could be near for Leinart in the desert.

Source: Pro Football Talk

 
Matt Leinart met with Ken Whisenhunt Monday afternoon to discuss Leinart's problems with his head coach.

Leinart suggested that the reason for his benching was due to issues not related to performance. The reality is Leinart has not demonstrated the ability to execute Arizona's vertical passing attack. Despite his accuracy shortcomings, Derek Anderson is simply a better fit for the Cardinals' system.

Source: Kent Somers on Twitter

 
LHUCKS said:
A lot of local media have questioned whether or not Leinart has been given a fair shot...I personally don't think that he has.
I think 4 years is enough time to evaluate a guy you've had in your organization. How many more years would it take to get a proper evaluation?
Depends...what conference did he play for in college?
 
Should I drop Leinart & pick up Anderson? I need a (starting) QB badly and I'd like to have part of the AZ offense.

 
Matt Leinart-QB-Cardinals Aug. 31 - 8:12 am et Matt Leinart is more likely to be cut than traded.Leinart's contract, which has him earning $2.485 million in 2010 and $7.36 million in 2011, isn't something another team will want to take on. The Cardinals won't keep four quarterbacks, and they don't want to cut either Max Hall or John Skelton. The end could be near for Leinart in the desert. Source: Pro Football Talk
:wolf: $2.485 M is not much for a QB in a year without a salary cap. I think several teams should be interested. If he sucks, simply cut him prior to 2011.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top