The General
Footballguy
Well?
Always! These guys suck!!Was there a call in the (on-going) IU/Michigan game that has prompted this?![]()
This was my "other" vote too for the same reasons.It’s pretty easily soccer, IMO. With limited scoring and it being not uncommon for a red card or penalty kick to determine winners. Thankfully, with video replay they are getting most of those correct nowadays but it’s still the most influence a single ref has.
Soccer is a good one. I don’t really watch it that much. The penalty in the box is probably the biggest call in sports.It’s pretty easily soccer, IMO. With limited scoring and it being not uncommon for a red card or penalty kick to determine winners. Thankfully, with video replay they are getting most of those correct nowadays but it’s still the most influence a single ref has.
Football is close I think. The ability to remove players from the field is so big in Basketball though.Football. Huge plays taken away by fantom penalties, or huge plays happen because an obvious penalty wasn't called.
When the refs do make an impact, the biggest individual impacts are football plays.
The Netflix documentary on Tim Donaghy was an eye-opener on how subtle but influential a basketball ref can be in a game.I went Basketball since the ref can take players off the court or out of game with their terrible calls.
But, seriously it is a tough choice. I went Basketball since the ref can take players off the court or out of game with their terrible calls.
Football is very close however.
Baseball with the strike zone is obviously huge but there are so many pitches it feels like it balances out.
Yep. I haven’t watched that documentary but listened to a great podcast that got into that.The Netflix documentary on Tim Donaghy was an eye-opener on how subtle but influential a basketball ref can be in a game.I went Basketball since the ref can take players off the court or out of game with their terrible calls.
The refs can control momentum and game-planning with just a few whistles. For example, if a team is going on a heater, and you need them to slow down, call a travel or a palming, disrupt the rhythm. If a team's gameplan is to work in the post against a smaller lineup, and it proves to be effective, but you need it not to be, then you start calling charges and moving screens.
I did think of that game, the last pitch in particular is so badI was going to vote baseball until I read the reasoning for basketball and it just makes much more sense. But still -- the balls/strikes thing in baseball, though. You can't tell me the Marlins win the '97 World Series without that ump calling Livan Hernandez's pitches that were eight feet out of the strike zone strikes in the NLCS that year. That was an abomination. I've never seen games so affected by the officiating as with a bad ball/strike ump.
It's unwatchable at this point.The Netflix documentary on Tim Donaghy was an eye-opener on how subtle but influential a basketball ref can be in a game.I went Basketball since the ref can take players off the court or out of game with their terrible calls.
The refs can control momentum and game-planning with just a few whistles. For example, if a team is going on a heater, and you need them to slow down, call a travel or a palming, disrupt the rhythm. If a team's gameplan is to work in the post against a smaller lineup, and it proves to be effective, but you need it not to be, then you start calling charges and moving screens.
Rain man'esqueBasketball all day long.
My brother watches what I consider an unhealthy amount of NBA. Watching games with him, he can tell me how a game might go because of the refs involved. He's done it to me personally at least 3 times.
If we want to put judges/scorers into the same category as refs, then there is a whole slew of competitions influenced more the ones listed in the OP...gymnastics, diving, figure skating, etc...Ice Dancing![]()
Yup. The low scoring in soccer combined with the large percentage of goals on free kicks means that the refs have a huge impact. It makes the purists mad, but I would prefer rule changes to increase scoring and make it easier to score in open play such that a refs call has a lesser impact on the outcome.it seems like soccer is by far the easiest to control the outcome of a game because unlike other sports, a single play can determine the winner more often than not. You can call a game straight 99.9999% of the game and still effect the outcome where as in the other sports you have to be making "mistakes" far more often.
soccer is also noteriously one of the most corrupt sports on the planet with plenty of refs being bought off by the massive gambling syndicates. Thankfully technology has put a huge dent into this.
Don’t they review fouls now in soccer in the box and on those offside calls? Not really sure how their process works. NBA has added some cockamamy challenge rule which TBH I don’t really know the ins and outs but think it is pretty limited.Yup. The low scoring in soccer combined with the large percentage of goals on free kicks means that the refs have a huge impact. It makes the purists mad, but I would prefer rule changes to increase scoring and make it easier to score in open play such that a refs call has a lesser impact on the outcome.it seems like soccer is by far the easiest to control the outcome of a game because unlike other sports, a single play can determine the winner more often than not. You can call a game straight 99.9999% of the game and still effect the outcome where as in the other sports you have to be making "mistakes" far more often.
soccer is also noteriously one of the most corrupt sports on the planet with plenty of refs being bought off by the massive gambling syndicates. Thankfully technology has put a huge dent into this.
Here’s the thing though (it really should be College basketball - I watch much less NBA) a couple fouls on best player happens somewhat frequently. That player is now off court for rest of half or significant minutes. When they come back their defense is like 50% so they don’t get the third. They pick up the 4th foul early in second half and they sit again.Basketball games have so much scoring and fouls called that it evens out more times than not. Sure, occasionally foul trouble impacts star players but players seldom foul out. I’ve tried finding stats but I’d be willing to be money there’s more red cards than players fouling out on a per game basis.
It’s honestly not close - games being won by a single goal is so common and on occasion that goal directly results from a call or non-call. I’m so convinced that it’s soccer that you really should just have a debate about which sport is 2nd.*
*I may be forgetting some sport that isn’t as big or popular but of the biggest 5-6 sports I still say it’s not even remotely close
Don’t they review fouls now in soccer in the box and on those offside calls? Not really sure how their process works. NBA has added some cockamamy challenge rule which TBH I don’t really know the ins and outs but think it is pretty limited.Yup. The low scoring in soccer combined with the large percentage of goals on free kicks means that the refs have a huge impact. It makes the purists mad, but I would prefer rule changes to increase scoring and make it easier to score in open play such that a refs call has a lesser impact on the outcome.it seems like soccer is by far the easiest to control the outcome of a game because unlike other sports, a single play can determine the winner more often than not. You can call a game straight 99.9999% of the game and still effect the outcome where as in the other sports you have to be making "mistakes" far more often.
soccer is also noteriously one of the most corrupt sports on the planet with plenty of refs being bought off by the massive gambling syndicates. Thankfully technology has put a huge dent into this.
Soccer is very similar to Bball in terms of refs. All the issues with impacting game flow applies to both sports, but in Bball players can easily be removed from the court. Especially in College game, in first couple minutes of a half with some ticky tack 50/50 calls. When they come back they are significantly hampered on defense. I guess the yellow card is similar to this but they remain on the field.
Basketball additionally only has 5 people on the court so the star being taken off court is very significant.
They call a lot of fouls in Basketball, there are lots of free throws, and almost every close game is very heavily impacted by free throws.Don’t they review fouls now in soccer in the box and on those offside calls? Not really sure how their process works. NBA has added some cockamamy challenge rule which TBH I don’t really know the ins and outs but think it is pretty limited.Yup. The low scoring in soccer combined with the large percentage of goals on free kicks means that the refs have a huge impact. It makes the purists mad, but I would prefer rule changes to increase scoring and make it easier to score in open play such that a refs call has a lesser impact on the outcome.it seems like soccer is by far the easiest to control the outcome of a game because unlike other sports, a single play can determine the winner more often than not. You can call a game straight 99.9999% of the game and still effect the outcome where as in the other sports you have to be making "mistakes" far more often.
soccer is also noteriously one of the most corrupt sports on the planet with plenty of refs being bought off by the massive gambling syndicates. Thankfully technology has put a huge dent into this.
Soccer is very similar to Bball in terms of refs. All the issues with impacting game flow applies to both sports, but in Bball players can easily be removed from the court. Especially in College game, in first couple minutes of a half with some ticky tack 50/50 calls. When they come back they are significantly hampered on defense. I guess the yellow card is similar to this but they remain on the field.
Basketball additionally only has 5 people on the court so the star being taken off court is very significant.
They do review in some leagues/games. A lot happens outside the box and often it's subjective on when a foul begins relative to the box. Yes you can remain on the field for a yellow card, but if you get a second you come off and theirs no replacement. In some competitions yellow cards accumulate and you have to sit out the entire next game with a when you get a second. IMO a bad call in basketball might result in 2 points or 2-3% of the scoring where a bad call in soccer usually results in changing the scoring 33% to 100%.
I agree. I just assumed that the bad calls resulting in points in BB even themselves out due to the sheer volume.They call a lot of fouls in Basketball, there are lots of free throws, and almost every close game is very heavily impacted by free throws.Don’t they review fouls now in soccer in the box and on those offside calls? Not really sure how their process works. NBA has added some cockamamy challenge rule which TBH I don’t really know the ins and outs but think it is pretty limited.Yup. The low scoring in soccer combined with the large percentage of goals on free kicks means that the refs have a huge impact. It makes the purists mad, but I would prefer rule changes to increase scoring and make it easier to score in open play such that a refs call has a lesser impact on the outcome.it seems like soccer is by far the easiest to control the outcome of a game because unlike other sports, a single play can determine the winner more often than not. You can call a game straight 99.9999% of the game and still effect the outcome where as in the other sports you have to be making "mistakes" far more often.
soccer is also noteriously one of the most corrupt sports on the planet with plenty of refs being bought off by the massive gambling syndicates. Thankfully technology has put a huge dent into this.
Soccer is very similar to Bball in terms of refs. All the issues with impacting game flow applies to both sports, but in Bball players can easily be removed from the court. Especially in College game, in first couple minutes of a half with some ticky tack 50/50 calls. When they come back they are significantly hampered on defense. I guess the yellow card is similar to this but they remain on the field.
Basketball additionally only has 5 people on the court so the star being taken off court is very significant.
They do review in some leagues/games. A lot happens outside the box and often it's subjective on when a foul begins relative to the box. Yes you can remain on the field for a yellow card, but if you get a second you come off and theirs no replacement. In some competitions yellow cards accumulate and you have to sit out the entire next game with a when you get a second. IMO a bad call in basketball might result in 2 points or 2-3% of the scoring where a bad call in soccer usually results in changing the scoring 33% to 100%.
Soccer makes a compelling argument. Football does as well.
It cracks me up when people (usually refs) actually argue how "difficult" it is and that they are all just trying their hardest to do the right thing. Yeah right.
That is hilarious, to actually believe that. As if almost comparing them to pro athletes and/or being at some higher level. Including morally. Um, put your whistle back in your mouth.
Refs tend to think their job is way harder than it is and a lot are biased or flat-out crooked. And they have way too much influence. They suck.It cracks me up when people (usually refs) actually argue how "difficult" it is and that they are all just trying their hardest to do the right thing. Yeah right.
That is hilarious, to actually believe that. As if almost comparing them to pro athletes and/or being at some higher level. Including morally. Um, put your whistle back in your mouth.
What?
Refs tend to think their job is way harder than it is and a lot are biased or flat-out crooked. And they have way too much influence. They suck.It cracks me up when people (usually refs) actually argue how "difficult" it is and that they are all just trying their hardest to do the right thing. Yeah right.
That is hilarious, to actually believe that. As if almost comparing them to pro athletes and/or being at some higher level. Including morally. Um, put your whistle back in your mouth.
What?
Not when it‘s my team. They always get all the bad callsI agree. I just assumed that the bad calls resulting in points in BB even themselves out due to the sheer volume.They call a lot of fouls in Basketball, there are lots of free throws, and almost every close game is very heavily impacted by free throws.Don’t they review fouls now in soccer in the box and on those offside calls? Not really sure how their process works. NBA has added some cockamamy challenge rule which TBH I don’t really know the ins and outs but think it is pretty limited.Yup. The low scoring in soccer combined with the large percentage of goals on free kicks means that the refs have a huge impact. It makes the purists mad, but I would prefer rule changes to increase scoring and make it easier to score in open play such that a refs call has a lesser impact on the outcome.it seems like soccer is by far the easiest to control the outcome of a game because unlike other sports, a single play can determine the winner more often than not. You can call a game straight 99.9999% of the game and still effect the outcome where as in the other sports you have to be making "mistakes" far more often.
soccer is also noteriously one of the most corrupt sports on the planet with plenty of refs being bought off by the massive gambling syndicates. Thankfully technology has put a huge dent into this.
Soccer is very similar to Bball in terms of refs. All the issues with impacting game flow applies to both sports, but in Bball players can easily be removed from the court. Especially in College game, in first couple minutes of a half with some ticky tack 50/50 calls. When they come back they are significantly hampered on defense. I guess the yellow card is similar to this but they remain on the field.
Basketball additionally only has 5 people on the court so the star being taken off court is very significant.
They do review in some leagues/games. A lot happens outside the box and often it's subjective on when a foul begins relative to the box. Yes you can remain on the field for a yellow card, but if you get a second you come off and theirs no replacement. In some competitions yellow cards accumulate and you have to sit out the entire next game with a when you get a second. IMO a bad call in basketball might result in 2 points or 2-3% of the scoring where a bad call in soccer usually results in changing the scoring 33% to 100%.
Soccer makes a compelling argument. Football does as well.
So you've never tried to do it?Refs tend to think their job is way harder than it is and a lot are biased or flat-out crooked. And they have way too much influence. They suck.It cracks me up when people (usually refs) actually argue how "difficult" it is and that they are all just trying their hardest to do the right thing. Yeah right.
That is hilarious, to actually believe that. As if almost comparing them to pro athletes and/or being at some higher level. Including morally. Um, put your whistle back in your mouth.
What?
Basketball games have so much scoring and fouls called that it evens out more times than not. Sure, occasionally foul trouble impacts star players but players seldom foul out. I’ve tried finding stats but I’d be willing to be money there’s more red cards than players fouling out on a per game basis.
It’s honestly not close - games being won by a single goal is so common and on occasion that goal directly results from a call or non-call. I’m so convinced that it’s soccer that you really should just have a debate about which sport is 2nd.*
*I may be forgetting some sport that isn’t as big or popular but of the biggest 5-6 sports I still say it’s not even remotely close
Reffing is very difficult.Refs tend to think their job is way harder than it is and a lot are biased or flat-out crooked. And they have way too much influence. They suck.It cracks me up when people (usually refs) actually argue how "difficult" it is and that they are all just trying their hardest to do the right thing. Yeah right.
That is hilarious, to actually believe that. As if almost comparing them to pro athletes and/or being at some higher level. Including morally. Um, put your whistle back in your mouth.
What?
I don't think any of that is true.
Thankless job. For these 50/50 calls I’d they don’t call anything the game gets out of hand. If they call them people get pissed.Reffing is very difficult.Refs tend to think their job is way harder than it is and a lot are biased or flat-out crooked. And they have way too much influence. They suck.It cracks me up when people (usually refs) actually argue how "difficult" it is and that they are all just trying their hardest to do the right thing. Yeah right.
That is hilarious, to actually believe that. As if almost comparing them to pro athletes and/or being at some higher level. Including morally. Um, put your whistle back in your mouth.
What?
I don't think any of that is true.
LMFAO @ gutless. Strap those stripes on buddy, it's super gnarly down in the trenches. Do you pull the flag out from your left side or right when you make those big decisions (opinions)?? Talk about courage!!So you've never tried to do it?Refs tend to think their job is way harder than it is and a lot are biased or flat-out crooked. And they have way too much influence. They suck.It cracks me up when people (usually refs) actually argue how "difficult" it is and that they are all just trying their hardest to do the right thing. Yeah right.
That is hilarious, to actually believe that. As if almost comparing them to pro athletes and/or being at some higher level. Including morally. Um, put your whistle back in your mouth.
What?
Gutless if so. Until you've actually tried to do it and do it well at a high level, you don't know what you are talking about.
I've passed the CPA exam, stayed married for 22 years and have 2 teenage children. Being a good basketball ref is the most difficult thing I've ever attempted.
The problem was it was a holdSee that holding call in the SB.