What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread: Kings win 2nd Cup in 3 seasons (1 Viewer)

A thought: Quick now has a playoff GAA of 2.69 (it was 2.80 before tonight). I was wondering when the last time was a goalie had that high of a playoff GAA on a Cup-winning team. I have never really looked it up, but that seems high (which is obviously inflated by a handful of games, especially early on in the Sharks series).

It's crazy cause they said he allowed 29 goals in 20 games two years ago, and he has now allowed 65 goals in 24 games this year, yet the Kings are still one win away from a sweep to win the Cup. Crazy.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Niemi had a GAA of 2.63 in 2010

Fleury's was 2.61 in 2009

Kings scored 57 goals in 20 games in 2012

They have 84 goals in 24 games this year.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ah, okay. Niemi doesn't surprise me, as I remember the Blackhawks scoring a lot during that Cup run, although it can be hard to remember years and specifics and whatnot.

 
A thought: Quick now has a playoff GAA of 2.69 (it was 2.80 before tonight). I was wondering when the last time was a goalie had that high of a playoff GAA on a Cup-winning team. I have never really looked it up, but that seems high (which is obviously inflated by a handful of games, especially early on in the Sharks series).

It's crazy cause they said he allowed 29 goals in 20 games two years ago, and he has now allowed 65 goals in 24 games this year, yet the Kings are still one win away from a sweep to win the Cup. Crazy.
Just saw this tweet today: https://twitter.com/dimfilipovic/status/476016527947202562

 
Quick>Henrik about sums up the series

The Rangers were the better team in LA and came back with nothing. They looked defeated once Krieder couldnt put the puck in off the opening face off.

It was a fun ride but last night was pretty miserable. Quick was insane and he is the difference. It is crazy how many bounces have gone the kings way. Its too bad the Rangers couldnt do enough to get their own bounces.

I would like to see a win for my own personal sake so its not an awful cup experience but it doesnt really matter at this point

 
I'm just really happy for Marty. Maybe he can talk more about how this was 'meant to be' after he quit on his teammates in Tampa. :thumbup:

 
OK Rag fans. It's OK to concede series now. Brutal showing. Discusting.
Hardly a brutal/disgusting showing, they are just overmatched here as was mentioned by many (myself included) before the series started. Although that did seem to be a demoralized team once Carter scored that buzzer beater.

As Acer said, the Rangers' world-class best player just happens to have a better counterpart in the net down the other end of the ice. And for all the talk about bad luck bounces, it's really the Kings taking advantage of the luck and the Rangers not. That's how the first two games were won.

Proud of the Blueshirts for getting this far, but they just ran into a buzzsaw. Damn San Jose for not being able to win one more game. :angry:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Chicago/STL/San Jose or Anaheim would've done the same to the Rangers. It's not just the Kings.
Maybe, but I think the Rangers would have matched up better against those teams. Maybe at least stand a puncher's chance in a goalie vs goalie matchup.

 
Keith Jones just said the Rangers should've "skated around with their little trophy last night because they have no chance vs the west, they'll be happy to win one game."

Surprised he thinks that strongly about the finals considering they have that Lundqvist guy in net.

Congrats Ranger fans.
Don't #### with Jonesy!
:goodposting:
I do have to say he's probably my favorite NHL analyst. Was a hard-nosed player and brings that type of approach to his analysis.

 
While last night's game was definitely a letdown, I will be really disappointed if they don't win on Wednesday. They really needed to win one of those first two games and try to end this early because the Kings size was guaranteed to wear the Rangers down if they went 7. If they win Wednesday, I still think this could go 7. That's as far ahead as I'll look right now.

And the Rangers would beat any other team in the West. Prove they wouldn't. Stupid argument.

 
Keith Jones just said the Rangers should've "skated around with their little trophy last night because they have no chance vs the west, they'll be happy to win one game."

Surprised he thinks that strongly about the finals considering they have that Lundqvist guy in net.

Congrats Ranger fans.
Don't #### with Jonesy!
:goodposting:
I do have to say he's probably my favorite NHL analyst. Was a hard-nosed player and brings that type of approach to his analysis.
Dig Jonesy....have really grown to dislike Milbury

Oh, and Emrick is unlistenable on TV

 
And the Rangers would beat any other team in the West. Prove they wouldn't. Stupid argument.
:lmao:

when the Sharks, Ducks, and Blackhawks take the Kings to Game 7 and the Rangers get swept, there's all the proof you need.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Keith Jones just said the Rangers should've "skated around with their little trophy last night because they have no chance vs the west, they'll be happy to win one game."

Surprised he thinks that strongly about the finals considering they have that Lundqvist guy in net.

Congrats Ranger fans.
Don't #### with Jonesy!
:goodposting:
I do have to say he's probably my favorite NHL analyst. Was a hard-nosed player and brings that type of approach to his analysis.
Dig Jonesy....have really grown to dislike Milbury

Oh, and Emrick is unlistenable on TV
Milbury has always been a knucklehead. I think he's beaten a shoe against his own head more than he did on the fan in MSG in the '70s.

Don't understand the Emrick hate - his passion is second to none and he describes the action better than anyone.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
While last night's game was definitely a letdown, I will be really disappointed if they don't win on Wednesday. They really needed to win one of those first two games and try to end this early because the Kings size was guaranteed to wear the Rangers down if they went 7. If they win Wednesday, I still think this could go 7. That's as far ahead as I'll look right now.

And the Rangers would beat any other team in the West. Prove they wouldn't. Stupid argument.
:lmao:

 
While last night's game was definitely a letdown, I will be really disappointed if they don't win on Wednesday. They really needed to win one of those first two games and try to end this early because the Kings size was guaranteed to wear the Rangers down if they went 7. If they win Wednesday, I still think this could go 7. That's as far ahead as I'll look right now.

And the Rangers would beat any other team in the West. Prove they wouldn't. Stupid argument.
It can't be proven either way, but I think there's a good reason why, coming into the playoffs, many thought most of the best teams were from the West (plus Boston).

 
And the Rangers would beat any other team in the West. Prove they wouldn't. Stupid argument.
:lmao:

when the Sharks, Ducks, and Blackhawks take the Kings to Game 7 and the Rangers get swept, there's all the proof you need.
It's just an opinion that can't be proven.

Teams are in much different shape from Round 1 to the Finals. I'll let go of the hook now.
sure, you can't say for sure what would happen but all the top teams in the West would be big favorites over the Rangers whether they met in round 1, 2, 3, or 4.

 
While last night's game was definitely a letdown, I will be really disappointed if they don't win on Wednesday. They really needed to win one of those first two games and try to end this early because the Kings size was guaranteed to wear the Rangers down if they went 7. If they win Wednesday, I still think this could go 7. That's as far ahead as I'll look right now.

And the Rangers would beat any other team in the West. Prove they wouldn't. Stupid argument.
Hate to be a hater, GB, but the Rangers are clearly overmatched. Just have to tip your hat to an outstanding team. Even if the Rangers squeak out a win at MSG tomorrow night, they'll be done in LA.

While they may have had a chance against the likes of CHI, SJ or ANA, unfortunately we'll never know. And not very relevant anyway.

 
Keith Jones just said the Rangers should've "skated around with their little trophy last night because they have no chance vs the west, they'll be happy to win one game."

Surprised he thinks that strongly about the finals considering they have that Lundqvist guy in net.

Congrats Ranger fans.
Don't #### with Jonesy!
:goodposting:
I do have to say he's probably my favorite NHL analyst. Was a hard-nosed player and brings that type of approach to his analysis.
Dig Jonesy....have really grown to dislike Milbury

Oh, and Emrick is unlistenable on TV
Milbury has always been a knucklehead. I think he's beaten a shoe against his own head more than he did on the fan in MSG in the '70s.

Don't understand the Emrick hate - his passion is second to none and he describes the action better than anyone.
Lol @ Milbury line...

Don't get me wrong, grew up listening to Emrick when he broadcast the Maine Mariners their first three years... he was GREAT on the radio...GREAT...because you couldn't see the action. He basically does radio PbP on TV when less is more. It's just an avalanche of adjectives... (ladles, flexes it on, shovel shot)... [cringes]

I loved listening to Dan Kelly on TV... He was phenomenal on TV or radio

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Don't get me wrong, grew up listening to Emrick when he broadcast the Maine Mariners their first three years... he was GREAT on the radio...GREAT...because you couldn't see the action. He basically does radio PbP on TV when less is more. It's just an avalanche of adjectives... (ladles, flexes it on, shovel shot)... [cringes]
I'll give you that - sometimes he can go overboard on the descriptive terminology and has a face for radio. But he brings a passion that few announcers do, and that counts a lot in my book. He's often the only reason I watch the Devils games during the year.

 
Don't get me wrong, grew up listening to Emrick when he broadcast the Maine Mariners their first three years... he was GREAT on the radio...GREAT...because you couldn't see the action. He basically does radio PbP on TV when less is more. It's just an avalanche of adjectives... (ladles, flexes it on, shovel shot)... [cringes]
I'll give you that - sometimes he can go overboard on the descriptive terminology and has a face for radio. But he brings a passion that few announcers do, and that counts a lot in my book. He's often the only reason I watch the Devils games during the year.
you probably haven't watched the Devils in a while then

 
Rangers actually didn't play as badly as they did in Game 4 in Pittsburgh when they went down 3 games to 1. Quick made a couple of fantastic saves last night (such as the one where he just got his stick against the post when the Ranger had a gimme tuck in). Quick also was lucky a couple of times (such as when the pcuk hit the upper handle of his stick).

For those who say the series is over, I say :pokey: . Rangers win game 4 and its a whole new series. Rangers in 7.

 
Weren't the Rangers basically a 5 or 6 seed in the east?

No way they'd have a chance against any of the top west teams. They caught two massive breaks when Price stonewalled Boston and then got immediately hurt in the ECF. They're probably the 10-12th best team in the league this year and then got hot and lucky at the same time. Lundqvist would have to seriously outplay Quick for them to have a prayer and it isn't happening.

 
I think the HC Dynamo of Moscow would have won the cup had they been in the NHL this year ;)

In all seriousness, a few bad breaks, but this series is over... It was over after game 2 - You don't blow a 2 goal lead in games 1 and 2 on the road and then come back to win 4 out of 6. The goal with under 1 second left in the first period yesterday was the final nail in the coffin. As little chance people gave the Rangers in this series, a few breaks in the other direction and this is a very tight series right now.

 
They're probably the 10-12th best team in the league this year
I'd put them inside the top 10, but agree on the general point. Rangers have played better than the 3-0 series lead indicates and they are playing some of their best hockey all season right now...but the Kings also aren't playing that great. very sloppy, actually. really shows the gap between the two teams. Rangers are a good not great team IMO.

I don't know though, still time for the Kings to be caught off guard by all that speed. certainly nothing they've seen this playoffs from better teams.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Don't get me wrong, grew up listening to Emrick when he broadcast the Maine Mariners their first three years... he was GREAT on the radio...GREAT...because you couldn't see the action. He basically does radio PbP on TV when less is more. It's just an avalanche of adjectives... (ladles, flexes it on, shovel shot)... [cringes]
I'll give you that - sometimes he can go overboard on the descriptive terminology and has a face for radio. But he brings a passion that few announcers do, and that counts a lot in my book. He's often the only reason I watch the Devils games during the year.
you probably haven't watched the Devils in a while then
:goodposting:

he quit the Devils 3 years ago

 
I have to root for the Rangers now. Too much fun. No way do I want it to end in 4.

 
I think the HC Dynamo of Moscow would have won the cup had they been in the NHL this year ;)

In all seriousness, a few bad breaks, but this series is over... It was over after game 2 - You don't blow a 2 goal lead in games 1 and 2 on the road and then come back to win 4 out of 6. The goal with under 1 second left in the first period yesterday was the final nail in the coffin. As little chance people gave the Rangers in this series, a few breaks in the other direction and this is a very tight series right now.
Ah the all important puck luck, eh? Way more important than speed.

 
Don't get me wrong, grew up listening to Emrick when he broadcast the Maine Mariners their first three years... he was GREAT on the radio...GREAT...because you couldn't see the action. He basically does radio PbP on TV when less is more. It's just an avalanche of adjectives... (ladles, flexes it on, shovel shot)... [cringes]
I'll give you that - sometimes he can go overboard on the descriptive terminology and has a face for radio. But he brings a passion that few announcers do, and that counts a lot in my book. He's often the only reason I watch the Devils games during the year.
you probably haven't watched the Devils in a while then
:goodposting: he quit the Devils 3 years ago
Yes - so did I.

 
Rockaction really having trouble digging up Mike Keenan quotes today. :shrug:
He was on the wrap up show on MSG network last night. Basically said, a championship team doesnt lose two 2 goal leads on the road. Said nothing else mattered.

Agree with him

Thought him and Micaletti (spelling ?) were going to go at it.

 
I think the HC Dynamo of Moscow would have won the cup had they been in the NHL this year ;)

In all seriousness, a few bad breaks, but this series is over... It was over after game 2 - You don't blow a 2 goal lead in games 1 and 2 on the road and then come back to win 4 out of 6. The goal with under 1 second left in the first period yesterday was the final nail in the coffin. As little chance people gave the Rangers in this series, a few breaks in the other direction and this is a very tight series right now.
Ah the all important puck luck, eh? Way more important than speed.
C'mon, this series really could be a lot different right now... Two loses in OT, two 2 goal leads given up, and a goal with less than one second... Things aren't bouncing in the Rangers favor this series.

 
I think the HC Dynamo of Moscow would have won the cup had they been in the NHL this year ;)

In all seriousness, a few bad breaks, but this series is over... It was over after game 2 - You don't blow a 2 goal lead in games 1 and 2 on the road and then come back to win 4 out of 6. The goal with under 1 second left in the first period yesterday was the final nail in the coffin. As little chance people gave the Rangers in this series, a few breaks in the other direction and this is a very tight series right now.
Ah the all important puck luck, eh? Way more important than speed.
C'mon, this series really could be a lot different right now... Two loses in OT, two 2 goal leads given up, and a goal with less than one second... Things aren't bouncing in the Rangers favor this series.
Maybe they should switch to a 13 game series.

 
Niemi had a GAA of 2.63 in 2010

Fleury's was 2.61 in 2009

Kings scored 57 goals in 20 games in 2012

They have 84 goals in 24 games this year.
You've got to go back a ways, but Barrasso was at 2.60 and 2.82 on the back-to-back Penguins Cup winners in 1991 and '92.

Grant Fuhr actually was 2.90 in 1988 ... during the most dominating Cup win ever (Oilers only lost two games, outscoring teams 87-55).

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top