What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Subscriber Contest (1 Viewer)

Andre JohnsonSantana MossMike WilliamsBernard BerrianLaurent RobinsonLouis MurphyDeion BranchCan anyone top that combo? Here's to 40+ for Brady tomorrow!
I have that exact same combo of guys, but luckily, I also have Calvin Johnson (26.8 pts) and Justin Gage (5.0 pts), to add to the 2 pts produced by Branch. Sitting at 150.45 with Fasano and Sammy Morris to go.
 
Laurent Robinson looks like dead money. Hasn't been quite healthy all year, and Gibson's doing well in his stead.

Roughly 174 this week, with Hernandez jumping in if he can beat 13 points or so.

:thumbup:

 
179ish with Brady and Edelman to play.

Vick 4.15 (Brady)

Foster 32.2

Bradshaw 21.3

Williams 16.5

Brandon Gibson 20 (?)

Roddy White 17.4

Branch 2 (Edelman)

Z. Miller 34.7

Hanson 20

San Fran 11

 
Wootness... sitting at 217.45 at the moment.

Rodgers - 27.05

Foster - 32.2

Tomlinson - 29

Gore - 17.2 (Ronnie Brown could post more)

Megatron - 26.8

Floyd - 6.5

Higgins - 5.8 (Randy Moss SHOULD post more)

Gates - 36.9

Kaeding - 15

Chargers - 21

Bad week for me with wideouts but I ended up sitting pretty.

 
No AJ, Austin, M.Williams, Schaincoe means this 19 man roster is toast.

LOL, cant even find a flex guy right now.

Brady

Foster

Bradshaw

R.Moss

Nicks

M.Clayton

Finley

Spiller/Gronkowski (flex?) thats all i have to choose from.

Hanson

Saints.

I think im around 110 right now....this heavy wr core team looks like i wont make it, But all along i knew if one of the big time wr's got hurt my ### was in trouble anyways.

A.Johnson, R.Moss, M.Austin and H.Nicks was alot to spend on wr's. Clayton and M.Williams have been nice additions however. Anyway, i hope Brady/Moss does well enough for me to survive.

 
Just out of curiousity, I'd love to see your 30 man roster for this, if you don't mind sharing
Sure.
Code:
Jason Campbell		$11	 17.50Sam Bradford		   $9	 15.65 Derek Anderson		 $6	 21.75 ----------------------------------------Jahvid Best		   $27	 18.10   Pierre Thomas		 $27	 16.10		 LaDainian Tomlinson   $12	  8.80 Leon Washington		$8	  1.20   Fred Taylor			$6	  8.70	 Marshawn Lynch		 $4	  1.30	 ----------------------------------------Johnny Knox		   $18	  8.20		  Donald Driver		 $15	 14.00		  Devin Aromashodu	  $11	 12.10	  Nate Washington		$8	 17.80	   Chaz Schilens		  $7	  0.00   Laurent Robinson	   $7	 10.80	  Legedu Naanee		  $7	 22.00	   Harry Douglas		  $5	  6.90	  Louis Murphy		   $4	  6.80		----------------------------------------Tony Gonzalez		 $19	  6.50		Jeremy Shockey		 $9	  6.80		Bo Scaife			  $7	 14.20			  Ben Watson			 $5	  6.00			  ----------------------------------------Ryan Succop			$2	  3.00		Sebastian Janikowski   $2	  9.00  Olindo Mare			$2	  8.00	 Matt Bryant			$2	 12.00	 ----------------------------------------Seattle Seahawks	   $3	 12.00	   Tampa Bay Buccaneers   $3	  6.00	St. Louis Rams		 $2	 10.00		Detroit Lions		  $2	 12.00
Here's mine, for an example of an 18-player, stud-led roster. I think if my guys stay healthy and I survive week 10 (Rodgers and Finley's bye), and if a couple of the cheaper players break out, I'll do pretty well. However, any major injuries or big dud weeks by several studs at once and I could be toast early. With Ray Rice's and Andre Johnson's duds in week 1, and without Rodgers' points being used, the rest still managed to score 184.75. Even with 3 studs down, a score like that should make the cut most weeks, giving me some hope for the bye weeks. Last year, the cutoff for Week 10 was 130.04, the highest bye week cutoff was 141.44, and the highest non-bye week cutoff was 167.89.
Code:
Aaron Rodgers		 $29	 20.30  Derek Anderson		 $6	 21.75  ----------------------------------------Chris Johnson		 $40	 29.00	Ray Rice			  $37	  7.20	   Arian Foster		  $13	 42.30	 Leon Washington		$8	  1.20  ----------------------------------------Andre Johnson		 $32	  6.30  Wes Welker			$21	 26.40  Mike Williams		  $8	 14.00   Bernard Berrian		$7	  1.30  Louis Murphy		   $4	  6.80   Deion Branch		   $3	 10.10  ---------------------------------------Jermichael Finley	 $21	 10.70 Jermaine Gresham	   $6	 17.5---------------------------------------Rob Bironas			$3	 10.00   Billy Cundiff		  $3	  4.00	  ---------------------------------------San Francisco 49ers	$5	  3.00New Orleans Saints	 $4	  3.00
Rodgers 28Foster 32CJ 9Murphy 2Branch 2WelkerGresham 11Finley 16Bironas 12SF 7126 + Welker. You should make it.I'm not sitting as good.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Rodgers 28Foster 32CJ 9Murphy 2Branch 2WelkerGresham 11Finley 16Bironas 12SF 7126 + Welker. You should make it.I'm not sitting as good.
Andre Johnson's late scratch when Williams and Berrian were already on bye, combined with Murphy and Branch getting shut down, killed my WR's. Ray Rice's knee and Chris Johnson's dud didn't help at RB. As long as Welker has a decent game, I should be ok, and if so, my uniqueness should increase significantly. The AJ/Chris Johnson/Rice/Murphy/Williams owners should be trimmed back this week. I'm afraid I might be in that trimmed back group if Welker underperforms like the rest of my WR's. The sim has me at 84% survival, down from around 99% before the games. If I make it, I'll have my studs Rodgers, Finley, Foster, and Welker to thank.
 
with all the stud definitions bouncing around, I would not list Foster as a stud. He was a value pick if viewing studs in the amount of $ a player cost.

 
Andre JohnsonSantana MossMike WilliamsBernard BerrianLaurent RobinsonLouis MurphyDeion BranchCan anyone top that combo? Here's to 40+ for Brady tomorrow!
I have 6 of the same 7 recievers. But believing in large roster sizes, instead of Andre Johnson, I have:Santonio HolmesLance MooreBrian HarlineDevery HendersonEmmanual SandersYou spent $32 for A Johnson. I spent $34 for my committee of 5.
 
In at around 140 with Brady still to go (minus D. Anderson's measly points). 100% chance of survival. Considering I had 7 players on a bye and two players out I'm pretty happy with this. I don't expect to make it through next week though with Anderson as my only healthy QB.

 
Andre JohnsonSantana MossMike WilliamsBernard BerrianLaurent RobinsonLouis MurphyDeion BranchCan anyone top that combo? Here's to 40+ for Brady tomorrow!
How about this?Romo, Stafford (my only two QBs)Garcon, Jacoby Jones, Laurent Robinson, Mike Williams, Dexter McCluster, Louis Murphy, Deon Butler (I'm counting his 4 pts as my WR3)Jason WittenDespite no QB and 7 of my 9 WR laying stink bombs, I think I got a shot at 162.1 with Ronnie Brown and the Gronk vieing for my flex (-12.6) tonite. Odd week.
 
Andre JohnsonSantana MossMike WilliamsBernard BerrianLaurent RobinsonLouis MurphyDeion BranchCan anyone top that combo? Here's to 40+ for Brady tomorrow!
I have 6 of the same 7 recievers. But believing in large roster sizes, instead of Andre Johnson, I have:Santonio HolmesLance MooreBrian HarlineDevery HendersonEmmanual SandersYou spent $32 for A Johnson. I spent $34 for my committee of 5.
I started with a big stable...the combined Holmes and Garcon and Hartline to get up to AJ. Obviously, I didn't expect him to miss a week when I also had 2 other WR and my (expected) weekly flex play (Witten) on bye. I'm at 53.6 to survive...go Brady!
 
Pre-MNF sim. The cut will almost certainly be in the low 130s.
124 with Welker and Marshall to go. Nice games this week from Bradford and Eddie Royal. If I had gone with my original plan of going with Eli and Big Ben, I'd probably be toast. Swapped out Ben for Bradford/D Anderson combo. Anderson actually started for me one week, but something tells me he might not again this season...
 
Who would have though that a KICKER would be my 3rd highest Scorer through Monday Morning??!?

3051. Team 103640 | 100.0 | 170 |

Shaub - 21.7 (Henne to go)

D-Williams 16.5

Arian Foster 32.2

(Ronnie Brown, Fragile Freddie to Go)

Jabar Gaffney 10.1

Devery Henderson 11.7

Deion Branch 2.0

(Welker to go)

Brent Celek 13.2

Todd Heap 8

Jason Hanson 20

Tennesse Titans 14

Currently at 147.40 with Welker (-2) and possibly Ronnie Brown (-8) and Henne (-21.7) to go.

I think my kicker and Defense with 34 points scored saved my Bacon this week...

 
Andre JohnsonSantana MossMike WilliamsBernard BerrianLaurent RobinsonLouis MurphyDeion BranchCan anyone top that combo? Here's to 40+ for Brady tomorrow!
Pretty close:Santana Moss 0.50 points Pierre Garcon 0 points Nate Burleson 0 points Jacoby Jones 2.20 points Legedu Naanee 1 rec., 4yards Louis Murphy 1.50 points Deion Branch 2.00 points Greg Camarillo 0 pointsYeah, my WRs suck. Sad thing is, the rest of my team is pretty good this year. But these WRs will surely lose this contest for me.
 
Andre JohnsonSantana MossMike WilliamsBernard BerrianLaurent RobinsonLouis MurphyDeion BranchCan anyone top that combo? Here's to 40+ for Brady tomorrow!
No I can't top that.Roddy White Brandon Marshall James Jones Jordy Nelson Devery Henderson Deion Branch ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jermichael Finley John Carlson Donald Lee
 
Andre JohnsonSantana MossMike WilliamsBernard BerrianLaurent RobinsonLouis MurphyDeion BranchCan anyone top that combo? Here's to 40+ for Brady tomorrow!
Pretty close:Santana Moss 0.50 points Pierre Garcon 0 points Nate Burleson 0 points Jacoby Jones 2.20 points Legedu Naanee 1 rec., 4yards Louis Murphy 1.50 points Deion Branch 2.00 points Greg Camarillo 0 pointsYeah, my WRs suck. Sad thing is, the rest of my team is pretty good this year. But these WRs will surely lose this contest for me.
I think Moss just had a bad game but yes your WR's suck. Mine do as well. Bad enough I had to use the 3.5 from Knox and 11 and change from Henderson. But like you the rest of my team is good and I put up 192 this week with some non WR's still playing and have not scored less than 182 this year. I won this thing last year with a poo poo platter at WR. Needed guys like Schilens and Earl Bennett to produce for me last year. If you make it to the final 250 you can be competitive if the rest of the team steps up but it's not easy.Here is my group of WR's:Johnny KnoxMike Williams(TB)Austin CollieBernard BerrianLouis MurphyDevery HendersonDeion BranchGreg CamarilloPat Crayton
 
Andre JohnsonSantana MossMike WilliamsBernard BerrianLaurent RobinsonLouis MurphyDeion BranchCan anyone top that combo? Here's to 40+ for Brady tomorrow!
Pretty close:Santana Moss 0.50 points Pierre Garcon 0 points Nate Burleson 0 points Jacoby Jones 2.20 points Legedu Naanee 1 rec., 4yards Louis Murphy 1.50 points Deion Branch 2.00 points Greg Camarillo 0 pointsYeah, my WRs suck. Sad thing is, the rest of my team is pretty good this year. But these WRs will surely lose this contest for me.
I think Moss just had a bad game but yes your WR's suck. Mine do as well. Bad enough I had to use the 3.5 from Knox and 11 and change from Henderson. But like you the rest of my team is good and I put up 192 this week with some non WR's still playing and have not scored less than 182 this year. I won this thing last year with a poo poo platter at WR. Needed guys like Schilens and Earl Bennett to produce for me last year. If you make it to the final 250 you can be competitive if the rest of the team steps up but it's not easy.Here is my group of WR's:Johnny KnoxMike Williams(TB)Austin CollieBernard BerrianLouis MurphyDevery HendersonDeion BranchGreg CamarilloPat Crayton
That list is almost identical to my list...should squeak through this week thanks to foster and orton
 
Andre JohnsonSantana MossMike WilliamsBernard BerrianLaurent RobinsonLouis MurphyDeion BranchCan anyone top that combo? Here's to 40+ for Brady tomorrow!
Pretty close:Santana Moss 0.50 points Pierre Garcon 0 points Nate Burleson 0 points Jacoby Jones 2.20 points Legedu Naanee 1 rec., 4yards Louis Murphy 1.50 points Deion Branch 2.00 points Greg Camarillo 0 pointsYeah, my WRs suck. Sad thing is, the rest of my team is pretty good this year. But these WRs will surely lose this contest for me.
I think Moss just had a bad game but yes your WR's suck. Mine do as well. Bad enough I had to use the 3.5 from Knox and 11 and change from Henderson. But like you the rest of my team is good and I put up 192 this week with some non WR's still playing and have not scored less than 182 this year. I won this thing last year with a poo poo platter at WR. Needed guys like Schilens and Earl Bennett to produce for me last year. If you make it to the final 250 you can be competitive if the rest of the team steps up but it's not easy.Here is my group of WR's:Johnny KnoxMike Williams(TB)Austin CollieBernard BerrianLouis MurphyDevery HendersonDeion BranchGreg CamarilloPat Crayton
Honestly, I didn't expect my squad to light it up this year. Just to put up enough collective scores to get me through. The only big regrets so far are Burleson and Garcon. That's about $22 I could have spent on a much better WR.
 
QG>Stafford should be back before Rivers' bye week, right? Right? :scared: I noticed some time back we had the same quarterbacks. I don't think Anderson is gonna do us much good going forward.
Yeah, I'm a little :scared: for Week 10, but I'll cross my fingers that Stafford will be around for that week.If the Cardinals O-line continues to give up sacks, you never know they might just be stuck with Anderson being back in there. Plus it's totally possible they'll still throw him in there before then. Probable? No. Possible? Yes.-QG
 
Pre-MNF sim. The cut will almost certainly be in the low 130s.
Simulator question for the Turk. I noticed this odd-ball projection:7100. Team 112845 | 66.5 | 133 | 170 133 133 133 133 133

Looking at the roster, it looks like the only player they have left is the Dolphins (-2.0)

The distribution of 133 in all cases then jumping sharply to 170 as a top score is a bit odd. It's further strange since I would think that the odds of the Dolphins defense getting more than 2 points would be pretty high.

Just figured I'd point it out in case there's a bug in the Turkometer.

-QG

 
My recievers did their best to knock me out:

M. Williams (TB) BYE

D. McCluster BYE

L. Naanee

J. Knox

J. Gaffney

James Jones

Jacoby Jones

Thankfully rest of team picked up the slack.

Very ugly week, but everyone of us is going to have those at some point.

 
Pre-MNF sim. The cut will almost certainly be in the low 130s.
why does this team at the top has LOCK next to it? http://subscribers.footballguys.com/contest/2010/101289.php

Is it a MODS team? I know it makes it to the next week but many others are well over the cutline easy too.
That team is a :confused: Should be self-evident by the mightiness of the roster.

Pay no attention to the 2nd 101289 that appears later down on the list. This was a flaw in the original Turkometer that did not acknowledge the mightiness of SeniorVBDStudents entry. The LOCK status was the quick fix that they came up with in order to duly recognize the might that is entry 101289.

-QG

PS - look for other posts in this thread by SeniorVBDStudent if you are still confused ;)

 
I haven't been paying much attention to this but I'm still in. I paid $7 for ZMiller. It looks I need to have the Oakland ZMiller. HOw can I tell which one I have?

QuizGuy66 said:
THE UNDERCOVER BROTHA said:
Pre-MNF sim. The cut will almost certainly be in the low 130s.
why does this team at the top has LOCK next to it? http://subscribers.footballguys.com/contest/2010/101289.php

Is it a MODS team? I know it makes it to the next week but many others are well over the cutline easy too.
That team is a :lol: Should be self-evident by the mightiness of the roster.

Pay no attention to the 2nd 101289 that appears later down on the list. This was a flaw in the original Turkometer that did not acknowledge the mightiness of SeniorVBDStudents entry. The LOCK status was the quick fix that they came up with in order to duly recognize the might that is entry 101289.

-QG

PS - look for other posts in this thread by SeniorVBDStudent if you are still confused :mellow:
 
with all the stud definitions bouncing around, I would not list Foster as a stud. He was a value pick if viewing studs in the amount of $ a player cost.
I view Foster as an anomaly, as he was clearly perceived as a "stud" by most of the entrants at the time of the contest entry deadline, despite his $13 price tag -- I don't think anyone else has ever been owned by over 75% of entrants, or anywhere close to that. He should have cost at least around twice as much, putting him in the stud range. He was obviously mispriced because the pricing structure was put in place weeks earlier. If Adrian Peterson were mistakenly listed at $13, and then most of the entrants rostered him, I would also consider him to be a stud despite the price tag.
 
with all the stud definitions bouncing around, I would not list Foster as a stud. He was a value pick if viewing studs in the amount of $ a player cost.
I view Foster as an anomaly, as he was clearly perceived as a "stud" by most of the entrants at the time of the contest entry deadline, despite his $13 price tag -- I don't think anyone else has ever been owned by over 75% of entrants, or anywhere close to that. He should have cost at least around twice as much, putting him in the stud range. He was obviously mispriced because the pricing structure was put in place weeks earlier. If Adrian Peterson were mistakenly listed at $13, and then most of the entrants rostered him, I would also consider him to be a stud despite the price tag.
I doubt that he was perceived as a stud by the entry deadline. What he was perceived as was a "must have" for the price. I didn't expect anything close to the production he has had but figured a $13 starting RB was a must that pretty much everyone would have on their roster. Anyone that says they had him tagged as a "stud" prior to the season starting is a loon or a liar IMO.
 
with all the stud definitions bouncing around, I would not list Foster as a stud. He was a value pick if viewing studs in the amount of $ a player cost.
I view Foster as an anomaly, as he was clearly perceived as a "stud" by most of the entrants at the time of the contest entry deadline, despite his $13 price tag -- I don't think anyone else has ever been owned by over 75% of entrants, or anywhere close to that. He should have cost at least around twice as much, putting him in the stud range. He was obviously mispriced because the pricing structure was put in place weeks earlier. If Adrian Peterson were mistakenly listed at $13, and then most of the entrants rostered him, I would also consider him to be a stud despite the price tag.
I doubt that he was perceived as a stud by the entry deadline. What he was perceived as was a "must have" for the price. I didn't expect anything close to the production he has had but figured a $13 starting RB was a must that pretty much everyone would have on their roster. Anyone that says they had him tagged as a "stud" prior to the season starting is a loon or a liar IMO.
I got Foster in the 4th round of my ff draft just days before the season started. He certainly wasn't viewed as a universal stud then. He has become one since then.
 
with all the stud definitions bouncing around, I would not list Foster as a stud. He was a value pick if viewing studs in the amount of $ a player cost.
I view Foster as an anomaly, as he was clearly perceived as a "stud" by most of the entrants at the time of the contest entry deadline, despite his $13 price tag -- I don't think anyone else has ever been owned by over 75% of entrants, or anywhere close to that. He should have cost at least around twice as much, putting him in the stud range. He was obviously mispriced because the pricing structure was put in place weeks earlier. If Adrian Peterson were mistakenly listed at $13, and then most of the entrants rostered him, I would also consider him to be a stud despite the price tag.
I doubt that he was perceived as a stud by the entry deadline. What he was perceived as was a "must have" for the price. I didn't expect anything close to the production he has had but figured a $13 starting RB was a must that pretty much everyone would have on their roster. Anyone that says they had him tagged as a "stud" prior to the season starting is a loon or a liar IMO.
After the fact perspective stud :goodposting:
 
Wow. I can't believe I might survive this week. Looks like I'm at 140 points despite the following:

1. I have 2 QB's..one is Jay Cutler

2. Dez Bryant, Mike Williams, McCluster, Greg Camarillo and Andre Johnson...4 on byes, and Andre injured

3. I have one defense on the roster, the Cowboys..who were on bye

In my starting lineup this week were Jordy Nelson and Louis Murphy.

Fortunately, I had Kyle Orton, Arian Foster, Ladainian, Tolbert, Brandon Pettigrew, Harry Douglas...

I basically had 6 guys score me in the 140's and just barely made it.

That's the kind of week I needed to have a shot. Got some byes out of the way.

 
Pre-MNF sim. The cut will almost certainly be in the low 130s.
Simulator question for the Turk. I noticed this odd-ball projection:7100. Team 112845 | 66.5 | 133 | 170 133 133 133 133 133

Looking at the roster, it looks like the only player they have left is the Dolphins (-2.0)

The distribution of 133 in all cases then jumping sharply to 170 as a top score is a bit odd. It's further strange since I would think that the odds of the Dolphins defense getting more than 2 points would be pretty high.

Just figured I'd point it out in case there's a bug in the Turkometer.

-QG
You're looking at week 3 scores. SF scored 13 this week.
 
with all the stud definitions bouncing around, I would not list Foster as a stud. He was a value pick if viewing studs in the amount of $ a player cost.
I view Foster as an anomaly, as he was clearly perceived as a "stud" by most of the entrants at the time of the contest entry deadline, despite his $13 price tag -- I don't think anyone else has ever been owned by over 75% of entrants, or anywhere close to that. He should have cost at least around twice as much, putting him in the stud range. He was obviously mispriced because the pricing structure was put in place weeks earlier. If Adrian Peterson were mistakenly listed at $13, and then most of the entrants rostered him, I would also consider him to be a stud despite the price tag.
I doubt that he was perceived as a stud by the entry deadline. What he was perceived as was a "must have" for the price. I didn't expect anything close to the production he has had but figured a $13 starting RB was a must that pretty much everyone would have on their roster. Anyone that says they had him tagged as a "stud" prior to the season starting is a loon or a liar IMO.
It's all in the definition of "stud." I'm not saying anyone expected Foster to perform like he has so far, as the #1 RB by far (an "uber-stud"). Previous discussions of a "stud" here was about guys costing more than about $20-21. Most entrants thought he should have cost more than $20-21, and thus perceived him as a "stud" as previously discussed on this thread.
 
Foster would not be a stud under our definitions we were bouncing around in this thread. He was the cheapest starting RB out there, so a must have like mentioned above. He just is out performing his price so far, along with other players like LT. But it does not make them studs. Any rosters who had Foster as their 2nd RB would have been flawed in my view too. Since planning to rely on a potential boom or bust player for weekly points is a very risky move, especially in best ball in my view. He was the best looking #3 RB available though, thus many people picked him. ( though I figure many did pick him as their #2 RB... which pushed the percentage to such high amounts of ownership. but those will undoubtably be the teams falling off as the season progresses )

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top