cvnpoka said:no way he plays. out next week too. just hope he can return and be effective and doesnt get reinjured.
cvnpoka said:no way he plays. out next week too. just hope he can return and be effective and doesnt get reinjured.
Worst poster on these boards. Constantly makes terrible calls.cvnpoka said:no way he plays. out next week too. just hope he can return and be effective and doesnt get reinjured.
Big time concern for me--but as a Graham owner--what choice do we have but to play him? I got stuck playing Amaro on Thursday because I didn't know what to expect form the Graham situation--and now I'm left with choosing between Graham, Storm, Justin Hunter, or Zac Stacy as a flex. Unless Graham owners have a legit and solid second option--I think we just have to start him regardless of how low our confidence is.Any concerns that Graham will play today as a decoy and on a limited snap count?
He will definitely be on a limited snap count. So obviously concerns there are 1000% warranted.Any concerns that Graham will play today as a decoy and on a limited snap count?
Of course there's a concern. It's high risk/high reward. So weigh your options accordingly.Any concerns that Graham will play today as a decoy and on a limited snap count?
Just like it was definite he would be out this week?He will definitely be on a limited snap count. So obviously concerns there are 1000% warranted.Any concerns that Graham will play today as a decoy and on a limited snap count?
Decoy-risk is lower than the re-injury-risk, but they're both significant. But both of those risks are built into everyone's opinion already, so there's nothing new with either.
For sure. But when you're starting a TE that you're realistically expecting 3-4 catches from in his place I'd rather hope that Grahan can catch 3-4 passes with a better chance at a TD. Guys like Jordan Reed, Delanie Walker, etc are a different story though.Any concerns that Graham will play today as a decoy and on a limited snap count?
Ha! Well, nothing is definite! If he is pain-free and doing awesome, there's a chance he'll play 100% of snaps of course...but obviously that's unlikely. This is more art than science. I think the reality is that he got injured two weeks ago (the only facts I have since I do not attend Saints practices personally), and I'd bet you anything is snap percentage is less than 80%.Just like it was definite he would be out this week?He will definitely be on a limited snap count. So obviously concerns there are 1000% warranted.Any concerns that Graham will play today as a decoy and on a limited snap count?
Decoy-risk is lower than the re-injury-risk, but they're both significant. But both of those risks are built into everyone's opinion already, so there's nothing new with either.
That sounds absolutely arbitrary and also good enough for me to start him.FOX's Jay Glazer said the plan is for Jimmy Graham (shoulder) to play roughly 30 snaps in Sunday's game at Detroit.
It's probably because the plan is for the Saints to get into the redzone 30 times today. And each of those times it only takes 1 play to score. And each of those scores goes to Jimmy Graham.That sounds absolutely arbitrary and also good enough for me to start him.FOX's Jay Glazer said the plan is for Jimmy Graham (shoulder) to play roughly 30 snaps in Sunday's game at Detroit.
Kelce played on 29 before the bye.Can't bench Cameron/Kelce for 30 snaps - sorry Jimmy!
Did the same.I picked up Owen Daniels and ended up putting Graham in the last minute. Hate these mind games coaches play.
Shoulda known he wasn't gonna do much today. Damn!!!
How do you figure? It's saying Graham got 0 for my opponent this week on yahoo.Doughnut avoided although it did little to help my team.
I think he got the wrong Graham.How do you figure? It's saying Graham got 0 for my opponent this week on yahoo.Doughnut avoided although it did little to help my team.
No wins in the entire division this week...With another L this week don't know if they can keep this BS up and have a shot at the division.
Another week not making up any ground.No wins in the entire division this week...With another L this week don't know if they can keep this BS up and have a shot at the division.
I mean I benched him for Reed hence avoiding the zero, but Reed didn't do much better much like most of the rest of my team as well !How do you figure? It's saying Graham got 0 for my opponent this week on yahoo.Doughnut avoided although it did little to help my team.
half-empty vs half-full, etc.Another week not making up any ground.No wins in the entire division this week...With another L this week don't know if they can keep this BS up and have a shot at the division.
yup. pretty sure i was right about him not being able to play. just like with calvin.Worst poster on these boards. Constantly makes terrible calls.cvnpoka said:no way he plays. out next week too. just hope he can return and be effective and doesnt get reinjured.
2-4half-empty vs half-full, etc.Another week not making up any ground.No wins in the entire division this week...With another L this week don't know if they can keep this BS up and have a shot at the division.
Did he play? Didnt you say no way he plays? How are you right again?yup. pretty sure i was right about him not being able to play. just like with calvin.Worst poster on these boards. Constantly makes terrible calls.no way he plays. out next week too. just hope he can return and be effective and doesnt get reinjured.
glad my stalker is back tho.
Gross. I am going to sit him. Problem is, I picked up Josh Hill (14 team league, pickings are slim) as his replacement, but I can't start him with any confidence either.Theres a very real chance hes a decoy again next week
Yeah...no hiding from that.2-4half-empty vs half-full, etc.Another week not making up any ground.No wins in the entire division this week...With another L this week don't know if they can keep this BS up and have a shot at the division.
I'm going to continuing sitting him until he starts putting in some full practices. I may miss a huge game at some point, but I can't risk those zeros in a ppr league...Gross. I am going to sit him. Problem is, I picked up Josh Hill (14 team league, pickings are slim) as his replacement, but I can't start him with any confidence either.Theres a very real chance hes a decoy again next week
My biggest problem with coaches, not trying to score TDs every possible drive.Yeah...no hiding from that.2-4half-empty vs half-full, etc.Another week not making up any ground.No wins in the entire division this week...With another L this week don't know if they can keep this BS up and have a shot at the division.
I cant believe they were running so much inside their 25 up 10.
That was where it went off the rails. PUT THEM AWAY.
There was a ton of time at that point. Between 5-10 minutesMy biggest problem with coaches, not trying to score TDs every possible drive.Yeah...no hiding from that.2-4half-empty vs half-full, etc.Another week not making up any ground.No wins in the entire division this week...With another L this week don't know if they can keep this BS up and have a shot at the division.
I cant believe they were running so much inside their 25 up 10.
That was where it went off the rails. PUT THEM AWAY.
You might want to entertain a trade.Ugh. Benched Emmanuel Sanders, Roddy White, and Michael Floyd for Graham today.
twice. he looked like a shell of himself out there. barely ran routes without any energy, detroit said they had zero concerns about him. clearly a decoy.leftcoastguy7 said:Did he even get targeted yesterday?
immy Graham played on 30-of-75 snaps in Sunday's loss at Detroit.
Graham played enough snaps to be a factor, but he oddly wasn't really a part of the gameplan. He had zero catches on two targets and the Lions defenders said afterward they weren't worried about him. ESPN Saints reporter Mike Triplett says it's difficult to predict if Graham's role will increase going forward, as the tight end's ability to block and absorb contact are in doubt. Owners can just hang their hat on the fact that he didn't appear to suffer any setbacks Sunday.
Source: profootballfocus.com
Oct 20 - 8:22 AM