you will not. Fargo is a good movie wih solid actors. But it has limited staying power IMO. The plot is nothing new. About the only thing I enjoy in it are the accents. It's top 50 form the 90s. Not top 10Fargo is another highly overrated movie. Like The Unforgiven, I am sure I will be the only dissenting view.
This was the other universally praised film that did not make the AV Club top 50 films of the 90s.5. The Silence of the Lambs (1991)
Directed by: Jonathan Demme
Starring: Jodi Foster, Anthony Hopkins, Scott Glenn, Ted Levine
Synopsis: The FBI attempts to use a serial killer already in prison to help them catch another one on the loose.
It puts the lotion on its skin. - Ted Levine as Buffalo Bill
Scary as hell, intense as all get out, thrilling and exciting. Maybe the best psychological suspense film of all time? Everything about it is satisfying from beginning to end. I think the sequel was extremely disappointing and unnecessary.
My only qualm about this movie is a societal one- I believe that it in Buffalo Bill a negative stereotype of transgender persons was created that lasts to this day and continues to have an impact on modern society, a detrimental one IMO. I won’t say any more because I don’t want to derail this thread (or forum) with politics.
The song playing over the creepy stuff was by Goodbye Horses by Q Lazzarus, a transgender, who lucked into meeting the director Jonathan Demme in a cab and playing this track.I’ve never once thought of him as a transgender - I understand his “mission” with the skins he was taking - and have never heard it mentioned in context r with this movie anywhere by anyone prior to reading this.My only qualm about this movie is a societal one- I believe that it in Buffalo Bill a negative stereotype of transgender persons was created that lasts to this day and continues to have an impact on modern society, a detrimental one IMO.
“Goodbye Horses" quickly became a cult hit after Demme used it in a scene from his 1991 film The Silence of the Lambs.[3] In the scene, the film's antagonist, serial killer Buffalo Bill(portrayed by Ted Levine) puts on makeup in the mirror and plays with his nipple ring while his victim, Catherine Martin (Brooke Smith), attempts to escape from a deep pit. As the song plays, Buffalo Bill says to himself, "Would you **** me? I'd **** me. I'd **** me so hard", and then begins dancing naked into a video camera with his penis and testicles tucked between his legs as Catherine cries in the background.[13][15][17][18] "Goodbye Horses" was not in the script, and other songs by David Bowie and Mick Jaggerwere also considered for the scene.[19][16] It was originally rehearsed to Bob Seger's 1980 song "Her Strut", but "Goodbye Horses" was eventually chosen, with Levine saying that it became "a little gentler", "stranger", and "more feminine" as a result.
It places the lotion in the basket
Now it's my turn.
While Hannibal Lecter is an all time great villain, the movie is not much more than an afterthought to me.![]()
The more I rewatch it, the more I think it is a rare perfect movie, and what really elevates it is Demme's direction. I love that it starts and ends with credits over the action. The Demme close ups really ramped up the tension as Lecter's face fills the screen looking you in the eye. I could go on. The acting is great, and what sticks out to me is all the memorable side characters as well from the warm Barney to the sniveling Chilton to the bug nerds. I love it for basically all the reasons I grew to love Fargo as much as I do. Fargo makes me laugh more and Silence scares me more.Now it's my turn.
While Hannibal Lecter is an all time great villain, the movie is not much more than an afterthought to me.![]()
I do like me some Happy Gilmore and Wedding Singer, but that's about it.Now it's my turn.
While Hannibal Lecter is an all time great villain, the movie is not much more than an afterthought to me.![]()
Im sure there's an Adam Sandler movie out there for you.![]()
Aura-GAHNI rather enjoy it now when we go to Michigan to visit my wife's family and listen to all of them butcher the pronunciation of the challenging word "Oregon". I don't dare correct them; it tickles me at this point. They're all so midwestern nice and they all live like 10 miles from where they grew up but my word, it's crazy how badly they miss on this one.
Ditto. It was fine. I enjoyed it — then found out after seeing it that it was beloved by two groups of people: those from Minnesota and those who had never been to Minnesota.I’m a little bit with you. I think it’s a good movie, maybe even very good, but it’s not among the Coens’ best. A little too quirky just for the sake of it. I’ve never felt the need to rewatch, unlike many of their other films.Fargo is another highly overrated movie. Like The Unforgiven, I am sure I will be the only dissenting view.
5. The Silence of the Lambs (1991)
Directed by: Jonathan Demme
Starring: Jodi Foster, Anthony Hopkins, Scott Glenn, Ted Levine
Synopsis: The FBI attempts to use a serial killer already in prison to help them catch another one on the loose.
Fixed5. The Silence of the Lambs (1991)
Directed by: Jonathan Demme
Starring: Jodi Foster, Anthony Hopkins, Scott Glenn, Ted Levine
Synopsis: The FBI attempts to use a serial killer already in prison to help them catch another one on the loose.
TotalBangers and fava beans with a nice chianti
Seriously?I really liked A Serious Man I’d take it over any of the best picture winners that yearLebowski is the other for me ive grown to love, so my list is your 1st two and that one. I haven't see. A Serious Man yet.Fargo, No Country, and a Serious Man are fantastic. Most of the rest are just OK imoThat is weird, because that I how I feel about 80% of their movies, and think Fargo is one of their more straight forward movies.I’m a little bit with you. I think it’s a good movie, maybe even very good, but it’s not among the Coens’ best. A little too quirky just for the sake of it. I’ve never felt the need to rewatch, unlike many of their other films.Fargo is another highly overrated movie. Like The Unforgiven, I am sure I will be the only dissenting view.
Also think we might have a glaring omission on another Coen movie, almost as if Tim is giving it the high hat
I have only seen it once and it was probably about the time it came out. I am not a QT fan in general and I have given his movies opportunities. I am just always disappointed as they haven't lived up to the hype for me.4. Pulp Fiction (1994)
Directed by: Quentin Tarantino
Starring: John Travolta, Samuel L. Jackson, Uma Thurman, Bruce Willis, Ving Rhames
Synopsis: A day in the life of various low level crime figures is told out of order.
(after shooting someone on the couch) I’m sorry did I break your concentration? I didn’t mean to do that. You were saying about best intentions? - Samuel L. Jackson as Jules
I remember seeing this in the theater and thinking it was unlike any film I had ever watched before because of its non-linear nature. I especially love, with regard to this, how Travolta’s character is featured so prominently in the first and third part of the movie but dies suddenly and almost casually in the middle part. So well done. But the whole film is well done, just really smart with one great scene after another. I’m not sure it’s Tarantino’s best film (I adore Inglorious Basterds as well) but these two rise above the rest IMO.
Same. I like a few QT movies but after the first viewing of Pulp Fiction I've never felt the urge to watch again.I have only seen it once and it was probably about the time it came out. I am not a QT fan in general and I have given his movies opportunities. I am just always disappointed as they haven't lived up to the hype for me.4. Pulp Fiction (1994)
Directed by: Quentin Tarantino
Starring: John Travolta, Samuel L. Jackson, Uma Thurman, Bruce Willis, Ving Rhames
Synopsis: A day in the life of various low level crime figures is told out of order.
(after shooting someone on the couch) I’m sorry did I break your concentration? I didn’t mean to do that. You were saying about best intentions? - Samuel L. Jackson as Jules
I remember seeing this in the theater and thinking it was unlike any film I had ever watched before because of its non-linear nature. I especially love, with regard to this, how Travolta’s character is featured so prominently in the first and third part of the movie but dies suddenly and almost casually in the middle part. So well done. But the whole film is well done, just really smart with one great scene after another. I’m not sure it’s Tarantino’s best film (I adore Inglorious Basterds as well) but these two rise above the rest IMO.
When I saw Pulp Fiction it was fine. I actually really have no memories of what it is even about. I know have seen it but couldn't really say anything about it. I probably ought to give it another chance but since i seem to always be disappointed in QT movies I haven't been able to bring myself to watch it again.
Which do you like? What was it about Pulp that made you not want to revisit it?Same. I like a few QT movies but after the first viewing of Pulp Fiction I've never felt the urge to watch again.I have only seen it once and it was probably about the time it came out. I am not a QT fan in general and I have given his movies opportunities. I am just always disappointed as they haven't lived up to the hype for me.4. Pulp Fiction (1994)
Directed by: Quentin Tarantino
Starring: John Travolta, Samuel L. Jackson, Uma Thurman, Bruce Willis, Ving Rhames
Synopsis: A day in the life of various low level crime figures is told out of order.
(after shooting someone on the couch) I’m sorry did I break your concentration? I didn’t mean to do that. You were saying about best intentions? - Samuel L. Jackson as Jules
I remember seeing this in the theater and thinking it was unlike any film I had ever watched before because of its non-linear nature. I especially love, with regard to this, how Travolta’s character is featured so prominently in the first and third part of the movie but dies suddenly and almost casually in the middle part. So well done. But the whole film is well done, just really smart with one great scene after another. I’m not sure it’s Tarantino’s best film (I adore Inglorious Basterds as well) but these two rise above the rest IMO.
When I saw Pulp Fiction it was fine. I actually really have no memories of what it is even about. I know have seen it but couldn't really say anything about it. I probably ought to give it another chance but since i seem to always be disappointed in QT movies I haven't been able to bring myself to watch it again.
But sometime I'll give it another chance.
4. Pulp Fiction (1994)
Directed by: Quentin Tarantino
Starring: John Travolta, Samuel L. Jackson, Uma Thurman, Bruce Willis, Ving Rhames
Synopsis: A day in the life of various low level crime figures is told out of order.
I really like. Kill Bill 1 & 2 and Inglorious Basterds. I thought Reservoir Dogs was decent - a recent rewatch didn't move the needle much.Which do you like? What was it about Pulp that made you not want to revisit it?Same. I like a few QT movies but after the first viewing of Pulp Fiction I've never felt the urge to watch again.I have only seen it once and it was probably about the time it came out. I am not a QT fan in general and I have given his movies opportunities. I am just always disappointed as they haven't lived up to the hype for me.4. Pulp Fiction (1994)
Directed by: Quentin Tarantino
Starring: John Travolta, Samuel L. Jackson, Uma Thurman, Bruce Willis, Ving Rhames
Synopsis: A day in the life of various low level crime figures is told out of order.
(after shooting someone on the couch) I’m sorry did I break your concentration? I didn’t mean to do that. You were saying about best intentions? - Samuel L. Jackson as Jules
I remember seeing this in the theater and thinking it was unlike any film I had ever watched before because of its non-linear nature. I especially love, with regard to this, how Travolta’s character is featured so prominently in the first and third part of the movie but dies suddenly and almost casually in the middle part. So well done. But the whole film is well done, just really smart with one great scene after another. I’m not sure it’s Tarantino’s best film (I adore Inglorious Basterds as well) but these two rise above the rest IMO.
When I saw Pulp Fiction it was fine. I actually really have no memories of what it is even about. I know have seen it but couldn't really say anything about it. I probably ought to give it another chance but since i seem to always be disappointed in QT movies I haven't been able to bring myself to watch it again.
But sometime I'll give it another chance.
Great last three movies.Great last couple of movies.
Saw it in the theater on State Street in Madison WI during undergrad. Went with my gf (now wife), college roommate, and another female friend. We all walked out of the theater in a daze asking “what did we just see?!?”4. Pulp Fiction (1994)
Directed by: Quentin Tarantino
Starring: John Travolta, Samuel L. Jackson, Uma Thurman, Bruce Willis, Ving Rhames
Synopsis: A day in the life of various low level crime figures is told out of order.
(after shooting someone on the couch) I’m sorry did I break your concentration? I didn’t mean to do that. You were saying about best intentions? - Samuel L. Jackson as Jules
I remember seeing this in the theater and thinking it was unlike any film I had ever watched before because of its non-linear nature. I especially love, with regard to this, how Travolta’s character is featured so prominently in the first and third part of the movie but dies suddenly and almost casually in the middle part. So well done. But the whole film is well done, just really smart with one great scene after another. I’m not sure it’s Tarantino’s best film (I adore Inglorious Basterds as well) but these two rise above the rest IMO.
It’s up there for me as well. May not hit as hard now because the QT shtick is well worn, but it made a huge impact on me when I saw it first the first time.Pulp Fiction is tremendous. IMO it tiptoed the line between weird and cool perfectly. Sometimes QT ventures too far one way or the other, but I loved the balance in Pulp Fiction. I was curious, confused and impressed over and over.
Great movie and I may have put it #1 if this was my list.
Same in that I saw PF before I watched Reservoir Dogs and had no expectations but was blown away by the non-linear story telling and the dialogue.Aside from A New Hope and Empire Strikes Back, Pulp Fiction is probably the movie that I've seen the most. And much of that viewing was within a few years of its original release. I think I saw it about five times in the theater. The first time I went, I don't think I had heard of QT nor did I know of any hype for the film. I hadn't seen nor heard of Reservoir Dogs. I went in totally blind.
Saw it in the theater on State Street in Madison WI during undergrad. Went with my gf (now wife), college roommate, and another female friend. We all walked out of the theater in a daze asking “what did we just see?!?”
I still remember the crowd erupting with tense laughter and applause when Bruce Willis grabs the chainsaw followed by the samurai sword.
It’s my most memorable theater viewing experience of all time (followed closely by Empire and Raiders).
Oh man, we were there at the same time. I have a memory of seeing it a smaller theater on campus - Union South, maybe? Not exactly sure where I saw it, but I remember being the only one of the group who didn't like it.Saw it in the theater on State Street in Madison WI during undergrad. Went with my gf (now wife), college roommate, and another female friend. We all walked out of the theater in a daze asking “what did we just see?!?”4. Pulp Fiction (1994)
Directed by: Quentin Tarantino
Starring: John Travolta, Samuel L. Jackson, Uma Thurman, Bruce Willis, Ving Rhames
Synopsis: A day in the life of various low level crime figures is told out of order.
(after shooting someone on the couch) I’m sorry did I break your concentration? I didn’t mean to do that. You were saying about best intentions? - Samuel L. Jackson as Jules
I remember seeing this in the theater and thinking it was unlike any film I had ever watched before because of its non-linear nature. I especially love, with regard to this, how Travolta’s character is featured so prominently in the first and third part of the movie but dies suddenly and almost casually in the middle part. So well done. But the whole film is well done, just really smart with one great scene after another. I’m not sure it’s Tarantino’s best film (I adore Inglorious Basterds as well) but these two rise above the rest IMO.
I still remember the crowd erupting with tense laughter and applause when Bruce Willis grabs the chainsaw followed by the samurai sword.
It’s my most memorable theater viewing experience of all time (followed closely by Empire and Raiders).
I do like me some Happy Gilmore and Wedding Singer, but that's about it.Now it's my turn.
While Hannibal Lecter is an all time great villain, the movie is not much more than an afterthought to me.![]()
Im sure there's an Adam Sandler movie out there for you.![]()
I do like me some Happy Gilmore and Wedding Singer, but that's about it.Now it's my turn.
While Hannibal Lecter is an all time great villain, the movie is not much more than an afterthought to me.![]()
Im sure there's an Adam Sandler movie out there for you.![]()
I like Adam Sandler the person and the comic but his slapstick movies are torture for me.
Aura-GAHNI rather enjoy it now when we go to Michigan to visit my wife's family and listen to all of them butcher the pronunciation of the challenging word "Oregon". I don't dare correct them; it tickles me at this point. They're all so midwestern nice and they all live like 10 miles from where they grew up but my word, it's crazy how badly they miss on this one.
Yep. Little Nicky was the beginning of the end.I
I do like me some Happy Gilmore and Wedding Singer, but that's about it.Now it's my turn.
While Hannibal Lecter is an all time great villain, the movie is not much more than an afterthought to me.![]()
Im sure there's an Adam Sandler movie out there for you.![]()
I like Adam Sandler the person and the comic but his slapstick movies are torture for me.
Everything slapstick before Little Nicky was entertaining, everything including and after sucks IMO
That second pronunciation is probably from southerners who moved to Detroit to work in the auto industry in the 70sAura-GAHNI rather enjoy it now when we go to Michigan to visit my wife's family and listen to all of them butcher the pronunciation of the challenging word "Oregon". I don't dare correct them; it tickles me at this point. They're all so midwestern nice and they all live like 10 miles from where they grew up but my word, it's crazy how badly they miss on this one.
Nailed it. This is precisely how they pronounce it.
Although sometimes they speed up the pace and pronounce it like "Argon" the gas, element #18 on your periodic table.
Yep. Little Nicky was the beginning of the end.I
I do like me some Happy Gilmore and Wedding Singer, but that's about it.Now it's my turn.
While Hannibal Lecter is an all time great villain, the movie is not much more than an afterthought to me.![]()
Im sure there's an Adam Sandler movie out there for you.![]()
I like Adam Sandler the person and the comic but his slapstick movies are torture for me.
Everything slapstick before Little Nicky was entertaining, everything including and after sucks IMO
Looks like you need a shower stinkyYep. Little Nicky was the beginning of the end.I
I do like me some Happy Gilmore and Wedding Singer, but that's about it.Now it's my turn.
While Hannibal Lecter is an all time great villain, the movie is not much more than an afterthought to me.![]()
Im sure there's an Adam Sandler movie out there for you.![]()
I like Adam Sandler the person and the comic but his slapstick movies are torture for me.
Everything slapstick before Little Nicky was entertaining, everything including and after sucks IMO
I dunno, man. At the risk of getting barked at by Blocked Punt, Waterboy has a 33% Rotten Tomatoes score. Can we at least admit his antics were wearing thin for many of us before Little NIcky?
I’m the same as well. I don’t like the comically gratuitous violence, nor over-the-top banter. So, pretty much his entire style.Which do you like? What was it about Pulp that made you not want to revisit it?Same. I like a few QT movies but after the first viewing of Pulp Fiction I've never felt the urge to watch again.I have only seen it once and it was probably about the time it came out. I am not a QT fan in general and I have given his movies opportunities. I am just always disappointed as they haven't lived up to the hype for me.4. Pulp Fiction (1994)
Directed by: Quentin Tarantino
Starring: John Travolta, Samuel L. Jackson, Uma Thurman, Bruce Willis, Ving Rhames
Synopsis: A day in the life of various low level crime figures is told out of order.
(after shooting someone on the couch) I’m sorry did I break your concentration? I didn’t mean to do that. You were saying about best intentions? - Samuel L. Jackson as Jules
I remember seeing this in the theater and thinking it was unlike any film I had ever watched before because of its non-linear nature. I especially love, with regard to this, how Travolta’s character is featured so prominently in the first and third part of the movie but dies suddenly and almost casually in the middle part. So well done. But the whole film is well done, just really smart with one great scene after another. I’m not sure it’s Tarantino’s best film (I adore Inglorious Basterds as well) but these two rise above the rest IMO.
When I saw Pulp Fiction it was fine. I actually really have no memories of what it is even about. I know have seen it but couldn't really say anything about it. I probably ought to give it another chance but since i seem to always be disappointed in QT movies I haven't been able to bring myself to watch it again.
But sometime I'll give it another chance.
but the audience score is 71% and it has a 6.1 on IMDB. Don't really care if you dislike it and I agree that it probably wouldn't make my list. Tim is likely in a very similar boat as me, I watched this multiple times when it came out tv. I laughed, I found it memorable and there are a lot of us commoners that do. Critics generally hate comedy anyways.Yep. Little Nicky was the beginning of the end.I
I do like me some Happy Gilmore and Wedding Singer, but that's about it.Now it's my turn.
While Hannibal Lecter is an all time great villain, the movie is not much more than an afterthought to me.![]()
Im sure there's an Adam Sandler movie out there for you.![]()
I like Adam Sandler the person and the comic but his slapstick movies are torture for me.
Everything slapstick before Little Nicky was entertaining, everything including and after sucks IMO
I dunno, man. At the risk of getting barked at by Blocked Punt, Waterboy has a 33% Rotten Tomatoes score. Can we at least admit his antics were wearing thin for many of us before Little NIcky?
Yeah... that's fine.Yep. Little Nicky was the beginning of the end.I
I do like me some Happy Gilmore and Wedding Singer, but that's about it.Now it's my turn.
While Hannibal Lecter is an all time great villain, the movie is not much more than an afterthought to me.![]()
Im sure there's an Adam Sandler movie out there for you.![]()
I like Adam Sandler the person and the comic but his slapstick movies are torture for me.
Everything slapstick before Little Nicky was entertaining, everything including and after sucks IMO
I dunno, man. At the risk of getting barked at by Blocked Punt, Waterboy has a 33% Rotten Tomatoes score. Can we at least admit his antics were wearing thin for many of us before Little NIcky?
Yeah... that's fine.Yep. Little Nicky was the beginning of the end.I
I do like me some Happy Gilmore and Wedding Singer, but that's about it.Now it's my turn.
While Hannibal Lecter is an all time great villain, the movie is not much more than an afterthought to me.![]()
Im sure there's an Adam Sandler movie out there for you.![]()
I like Adam Sandler the person and the comic but his slapstick movies are torture for me.
Everything slapstick before Little Nicky was entertaining, everything including and after sucks IMO
I dunno, man. At the risk of getting barked at by Blocked Punt, Waterboy has a 33% Rotten Tomatoes score. Can we at least admit his antics were wearing thin for many of us before Little NIcky?
Young me still liked Waterboy but young me would have laughed at Sandler, Farley, and Spade around that time if they were standing stoic at a funeral.
Little Nicky was for me the first time I went, "uhhh this isn't funny..."
Grown Ups was good. I do check it out when its on. Grown Ups 2 as well.Y'all are sleeping on Deeds and Grown Ups.![]()
Yeah... that's fine.Yep. Little Nicky was the beginning of the end.I
I do like me some Happy Gilmore and Wedding Singer, but that's about it.Now it's my turn.
While Hannibal Lecter is an all time great villain, the movie is not much more than an afterthought to me.![]()
Im sure there's an Adam Sandler movie out there for you.![]()
I like Adam Sandler the person and the comic but his slapstick movies are torture for me.
Everything slapstick before Little Nicky was entertaining, everything including and after sucks IMO
I dunno, man. At the risk of getting barked at by Blocked Punt, Waterboy has a 33% Rotten Tomatoes score. Can we at least admit his antics were wearing thin for many of us before Little NIcky?
Young me still liked Waterboy but young me would have laughed at Sandler, Farley, and Spade around that time if they were standing stoic at a funeral.
Little Nicky was for me the first time I went, "uhhh this isn't funny..."
I've got what, 15 years on you? I remember watching Billy Maddison right after I graduated college and was smoking weed daily, so I did laugh at this one. But I remember watching a few years later and it just didn't do it for me anymore. I still find Tommyboy funny, but that's because I really like buddy movies and Spade and Farley were terrific together (although Black Sheep was a big whiff for me).
Like I said, I do like Adam Sandler and think he's a very funny person, but the yelling and screaming and silly voices just don't do anything but annoy me now.
I used to think highly of all of youI’m the same as well. I don’t like the comically gratuitous violence, nor over-the-top banter. So, pretty much his entire style.Which do you like? What was it about Pulp that made you not want to revisit it?Same. I like a few QT movies but after the first viewing of Pulp Fiction I've never felt the urge to watch again.I have only seen it once and it was probably about the time it came out. I am not a QT fan in general and I have given his movies opportunities. I am just always disappointed as they haven't lived up to the hype for me.4. Pulp Fiction (1994)
Directed by: Quentin Tarantino
Starring: John Travolta, Samuel L. Jackson, Uma Thurman, Bruce Willis, Ving Rhames
Synopsis: A day in the life of various low level crime figures is told out of order.
(after shooting someone on the couch) I’m sorry did I break your concentration? I didn’t mean to do that. You were saying about best intentions? - Samuel L. Jackson as Jules
I remember seeing this in the theater and thinking it was unlike any film I had ever watched before because of its non-linear nature. I especially love, with regard to this, how Travolta’s character is featured so prominently in the first and third part of the movie but dies suddenly and almost casually in the middle part. So well done. But the whole film is well done, just really smart with one great scene after another. I’m not sure it’s Tarantino’s best film (I adore Inglorious Basterds as well) but these two rise above the rest IMO.
When I saw Pulp Fiction it was fine. I actually really have no memories of what it is even about. I know have seen it but couldn't really say anything about it. I probably ought to give it another chance but since i seem to always be disappointed in QT movies I haven't been able to bring myself to watch it again.
But sometime I'll give it another chance.