This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
We do what we're paid to do.What do you think the models are thinking when they have to wear that stuff?If you think short suits may not catch on, get a hold of floral short suits
http://www.mensfashionmagazine.com/the-floral-print-trend-2014
They detract a bit from the cool socks.
Agreed. If it's a true dress shirt, no pocket ever. If it's more of a semi casual deal you'd wear with khakis or jeans, I actually like a pocket.
I agree with this.
Nice, but a little too brown and formal for my liking if you're looking for a versatile dress up and down brogue. I like the slightly lighter tan color and styling of these...
Thanks man, I'll look at these too. No immediate rush for me, just want something once fall rolls around.
More of a rush if you want to get those Strands offdee linked above at the Nordstrom anniversary sale price of $240, which runs through Aug 3.
Only issue with Bucks... which I like a lot... are that I see them being tied to this year, when they've had a major resurgence. I think they might seem dated within a year or two, moreso than those first wingtips.
I am serious about getting a nice pair of leather shoes, but if I had to get 1 additional pair for versatility/to give the leathers a breather, it's definitely bucks in some shade of brown. Like the Sahara shade, will definitely keep these on the list.
Thanks man, I appreciate you pointing that out. I'd much rather make a big purchase on something a little more boring/conservative that won't be tied to a trend, and will always "just look good" in a timeless way. I had bucks in HS, they were nice but I haven't owned any since. Kind of hate that they're trendy now around the time of my re-entry point, because they "should" be timeless if worn correctly. Will dwell on that, but thanks again for pointing that out.Only issue with Bucks... which I like a lot... are that I see them being tied to this year, when they've had a major resurgence. I think they might seem dated within a year or two, moreso than those first wingtips.
I am serious about getting a nice pair of leather shoes, but if I had to get 1 additional pair for versatility/to give the leathers a breather, it's definitely bucks in some shade of brown. Like the Sahara shade, will definitely keep these on the list.
IMO, the wingtips you first listed can go casual really well- the soles make them less formal. But they can dress up too- just not too much.
i remember that too. The one thing I will say about JCrew is that it is better made stuff now. I'm not sure if it is worth the money but at least it is quality.
I agree with this
They are probably referring to the colorful rubber soles, which doesn't exactly scream timeless. Popular now though.
there are like 3 things availble for men. and they slowly cycle in and out of style/trend. you can take the approach that none of them really go out of style and just keep wearing them, or try to stay current and wear what the cool kids are wearing.
![[icon]](/data/avatars/m/5/5167.jpg?1660313464){kind=avatar}
And plenty decently made ones that don't cost a fortune. They aren't going anywhere.
First ones are awful and square toed. The AEs are decent looking if you find them comfortable, though they are a more casual shoe with the stitching. That zappos price on them isn't good.
I'm confused how one person could be debating between these two pairs. Opposite ends of the :style: spectrum.
Not a big fan of square toe or mixing brown stitching on a black shoe.
I work in a business casual setting. It is extremely rare that I see an untucked polo, and I generally think it looks sloppy with chinos/slacks. Just my opinion though.
For anyone needing a dressy pair of shoes, the Vernon for $199 is a very nice option. I have the Kenilworth in black, which also dresses up well. It's even cheaper. Tempted to add a bourbon pair now.
Agreed on no untucked with chinos/slacks. I'd only go untucked with jeans and even that depends on the shirt.I work in a business casual setting. It is extremely rare that I see an untucked polo, and I generally think it looks sloppy with chinos/slacks. Just my opinion though.
As far as black shirts, I've done black shirts with tan slacks, but black belt and shoes. But, I'm not sure if this is ok.
FTR, my tan slacks don't have pleats, if that helps at all.Agreed on no untucked with chinos/slacks. I'd only go untucked with jeans and even that depends on the shirt.I work in a business casual setting. It is extremely rare that I see an untucked polo, and I generally think it looks sloppy with chinos/slacks. Just my opinion though.
As far as black shirts, I've done black shirts with tan slacks, but black belt and shoes. But, I'm not sure if this is ok.
It bothers me when I see the black shirt/belt/shoes combo with khakis. Turrible. Might be more ok with tan slacks... can't recall noticing. For me at least the shoes are the big problem.
Seems like charcoal or light gray pants would be best (or jeans if acceptable). Not black, Johnny Cash.
Black shirts can go with anything.Disco Stu said:Agreed on no untucked with chinos/slacks. I'd only go untucked with jeans and even that depends on the shirt.Bull Dozier said:I work in a business casual setting. It is extremely rare that I see an untucked polo, and I generally think it looks sloppy with chinos/slacks. Just my opinion though.As far as black shirts, I've done black shirts with tan slacks, but black belt and shoes. But, I'm not sure if this is ok.Northern Voice said:
It bothers me when I see the black shirt/belt/shoes combo with khakis. Turrible. Might be more ok with tan slacks... can't recall noticing. For me at least the shoes are the big problem.
Seems like charcoal or light gray pants would be best (or jeans if acceptable). Not black, Johnny Cash.
Guys - I'm obviously not the king of fashion by any stretch. But I do try to stay current. Older guy, but wearing flat front slacks, no cuffs and fitted shirts. I've never been a shoe guy. Trying to get to the next level and compliment my wardrobe as I have to go to an office more now. So I have bought some new slacks, new shirts, and now need to round out with shoes/belts. I'm one of those guys who wears black shoes way too much. Trying to change that. And I know Eccos aren't at the top of the fashion food chain. That being said, I HATE shoes that take a long time to break in. Deal breaker for me. Trying walking miles in shoes at McCormick Place in Chicago at a convention. So I need versatility, style, and comfort. I don't want outrageous. Multi-colored oxfords are just not me. But I want a very good brown/tan shoe that I can also dress down with jeans. Just go AE with those? Where's the best place to buy?Also- is that enough or do I need another pair/style/color? I don't want to spend $600 on a shoe either. I'll spend in the $200's or $300's max.BobbyLayne said:
We're within a year age wise and I'm in the same place, looking forward to opinions.
Disco Stu said:
Huge. I like websites.
Stu nails it of course.Disco Stu said:Agreed on no untucked with chinos/slacks. I'd only go untucked with jeans and even that depends on the shirt.Bull Dozier said:I work in a business casual setting. It is extremely rare that I see an untucked polo, and I generally think it looks sloppy with chinos/slacks. Just my opinion though.Northern Voice said:
As far as black shirts, I've done black shirts with tan slacks, but black belt and shoes. But, I'm not sure if this is ok.
It bothers me when I see the black shirt/belt/shoes combo with khakis. Turrible. Might be more ok with tan slacks... can't recall noticing. For me at least the shoes are the big problem.
Seems like charcoal or light gray pants would be best (or jeans if acceptable). Not black, Johnny Cash.
