Apparently I missed something there as I didn't think that character was that good. He was fine but nothing special IMO.You're probably not wrong that the end of the character bled into my subconscious when I did my rankings. I admit I only looked for Emmy wins in this category.
I also grew up with Will Smith so I see him as the superior character regardless (and the other two judges seem to agree).
Comedy is so subjective it is not surprising there is a wide variety on people's opinions. In this case, the 3 judges were pretty well aligned. I know it was a top ranked comedy for many years, I just flat out did not find the show very funny, and Charlie in particular I found much more obnoxious than funny. Conchatta Ferrell and Jon Cryer were the better parts of the show to me, but overall just wasn't a fan.You're probably not wrong that the end of the character bled into my subconscious when I did my rankings. I admit I only looked for Emmy wins in this category.
I also grew up with Will Smith so I see him as the superior character regardless (and the other two judges seem to agree).
Very true and it is why this draft scoring is such a wild ride.Comedy is so subjective it is not surprising there is a wide variety on people's opinions. In this case, the 3 judges were pretty well aligned. I know it was a top ranked comedy for many years, I just flat out did not find the show very funny, and Charlie in particular I found much more obnoxious than funny. Conchatta Ferrell and Jon Cryer were the better parts of the show to me, but overall just wasn't a fan.
I have a highly defined and metric driven "obnoxious/funny" line. Berta had a raw score of 48.72 whereas Charlie was 53.69. This gap further widened however when intangibles were taken into account, with Berta's adjusted score dropping only to a 45.32 while Charlie's inflated to a wild 72.08. According to the numbers, Berta fell just barely on the funny side where Charlie was clearly obnoxious by either raw or adjusted metrics.Very true and it is why this draft scoring is such a wild ride.Comedy is so subjective it is not surprising there is a wide variety on people's opinions. In this case, the 3 judges were pretty well aligned. I know it was a top ranked comedy for many years, I just flat out did not find the show very funny, and Charlie in particular I found much more obnoxious than funny. Conchatta Ferrell and Jon Cryer were the better parts of the show to me, but overall just wasn't a fan.
ETA: Berta was very obnoxious as well as Charlie. That was the humor style. Not sure how you saw one as obnoxious and not funny and the other funny. That seems odd to me.
show dont work without Charlie. except for a mild affinity for Dharma and Greg because the lead reminded me of my Mary, i don't like Chuck Lorre shows, but find 2.5 behind only 30Rock as the funniest show of this century. yes, ahead of Curb, Office, Schitt's Creek, Here's Sarah Huckaby Sanders!I have a highly defined and metric driven "obnoxious/funny" line. Berta had a raw score of 48.72 whereas Charlie was 53.69. This gap further widened however when intangibles were taken into account, with Berta's adjusted score dropping only to a 45.32 while Charlie's inflated to a wild 72.08. According to the numbers, Berta fell just barely on the funny side where Charlie was clearly obnoxious by either raw or adjusted metrics.
Exactly.show dont work without Charlie. except for a mild affinity for Dharma and Greg because the lead reminded me of my Mary, i don't like Chuck Lorre shows, but find 2.5 behind only 30Rock as the funniest show of this century. yes, ahead of Curb, Office, Schitt's Creek, Here's Sarah Huckaby Sanders!
Cryer, Ferrell, the star turns of myriad hotties are just planets, Sheen's the star, as vital as Sam to Cheers. without his reflected light they are but frantic orbs. cropdusters waiting for Cary Grant. i'd have him behind only the Big 3 and House
There's no doubt that Sheen was the star. For me, it was the bolded, the show didn't work for me. I'm clearly in the minority though because it was the top rated comedy for a decade.Exactly.show dont work without Charlie. except for a mild affinity for Dharma and Greg because the lead reminded me of my Mary, i don't like Chuck Lorre shows, but find 2.5 behind only 30Rock as the funniest show of this century. yes, ahead of Curb, Office, Schitt's Creek, Here's Sarah Huckaby Sanders!
Cryer, Ferrell, the star turns of myriad hotties are just planets, Sheen's the star, as vital as Sam to Cheers. without his reflected light they are but frantic orbs. cropdusters waiting for Cary Grant. i'd have him behind only the Big 3 and House
You’re missing my 11 points for Homeland / Action in that number too.1 --Yo Mama--525
2 --mphtrilogy--461
3 --tuffnutt--449
4 --KarmaPolice--445
5 --timschochet--439
6 --jwb--437
7 --AcerFC--435
8 --Tolstoy--431
9 --Gally Steiner--428
10 -TripleLayne--405
11 -Zow--401
12 -Doug B--394
13 -Hov34--387
14 -Mrs. Rannous--387
15 -Pitchfork--387
16 -rick6668--378
And I’m not fixing it you little whiny babyYou’re missing my 11 points for Homeland / Action in that number too.
Team GallStein took Seinfeld for GOATIt's a tight race from 3-9. Who took what for GOAT?
I have to think your third-place ranking won't be hurt by having this.I have Cheers for GOAT
Depends what 4-6 have as their submissions. I would be surprised if Cheers was higher than 7th or 8th and wouldn't be surprised if it wasn't in the top 10 (I have it in my top 5). Without seeing the complete list I would estimate it finishes 11th.krista4 said:I have to think your third-place ranking won't be hurt by having this.
The Adam Gace of TimDrafts up in here. Sorry, Pitch1 --Yo Mama--536
...
11 -Zow--401
12 -Doug B--394
13 -Hov34--387
14 -Mrs. Rannous--387
15 -Pitchfork--387
16 -rick6668--378
Not enough menace?Worst net value: -7 for Batman in the infamous Hero rankings – 4 points for the sixth pick in the category
Apparently not. Should have taken the cartoon one.Not enough menace?
lolYou might want to post faster before you get banned again.
I think tim is just making it up as he goes.Are all the GOAT nominations listed somewhere? I checked the spreadsheet and didn't see them listed.
timschochet: I love LucyAre all the GOAT nominations listed somewhere? I checked the spreadsheet and didn't see them listed.
You're back!Family Ties was criminally underrated in this draft. Mork and Mindy? Give me a break.
That tooFamily Ties was criminally underrated in this draft. Mork and Mindy? Give me a break.
Not my pick, so this isn't meant as a complaint, just observation about judging this category...The Greatest Shows of All Time
9 Pts Star Trek (The Original Series)
No problem. Mad Men was an excellent show and would have done well on this list. How well, especially in relation to Seinfeld, I’m not sure about that. I’ll give that some thought.Not my pick, so this isn't meant as a complaint, just observation about judging this category...
I think in some ways it should be ranked higher for all the meta-level notes it hit; at its best, the show was simply a vehicle for addressing social issues, and Rodenberry and co. did it in a way that was both revealing yet removed enough that their message was able to probe sensitive spots with a gentle touch. The story of Nichelle Nichols staying on the show because Martin Luther King told her that it was important to see people of color holding high-profile roles in the future is becoming more well known as the years go by, and IMO set the standard for what diversity on TV should look like, which is a tough factor to work into calculating a show's all-time value but should be considered nonetheless. You rightly pointed out how the show itself lost its way toward the end of its initial run, but without knowing for sure, I would guess, just like with The Smothers Brothers show, executives and powers that be in the business were too uncomfortable/feared losing sponsors over potentially controversial material. Regardless of what the true factors were that ended the show, pound for pound it created a longer wake behind it than most shows, a fact that should have carried higher than 14 out of the 16 choices given.
FWIW, I agree with the other picks revealed so far. I think Gunsmoke owes its longevity to the radio show (FWIW, it would be in the top 3, with Dragnet being #1 by a large margin), and The Honeymooners, while well done, didn't really move the needle like the other shows on the list. Top-notch entertainment to be sure, but again that was due more to the execution of it by the actors than the content itself.
I do have a question for when you reveal our pick...
Gally and I had 2 good options for this category, Seinfeld and Mad Men. We unanimously agreed on Seinfeld, but I think Mad Men would do well here as well. I just couldn't make a case for it, since it was the 5th or 6th show taken in its category, Nevertheless, if you have a minute when you post Seinfeld, if it's no trouble, please include your estimation of where Mad Men would have landed in the rankings, as I keep going back to it.
TBH, I had no hesitation about choosing Seinfeld over Mad Men for this category, so it was more just curiosity as it gets mentioned in the same breath as some of the other shows in our GOAT list.No problem. Mad Men was an excellent show and would have done well on this list. How well, especially in relation to Seinfeld, I’m not sure about that. I’ll give that some thought.
I agree with your points about Star Trek and I had a difficult time placing it. (Like so many of these shows!)
This is fake newsThere is a big fail in this draft by all of us: nobody took Buffy the Vampire Slayer? In the horror category, as a hero, nowhere?