That was the very first thing that popped in my head.They’re going to ruin red zone.
That was the very first thing that popped in my head.They’re going to ruin red zone.
I think I'll just leave this here.
"I have no desire to be a politician. My life is pretty well."
This man doesn't have an ironic of humorous bone in his body, and he's not very bright. Oof.
This man doesn't have an ironic of humorous bone in his body, and he's not very bright. Oof.
This isn't disqualifying
He(or most anyone) can follow this book to the letter and garner 20% of the popular vote.This man doesn't have an ironic of humorous bone in his body, and he's not very bright. Oof.
This isn't disqualifying
Touché. Sad that it doesn’t.
I'm basically at the point where I'm scrawling "Garfield" or "Odie" in thick orange magic marker on election ballots anyway, so I welcome SAS's entry to the rapid fight to the bottom. How much worse can it get? (SAS - "Hold my beer.")
I can understand not liking Stephen A. Smith's style or delivery.
But I think he's very bright.
I remember him from my freshman year Ancient and Medieval Political Theory course.I'm basically at the point where I'm scrawling "Garfield" or "Odie" in thick orange magic marker on election ballots anyway, so I welcome SAS's entry to the rapid fight to the bottom. How much worse can it get? (SAS - "Hold my beer.")
This time, I voted for Epictetus, a deceased Greek slave and stoic philosopher.
In the sense that Smith is now the highest paid clown in America, I agree that he is very bright. No one should ever listen to him for real analysis of anything, though. He is a clown show, and he is banking big off it, so props to him.I can understand not liking Stephen A. Smith's style or delivery.
But I think he's very bright.
Seems to be a prerequisite these days.I think I'll just leave this here.
"I have no desire to be a politician. My life is pretty well."
He was dead serious the whole time. This man doesn't have an ironic of humorous bone in his body, and he's not very bright. Oof.
I can understand not liking Stephen A. Smith's style or delivery.
But I think he's very bright.
I'm not really willing to give him the benefit of the doubt considering he's been yelling some not-well-thought-out takes on sports in my ear whenever I hit the ESPN website or mistakenly leave the channel on. Has he ever discussed a high-level analytical concept during his show? Has he ever said anything you've heard where you nodded your head and said "good point"? It's not necessarily the style or delivery at all. It's that his points are always reductive and emotional, lowest common denominator. He bleats hot, bad, emotionally overwrought takes in one's ear.
How about this? I'll succinctly analyze the three minutes I spent watching that interview. First of all, he didn't use the adverb "well" correctly, and it was an egregious grammatical mistake. Second, anybody who thinks they can study for three months and be prepared for the presidency is naive at best. Then to say that you'd "wipe the floor" with the other candidates in a debate is grossly hubristic. Bad combination.
So in three minutes his three main statements were all wrong in some way. Wrong with respect to the English language and its usage; wrong about the nature of the office he claims that he might seek to hold; and wrong about his own prowess as a debater.
Agree with this completely. He's a television personality, bright in ways that the Kardashians are bright. Occasionally substantive, but mostly a loudmouth who needlessly uses too many words to get his point across. Why? To suck the air out of the room and to come across as "smarter" than he really is and to even intimidate fellow panelists. I've come across people like this in my life. There's not much to them. He's a helluva opportunist though. I'll give him that.In the sense that Smith is now the highest paid clown in America, I agree that he is very bright. No one should ever listen to him for real analysis of anything, though. He is a clown show, and he is banking big off it, so props to him.I can understand not liking Stephen A. Smith's style or delivery.
But I think he's very bright.
The only time I ever watch is live sportsis everyone still watching this dying station like always or what take that to the bank brohans
I have ESPN+ so I can get college baseball games that are not on our local channel. I don't have a service that has the actual ESPN channels.is everyone still watching this dying station like always or what take that to the bank brohans
Same here or 30 for 30The only time I ever watch is live sportsis everyone still watching this dying station like always or what take that to the bank brohans
I used to love pti. Haven’t watched in quite awhileSame here or 30 for 30The only time I ever watch is live sportsis everyone still watching this dying station like always or what take that to the bank brohans
That’s it.
Everything else is hot garbage.
ESPNU
ACC
SEC
Big 10
Big 12
Have a sports package (not ESPN Plus) and watch a ton of NCAA Baseball on those ESPN networks.
Yeah that was a good show …..been a decade for me since I watched it.I used to love pti. Haven’t watched in quite awhileSame here or 30 for 30The only time I ever watch is live sportsis everyone still watching this dying station like always or what take that to the bank brohans
That’s it.
Everything else is hot garbage.
ESPNU
ACC
SEC
Big 10
Big 12
Have a sports package (not ESPN Plus) and watch a ton of NCAA Baseball on those ESPN networks.
Seems like a good deal for Rich. Gets to keep his role at NFLN and gets more distribution for his show