SUPERHEROES JUDGING CRITERIA
-  The movie should be enjoyable, which doesn't mean it can't be very serious, but it needs to have some entertainment value to score highly.  This is probably obvious but I felt the need to state it for the record.
-   Drafters need to be having some issues or complaints with the new board functions.  If everyone is working smoothly for you with the crisp new setup, you won't score well.
-   Plot and dialogue are what make movies for me, not just fight scenes and action sequences, no matter how good.
-   My category is one of those most affected by THE RULE, and I'm assuming that the judges have some input as to how to interpret it, so this is my attempt to do so, which hopefully will spark no tiresome controversy:
- Different iterations of the same character are not the same for purposes of THE RULE.  For example, the Keaton Batman series is a different franchise than the Nolan trilogy, and a pick in one of them does not block other picks in the other.
-  The Marvel Cinematic Universe that began with the Iron Man films and has extended into The Avengers is one franchise.  Any selection of any of the films in that group, including "The Avengers," prevents selections of any other movies in that group.  Yeah, I know, it doesn't make much sense, does it?  However, this is THE RULE in action. 
-    The X-Men trilogy DOES prevent a selection of "First Class," and vice versa, and the Wolverine film as well.
-   Better selections will be those films that have value outside of the genre, as in, they are good films, not just superhero films.
-    Because of THE RULE, some innvoation will be needed to get to 25 selections, and that's, of course, the purported genius of the statute.  Accordingly, creative ways to evade the ridiculous provision will be rewarded.  For example, superheroes do not have to be superpowered, nor do they have to be based on comic books or on traditional characters.
I will be happy to take additional questions via PM.
/fin