Mister CIA
Footballguy
Hellooooo
Was looking like another abysmal game until that one...I'll take it though!The TDs WILL come.![]()
Thats why they play the whole game.Was looking like another abysmal game until that one...I'll take it though!The TDs WILL come.![]()
Make sense yet?The "always start your studs" thing is a joke.
Cobb is not the same just because of his injury but because they have zero receiving threats other than him. I could buy the "he'll break out soon stuff" if Jordy was around. Fact is he's not and expectations should be lowered. Starting him over Diggs for example makes no sense.
Cobb 4/99/1Make sense yet?The "always start your studs" thing is a joke.
Cobb is not the same just because of his injury but because they have zero receiving threats other than him. I could buy the "he'll break out soon stuff" if Jordy was around. Fact is he's not and expectations should be lowered. Starting him over Diggs for example makes no sense.
Nope. It doesn't. And where were you last week asking if it made sense when Cobb stunk up the field and fantasy box scores all around the nation? And the 3 weeks prior to that? Very doosherony posting on your part.Make sense yet?The "always start your studs" thing is a joke.
Cobb is not the same just because of his injury but because they have zero receiving threats other than him. I could buy the "he'll break out soon stuff" if Jordy was around. Fact is he's not and expectations should be lowered. Starting him over Diggs for example makes no sense.
Fun game. Now do it for each of the weeks Diggs has started.dirtyjay said:Cobb 4/99/1TheDirtyWord said:Make sense yet?The "always start your studs" thing is a joke.
Cobb is not the same just because of his injury but because they have zero receiving threats other than him. I could buy the "he'll break out soon stuff" if Jordy was around. Fact is he's not and expectations should be lowered. Starting him over Diggs for example makes no sense.
Diggs 3/42/0
But was that the point of the thread?Diggs for as great as he had been, was due to come back down to earth. And Cobb had gone thru a tough stretch. Cobb doesn't suck and neither does Rodgers. At some point, the two of them were going to get their act together. It was a basic Buy Low/Sell High roster decision.Fun game. Now do it for each of the weeks Diggs has started.dirtyjay said:Cobb 4/99/1TheDirtyWord said:Make sense yet?The "always start your studs" thing is a joke.
Cobb is not the same just because of his injury but because they have zero receiving threats other than him. I could buy the "he'll break out soon stuff" if Jordy was around. Fact is he's not and expectations should be lowered. Starting him over Diggs for example makes no sense.
Diggs 3/42/0
Cobb's had one good game in the last 5. This one. No one ever said he sucked. Adams went over 100 today. That had some Jordy-effect. Gave defenses more than one person to worry about. Hopefulpy, Cobb's owners didnt get tio far in a hole these last four weeks and are still in contention and can benefit going forward.But was that the point of the thread?Diggs for as great as he had been, was due to come back down to earth. And Cobb had gone thru a tough stretch. Cobb doesn't suck and neither does Rodgers. At some point, the two of them were going to get their act together. It was a basic Buy Low/Sell High roster decision.Fun game. Now do it for each of the weeks Diggs has started.dirtyjay said:Cobb 4/99/1TheDirtyWord said:Make sense yet?The "always start your studs" thing is a joke.
Cobb is not the same just because of his injury but because they have zero receiving threats other than him. I could buy the "he'll break out soon stuff" if Jordy was around. Fact is he's not and expectations should be lowered. Starting him over Diggs for example makes no sense.
Diggs 3/42/0
Someone chose to pooh pooh the idea as being non-sensical when it was presented last week. I was simply revisiting whether that sentiment still held water. For those who like their grapes sour, it apparently still does...
Lets do it for who has done it longer and more consistently over their careers and lets do it for who has a longer history of success.Fun game. Now do it for each of the weeks Diggs has started.dirtyjay said:Cobb 4/99/1TheDirtyWord said:Make sense yet?The "always start your studs" thing is a joke.
Cobb is not the same just because of his injury but because they have zero receiving threats other than him. I could buy the "he'll break out soon stuff" if Jordy was around. Fact is he's not and expectations should be lowered. Starting him over Diggs for example makes no sense.
Diggs 3/42/0
lol. If my fantasy league gave me points for what players did in past years, I'd give a crap.Lets do it for who has done it longer and more consistently over their careers and lets do it for who has a longer history of success.Fun game. Now do it for each of the weeks Diggs has started.dirtyjay said:Cobb 4/99/1TheDirtyWord said:Make sense yet?The "always start your studs" thing is a joke.
Cobb is not the same just because of his injury but because they have zero receiving threats other than him. I could buy the "he'll break out soon stuff" if Jordy was around. Fact is he's not and expectations should be lowered. Starting him over Diggs for example makes no sense.
Diggs 3/42/0
I've said this a couple times now. I own the stack in dynasty so pay a lot of attention and Cobb seriously coulda/woulda/shoulda had a TD or more in every game this season. Lot of bad luck effecting both of them so far. Narrative would probably be different if they hooked up on half of those.Cobb didn't break out. I watched the entire Packers vs. Broncos game. Cobb was the only one getting open, Rodgers had no time to get him the ball. Rodgers has actually missed Cobb quite a few times this year open for touchdowns. Including yesterday to tie the game.
lol. If they gave points moving forward for what they did in past games this season, I would give a crap too.lol. If my fantasy league gave me points for what players did in past years, I'd give a crap.Lets do it for who has done it longer and more consistently over their careers and lets do it for who has a longer history of success.Fun game. Now do it for each of the weeks Diggs has started.dirtyjay said:Cobb 4/99/1TheDirtyWord said:Make sense yet?The "always start your studs" thing is a joke.
Cobb is not the same just because of his injury but because they have zero receiving threats other than him. I could buy the "he'll break out soon stuff" if Jordy was around. Fact is he's not and expectations should be lowered. Starting him over Diggs for example makes no sense.
Diggs 3/42/0
Did you read the comments?I guess some of you leaned that Norman does not cover the slot after-all.
https://twitter.com/MikeClayNFL/status/663793261895643137?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
I did. If he lined up on 3-4 instead of 1 snap, that doesn't change the point.Jed said:Did you read the comments?Squintz82 said:I guess some of you leaned that Norman does not cover the slot after-all.
https://twitter.com/MikeClayNFL/status/663793261895643137?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
I did hear many people on ESPN and FS1 say Cobb would have a tough time going up against Norman. I thought these people knew their stuff, I do like them because I played a person who benched Cobb because he thought Norman was covering him, maybe they are the one who told him.Squintz82 said:I guess some of you leaned that Norman does not cover the slot after-all.
https://twitter.com/MikeClayNFL/status/663793261895643137?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
PFF stats and advice >>>> ESPN and NFL.com adviceI did hear many people on ESPN and FS1 say Cobb would have a tough time going up against Norman. I thought these people knew their stuff, I do like them because I played a person who benched Cobb because he thought Norman was covering him, maybe they are the one who told him.Squintz82 said:I guess some of you leaned that Norman does not cover the slot after-all.
https://twitter.com/MikeClayNFL/status/663793261895643137?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
They can't run and the receivers can't get separation.and...I guess I'm glad I'm out?? wtf is going on with the packers?
Agreed...amazing how bad his loss has hurt this team.The answer is, "When Jordy Nelson returns."
Id rather have Larry.Bump
Cobb is the best slot receiver in the NFL. Which means nothing. He is not special just in a special situation. The situation has changed though so now he is being exposed.
Hell yes. Fitz over Cobb in a heartbeat. This year at least.Id rather have Larry.Bump
Cobb is the best slot receiver in the NFL. Which means nothing. He is not special just in a special situation. The situation has changed though so now he is being exposed.
He will probably get it going vs DET at home.Nelson's injury, Lacy's blubber, Rodgers' mediocrity and a somewhat difficult schedule are all to blame. He'll get it going soon... probably a week later than we need him to.
Lol yup. Are we done wth the excuses yet? In his defense the entire packers offense looked horrific. Rodgers' stats were padded by the soft 4th Qtr defensive formations.He will probably get it going vs DET at home.Nelson's injury, Lacy's blubber, Rodgers' mediocrity and a somewhat difficult schedule are all to blame. He'll get it going soon... probably a week later than we need him to.
I thought you traded him away and were not coming back, instead you just come to troll?Lol yup. Are we done wth the excuses yet? In his defense the entire packers offense looked horrific. Rodgers' stats were padded by the soft 4th Qtr defensive formations.He will probably get it going vs DET at home.Nelson's injury, Lacy's blubber, Rodgers' mediocrity and a somewhat difficult schedule are all to blame. He'll get it going soon... probably a week later than we need him to.
But yeah Cobb is a wr3 with wr1 upside in any given week this year. That's the best way to describe him in 2015. Good luck enduring his crappy performances week in and week out just so that you can benefit from that 1 in every 4 games where he does well.
Never do say "I'm out of this thread". I said "I'm out" meaning I traded Cobb. I STARTED this thread. And regardless of whether I traded him away or not, I still have interest in Cobb and the packers in dynasty. In fact, I'm actively trying to trade FOR Cobb in my dynasty league rt now. I just don't believe he will be a consistent fantasy play ros in 2015.I thought you traded him away and were not coming back, instead you just come to troll?Lol yup. Are we done wth the excuses yet? In his defense the entire packers offense looked horrific. Rodgers' stats were padded by the soft 4th Qtr defensive formations.But yeah Cobb is a wr3 with wr1 upside in any given week this year. That's the best way to describe him in 2015. Good luck enduring his crappy performances week in and week out just so that you can benefit from that 1 in every 4 games where he does well.He will probably get it going vs DET at home.Nelson's injury, Lacy's blubber, Rodgers' mediocrity and a somewhat difficult schedule are all to blame. He'll get it going soon... probably a week later than we need him to.
You're more of a risk-taker than I am. If I had Amendola and Cobb in two leagues, I'd likely hedge and start each in a league.Just for context, I am benching Randall Cobb in two separate "start 3WR" leagues this week.
One league I am starting Julio Jones,Allen Robinson and Danny Amendola in front of Cobb this week. (I have Martavis Bryant on bye as well)
In league #2 I am starting Julio Jones, Eric Decker and Danny Amendola in front of Cobb this week.
I actually think the recent losses by GB should help Cobb.
The Davante Adams heavy usage didn't work out last week, and Aaron Rodgers should spread the ball around more in the coming weeks.
If Cobb hasn't helped to knock you out of the playoffs (and I'm sure he has for some of us) then I think he should be more dependable in the coming weeks, but I do not like him a lot in this matchup.
It actually wouldn't surprise me if he had a solid game this week, after the crazy target distribution and Rodgers' inaccuracy last week, but I'm going to put him on the shelf this week though, for other options.
TZM